Open Access

Branchial NH4+-dependent acid–base transport mechanisms and energy metabolism of squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana) affected by seawater acidification

  • Marian Y Hu1,
  • Ying-Jey Guh1,
  • Meike Stumpp1,
  • Jay-Ron Lee1,
  • Ruo-Dong Chen1,
  • Po-Hsuan Sung2,
  • Yu-Chi Chen2,
  • Pung-Pung Hwang1 and
  • Yung-Che Tseng2Email author
Frontiers in Zoology201411:55

Received: 18 March 2014

Accepted: 22 July 2014

Published: 6 August 2014



Cephalopods have evolved strong acid–base regulatory abilities to cope with CO2 induced pH fluctuations in their extracellular compartments to protect gas transport via highly pH sensitive hemocyanins. To date, the mechanistic basis of branchial acid–base regulation in cephalopods is still poorly understood, and associated energetic limitations may represent a critical factor in high power squids during prolonged exposure to seawater acidification.


The present work used adult squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana to investigate the effects of short-term (few hours) to medium-term (up to 168 h) seawater acidification on pelagic squids. Routine metabolic rates, NH4+ excretion, extracellular acid–base balance were monitored during exposure to control (pH 8.1) and acidified conditions of pH 7.7 and 7.3 along a period of 168 h. Metabolic rates were significantly depressed by 40% after exposure to pH 7.3 conditions for 168 h. Animals fully restored extracellular pH accompanied by an increase in blood HCO3 levels within 20 hours. This compensation reaction was accompanied by increased transcript abundance of branchial acid–base transporters including V-type H+-ATPase (VHA), Rhesus protein (RhP), Na+/HCO3 cotransporter (NBC) and cytosolic carbonic anhydrase (CAc). Immunocytochemistry demonstrated the sub-cellular localization of Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), VHA in basolateral and Na+/H+-exchanger 3 (NHE3) and RhP in apical membranes of the ion-transporting branchial epithelium. Branchial VHA and RhP responded with increased mRNA and protein levels in response to acidified conditions indicating the importance of active NH4+ transport to mediate acid–base balance in cephalopods.


The present work demonstrated that cephalopods have a well developed branchial acid–base regulatory machinery. However, pelagic squids that evolved a lifestyle at the edge of energetic limits are probably more sensitive to prolonged exposure to acidified conditions compared to their more sluggish relatives including cuttlefish and octopods.


Acid–base regulation Invertebrate Metabolism Ocean acidification Rh proteins


CO2 induced acid–base disturbances are a unifying physiological phenomenon that all animals are confronted with. Depending on the degree of metabolic activity an organism generates metabolic CO2 leading to intra- and extra-cellular p CO2 fluctuations causing acid–base disturbances after the hydration of CO2 in body fluids. Cephalopods have probably evolved the highest physiological complexity among all invertebrate taxa. It is believed that convergent evolutionary features including sensory and locomotory abilities derived from the competition with fish for similar resources in the marine environment. As a trade off to their less efficient swimming mode and active lifestyle they have the highest metabolic rates among marine animals [1]. As a consequence cephalopods are confronted with strong metabolic CO2 induced temporal acid–base disturbances during jetting and fast swimming [2]. To accommodate strong temporal CO2 induced acid–base challenges cephalopods have evolved moderate to strong acid–base regulatory abilities to stabilize blood pH during exercise and hypercapnic exposure by accumulating up to 7 mM HCO3[2],[3]. It is believed that well developed extracellular pH (pHe) regulatory abilities are an essential feature for cephalopods to protect their highly pH sensitive extracellular O2 transporting hemocyanins [4],[5]. Oxygen affinity of the extracellular hemocyanin is inversely related to both, pH and pCO2 which is expressed by the Bohr effect [6]. The high pH sensitivity of squid hemocyanin is an important feature to efficiently load oxygen at the gill and unload in tissues. On one hand, high Bohr coefficients of cephalopods were proposed to be a critical physiological characteristic that would make cephalopods particularly sensitive to acid–base disturbances [7]. On the other hand well developed acid–base regulatory abilities were hypothesized to represent a unifying feature that makes ectothermic marine animals robust to seawater acidification as projected for the coming century [8]. Studies using adult cuttlefish could in fact demonstrate that these animals can tolerate exposure to pH 7.1 over several weeks without compromising growth rates and even increase calcification rates of the internal cuttlebone [9]. Moreover the same study demonstrated that metabolic rates of cuttlefish exposed to decreased seawater pH of 7.1 (0.6 kPa CO2) remained unchanged along the experimental period of 24 h. In contrast the pelagic squid Dosidicus gigas responded with depressed metabolic rates (31%) and activity levels (45%) in response to acute exposure to 0.1 kPa CO2[1]. However, medium- to long-term (several days) acidification experiments using squids with a pelagic lifestyle are rare as these animals are extremely difficult to keep under laboratory conditions. Such experiments require large-scale experimental facilities with access to natural, high quality seawater. Recent research conducted with squid and cuttlefish embryonic stages which are easier to handle under laboratory conditions demonstrated that acidified conditions evoke a developmental delay associated with an increase in proton secretion activity [10]. The upregulation of acid–base regulatory genes including Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE3), V-type H+-ATPase (VHA), Rhesus protein (RhP) and Na+/HCO3 cotransporter (NBC) expressed in epidermal ionocytes suggest that these transporters are key players of acid–base regulation in cephalopod early life stages. The current model for epidermal ionocytes of squid embryos denotes the presence of NHE3 in apical membranes whereas Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) and VHA are localized in basolateral membranes. Proton secretion by epidermal ionocytes is sensitive to ethyl-isopropyl amiloride (EIPA) suggesting a central role of NHE proteins in proton secretion pathways. Less information is available for the branchial acid–base regulatory machinery of adult cephalopods. Earlier studies identified and localized acid–base transporters including NKA, VHA, NBC and carbonic anhydrase (CA) in specialized ion-transporting cells of the cephalopod gill [11]–[13]. In contrast to fish and crustacean gills, the gill of decapod cephalopods is a highly folded epithelium consisting of two epithelial layers that line a blood sinus (Figure 1). The two epithelial layers are linked by pilaster cells, that interdigitate deeply with muscle cells differentiated on the basal lamina of the inner and the outer epithelium. The thin outer epithelium is mainly involved in respiratory processes, whereas the inner, mitochondria rich epithelium is responsible for ion regulation and, probably, nitrogen excretion [11],[12],[14].
Figure 1

Graphical illustration of the squid gill morphology. The 3° gill lamellae arise from the 2 order gill lamellae and create a highly folded epithelium with semi-tubular spaces. This epithelium is well perfused by blood vessels, and divided into an outer and inner epithelium lining a blood sinus re-drawn from [54]. The outer epithelium (turquois) is thin and mainly involved in gas exchange whereas the inner epithelium (orange) located in the concave areas of the third order lamellae is involved in ion regulatory processes indicated by high mitochondrial density and expression of ion transporters [11],[12].

In teleost fish acid–base regulating epithelia and organs have been extensively studied and the sub-cellular organization of ion transporters localized in mitochondria-rich cells is well described e.g. [15]–[17]. Besides primary active proton extrusion mechanisms via VHA these models suggest an import of HCO3 and export of protons by secondary active transporters such as NHEs and Na+-dependent HCO3 transporters of the SLC4 solute transporter family energized by the NKA located in basolateral membranes. Although a large body of knowledge is available for teleosts, a comparatively small number of studies investigated acid–base and ion regulatory mechanisms in non-model invertebrates like mollusks, echinoderms and crustaceans. For the latter a number of studies exist with osmotic and acid–base regulatory mechanisms recently summarized by Henry et al. [18], demonstrating the complexity of ion-transport processes in gill epithelia of crustaceans. Although the picture seems more complete for osmoregulatory mechanisms in crustacean gill epithelia the mechanistic basis for acid–base regulation seems largely unexplored as well. Crustaceans were also characterized as strong acid–base regulators that are capable of accumulating high concentrations of HCO3 in their body fluids to buffer an excess of protons. It has been pharmacologically demonstrated that low pH conditions trigger the response of carbonic anhydrase (CA), apical VHA and basolateral Na+/HCO3 exchanger in perfused gills of the euryhaline crab Neohelice (Chasmagnathus) granulata[19]. Furthermore, NHE-dependent acid–base regulation has been suggested in the blue crab that responded with an increase in Na+ uptake when exposed to hypercapnic conditions of 1% CO2[20]. Pharmacological studies suggested the presence of NHEs and VHA in apical membranes of crustacean gills. Another potential model for proton equivalent secretion in crustacean gills has been proposed by Weihrauch and colleagues [21], suggesting trapping of NH4+ in VHA-rich vesicles and subsequent exocytosis across the apical membrane. The entrance of NH4+ across the basolateral membrane is achieved by the NKA, which may also accept NH4+ as a substrate or by K+/NH4+ channels. In this context a Rhesus protein (RhP) cloned from Dungeness crab Metacarcinus magister is proposed to be substantially involved in branchial NH3/NH4+ regulation during exposure to a high NH4+ environment [22].

