Skip to main content

The evolution of a bat population with white-nose syndrome (WNS) reveals a shift from an epizootic to an enzootic phase



White-nose Syndrome (WNS) is a mycosis caused by a cutaneous infection with the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd). It produces hibernation mortality rates of 75–98% in 4 bats: Myotis lucifugus, M. septentrionalis, M. sodalis, and Perimyotis subflavus. These high mortality rates were observed during the first several years after the arrival of P. destructans at a hibernation site. Mortality is caused by a 60% decrease in torpor bout duration, which results in a premature depletion of depot fat prior to spring.


Little is known about the long-term effects of Pd on torpor and mortality, thus we conducted a 9-year study on M. lucifugus at 5 of the hibernation sites where Pd first appeared in North America during the winter of 2007–08. The M. lucifugus hibernating at one of these sites one year after the arrival of Pd (2008–09) had: a) a mean torpor bout duration of 7.6 d, b) no depot fat reserves by March, and c) an apparent over-winter mortality rate of 88%. The M. lucifugus hibernating at this same site 6–9 years after the arrival of Pd, in contrast, had: a) a mean torpor bout duration of 14.7 d, b) depot fat remaining in March, and c) an apparent mortality rate of 50%. The number of M. lucifugus hibernating at 2 of these sites has consistently increased since 2010 and is now more than 3.0-fold higher than the number remaining after the winter of 2008–09.


These findings indicate that this population of M. lucifugus has evolved mechanisms to hibernate well in the presence of Pd, thus reducing over-winter mortality.


White-nose Syndrome (WNS) is an emergent mycosis caused by an extensive cutaneous infection with the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd). It was first observed at a single cave in New York State during the winter of 2006–2007, and then spread to 5 more caves/mines in New York State during the winter of 2007–08 [1]. Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd) has since spread to 38 U.S. States and 7 Canadian provinces, and it was introduced to North America from Europe [2]. This fungus grows on the muzzle, wings, and ears of afflicted bats during hibernation, with hyphae penetrating both the epidermis and dermis, consuming the hair follicles, sebaceous and sweat glands [3,4,5]. The optimal temperature for Pd growth is ~ 12.5 °C and it ceases above 19 °C [6]. Within 1–2 years after the arrival of Pd at a hibernation site, the number of little brown (Myotis lucifugus), northern long-eared (Myotis septentrionalis), Indiana (Myotis sodalis), and tricolored (Perimyotis subflavus) bats decreases by 75–95% [7].

The body fat content of M. lucifugus increases from 7 to 27% body mass during the 1–2 months prior to hibernation [8, 9]. Depot fat is the primary energy source utilized during mammalian hibernation [10, 11]. Mammalian torpor involves the regulation of body temperature (Tb) at a substantially lower level, with a new critical minimum Tb maintained. Hibernators do not remain torpid throughout the hibernation season; instead bouts of torpor last from days to weeks, interrupted by brief (< 3 h for bats) periods of high metabolic rates and Tb, known as arousal episodes [12], which account for ~ 90% of the depot fat utilized during hibernation, but their physiological function is unknown [13]. Field studies on M. lucifugus indicate that cutaneous infection with Pd causes mortality through the disruption of normal torpor patterns during hibernation, causing more frequent arousal episodes, which leads to a premature depletion of depot fat reserves prior to the availability of food, and subsequent death [14].

Little is known about the long-term effects of Pd on bat populations, however, beyond the declines observed during the first 1–2 years. A mark/recapture study conducted by Reichard et al. [15] revealed that the over-winter survival rate of M. lucifugus at 8 Pd contaminated sites in the Northeastern USA was 5.4%, with some individuals surviving 4 consecutive winters. A small maternity colony of M. lucifugus in NY examined by Dobony and Johnson [16] during the summers of 2006 through 2017 demonstrated that the size of it decreased by 88% after the first appearance of Pd, then stabilized during 2010–14, and has been increasing since 2014. A field study conducted at a single hibernation site in NY during the winter of 2014–2015, about 6 years after Pd had arrived, indicated that the mean (± SE) torpor bout duration of M. lucifugus surviving the winter was 12.0 ± 10.8 d [17], which is close to the normal torpor bout duration of 15–20 d previously reported for this species [14, 18]. These studies indicate that M. lucifugus populations in the Northeastern USA are evolving a resistance to Pd infections. Each of these studies examined only those M. lucifugus that survived hibernation, however. The proportion of individuals capable of hibernating normally in the presence of Pd, and thus surviving the winter is not known, and it is not clear how this proportion has changed over time.