Interestingly, a range of marine invertebrates including bivalves, echinoderms and crustaceans responded with increased NH4+ excretion rates when exposed to acidified conditions [23]–[26]. It has been suggested that this phenomenon may be associated with enhanced protein metabolism to fuel increased acid–base regulatory costs, and/or may support NH4+ based proton equivalent secretion to mediate pH homeostasis. In vertebrates, the excretion of NH4+ mediated by Rhesus C glycoprotein (Rhcg) and Rhesus B glycoprotein (Rhbg) in combination with NHE3 or VHA located in apical membranes has been demonstrated to be connected to net export of protons [27]–[29]. Thus, it can be hypothesized that NH4+-based proton secretion also represents a fundamental pH regulatory pathway, probably connected to a reallocation of energy sources, in marine invertebrates.

The present work aims at identifying and characterizing the acid–base regulatory mechanisms by looking at H+ extrusion and HCO3 import pathways in gill epithelia of adult squid. Additionally, metabolism and excretion are monitored during exposure to acidified conditions, which are important indices for altered energetic features potentially associated with acid–base regulatory efforts. Immunocytochemical techniques in combination with gene expression analyses were applied in order to study the branchial acid–base regulatory machinery. It can be hypothesized that similar to the situation in embryonic epidermal ionocytes, the branchial acid–base regulatory machinery of adult squid involves ion-transporters including NHE3, V-type H+-ATPase, Rh-Protein as well as CAc and NBC, which allows the animal to cope with CO2 induced acid–base disturbances. In this context special attention has been dedicated to the potential role of RhP in mediating pH homeostasis during environmental hypercapnia by supporting proton equivalent transport across membranes. A potential coupling of NH3 and H+ excretion/secretion is proposed, which may represent a fundamental pathway of pH regulation in marine ammonotelic organisms.


Metabolic rates and NH4+ excretion

Metabolic rates of squid Sepiteuthis lessoniana kept under control conditions were 25.20 ± 4.97 μmol O2 h−1 gFM−1 (Figure 2A + B). During short-term exposure to hypercapnic conditions at the time point of 20 h no difference in metabolic rates was observed for animals from different treatment groups. However, after medium-term exposure to pH 7.3, at the time point of 168 h, metabolic rates were significantly decreased down to 16.3 ± 0.79 μmol O2 h−1 gFM−1 compared to animals from the pH 8.1 treatment (Figure 2B). Despite a positive correlation between acidified conditions and NH4+ excretion rates no significant differences (p = 0.28) were found between control and low pH treated animals after 20 h (Figure 2C). When exposed to acidified conditions for 168 h NH4+ excretion rates were decreased although statistical analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect (p = 0.155) in pH 7.3 treated animals (Figure 2D). No change in O:N ratio were observed in low pH treated animals during both, short- and medium-term exposure to acidified conditions (Figure 2E + F).
Figure 2

Effects of seawater acidification on metabolic rates and ammonia excretion. Routine metabolic rates were determined after 20 h (A) and 168 h (B) exposure to acidified conditions. NH4+ excretion rates determined after 20 h and 168 h exposure to different pH conditions are presented in (C) and (D), respectively. O:N ratios calculated from oxygen consumption and NH4+ excretion are given for short-term (E) and medium-term (F) exposure to different pH conditions. Letters indicate significant differences between pH treatments (p < 0.05). Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3; with the average of 2 animals from each replicate).

Extracellular acid–base status

Extracellular pH (pHe) measured in venous blood from control animals was 7.34 ± 0.07 (Figure 3A). In response to acidified conditions of pH 7.7 and 7.3 pHe dropped by approximately 0.05 to 0.08 pH units compared to control animals at the time point of 6 h. pHe was quickly restored after 20 h and maintained stable between pH 7.35 and pH 7.4 in both, control and low pH treated animals. Blood HCO3 levels were found to range from 2.24 to 2.68 mM in control animals along the incubation period of 168 h (Figure 3B). In response to acidified conditions of pH 7.3 blood HCO3 levels were significantly increased by 2 mM along the entire incubation period of 168 h. Only at the 168 h time point blood HCO3 levels were found to be increased by approximately 1 mM in pH 7.7 treated animals (Figure 3B). Blood p CO2 levels ranged from 0.32 to 0.39 kPa in control animals along the incubation period of 168 h (Figure 3C). In response to CO2 induced seawater acidification, blood p CO2 levels increased to peak values of 0.51 ± 0.08 kPa and 0.71 ± 0.29 kPa in pH 7.7 and pH 7.3 treated animals, respectively (Figure 3C). Acid–base compensatory characteristics are depicted in Figure 4 using a davenport diagram. For clarity reasons the two low pH treatments were separated into two graphs. Figure 4A compares control (pH 8.1) to intermediate (pH 7.7) treated animals whereas Figure 4B compares control to low (pH 7.3) pH treated animals. In response to 6 h exposure to acidified conditions a slight initial respiratory acidosis was observed in both treatments. However, pHe is fully restored at the time point of 20 h of low pH exposure and is maintained along the entire period of 168 h.
Figure 3

Extracellular acid–base status in Sepioteuthis lessoniana during acclimation to acidified conditions. Time course of in vivo changes in blood acid–base parameters including extracellular pH (pHe) (A), HCO3(B) and p CO2(C) during 168 h exposure to control (pH 8.1) and acidified (pH 7.7 and pH 7.3) conditions. The exposure period was separated into a short-term (grey) and medium-term (white) acclimation period. Letters indicate significant differences between pH treatments (p > 0.05). Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3 replicate tanks, with six biological replicates per time point and treatment).

Figure 4

pH-bicarbonate (Davenport) diagram demonstrating the time course of acid–base compensation. Blood acid–base status was determined along the experimental period of 168 h for animals exposed to control (pH 8.1), intermediate (pH 7.7) and low (pH 7.3) conditions. For clarity reasons the intermediate pH (A) and low pH (B) treatments are presented in two separate graphs, including control acid–base conditions along the incubation period of 168 h. The non-bicarbonate buffer line for Sepioteuthis lessoniana is indicated by a grey dashed line and was adopted from Lykkeboe and Johansen [39]. The solid curved lines represent p CO2 isopleths. Numbers in brackets indicate sampling time points. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3 replicate tanks, with six biological replicates per time point and treatment).

Localization of acid–base relevant transporters in gill epithelia

Using antibodies specifically designed for cephalopod VHA, NHE3 and RhP the sub-cellular localization of these transporters in gill epithelia has been clarified (Figure 5). Using double staining of NKA and NHE3 high concentrations of NKA in basolateral and NHE3 in apical membranes was demonstrated for cells belonging to the inner (concave) ion-transporting epithelium of the cephalopod gill (Figure 5A). The basolateral signal of NKA can be characterized by deep infoldings into the cell cytoplasm of ionocytes. In contrast, the apical signal of NHE3 can be characterized by a sharp lining along the apical membrane. Both signals were clearly co-localized in cells belonging to the ion-transporting inner part of the gill epithelium. Double staining of NHE3 and VHA demonstrated the localization of VHA in basolateral membranes of the ion-transporting inner epithelium. Moreover VHA immunoractivity was also observed in pilaster cells spanning between the outer and the inner epithelium (Figure 5B + D). Using an antibody specifically designed against the squid RhP that was cloned in a previous study [10] positive immunoreactivity has been demonstrated in apical membranes of cells belonging to the inner ion-transporting epithelium (Figure 5C). Negative controls by omitting the primary antibody demonstrated no unspecific fluorescence signal (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Western blot analyses of the four antibodies used in this study demonstrate specific immunoreactivity with proteins including NKA (115 kDa), NHE3 (90 kDa), VHA (65 kDa) and RhP (50 kDa) (Figure 5E).
Figure 5

Localization of acid–base transporters in gill epithelia of squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana . Immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated co-localization of acid–base transporters including Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), Na+/H+-exchanger 3 (NHE3), V-type H+-ATPase (VHA) and Rhesus protein (RhP) in the ion-transporting epithelium of the squid gill. NKA is located in basolateral membranes whereas the NHE3 specific antibody shows positive immunoreactivity in apical membranes (A). VHA is located in basolateral membranes as well as pillar-cells spanning through the blood sinus (B). The RhP specific antibody shows positive immunoreactivity in apical membranes of the inner, ion-transporting branchial epithelium (C). High magnification image of a pilaster (pillar) cell showing positive VHA immunoreactivity. Dashed lines indicate the contour of the cell and the epithelial cells lining the blood sinus (D). Western blot analyses using gill homogenates, indicating specific immune-reactivity of the different antibodies with proteins in the predicted size range (indicated by arrows) (E). blood sinus (bs); inner epithelium (ie); outer epithelium (oe).