We hypothesized that the proportion of M. lucifugus capable hibernating normally in the Pd-contaminated sites of the Northeast would increase over time. We also hypothesized that the proportion of M. lucifugus with depot fat reserves persisting to the spring emergence from hibernation would correspondingly increase over time as well. Lastly, we also hypothesized these physiological adaptations to the presence of Pd lead to an increase in the size of these M. lucifugus populations. We tested our hypotheses in a 9-year field study on the first population of M. lucifugus to be affected by Pd. This study was conducted at 5 of the 6 hibernation sites where WNS first occurred in North America.


Torpor patterns of hibernating bats

The field study was conducted at the Williams Preserve Mine located in Ulster County, NY (Table 1). WNS first appeared at the Williams Preserve site during the winter of 2007–08, thus the winter of 2007–08 was thus designated as “Pd Season 0” for this site. Male and female bats differ slightly in their torpor patterns [19], thus the skin temperature (Tskin) of only female M. lucifugus were examined. Adult M. lucifugus begin hibernating at the Williams Preserve Mine during late October/early November, with the subsequent emergence from hibernation occurring in late April. Fifteen adult female M. lucifugus were therefore collected while torpid in this mine during a single day in November/December 2008, 2013, and 2014 (45 total). Immediately upon collection, each bat was fitted with a temperature sensitive radio transmitter (Holohil models LB-2NT or LB-2XT) and released back into the mine. The transmitter was adhered to a shaved area on the back, between the shoulders (scapulas). It weighed only 0.5–0.6 g, and had a battery of life ~ 120 d. Each transmitter was previously calibrated by holding it at each of 6 sequential temperatures ranging from 0.3 to 40.0 °C in a circulating water bath and recording the rate of radio pulses emitted. These data were then used to calculate calibration equations for each transmitter individually.

Table 1 Hibernation sites and numbers of Myotis lucifugus in them during the most recent survey conducted prior to the first appearance of Pseudogymnoascus destructans

The skin temperature (Tskin) of each bat was continuously measured and recorded at 10–15 min intervals by constantly monitoring radio signals using a computerized radio receiving system (ATS model 4500 s). Skin temperature (Tskin) is equivalent to Tb in small bats [20]. Torpor was defined as when Tskin < 24 °C. Four antennas were placed inside the mine at areas where M. lucifugus roost during hibernation. The antennas were connected to 50 Ω cables that ran to the mine entrance and interfaced with the radio receiving system. This permitted weekly data downloads without re-entering the mine and disturbing hibernating bats. We did not re-enter the mine after the single day of capture and transmitter attachment during 2014 and 2015 until the following April, to avoid disturbing the bats while Tskin was being recorded. Severe WNS was observed during the winter of 2008–09, and all telemetered bats either disappeared or died by January 2009. Fifteen additional female M. lucifugus were thus collected while torpid on 3 February 2009 (Julian date 34), fitted with transmitters, and released back into the mine to obtain additional Tskin data for February 2009 and March 2009. We did not re-enter the mine again until April 2009. Radio signals were monitored and recorded throughout the following March during each of the 3 study periods.

Each of the 15 M. lucifugus captured during 2013 and 2014 were also screened for the wing lesions indicative of Pd infections using ultraviolet (UV) light prior to transmitter attachment following the techniques of Turner et al. [21]. All bats were kept in the mine, with both wings extended, while being transilluminated by a portable long-wave (365–385 nm) UV light. This technique causes an orange-yellow fluorescence of the lesions due to Pd infection. The presence or absence of an orange-yellow fluorescence was recorded for each wing. Groups of M. lucifugus were observed hibernating at numerous roost sites throughout the Williams Preserve Mine. We measured the ambient air temperature (Ta) at a single M. lucifugus roost site located near the entrance during the 2008–09 (Pd season 1) and 2014–2015 (Pd season 7) periods by placing an Onset model “Tidbit v2” at this site. It was programmed to record temperatures at 1 h intervals from 1 December through 30 March. These loggers were factory calibrated before deployment, and their calibrations were verified after deployment by placing them at 0 and 30 °C in a circulating water bath.

A previous study on free-ranging M. lucifugus conducted before the arrival of Pd in North America revealed that their torpor bouts were 15–20 d in length [18], and a field study on M. lucifugus performed by Reeder et al. [14] revealed that M. lucifugus hibernating in areas of the Northeastern USA where Pd had not yet arrived had torpor bouts that averaged 16.33 ± 6.7 d in length. The mean torpor lengths observed for each group of bats were thus statistically compared to 16.33 d to determine if they deviated from the healthy torpor bout length previously reported for this species. The proportion of bats with torpor bouts that were > 15 d in length was also calculated for each study period since M. lucifugus must have torpor bouts that average at least 15 d long in order to survive the hibernation period [18]. Handling torpid bats caused them to arouse, and they re-entered torpor within 30 min upon their subsequent release. The first torpor bout observed for each bat was therefore not included in the analyses of torpor patterns, to avoid any biases due to artifacts stemming from the preceding “provoked” arousal episode. Only Tskin data collected after the first spontaneous (undisturbed) arousal episode recorded from each bat were included in the torpor pattern analyses. In most instances, Tskin data were obtained for several torpor bouts by the same bat. In these cases, the most recent torpor bout observed for that individual was included in the analysis.

Body fat levels of free-ranging bats

Four adult M. lucifugus were collected 12 December 2013 (Pd Season 6), 4 on 13 November 2015 (Pd season 8), and 8 more on 16 March 2017 (Pd Season 9). All were collected while torpid from the Williams Preserve Mine, sacrificed immediately upon capture using an Isoflurane overdose, and their carcasses were frozen at − 20 °C until analysis. Adult M. lucifugus are sometimes infected with rabies [22] which can also lead to rapid body fat loss during hibernation, thus all bat carcasses were first tested for rabies following the methods summarized in Blanton et al. [23]. None tested positive for rabies; thus all were included in the analyses. Each carcass was first weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g and dried at 60 °C for 24 h. The dried carcass was then weighed again, homogenized, and dried again at 60 °C for another 24 h. All lipids were subsequently extracted from the homogenized carcass in a Soxhlet apparatus for 12 h using petroleum ether following the techniques of Dobush et al. [24] to determine total lipid content. Chemical extraction methods remove both depot and structural lipids. The structural lipids in mammalian tissues are phospholipids, cholesterol, ceramides, wax esters, and sphingolipids, all of which are neither stored nor mobilized as energy sources. Mammalian depot lipids, in contrast, are triacylglycerols stored in adipocytes, and are both mobilized and catabolized during fasting [25]. Total body fat content (% live mass) thus represents the sum of both depot lipids, which can be mobilized to support metabolism during fasting, and structural lipids, which cannot. Mammals that have depleted all their depot lipid reserves will consequently still have total body fat contents of 4–8% live mass [26], composed entirely of structural lipids. The mean total body fat contents obtained were thus compared to the minimum body fat content reported for free-ranging M. lucifugus, which is 6.7% body mass [9].

Previous field studies on the torpor patterns of WNS-affected M. lucifugus revealed that cutaneous infections with Pd vary in degree of severity within the same hibernating population. Those M. lucifugus with the most severe Pd infections have torpor bouts that are 50–60% shorter in length than normal, and usually die well before the end of hibernation (April in NY). The M. lucifugus with moderate Pd infections, however, usually have torpor bouts that are normal in length, and typically survive to the end of hibernation [14]. We thus also compared the body fat contents obtained to those previously reported for M. lucifugus collected at 2 different WNS-affected hibernation sites during 2 different periods: mid-hibernation (February 2008/09) and natural emergence from hibernation (April 2008), to assess the body fat levels associated with these 2 degrees of cutaneous infection in M. lucifugus shortly after Pd arrived. They were collected from the Williams Preserve Mine and another mine located in Essex County NY [27].

Bat surveys

The 5 sites surveyed for bats, and the number of M. lucifugus hibernating in each during the most recent survey conducted prior to the arrival of Pd in New York, are listed in Table 1. The total number of bats hibernating in each of these sites was determined at 1 to 2-year intervals starting in 2007 by visually counting all bats roosting in them during a single day-long survey each winter. Surveys were conducted by wildlife biologists from the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) during the February–March periods of 2008–2017. WNS was first observed at Howe Cave during the winter of 2006–07, whereas WNS was first detected at all other sites listed in Table 1 during the winter of 2007–08. Myotis lucifugus was the most common bat at all sites both before and after the arrival of Pd. These 5 hibernation sites were selected because they are among the 6 sites were WNS was first observed in North America.

Statistical analyses

Mean body fat contents, Tskin and torpor bout lengths were compared among groups using a one-way ANOVA (General Linear Models) procedure in conjunction with Tukey’s Highly Significant Difference (HSD) Test. Mean torpor bout lengths and body fat contents were compared previously published values using an one-tailed Student’s t-test for a hypothesis concerning the mean. The number of M. lucifugus hibernation at a study site during each survey was analyzed by Least Squares Linear Regression. All statistical methods were performed using SYSTAT version 13.2 software. The variance about each calculated mean is reported as ±1 standard error (SE).