NKA and VHA activity

Enzyme activities of NKA measured in gill homogenates of control animals at the time point of 0 h were 150 ± 29.17 μmol ATP h−1 gFM−1. After 168 h NKA maximum activities decreased down to 43.3 ± 12.3 μmol ATP h−1 gFM−1 (Figure 6A). Along the entire experimental period no significant differences (p = 0.342) were observed between control and low pH treated animals. Enzyme activities of VHA measured in gill homogenates of control animals at the time point of 0 h were 172 ± 39.40 μmol ATP h−1 gFM−1, and control activities remained relatively stable over the entire incubation period of 168 h (Figure 6B). Despite a tendency (p = 0.061) of increased activities in gills of pH 7.3 treated animals at the time point of 20 h no significant differences were observed between control and low pH treated animals.
Figure 6

Na + /K + -ATPase (NKA) and V-type H + -ATPase (VHA) enzyme activities in gill homogenates. Branchial NKA (A) and VHA (B) maximum activities were determined along the time course of 168 h exposure to control (pH 8.1) and acidified conditions (pH 7.7 and pH 7.3). The exposure period was separated into a short-term (grey) and medium-term (white) acclimation period. No statistical differences were observed between the three different pH treatments using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3 replicate tanks, with six biological replicates per time point and treatment).

Protein concentrations

Determination of relative protein concentrations in gill homogenates at the time point of 20 h (short-term) demonstrated that NKA protein concentration normalized to β-actin had no statistical difference between pH treatments (Figure 7A). VHA protein concentrations in gill tissues were significantly increased by 54% (p = 0.009) and 47% (p = 0.033) in response to low pH treatments of pH 7.7 and 7.3, respectively (Figure 7B). No change in relative protein concentrations was observed for NHE3 in gill homogenates (Figure 7C). Finally, RhP protein concentrations were significantly increased by 40% in response to the pH 7.3 treatment (p = 0.045) (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Relative protein concentrations of branchial acid–base transporters. Branchial protein concentrations of acid–base transporters including Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) (A), V-type H+-ATPase (VHA) (B), Na+/H+-exchanger 3 (NHE3) (C) and Rhesus protein (RhP) (D) determined after 20 h exposure to different pH conditions. Protein concentrations were normalized to ß-actin protein concentrations as an internal control. Letters indicate significant differences between pH treatments (p < 0.05). Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3; with the average of 2 animals from each replicate).

Gene expression

Gene expression studies demonstrated differences along the incubation period of 168 h in control and low pH treated animals. Despite an up regulation pattern of NKA and NHE3 during short-term exposure to acidified conditions no significant differences (p = 0.1 for NKA and p = 0.15 for NHE3) were detected between control and low pH treatments (Figure 8). In contrast, significant up regulations were detected for the genes VHA, RhP and NBC between control and low pH treated animals. VHA expression increased rapidly at the time point of 6 h in pH 7.7 and pH 7.3 treated animals by 53% and 71%, respectively (Figure 8). At this time point statistically significant differences for VHA transcript levels were found between pH 8.1 and pH 7.3 (p < 0.001) and between pH 7.7 and pH 7.3 (p = 0.032) treatments. Although no significant differences were detected for the following time points VHA transcript levels of low pH treated animals were elevated by approximately 30% compared to control levels along the entire period of 168 h (Figure 8). In low pH treated animals RhP increased transcript levels during both short-term and medium-term exposure to acidified conditions. In response to 48 h exposure to acidified conditions RhP transcript levels were significantly increased by 50% (p < 0.001) and 55% (p = 0.02) in pH 7.7 and pH 7.3 treated animals, respectively when compared to pH 8.1 conditions (Figure 8). This significant increase of RhP mRNA levels in low pH treated animals compared to control animals was still evident after 168 h in pH 7.7 (p = 0.038) and pH 7.3 (p = 0.025), respectively. Compared to control animals NBC was significantly up regulated at 48 h in pH 7.7 and pH 7.3 treated animals by 55% (p < 0.001) and 33% (p = 0.002), respectively (Figure 8). No statistical differences for NBC mRNA levels were found between control and low pH treated animals during medium-term exposure of 168 h. During short-term (6 h) and medium-term (168 h) exposure to acidified conditions carbonic anhydrase transcript levels were significantly increased (p < 0.001) in gills of squid exposed to pH 7.7 conditions when compared to control (pH 8.1) animals (Figure 8). No significant differences were observed for branchial CAc transcript levels between control and pH 7.3 treated animals.
Figure 8

Effects of acidification on transcript abundance of gill acid–base transporters. Branchial mRNA expression levels of acid–base relevant candidates including Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), Na+/H+-exchanger 3 (NHE3), V-type-H+-ATPase (VHA), Rhesus protein (RhP), Na+/HCO3 co-transporter (NBC) and cytosolic carbonic anhydrase (CAc) during exposure to different pH conditions including pH 8.1 (control), pH 7.7 (intermediate) and pH 7.3 (low) along the time course of 168 h. Expression of the gene candidates are normalized to UBC and presented as relative change. The exposure period was separated into a short-term (grey) and medium-term (white) acclimation period. Letters indicate significant differences between pH treatments (p < 0.05). Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3; with the average of 2 animals from each replicate).


Metabolism and excretion

The present work demonstrated that routine metabolic and NH4+ excretion rates in squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana are comparable to those determined for other squid and cuttlefish species [1],[30]–[33]. While NH4+ excretion rates were not significantly affected by acidified conditions, metabolic rates were reduced upon prolonged exposure to pH 7.3. To date only a few studies investigated the effects of acidified conditions on metabolic responses in cephalopods. One study using the pelagic squid Dosidicus gigas demonstrated that in response to acute (several minutes) CO2 induced acidified conditions of pH 7.6 (0.1 kPa p CO2) animals respond with depressed metabolic rates accompanied by decreased activity levels [1]. In contrast, routine metabolic rates of the demersal cuttlefish Sepia officinalis remained unaffected by CO2 induced seawater acidification down to pH 7.1 during acute (24 h) exposure [9]. Differential responses observed for the three cephalopod species can be attributed to their very different life styles and abilities to swim and maintain neutral to positive buoyancy in the water column. Migratory pelagic squids like D. gigas swim and maintain positive buoyancy by continuously jetting water through their funnel, whereas S. officinalis has a decoupled swimming mode, by using jetting and fin undulation. Additionally, Sepia spp. have a gas filled cuttlebone to control buoyancy without continuous muscular activity that significantly increases locomotor efficiency [34]. S. lessoniana is a large-finned pelagic squid that has evolved a partially decoupled swimming mode by additionally maintaining buoyancy using their enlarged fins running the full length of its mantle. Powerful pelagic squids that have no decoupled swimming mode need to spend a larger fraction of their energy budget to swim and to maintain neutral buoyancy [34],[35]. This higher fraction of energy that is spent for maintaining buoyancy could be a critical factor leading to higher sensitivities. In fact, the energy budget of marine invertebrates has been demonstrated to be compromised by seawater acidification by shifting a larger fraction of energy towards compensatory processes (e.g. acid–base regulation) leading to less energy available for growth and development [23]. The fact that in the present work two individuals died after exposure to pH 7.3 conditions for one week indicates a higher sensitivity towards acidified conditions than cuttlefish S. officinalis that survived with a five-fold increase in body mass during exposure to a seawater pH of 7.1 for 6 weeks [9]. It can be suggested that pelagic squids that evolved a life-style at the edge of energetic limitations, might react more sensitively to seawater acidification due to energetic limitations, compared to less “tuned” cuttlefish and octopus. To test this hypothesis, studies addressing the energetic costs of acid–base regulation in cephalopods will be an important future task.