Torpor patterns of hibernating bats

Sufficient Tskin data were obtained to determine the spontaneous torpor patterns of 17 adult female M. lucifugus at the Williams Preserve Mine during the November–March period of 2008–09 (Pd Season 1), and for 20 more individuals during the November/December–March periods of 2013–14 and 2014–15 (Pd Seasons 6 and 7). The Tskin values recorded for a single M. lucifugus during February 2009, as well as for another individual observed during January and February 2014, are summarized in Fig. 1. The mean torpor bout durations observed during Pd Seasons 6 and 7 (Table 2) were 1.7X and 1.9X greater than that observed during Pd Season 1, respectively (F2,34 = 6.276, p = 0.005). Mean torpor bout duration during Pd Season 1 was significantly less than 16.33 d (t = − 6.291, df = 16, p < 0.001), but those of Pd Seasons 6 and 7 were not significantly different from 16.33 d (t = − 1.019, df = 12, p = 0.16, and, t = − 1.714, df = 6, p = 0.07, respectively). Just 18% of the M. lucifugus examined during Pd Season 1 (3 of 17) had torpor bouts that were > 15 d in length, whereas 50% (10 of 20 total) of the bats monitored during Pd seasons 6 and 7 had torpor bouts that were > 15 d. Torpor bout length varied between individual bats by more than 12-fold during Pd Season 1, by about 3.5-fold during Pd Season 6, and by just 2.6-fold during Pd Season 7 (Table 2). The mean minimum Tskin maintained during torpor in Pd Seasons 6 and 7 was 1.0 and 2.1 °C greater (Table 2) than that during Pd Season 1 (F2,34 = 4.178, p = 0.024). The mean maximum Tskin observed during arousal episodes was significantly less during Pd Season 6 (Table 2) than during Pd Seasons 1 and 7 (F2,34 = 13.267, p < 0.001). No visible signs of Pd infection were detected using UV transillumination in any of the bats captured during 2013 and 2014. Mean (± SE) December–March air temperatures at a single roost site in the mine during 2008–09 was 3.7 ± 0.1 °C, with temperatures range from 2.6 to 5.7 °C, and during this same period in 2014–15 it was 2.0 ± 0.1 °C, with temperatures ranging from − 1.0 to 4.6 °C.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Skin temperatures of two different Myotis lucifugus hibernating at the Williams Preserve Mine during: a February 2009, and b January–February 2014. The February 2009 recordings of Tskin began 45 min after transmitters were placed on all bats on Julian date 34. Arousal episodes occurred on Julian dates 36.6458 and 38.0181, delineating a torpor bout of 1.37 d in duration. No radio signals were received from this bat after Julian date 39

Table 2 Mean (± SE) torpor parameters of Myotis lucifugus hibernating at the Williams Preserve Mine

Body fat levels of free-ranging bats

The mean body fat content of M. lucifugus collected during Pd Season 9 (March 2017) was 1.4x greater (Fig. 2a) than that previously reported for M. lucifugus collected during Pd Seasons 0 and 1 (February 2008/09) and Pd Season 0 (April 2008) at mines in New York (F2,29 = 8.365, p = 0.001). The mean body fat content during February of Pd Seasons 0 and 1 did not significantly differ from the minimum of 6.7% body mass for M. lucifugus (t = 0.972, df = 7, p = 0.36), and neither did the April mean body fat content for Pd Season 0 (t = 0.045, df = 15, p = 0.97). The mean body fat content during the March of Pd Season 9, however, was significantly greater than 6.7% (t = 4.202,df = 7, p = 0.004). The mean body fat levels of bats collected during November and December of Pd Seasons 6 and 8 were not significantly different from each other (t = − 5.562, df = 6, p = 0.14), but when analyzed to together, the overall mean of 18.53 ± 1.84% is significantly less than the maximum of 27% body mass previously reported for this species (t = − 4.585, df = 7, p = 0.003). The mean (± SE) body mass of the bats collected during the November of Pd Season 1 was 8.6 ± 0.2 g, whereas that of the bats collected during the November/December of Pd Seasons 6 and 7 was 8.4 ± 0.1 g, and not significantly different (t = 0.497, df = 43, p = 0.62).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Histograms summarizing the mean (± SE) body fat contents of free-ranging Myotis lucifugus during a February–April, and b November–December. Mean sharing a common lower-case letter within a date range are not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level. Sample sizes are indicated in parentheses. Data for February 2008/09 (Pd Seasons 0/1) and April 2008 (Pd Season 0) are from Frank et al. [28]