Acid–base regulation during seawater acidification

The present work demonstrated that squid S. lessoniana can fully compensate for an extracellular acidosis evoked by seawater acidification up to pH 7.3. Stabilization of pHe is accompanied by an increase in blood HCO3 levels, which is a conserved and efficient mechanism to counter a respiratory acidosis found in several taxa, including fish, crustaceans and cephalopods [2],[3],[18],[36]. The hyperbolic increase in blood HCO3 levels in response to a respiratory acidosis described for other powerful acid–base regulators is in general accordance to the findings for S. lessoniana e.g. [37],[38]. Under control conditions venous HCO3 levels of S. lessoniana (2.5 mM) were found to be in the range as described for other cephalopod species including the squid Illex illecebrosus (2.2 mM) and the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (3.4 mM) [2],[3]. An earlier study using the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis demonstrated control blood HCO3 levels of 3.4 mM and a partial compensation of pHe via HCO3 accumulation during exposure to environmental hypercapnia (0.6 kPa p CO2; pH 7.1) [3]. In the same study it was suggested that a partial compensation of 0.2 pH units below control levels is sufficient to achieve sufficient gas transport via the blood pigment hemocyanin under acidified conditions in this less active cephalopod species. However, for the squid S. lessoniana a full compensation of extracellular pH was evident after 20 h during exposure to acidified conditions (pH 7.3). It has been hypothesized that more sluggish cephalopod species like cuttlefish and octopods may not rely on pH dependent oxygen transport to the same extent as more active pelagic squid species [3],[4],[6]. Interestingly, blood HCO3 levels in S. officinalis increased by approximately 7.5 mM within 48 h in response to 0.6 kPa CO2 exposure whereas in this study blood [HCO3] was only increased by 2 mM when exposed to a similar acidification level. This indicates the presence of differential pH buffering/regulatory mechanisms, including non-bicarbonate buffering and H+ extrusion mechanisms among cephalopods. Non-bicarbonate buffer values determined for squid species ranged between 5 mmol l−1 pH unit−1 (Illex illecebrosus), 5.8 mmol l−1 pH unit−1 (Loligo pealei) and 4.7 mmol l−1 pH unit−1 (S. lessoniana) whereas those determined for cuttlefish, S. officinalis were 10 mmol l−1 pH unit−1[3],[6],[39] indicating an even lower HCO3 independent buffering potential in squid species. According to these observations it can be suggested that control of extracellular pH in squids is likely to be attributed to efficient H+ extrusion mechanisms. Earlier studies using fish and crustaceans demonstrated that the compensation of acid–base disturbances elicited by hypercapnia is always associated with significant export of proton equivalents [36],[40],[41]. This feature is particularly important, as HCO3 formation through the hydration of CO2 is always accompanied with the generation of H+. Thus, on the long run organisms that stabilize blood pH via increased HCO3 accumulation require H+ secretion mechanisms as well. These observations are in line with the results of the present work demonstrating that environmental acidification stimulates expression of branchial acid–base transporters involved in HCO3 (NBC, CA) and H+ transport (VHA and RhP). Although an increase of VHA in response to acidified conditions on both the protein and mRNA level has been demonstrated, no significant (p = 0.061) increases in branchial VHA enzyme activities were found. It can be suggested that despite a trend of increased VHA activity during short-term low pH acclimation, statistical analyses failed to prove this effect due to a relatively low experimental “n” (three experimental replicates with six biological replicates) which is always the limitation when working with non-model organisms. Nonetheless, whole animal observations and molecular findings suggest that besides HCO3 buffering H+ secretion pathways across gill epithelia represent probably an even more important mechanism to compensate for acid–base disturbances in active squids. Thus, a special focus of the present work has been dedicated to a better understanding of branchial proton equivalent secretion mechanisms in ammonotelic cephalopods.

Branchial acid–base regulatory machinery

In convergence to fish and crustaceans, cephalopods evolved branchial ion regulatory epithelia, which are equipped with ion transporters including NKA, VHA and NBCe beneficial for coping with acid–base disturbances [16],[17],[25],[42],[43]. The present work further demonstrates that gene transcripts coding for Na+/H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3) and Rh protein (RhP), which are essential for proton equivalent transport in vertebrates [27],[28],[44],[45] are also expressed in the cephalopod gill. NKA-rich cells (NaRs) located in the ion-transporting inner epithelium of the 3 order lamellae of the cephalopod gill showed positive immunoreactivity for VHA (basolateral), NHE3 (apical) and RhP (apical) using antibodies specifically designed for this species. These polyclonal antibodies were designed against conserved regions of the respective protein, and western blot analyses of a previous study [10] and the present work demonstrated specific immunoreactivity with proteins in the predicted size range. Using in situ hybridization an earlier study demonstrated that an electrogenic Na+/HCO3 cotransporter (NBC) is also highly expressed in the ion-transporting epithelium of the cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) gill [12]. Together with the results of the present work it can be suggested that this transporter represents an important player in branchial epithelia that mediates extracellular accumulation of HCO3 in cephalopods. Due to the lack of sequence information the existence and role of anion exchangers (e.g. AE1) which were demonstrated to contribute to acid–base homeostasis in teleosts [46] remains unexplored for cephalopods.

Interestingly, positive VHA immunoractivity was additionally found in pilaster (or pillar) cells spanning through the blood sinus between the inner and the outer epithelium. Little information exists regarding a potential function of pillar cells in ion-regulatory or respiratory processes. Pillar cells in the dogfish (Squalus acanthias) gill were demonstrated to represent an important cell type that may contribute to gas exchange. These pillar cells are characterized by high concentrations of extracellular membrane bound carbonic anhydrase (CA) IV summarized in [47]. This extracellular membrane bound CAIV has been suggested to facilitate the formation of CO2 from HCO3 in concert with basolateral VHA contributing to CO2 excretion across branchial epithelia in dogfish [48]. In Cephalopods carbonic anhydrase has been demonstrated to be associated with the inner ion-transporting epithelium [11], but information regarding the expression of CA by pilaster cells is not available at present. However, it can be hypothesized that analogous to the situation in dogfish high concentrations of VHA associated with pillar cells may also support gas exchange by providing protons for the formation of CO2.

The subcellular localization of ion-transporters in squid gills is similar to that found in epidermal ionocytes of cephalopod embryonic stages [10],[49]. Interestingly, ion regulatory epithelia in both, adults and embryonic stages seem to have a basolateral orientation of the VHA. This feature has been described for base-secreting type B intercalated cells in the mammalian kidney, and was mainly associated with base secretory processes in other vertebrate systems [50]–[52]. Although information is scarce for pH regulatory systems of invertebrates a recent study suggested the interplay of VHA, NKA, NHE and CA in the NH3/NH4+ secretion mechanism of the freshwater planarian, Schmidtea mediterranea[53]. Similar to this early invertebrate the present work indicates that also in cephalopod molluscs acid–base regulation in branchial epithelia is associated with increased VHA and RhP protein and mRNA levels. As VHA can only pump H+ out of the cell, with the catalytic (V1 complex) site located within the cytoplasm, it can be proposed that increased demands of VHA may be explained by two possibilities: i) extracellular NH4+ formation in the basolateral boundary layer to import ammonium ions via basolateral NKA and / or ii) local and timely control of blood pH homeostasis in the branchial blood sinus to maintain optimum conditions for gas exchange by hemocyanins. The latter, is particularly interesting, as the cephalopod gill has to simultaneously serve acid–base regulatory (excretory) and respiratory functions, which to some extend, must be connected due to morphological features of the cephalopod gill (see Figures 1 and 9). At the site of gas exchange and excretion, a substantial amount of free protons are removed from the blood due to CO2 diffusion across the respiratory epithelium into the seawater and via NH4+ secretion across the ion-transporting epithelium. During transit of blood through the gills (between ctenidial artery and vein) up to 0.62 mM l−1 NH4+ is excreted indicating an equimolar loss in H+ ions in Octopus dolfleini[54]. Furthermore, cannulation experiments using unrestrained squid demonstrated that during exercise an alkalosis occurs in venous blood due to an alkalizing effect of hemocyanin deoxygenation [2]. Although a fraction of protons of approximately 7*10−6 mM l−1 see [6] are bound to hemocyanin during deoxygenation and vice versa it is unlikely that the release of protons during oxygenation at the gills would compensate for the total loss of proton equivalents (e.g. NH4+) leading to a local alkalosis in branchial blood sinuses. Accordingly, it can be hypothesized that VHA located in basolateral membranes and pillar cells could potentially contribute to temporal and local pH homeostasis (during exercise/environmental hypercapnia), to optimize branchial O2 uptake and especially CO2 release via the highly pH sensitive hemocyanins (see Figure 9). This is very important as cephalopod hemocyanin appear to have an O2-dependent CO2 binding mechanisms that is particularly well developed in active squid species [55]. Unfortunately hemocyanin functioning in cephalopods mainly focused on O2 release and CO2 uptake/release in tissues, leaving the characteristics of O2 uptake, and particularly CO2 release mechanisms in branchial epithelia underrepresented [56]. Thus, future studies are needed to address the acid–base parameters at the site of gas exchange, (within gills) in combination with a more detailed characterization of potential pillar cell functions.
Figure 9

Hypothetical model for the coupling of acid–base regulation and gas exchange in the squid gill. Schematic illustration of the inner (ion-transporting) and the outer (respiratory) epithelium connected by pillar cells. Ionocytes of the ion-transporting epithelium express Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), V-type H+-ATPase (HA), Na+/H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3), Rhesus protein (RhP) and Na+/HCO3 co-transporter (NBC) which are involved in HCO3 buffering and NH4+ excretion. NH4+ is trapped in the acidified tubular space of the 3° gill lamellae whereas the outer respiratory epithelium is spatially separated from the excretory epithelium. HA expressed in pillar cells may contribute to blood pH homeostasis to support gas transport by the highly pH sensitive hemocyanin (HC).