Bat surveys

The number of M. lucifugus hibernating at the Williams Preserve Mine (Fig. 3a) during the year following the first appearance of Pd was just 12% of that observed at this site previously (Table 1), and the number hibernating at Hailes Cave (Fig. 3b) was just 9% of the pre-Pd level (Table 1). The number of M. lucifugus observed at these sites during subsequent surveys consistently increased, however, and the trend at each site was significant (F1,3 = 33.423, p = 0.01 for Williams Preserve Mine, and F1,6 = 62.986, p = 0.0002 for Hailes Cave). The number of M. lucifugus increased to 41% of the pre-Pd level by 2017 at the Williams Preserve Mine, and to 31% of the pre-Pd level for Hailes Cave by 2017 (Fig. 3). Likewise, the number of bats hibernating at Howe Cave, Schoharie Cavern, and South Bethlehem Cave were just 5–12% of the pre-Pd levels for these sites 1–2 years after the first appearance of Pd (Fig. 4). The number of M. lucifugus found at each these sites during subsequent survey years varied little from the initial reduction, and no significant trends were found for either Howe Cave (F1,7 = 0.0388, p = 0.84), Schoharie Cavern (F1,6 = 0.0184, p = 0.90), or South Bethlehem Cave (F1,7 = 0.0028, p = 0.96) over time.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The relationship between survey year and the number of Myotis lucifugus hibernating at a The Williams Preserve Mine, and b Hailes Cave. The line drawn through each set of points represents the least squares linear regression

Fig. 4
figure 4

Survey year and the number of Myotis lucifugus hibernating at Howe Cave, Schoharie Cavern, and South Bethlehem Cave from 2008 through 2017


The results of the field study clearly support our hypothesis that the proportion of M. lucifugus hibernating with normal (15–20 d) torpor bout lengths in the presence of Pd increases over time. Only 18% of the M. lucifugus observed during Pd Season 1 had torpor bouts that were greater than 15 d in length, whereas 50% of those observed during Pd Seasons 6 and 7 had torpor bouts of this duration. Consequently, mean torpor bout durations during Pd Seasons 6 and 7 increased by 1.7 to 1.9-fold over those that were observed during Pd Season 1. This increase in mean torpor bout duration was associated with a reduction in the range of torpor bout lengths observed between individuals. The shortest torpor bout observed during Pd Season 1 was 1.51 d, whereas the shortest torpor bout observed during Pd Season 7 was 9.19 d (Table 2). The increase in mean torpor bout duration was associated with a 1.0–2.1 °C increase in mean minimum Tskin during torpor (Table 2). This observation in in contrast to the findings of Lilley et al. [17], who observed that the Tskin of M. lucifugus hibernating at a mine where Pd had just arrived was greater than that of M. lucifugus hibernating at another mine where Pd had been present for about 6 years. The two study sites examined by Lilley et al. [17] differed in mean Ta by 4.6 °C, however, which may account for the differences in Tskin observed during torpor. Our study also revealed that the maximum Tskin observed during arousal episodes did not vary in a consistent manner between hibernation seasons, and this was also observed by Lilley et al. [17].

The air temperatures measured at a single roost site near the mine entrance range from 2.6 to 5.7 °C during the December 2008–March 2009 period, and they ranged from − 1.0 to 4.6 °C at this same site from December 2014 through March 2015. The mean minimum Tskin of torpid M. lucifugus was 7.0 ± 0.5 °C during 2008–09, and it was 9.1 ± 0.7 °C during 2014–15 (Table 2), however. The Tskin of M. lucifugus during torpor is usually 0.5–1.0 °C above ambient temperature [18], and the Tskin of torpid M. lucifugus infected with Pd is not significantly different from that of torpid uninfected M. lucifugus hibernating at the same Ta [28]. Field studies conducted at an abandoned mine in western Ohio (USA) revealed that M. lucifugus hibernate at sites with mean (± SD) surface temperatures ranging from 4.3 ± 1.6 to 10.8 ± 1.6 °C within the same mine, and that both air as well as surface temperatures are higher in the back of the mine than in the front of it, near the entrance [29, 30]. Interpreting our finding in conjunction with these published studies indicates that most of the M. lucifugus observed in our study were hibernating at roost sites which were further back in the Williams Preserve Mine, where it was warmer, than the single roost site at which we measured air temperatures.