Branchial NH3/NH4+ transport mechanisms

The dual function of the cephalopod gill in gas exchange and extracellular acid–base regulation is achieved by different epithelia in this organ (depicted in Figures 1 and 9). The thin outer epithelium is believed to be involved in gas exchange by diffusive processes, whereas the inner ion-transporting epithelium is responsible for active transport of acid–base equivalents [11]–[13]. Apical localization of RhP and NHE3 in the inner transporting epithelium supports the hypothesis that the cephalopod gill is a major site of NH4+ excretion. Earlier studies demonstrated that in various cephalopod species the largest fraction of ammonia produced through amino acid metabolism is excreted via branchial epithelia [14],[54]. Blood NH4+/NH3 concentrations determined for octopus [54], cuttlefish [14] and squid [57] range from 100 to 500 μmol l−1 and are comparable to those determined for S. lessoniana in the present work (132.11 ± 37.79 μmol l−1; n = 4). Earlier studies hypothesized that ammonia is excreted as ammonia (NH3) accompanied with an excretion of protons to form the ammonium ion (NH4+) [14],[54]. This net export of proton equivalents further suggests that NH4+ excretion represents an important mechanism that contributes to acid–base balance in cephalopods. Interestingly, the cephalopod gill shows many morphological and functional similarities to the collecting duct of the mammalian kidney, where NH4+ is transported to the luminal space via Rh glycoproteins and V-type H+-ATPase [45]. In the cephalopod gill, the semi-tubular structure of the 3° gill lamellae creates a luminal space into which NH4+ is secreted by the interplay of RhP and NHE3 (Figure 9). The involvement of NHE3 instead of VHA in this process is thermodynamically favored by the strong Na+ gradient between cytosol (30 mM) and seawater (470 mM). In teleosts Rh proteins including Rhcg and Rhbg were identified as important players in branchial ammonia excretion pathways, as well [58]. The current model denotes the presence of Rhbg in basolateral membranes to facilitate the entry of NH3 into the cell, whereas Rhcg in combination with VHA and NHE2/3 is located in apical membranes. This interplay of H+ and NH3 secretion provides an acid trapping mechanisms for apical NH4+ secretion [58]. Accordingly it can be hypothesized that similar to the situation in teleosts and the mammalian kidney, cephalopods excrete ammonia across gill epithelia by trapping NH4+ in the semi tubular space of the 3° lamellae (Figure 9).


The present work demonstrated that cephalopods have evolved an efficient pH regulatory machinery in branchial epithelia. Acid–base transporters potentially involved in both, HCO3 accumulation and H+ equivalent secretion were identified and localized in gill epithelia suggesting that this represents the major site for acid–base regulatory in cephalopods. Although significant HCO3 buffering capacities to control extracellular pH were only described for few marine species (fish, crustaceans and cephalopods) proton or proton equivalent secretion mechanisms may represent a more direct and ubiquitious pH regulatory pathway. Particularly the coupling of H+ and NH3 secretion can be regarded a fundamental and evolutionary ancient pathway of excretion and acid–base regulation. The present work underlines the importance of NH4+ based proton secretion via RhP that may contribute to well developed acid–base regulatory abilities in cephalopod molluscs.

The rapid compensation of pHe during exposure to acidified conditions is accompanied by a stimulation of branchial acid–base transporters on the protein and mRNA level, suggesting that maintenance of pHe represents a critical and energy consuming process for cephalopods to maintain vital functions. The present work further demonstrated that squids can tolerate short-term exposure without compromising aerobic energy metabolism while medium-term (one week) exposure to acidified conditions evoked decreased metabolic rates and could even lead to mortality. These observations are in accordance to other studies using pelagic squids [1] but are contrasting to studies conducted on cephalopods that are able to switch to locomotory energy saving modes (e.g. cuttlefish) by burrowing in sediment or maintaining positive buoyancy by using their gas filled cuttlebones and fins [9]. Thus, this study indicates that energetic limitations may represent a critical feature that defines the degree of sensitivity towards seawater acidification. Pelagic squids that evolved a lifestyle at the edge of energetic limits due to high locomotory costs can be expected to be particularly sensitive to prolonged reallocations of energy towards compensatory processes despite their efficient proton equivalent secretion mechanisms. The identification of physiological principles that may lead to differential sensitivities even within one taxa represent an important task for future directions to better predict species sensitivities in times of rapid environmental change.


Acidification experiments

Sepioteuthis lessoniana with mantle lengths ranging from 8 to 10.5 cm were obtained from a local dealer in Keelung, Taiwan (ROC) in June 2013 and reared in a flow through system (6000 l total volume, nitrification filter, salinity 29–30, temperature 29°C, constant 12 h dark: 12 h light cycle) at the Jiao-Shi marine station of the Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica. The natural seawater was pumped directly from coastal waters off the east coast of Taiwan, which is the natural habitat of S. lessoniana to the culturing facilities of the marine station. Animals were fed twice per day with live Palaemon shrimps (approximately 20% of squid body mass). For the CO2 perturbation experiment a total of 90 animals were used and distributed into nine 300 l tanks (10 animals per tank). The nine tanks, with three replicate tanks for each pH treatment were connected to a flow through system providing filtered, natural seawater. Flow rates were adjusted to approximately 3 l min−1 to guarantee high water quality inside the test aquaria. A light regime with a 12 h: 12 h light/dark-cycle was chosen. The aquaria were continuously equilibrated with the appropriate gas mixtures (pH 8.1, pH 7.7 and pH 7.3) using a continuous pH-stat system (pH controller, MACRO) that controlled the addition of CO2 into the seawater, and aquaria were additionally continuously aerated with air (O2 saturation > 90%). Specific seawater conditions for the various incubations are given in Table 1. Temperature, pH (NBS scale) and salinity were monitored on a daily basis. pHNBS was measured with a WTW 340i meter and WTW SenTix 81 electrode calibrated daily with Radiometer IUPAC precision pHNBS buffers 7.00 and 10.00 (S11M44, S11 M007) to monitor the experiment and to adjust the pH-stat system. Additionally, water ammonia concentrations were determined every two to three days and levels were maintained < 5.55 μmol l−1. Total dissolved inorganic carbon (CT) was measured in triplicate (100 μL each) using a Corning 965 carbon dioxide analyzer (Olympic Analytical Service (OAS), Malvern, U.K.). Seawater carbonate chemistry speciation was calculated from CT and pHNBS with the software CO2SYS [59] using the dissociation constants of Mehrbach et al. [60] as refitted by Dickson & Millero [61]. Along the incubation time of 168 h, extracellular acid–base parameters were determined, and tissue samples were taken and quickly shock frozen in liquid nitrogen for gene expression and protein analyses. Sampling and measurements were carried out at five different time points (0, 6, 20, 48, and 168 h). For each pH treatment (pH 8.1: control; pH 7.7: intermediate and pH 7.3: low) three independent replicate tanks were used leading to a total number of nine experimental tanks. At each sampling time point two animals from every experimental tank were sampled, and thus biological replication was n = 6. For statistical analyses the two animals from each replicate tank were averaged leading to a statistical n = 3. The experimental protocols were approved by the National Taiwan Normal University Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee (approval no.: 101005).
Table 1

Seawater physiochemical parameters during the 168 h pH perturbation experiment including pH (NBS scale), CO 2 partial pressure ( p CO 2 ), total CO 2 (TCO 2 ), total alkalinity (TA), salinity (Sal) and temperature (Temp)








pH 8.1

8.06 ± 0.002

624.71 ± 11.90

2.27 ± 0.04

2.51 ± 0.05

29.89 ± 0.19

28.63 ± 0.03

pH 7.7

7.72 ± 0.019

1585.59 ± 253.20

2.47 ± 0.15

2.56 ± 0.14

29.44 ± 0.19

28.71 ± 0.06

pH 7.3

7.34 ± 0.017

4134.16 ± 168.76

2.52 ± 0.12

2.47 ± 0.12

29.56 ± 0.19

28.75 ± 0.08

Metabolic rates and ammonia excretion

Determination of metabolic and ammonia (NH4+) excretion rates were determined at the 20 h and 168 h time points. Sepiotheuthis lessoniana from the pH experiments were starved overnight (12 h) and were gently transferred to glass respiration chambers with a volume of 4 L containing 0.2 μm filtered seawater equilibrated with the appropriate p CO2 level. The digestion process in pelagic squids is finished within 2-6h [62] and the starvation time of 12 h is sufficient to prevent effects on metabolic rates due to digestion processes [63]. Respiration chambers were closed, and oxygen saturation was measured continuously (once every 30 s) for 20–30 min at 28–29°C using oxygen sensors (PreSens sensor spots, type PSt3) placed in the lid of respiration chambers, connected to an OXY-4 mini multichannel fiber optic oxygen transmitter (PreSens, Regensburg, Germany). The sensors were calibrated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that the ventilatory current of the animal could sufficiently mix the water inside the respiration chamber and oxygen concentration decreased linearly. Animal fresh mass was determined on a precision scale after all water was removed from the mantle cavity. When oxygen concentration reached the 75% air saturation level, animals were removed from the respiration chamber. Additionally, a separate glass chamber was incubated without animals to determine background readings of filtered seawater for ammonium excretion and respiration of bacteria. Bacterial respiration was 3.35 ± 3.88 μmol O2 h−1 compared to average oxygen consumption by squids (400.67 ± 161.16 μmol O2 h−1) leading to less than 1% of animal respiration. For calculation of oxygen consumption rates, the linear decrease in oxygen concentration during measuring intervals between 10 min after start and the end of the measurement period was considered. Oxygen consumption rates (MO2) are expressed as μmol O2 gFM−1 h−1.

Ammonium excretion rates were determined from NH4+ concentration measurements prior to and following incubation of squids for respiration measurements. Before and after closing the respiration chambers 10 ml of seawater (stock) were sampled. For NH4+ determinations a 100 μL subsample was taken from the stock and 25 μL of reagent containing orthophthaldialdehyde, sodium sulphite and sodium borate was added [64]. Samples were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the dark until fluorescence was determined at an excitation and emission wavelength of 360 and 422 nm, respectively, using a microplate reader (Molecular Device, Spectra Max, M5). Ammonia (NH3) was not measured as NH3 concentrations are negligible at pH values of 8.0–7.1 (0.2–2% of total ammonium/ammonia, [65]. NH4+ concentrations were determined in triplicates and excretion rates were expressed as μmol NH4+ gFM−1 h−1. Blood NH4+ concentrations of four control animals were determined with the same method. This method is suitable for NH4+ determinations in blood samples as it is specific to NH4+ and insensitive to amino acids and proteins [64].

Extracellular acid–base status

Blood samples were collected from the vena cava via a gas-tight Hamilton syringe by dissecting the funnel and mantle from the ventral side. Determination of pHe was performed in 500 μl samples inside a temperature controlled water bath (29°C) using a microelectrode (WTW Mic-D) and a WTW pHi 340 pH meter (precision ± 0.01 units) that was calibrated with Radiometer precision buffers 7 and 10 (S11M44, S11 M007). For blood cell disposal, withdrawn blood was centrifuged for 30 s (6000 rpm) using a minifuge (Spectrafuge, Labnet International INC.). The supernatant was transferred into a new sample tube for the determination of total dissolved inorganic carbon (CT). (CT) was determined in duplicates (100 μL each) via a Corning 965 carbon dioxide analyzer (precision ±0.1 mmol L−1; Olympic Analytical Service, England) that was calibrated by generating a sodium bicarbonate standard curve with a fresh dilution series of 20, 10, 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mM bicarbonate in distilled water. Carbonate system speciation (i.e. p CO2, [HCO3]) within the coelomic fluid of S. lessoniana was calculated from extracellular pH (pHe) and (CT) measurements according to the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation
p CO 2 = C T α 1 0 pH pk 1 + 1 1
e HCO 3 = C T αp CO 2

where α (0.039 μmol L−1 Pa) is the solubility coefficient of CO2 in seawater and pK1′ (5.94) the dissociation constant of carbonic acid at a salinity of 30, and a temperature of 29°C [66].

Immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses

For immunohistochemistry tissues were fixed by direct immersion for 24 h in Bouin’s fixative followed by rinses in 75% ethanol. Samples were fully dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in Paraplast (Paraplast Plus, Sigma, P3683). Sections of 4 μm were cut on a Leica RM2265 microtome, collected on poly-L-lysine-coated slides. The slides were deparaffinized in Histoclear II® for 10 min and passed through a descending alcohol series (100%, 95%, 90%, 70%, and 50% for 5 min each). Slides were washed in phosphate- buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.3. Subsequently, samples were transferred to a PBS solution containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min to block non-specific binding. The primary antibodies, a rabbit polyclonal antibody H-300, raised against the human α subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, INC) and Sepioteuthis lessoniana specific polyclonal antibodies raised against part of the carboxyl-terminal region (IYRVRKVGYDEQFIMSY) of Na+/H+-exchanger3 (NHE3), the subunit A region (SYSKYTRALDEFYDK) of the V-type-H+-ATPase (VHA) for more detail see [10] and the Rhesus protein (RhP) (antibody designed against the synthetic peptideTRAGYQEFKW) were diluted in PBS (1:50–100) and placed in small droplets of 200 μl onto the sections, and incubated for 12 h at 4°C in a wet chamber. To remove unbound antibodies, the sections were then washed (3 × 5 min) in PBS and incubated for 1 h with small droplets (200 μl) of secondary antibody, anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 or anti- rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen) (dilution 1:250). To allow double-color immunofluorescence staining, one of the polyclonal antibodies was directly labeled with Alexa Fluor dyes using the Zenon antibody labeling kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). After rinses in PBS (3 × 5 min), sections were examined with a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss imager A1) equipped with an appropriate filter set.

For immunoblotting, 15 μL of crude extracts from gill tissues were used. Proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels, according to Lämmli [67], and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore), using a tank blotting system (Bio-Rad). Blots were pre-incubated for 1 h at room temperature in TBS-Tween buffer (TBS-T, 50 mM Tris -HCl, pH 7.4, 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl, 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween20) containing 5% (wt/vol) blocking reagent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Blots were incubated with the primary antibody (see previous section) diluted 1:250–500 at 4°C overnight. After washing with TBS-T, blots were incubated for 2 h with horseradish conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (diluted 1:1,000-2,000, at room temperature; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Protein signals were visualized by using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and recorded using Biospectrum 600 imaging system (UVP, Upland, CA, USA). Signal intensity was calculated using the free software “Image J” e.g. [68].

Enzyme activity

ATPase activity was measured in crude extracts in a coupled enzyme assay with pyruvate kinase (PK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) by using the method of Schwartz et al. [69]. Crude extracts were obtained by quickly homogenizing the tissue samples using a tissue lyzer (Quiagen) in 10 volumes of ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% (w/v) deoxycholate, proteinase inhibitor cocktail from Sigma-Aldrich (catalogue no. P8340). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 1000 g, 4°C. The supernatant was used as a crude extract. The reaction was started by adding 2 μl of the sample homogenate to the reaction buffer containing 100 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 80 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCl, 5 mMMgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 0.24 mM Na-(NADH 2 ), 2 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, and about 12 U/ml PK and 17 U/ml LDH in a PK/LDH enzyme mix (Sigma-Aldrich). The oxidation of NADH coupled to the hydrolysis of ATP was followed photometrically at 29°C in a temperature controlled plate reader (Molecular Device, Spectra Max, M5), over a period of 15 min, with the decrease of extinction being measured at λ =339 nm. The fraction of Na+/K+ -ATPase or H+-ATPase activity in total ATPase (TA) activity was determined by the addition of 2 μl ouabain (5 mM final concentration) or bafilomycin (Bafilomycin A1, Sigma-Aldrich) (10 μM final concentration) to the assay, respectively. The concentrations of inhibitors applied were demonstrated to be sufficient to fully inhibit the NKA [70] and VHA [71], respectively. Each sample was measured in six replicates (3 with inhibitor dissolved in DMSO and 3 with DMSO). Enzyme activity was calculated by using an extinction coefficient for NADH of ε =6.31 mM−1 · cm−1 and given as micromoles of ATP consumed per gram tissue fresh mass (gFM) per hour.

Preparation of mRNA

Gill tissues (without branchial gland) were homogenized in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using a Tissue lyser (Quiagen). Total RNA was extracted from the aqueous phase after addition of chloroform to Trizol homogenates and purified by addition of isopropanol. DNA contamination was removed with DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The mRNA for the RT-PCR was obtained with a QuickPrep Micro mRNA Purification Kit (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ, USA) according to the supplier protocol. The amount of mRNA was determined by spectrophotometry (ND-2000, NanoDrop Technol, Wilmington, DE), and the mRNA quality was checked by running electrophoresis in RNA denatured gels. All mRNA pellets were stored at −80°C.

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

The mRNA expressions of target genes were measured by qPCR with the Roche LightCycler® 480 System (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Primers for all genes were designed using Primer Premier software (vers. 5.0; PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA). The sequences and primers were used in a previous study [10] and are depicted in Table 2. In addition to the previously cloned sequences of squid acid–base transporters a cytosolic carbonic anhydrase (CAc) sequence (KJ451614) was cloned from squid (S. lessoniana). PCRs contained 40 ng of cDNA, 50 nM of each primer, and the LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) in a final volume of 10 μl. All qPCR reactions were performed as follows: 1 cycle of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min (the standard annealing temperature of all primers). PCR products were subjected to a melting-curve analysis, and representative samples were electrophoresed to verify that only a single product was present. All primer pairs used in this PCR had efficiencies >96%. Control reactions were conducted with nuclease-free water to determine levels of background. Additionally, no PCR product was obtained by using DNAse I treated RNA samples as template demonstrating the success of the DNase I treatment. The standard curve of each gene was confirmed to be in a linear range with ubiquitin conjugated protein (UBC) as reference genes. The expression of this reference gene has been demonstrated to be stable in cephalopods among ontogenetic stages and during CO2 treatments [10],[12].
Table 2

P rimers used for qRT-PCR

Gene name


Primer sequence

Amplicon size (bp)

Accession numbers

Sodium–hydrogen exchanger 3






Vacuolar-type H + −ATPase






Na+, K + −ATPase






Rhesus protein






Sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter






Cytosolic Carbonic anhydrase






Reference gene


Ubiquitin-conjugated enzyme






F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Sigma Stat 3.0 (Systat) software. Statistical differences between pH treatments were analyzed by two-way and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data sets were normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Equal variance was tested using the Levene median test. The significance level was set to p < 0.05.

Additional file



This study was financially supported by the grants to Y. C. Tseng from the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China (NSC 102-2321-B-003-002) and an Alexander von Humbold/National Science Council (Taiwan) grant awarded to M. H (NSC 102-2911-I-001-002-2) and M.S. (NSC 103-2911-I-001-506). We gratefully thank Mr. H. T. Lee (assistant of Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology marine station) for his assistance to maintain experimental systems.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica
Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University