The results of the body fat analyses support our hypothesis that the increase in torpor bout length associated with long-term Pd exposure produces a corresponding increase in the proportion of individuals with depot fat reserves lasting throughout hibernation. The mean body fat content of M. lucifugus hibernating during Pd Seasons 0–1 was not significantly different from the minimum of 6.7%, indicating that all depot fat reserves have been depleted before the end of hibernation (mid-April). The mean body fat content of M. lucifugus collected one month prior to end of hibernation during Pd Season 9 (March 2017), however, was 1.4X greater, indicating that they had some depot fat reaming at this point. The increase in the amount of depot fat was not due to an increase in the amount of depot fat at the onset of hibernation since; a) the body fat content of M. lucifugus during November 2015 was not significantly different from the maximum of 27% previously report for this species, and, b) the mean body masses of M. lucifugus collected during November 2008 and November–December 2013–15 were not significantly different. Our findings are also consistent with those of Cheng et al. [31] who observe that the M. lucifugus hibernating at these sites during the winter of 2009–10 had a lower mean body fat content than those hibernating at the same sites during the winter of 2015–16.

The winter counts reveal that this M. lucifugus population is growing. The number of individuals hibernating at all five study sites decreased to 5–12% of previous levels within several years after the arrival of Pd. This trend did not continue in subsequent years. The number M. lucifugus hibernating at the Howe Cave, Schoharie Cavern, and South Bethlehem Cave sites have since remained stable, with no significant negative, or positive, trends. The number of M. lucifugus hibernating at the Williams Preserve Mine and Hailes Cave sites, in contrast, significantly increased by 3 to 4-fold since the initial decline associated with the arrival of Pd. A field study conducted by Reeder et al. [14] on M. lucifugus hibernating in Northeastern USA during the first several years after the arrival of Pd revealed 3 categories: a) those that developed severe Pd infections with 7–8 d torpor bouts, all which died during hibernation, b) those that developed moderate Pd infections, had torpor bouts 15–20 d long, and usually survived hibernation, and, c) bats that developed no Pd infections, had torpor bouts of 15–20 d as well, and survived hibernation. Analyses of the amount of Pd DNA found on the wings of M. lucifugus hibernating at 4 NY study sites conducted by Langwig et al. [32] indicated that this population is developing a resistant to cutaneous infection with Pd. Interpreting these findings with the results of our study indicates that the proportion of M. lucifugus that develop only moderate, or no, Pd infections during hibernation is increasing in our study population.

It thus appears that since the epizootic phase of Pd-induced White-nose Syndrome began in the Northeastern USA, there has been a shift to an enzootic phase with respect to M. lucifugus, where the host and Pd coexist. This is similar to what has been observed for chytridiomycosis in frogs, which is caused by a cutaneous infection with the fungus Bactrachochytrium dendrobatidis [33]. This led to population declines for 43 of the 238 amphibian species found in Australia since 1978. About 26% of the species that initially declined are now recovering, and the population levels of an additional 19% are now stable [34]. Laboratory experiments involving two frog species that are now recovering from chytridiomycosis in Panama revealed that this recovery was not caused by pathogen attenuation but was instead due to an increase in the resistance of these frog species to cutaneous infection with B. dendrobatidis [35]. These studies suggest a similar scenario for the evolution of Myotis lucifugus populations which are resistant to Pd may be occurring.

It thus appears that natural selection has favored the M. lucifugus that can somehow limit the degree of cutaneous infection with Pd during hibernation to the point where torpor bout length is not significantly reduced. The proportion of M. lucifugus with this Pd-resistant phenotype in the population has apparently increased over time due to this selective advantage, producing the trends in mean torpor bout length, mean depot fat levels, and population increases observed. We hypothesize that these trends may not be due to the attenuation of the Pd strain found in this region. At present, only 50% of the M. lucifugus in this population can hibernate with torpor bouts that are > 15 d in length and survive the winter. It is unknown if proportion of individuals in this population capable of hibernating in this manner in the presence of Pd will continue to increase. The mechanism by which some M. lucifugus reduce the level of Pd infection is not known. Recent studies on the epidermal lipid mixtures of 2 bat species that are highly resistant to Pd growth reveal that some of the free fatty acids, wax esters, and monoacylglycerols found in their epidermis inhibit Pd growth by 90–99% [36, 37]. Studies on free-ranging M. lucifugus have also revealed that the proportion of anti-Pd fatty acids in their epidermis greatly decreases during hibernation [38]. It is thus possible that the M. lucifugus that are more resistant to Pd growth have greater levels of anti-Pd free fatty acids, wax esters, and/or monoacylglycerols in their epidermis during hibernation than those that are highly susceptible to these infections. Further examination of this system will not only provide important insights into the log-term effects of White-nose Syndrome, but also will illuminate how epidemics of fungal pathogens subside in general.


One goal of this study was to examine the extent to which a hibernating bat population has evolved a resistance to a novel fungal pathogen (Pd) after 6–9 years of exposure to it. Another goal was to elucidate the physiological basis of any increase in resistance observed during this period. Our study clearly demonstrates that over a 6-year period, over-winter mortality decreased from an initial 88 to 50%. This decrease in mortality was associated with a nearly 2-fold increase in mean torpor bout length during hibernation, which in turn produced a corresponding increase in depot fat reserves during late hibernation. These findings indicate that instead of increasing the amount of body fat stored at the onset of hibernation, this bat population instead evolved mechanisms which increased the ability to maintain proper torpor patterns in the presence of Pd, thereby conserving depot fat reserves. This study thus demonstrates that a mammalian species is capable of rapid adaptive evolution in response to a novel fungal pathogen.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article can be found at the Figshare web site:



Degree of freedom


Sample size

Pd :

Pseudogymnoascus destructans


Standard deviation


Standard error

Ta :

Ambient (air) temperature

Tb :

Body temperature

Tskin :

Skin temperature


  1. Turner GG, Reeder D, Coleman J. A five-year assessment of mortality and geographic spread of white-nose syndrome in north American bats and a look to the future. Bat Research News. 2011;52:13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trivedi J, Lachapelle J, Vanderwolf KJ, Misra V, Willis CKR, Ratcliffe JM, et al. Fungus causing white-nose syndrome in bats accumulates genetic variability in North America with no sign of recombination. mSphere. 2017;2:e00271–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Behr M, Meteyer CU, Berlowski-Zier BM, Buckles EL, et al. Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Science. 2009;323(5911):227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gargas A, Trest MT, Christensen M, Volk TJ, Blehert DS. Geomyces destructans sp. Nov associated with bat white nose syndrome. Mycotaxon. 2009;108:147–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaturvedi V, Springer DJ, Behr MJ, Ramani R, Li X, Peck MK, et al. Morphological and molecular characterizations of psychrophilic fungus Geomyces destructans from New York bats with white nose syndrome (WNS). PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verant ML, Boyles JG, Waldrep W Jr, Wibbelt G, Blehert DS. Temperature-dependent growth of Geomyces destructans, the fungus that causes bat white-nose syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e46280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Langwig KE, Hoyt JR, Parise KL, Kath J, Kirk D, Frick WF, et al. Invasion dynamics of white-nose syndrome fungus, midwestern United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1023–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunz TH, Wrazen JA, Burnett CD. Changes in body mass and body composition in pre-hibernating little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Ecoscience. 1998;5:8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reynolds RS, Kunz TH. Changes in body composition during reproduction and postnatal growth in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Ecoscience. 2000;7:10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kayser, C. Hibernation. In: Mayer W, Van Gelder R, editors. Physiological mammalogy, volume II. New York: Academic Press; 1965. p. 180–296.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dark J. Annual lipid cycles in hibernators: integration of physiology and behavior. Annual Rev Nutr. 2005;25:469–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geiser F. Metabolic rate and body temperature. Annu Rev Physiol. 2004;66:239–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karpovich SA, Tøien Ø, Buck CL, Barnes BM. Energetics of arousal episodes in hibernating arctic ground squirrels. J Comp Physiol B. 2009;179:691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reeder DM, Frank CL, Turner GC, Meteyer CU, Kurta A, Britzke ER, et al. Frequent arousal from hibernation linked to severity of infection and mortality in bats with white-nose syndrome. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reichard JD, Fuller NW, Bennett AB, Darling SR, Moore MS, Langwig KE, et al. Interannual survival of Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) near the epicenter of white-nose syndrome. Northeast Nat. 2014;21(4):N56–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobony CA, Johnson JB. Observed resiliency of little brown myotis to long-term white-nose syndrome exposure. J Fish Wildlife Manag. 2018;9(1):168–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lilley T, Johnson J, Ruokolainen L, Rogers E, Wilson C, Mead Schell S, et al. White-nose syndrome survivors do not exhibit frequent arousals associated with Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection. Front Zool. 2016;13.