  1. Rosa R, Seibel BA: Synergistic effects of climate-related variables suggest future physiological impairment in a top oceanic predator. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008, 105: 20776-20780.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pörtner H-O, Webber DM, Boutilier RG, O‘Dor RK: Acid–base regulation in exercising squid (Illex illecebrosus, Loligo pealei). Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1991, 261: R239-R246.Google Scholar
  3. Gutowska MA, Melzner F, Langenbuch M, Bock C, Claireaux G, Pörtner H-O: Acid–base regulatory ability of the cephalopod (Sepia officinalis) in response to environmental hypercapnia. J Comp Physiol B. 2010, 180: 323-335.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pörtner HO: Coordination of metabolism, acid–base regulation and haemocyanin function in cephalopods. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol. 1994, 25: 131-148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Brix O, Lykkeboe G, Johansen K: The significance of the linkage between the Bohr and Haldane effects in cephalopod bloods. Respir Physiol. 1981, 44: 177-186.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Pörtner H-O: An analysis of the effects of pH on oxygen binding by squid (Illex illecebrosus, Loligo pealei) haemocyanin. J Exp Biol. 1990, 150: 407-424.Google Scholar
  7. Pörtner HO, Langenbuch M, Reipschläger A: Biological impact of elevated ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and earth history. J Oceanogr. 2004, 60: 705-718.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Melzner F, Gutowska MA, Langenbuch M, Dupont S, Lucassen M, Thorndyke MC, Bleich M, Pörtner H-O: Physiological basis for high CO2 tolerance in marine ectothermic animals: pre-adaptation through lifestyle and ontogeny?. Biogeosciences. 2009, 6: 2313-2331.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutowska MA, Pörtner H-O, Melzner F: Growth and calcification in the cephalopod Sepia officinalis under elevated seawater pCO2. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2008, 373: 303-309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu MY, Lee J-R, Lin L-Y, Shih T-H, Stumpp M, Lee M-F, Hwang P-P, Tseng Y-C: Development in a naturally acidified environment: Na+/H+-exchanger 3-based proton secretion leads to CO2 tolerance in cephalopod embryos. Front Zool. 2013, 10: 51-67.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Schipp R, Mollenhauer S, Boletzky S: Electron microscopical and histochemical studies of differentiation and function of the cephalopod gill (Sepia officinalis L.). Zoomorph. 1979, 93: 193-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu MY, Tseng Y-C, Stumpp M, Gutowska MA, Kiko R, Lucassen M, Melzner F: Elevated seawater p CO2 differentially affects branchial acid–base transporters over the course of development in the cephalopod Sepia officinalis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011, 300: R1100-R1114.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu MY, Sucré E, Charmantier-Daures M, Charmantier G, Lucassen M, Melzner F: Localization of ion regulatory epithelia in embryos and hatchlings of two cephalopods. Cell Tiss Res. 2010, 441: 571-583.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Donaubauer HH: Sodium- and potassium-activated adenosine triphosphatase in the excretory organs of Sepia officinalis (Cephalopoda). Mar Biol. 1981, 63: 143-150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Perry SF, Gilmour KM: Acid–base balance and CO2 excretion in fish: Unanswered questions and emerging models. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2006, 154: 199-215.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hwang PP, Perry SF: Ionic And Acid–Base Regulation. Zebrafish. Edited by: Perry SF, Ekker M, Farrel AP, Brauner CJ. 2010, Elsevier, London, 311-344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans DH, Piermarini PM, Choe KP: The multifunctional fish gill: Dominant site of gas exchange, osmoregulation, acid–base regulation, and excretion of nitrogenous waste. Physiol Rev. 2005, 85: 97-177.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry RP, Lucu C, Onken H, Weihrauch D: Multiple functions of the crustacean gill: osmotic/ionic reglation, acid–base balance, ammonia excretion, and bioaccumulation of toxic metals.Front Physiol 2012, 3:431.,Google Scholar
  19. Tresguerres M, Parks S, Sabatini SE, Goss GG, Luquet CM: Regulation of ion transport by pH and [HCO3-] in isolated gills of the crab Neohelice (Chasmagnathus) granulata. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008, 294 (3): R1033-R1043.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cameron JN: Effects of hypercapnia on blood acid–base status, NaCl fluxes and trans-gill potential in freshwater blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus. J Comp Physiol B. 1978, 123: 137-141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Weihrauch D, Ziegler A, Siebers D, Towle DW: Active ammonia excretion across the gills of the green shore crab Carcinus maenas: participation of Na+/k+-ATPase, V-type H+-ATPase and functional microtubules. J Exp Biol. 2002, 205: 2765-2775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin M, Fehsenfeld S, Sourial MM, Weihrauch D: Effects of high environmental ammonia on branchial ammonia excretion rates and tissue Rh-protein mRNA expression levels in seawater acclimated Dungeness crab Metacarcinus magister. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 2011, 160: 267-277.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Stumpp M, Trübenbach K, Brennecke D, Hu MY, Melzner F: Resource allocation and extracellular acid–base status in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in response to CO2 induced seawater acidification. Aqua Toxicol. 2012, 110–111: 194-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomsen J, Melzner F: Moderate seawater acidification does not elicit long-term metabolic depression in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol. 2010, 157: 2667-2676.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fehsenfeld S, Weihrauch D: Differential acid–base regulation in various gills of the green crab Carcinus maenas: effects of elevated environmental pCO2.Comp Biochem Physiol A 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.09.016.,Google Scholar
  26. Hu MY, Casties I, Stumpp M, Ortega-Martinez O, Dupont S: Energy metabolism and regeneration impaired by seawater acidification in the infaunal brittlestar Amphiura filiformis.J Exp Biol doi:10.1242/jeb.100024.,Google Scholar
  27. Wu S-C, Horng J-L, Liu S-T, Hwang PP, Wen Z-H, Lin C-S, Lin LY: Ammonium-dependent sodium uptake in mitochondrion-rich cells of medaka (Oryzias latipes) larvae. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010, 298: C237-C250.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nawata CM, Hirose S, Nakada T, Wood CM, Katoh A: Rh glycoprotein expression is modulated in pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes) during high environmental ammonia exposure. J Exp Biol. 2010, 213: 3150-3160.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wagner CA, Devuyst O, Belge H, Bourgeois S, Houillier P: The rhesus protein Rhcg: a new perspective in ammonium transport and distal urinary acidification. Kidney Int. 2011, 79: 154-161.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Trübenbach K, Pegado MR, Seibel BA, Rosa R: Ventilation rates and activity levels of juvenile jumbo squid under metabolic suppression in the oxygen minimum zone. J Exp Biol. 2013, 216: 359-368.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Webber DM, O´Dor RK: Monitoring the metabolic rate and activity of free-swimming squid with telemetered jet pressure. J Exp Biol. 1986, 126: 205-224.Google Scholar
  32. Boucher-Rodoni R, Mangold K: Comparative aspects of ammonia excretion in cephalopods. Malacologica. 1988, 29: 145-151.Google Scholar
  33. Boucher-Rodoni R, Mangold K: Respiration and nitrogen excretion by the squid Loligo forbesi. Mar Biol. 1989, 103: 333-338.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. O‘Dor RK: Telemetered cephalopod energetics: swimming, soaring, and blimping. Integr Comp Biol. 2002, 42: 1065-1070.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. O‘Dor RK, Webber DM: Invertebrate athletes: trade-offs between transport efficiency and power density in cephalopod evolution. J Exp Biol. 1991, 160: 93-112.Google Scholar
  36. Heisler N: Acid–Base Regulation In Animals. 1986, Elsevier Biomedical Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  37. Claiborne JB, Evans DH: Acid–base balance and ion transfers in the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) during hypercapnia - a role for ammonia excretion. J Exp Zool. 1992, 261: 9-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Toews DP, Holeton GF, Heisler N: Regulation of the acid–base status during environmental hypercapnia in the marine teleost fish Conger conger. J Exp Biol. 1983, 107: 9-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lykkeboe G, Johansen K: A cephalopod approach to rethinking about the importance of the Bohr and Haldane effects. Pac Sci. 1982, 36: 305-313.Google Scholar
  40. Heisler N: Acid–Base Regulation In Fishes. 1984, Academic, New YorkView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Cameron JN: Acid–Base Equilibria In Invertebrates. Acid–Base Regulation In Animals. Edited by: Heisler N. 1986, Elsevier Biomedical Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Hwang PP, Lee TH, Lin LY: Ion regulation in fish gills: recent progress in the cellular and molecular mechanisms. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011, 301 (1): R28-R47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Charmantier G, Charmantier-Daures M: Ontogeny of osmoregulation in crustaceans: the embryonic phase. Am Zool. 2001, 41: 1078-1089.Google Scholar
  44. Watanabe S, Niida M, Maruyama T, Kaneko T: Na+/H + exchanger isoform 3 expressed in apical membrane of gill mitochondrion-rich cells in Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus. Fish Sci. 2008, 74: 813-821.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bishop JM, Verlander JW, Lee H-W, Nelson RD, Weiner AJ, Handlogten ME, Weiner ID: Role of Rhesus glycoprotein, Rh B glycoprotein, in renal ammonia excretion. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010, 299: F1065-F1077.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee YC, Yan JJ, Cruz SA LHJ, Hwang PP: Anion exchanger 1b, but not sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter 1b, plays a role in transport functions of zebrafish H+-ATPase-rich cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011, 300: C295-C307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Gilmour KM, Perry SF: Carbonic anhydrase and acid–base regulation in fish. J Exp Biol. 2009, 212: 1647-1661.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Gilmour KM, Bayaa M, Kenny L, McNeill B, Perry SF: Type IV carbonic anhydrase is present in the gills of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 2007, 292: R556-R567.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Hu MY, Tseng Y-C, Lin L-Y, Chen P-Y, Charmantier-Daures M, Hwang PP, Melzner F: New insights into ion regulation of cephalopod molluscs: a role of epidermal ionocytes in acid–base regulation during embryogenesis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011, 301: 1700-1709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner CA, Finberg KE, Breton S, Marshanski V, Brown D, Geibel JP: Renal vacuolar H+-ATPase. Physiol Rev. 2003, 84: 1263-1314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Tresguerres M, Parks SK, Katoh F, Goss GG: Microtubule-dependent relocation of branchial V-H+-ATPase to the basolateral membrane in the Pacific spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias): a role in base secretion. J Exp Biol. 2006, 209: 599-609.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Piermarini PM, Evans DH: Immunochemical analysis of the vacuolar proton-ATPase B-subunit in the gills of a euryhaline stingray (Dasyatis sabina): effects of salinity and relation to Na+/K+-ATPase. J Exp Biol. 2001, 204: 3251-3259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Weihrauch D, Chan AC, Meyer H, Döring C, Sourial MM, O´Donnell MJ: Ammonia excetion in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea.J Exp Biol 2012, doi:10.1242/jeb.067942. J Exp Biol 2012, 215:3242–3253.,Google Scholar
  54. Potts WTW: Ammonia excretion in Octopus dolfeini. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1965, 14: 339-355.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Lykkeboe G, Brix O, Johansen K: Oxygen-linked CO2 binding independent of pH in cephalopod blood. Nature. 1980, 287: 330-331.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Brix O, Bardgard A, Cau A, Colosimo SGC, Giardina B: Oxygen-binding properties of cephalopod blood with special reference to environmental temperatures and ecological distribution. J Exp Zool. 1989, 252: 34-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Voight JR, Pörtner HO, O‘Dor RK: A review of ammonia-mediated buoyancy in squids (Cephalopoda: Teuthoidea). Mar Fresh Behav Physiol. 1994, 25: 193-203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Wright PA, Wood CM: A new paradigm for ammonia excretion in aquatic animals: role of Rhesus (Rh) glycoproteins. J Exp Biol. 2009, 212: 2303-2312.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewis E, Wallace DWR: Program developed for CO2 system calculations. 1998, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL/CDIAC-105, Oak RidgeView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Mehrbach C, Culberso C, Hawley J, Pytkowic R: Measurement of apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawter at atmospheric pressure. Limnol Oceanogr. 1973, 18: 897-907.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Dickson A, Millero F: A comparison of the equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media. Deep Sea Res A. 1987, 34: 1733-1743.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Lipiński MR: Changes in pH in the caecum of Loligo vulgaris reynaudii during digestion. S Afr J Mar Sci. 2010, 9 (1): 43-51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Katsanevakis S, Protopapas N, Miliou H, Verriopoulos G: Effect of temperature on specific dynamic action in the common octopus Octopus vulgaris (Cephalopoda). Mar Biol. 2005, 146: 733-738.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Holmes RM, Aminot A, Kérouel R, Hooker BA, Peterson BJ: A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1999, 56 (10): 1801-1808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Körner S, Das SK, Veenstra S, Vermaat JE: The effect of pH variation at the ammonium/ammonia equilibrium in wastewater and its toxicity to Lemna gibba. Aquat Bot. 2001, 71: 71-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Weiss RF: Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: the solubility of a non-ideal gas. Mar Chem. 1974, 2: 203-215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Lämmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012, 9: 671-675.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwartz AA, Allen JC, Harigaya S: Possible involvement of cardiac Na+/K+-adenosine triphosphatase in the mechanism of action of cardiac glycosides. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969, 168: 31-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Morris JF, Ismail-Beigi F, Jr BVP, Gati I, Lichtstein D: Ouabain-sensitive Na+, K(+)-ATPase activity in toad brain. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 1997, 118: 599-606.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Dröse S, Altendorf K: Bafilomycins and concanamycins as inhibitors of V-ATPases and P-ATPases. J Exp Biol. 1997, 200: 1-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© Hu et al. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.