  18. Thomas DW. The physiological ecology of hibernation in vespertilionid bats. Symp Zool Soc London. 1995;67:233–44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frank CL, Michalski A, McDonough AA, Rahimian M, Rudd RJ, Herzog CJ, et al. The resistance of a north American bat species (Eptesicus fuscus) to white-nose syndrome (WNS). PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Willis CKR, Brigham RM. Defining torpor in free-ranging bats: experimental evaluation of external temperature sensitive radio transmitters and the concept of active temperature. J Comp Physiol B. 2003;173:379–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Turner GG, Meteyer CU, Barton H, Gumbs JF, Reeder DM, Overton B, et al. Nonlethal screening of bat-wing skin with the use of ultraviolet fluorescence to detect lesions indicative of white-nose syndrome. J Wildl Dis. 2014;50(3):566–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mondul A, Krebs J, Childs J. Trends in national surveillance for rabies among bats in the United States (1993–2000). JAVMA. 2003;222:633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blanton JD, Robertson K, Palmer D, Rupprecht CE. Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2008. JAVMA. 2008;235:676–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dobush GR, Ankney CD, Krementa DG. The effect of apparatus, extraction time, and solvent type on lipid extraction of snow geese. Can J Zool. 1985;63:1917–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gunstone FD. Fatty acid and lipid chemistry. Glasgow: Blackie Academic and Professional; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Pond C. The fats of life. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Frank CL, Diaz P, Kunz TH. The relationship between white-nose syndrome and dietary PUFA levels in bats. In: Ruf T, Bieber C, Arnold W, Millesi E, editors. Living in a seasonal world: thermoregulatory and metabolic adaptations. Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2012. p. 271–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Mayberry HW, McGuire LP, Willis CKR. Body temperatures of hibernating little brown bats reveal pronounced behavioural activity during deep torpor and suggest a fever response during white-nose syndrome. J Comp Physiol B. 2018;188:333–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brack V Jr. Temperatures and locations used by hibernating bats, including Myotis sodalis (Indiana bat) in a limestone mine: implications for conservation and management. Environ Manag. 2007;40:739–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boyles J, Dunbar MB, Storm JJ, Brack V Jr. Energy availability influences microclimate selection of hibernating bats. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:4345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng TL, Gerson A, Moore MS, Reichard JD, DeSimone J, Willis CKR, et al. Higher fat stores contribute to persistence of little brown bat populations with white-nose syndrome. J Anim Ecol. 2019;00:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Langwig KE, Hoyt JR, Parise KL, Frick WF, Foster JT, Kilpatrick AM. Resistance in persisting bat populations after white-nose syndrome invasion. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2017;372:20160044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berger L, Roberts AA, Voyles J, Longcore J. Murray KA; Skerratt, LF. History and recent progress on chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Fungal Ecol 2016;19:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Scheele BC, Skerratt LF, Grogan LF, Hunter DA, Clemann N, McFadden M, et al. After the epidemic: ongoing declines, stabilizations and recoveries in amphibians afflicted by chytridiomycosis. Biol Conserv. 2017;206:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Voyles J, Woodhams DC, Saenz V, Byrne AQ, Perez R, Rios-Sotelo G, et al. Shifts in disease dynamics in a tropical amphibian assemblage are not due to pathogen attenuation. Science. 2018;359:1517–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Frank CL, Ingala MR, Ravenelle RE, Dougherty-Howard K, Wicks SO, Herzog C, et al. The effects of cutaneous fatty acids on the growth of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the etiological agent of white-nose syndrome (WNS). PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Frank CL, Sitler-Elbel KG, Hudson AJ, Ingala MR. The antifungal properties of epidermal fatty acid esters: insights from white-nose syndrome (WNS) in bats. Molecules. 2018;23:1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ingala MR, Monro JJ, Ravenelle RE, Frank CL. The effects of epidermal fatty acid profiles, 1-oleoglycerol, and triacylglycerols on the susceptibility of hibernating bats to Pseudogymnoascus destructans. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0187195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Alan Hicks for his generous assistance. Robert Rudd and Greg Turner provided valuable comments and guidance throughout the course of this study.


This work was support by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant #IOS-0818222) and Fordham University (faculty research grant 2013). Both funded CLF.. These funding sources played no role in the design of this study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of these data, or in the writing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Statement of authorship: CLF collected to telemetry and body fat data, analyzed all data, and wrote the manuscript, CH collected and analyzed the bat count data, ADD collected the rabies data and analyzed it. CLF, CH, and ADD designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig L. Frank.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This field study was conducted in strict accordance with recommendations listed in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National (US) Institutes of Health. Protocols were approved by the Fordham University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol numbers CF11–03, 12–01, 1202, 15–01, and 15–02). Protocols were also approved by the New York State Department of Health Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The capture of live bats was also conducted under a Scientific License to Collect (#1373) issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frank, C.L., Davis, A.D. & Herzog, C. The evolution of a bat population with white-nose syndrome (WNS) reveals a shift from an epizootic to an enzootic phase. Front Zool 16, 40 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: