Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

A nemertean excitatory peptide/CCHamide regulates ciliary swimming in the larvae of Lineus longissimus

Abstract

Background

The trochozoan excitatory peptide (EP) and its ortholog, the arthropod CCHamide, are neuropeptides that are only investigated in very few animal species. Previous studies on different trochozoan species focused on their physiological effect in adult specimens, demonstrating a myo-excitatory effect, often on tissues of the digestive system. The function of EP in the planktonic larvae of trochozoans has not yet been studied.

Results

We surveyed transcriptomes from species of various spiralian (Orthonectida, Nemertea, Brachiopoda, Entoprocta, Rotifera) and ecdysozoan taxa (Tardigrada, Onychophora, Priapulida, Loricifera, Nematomorpha) to investigate the evolution of EPs/CCHamides in protostomes. We found that the EPs of several pilidiophoran nemerteans show a characteristic difference in their C-terminus. Deorphanization of a pilidiophoran EP receptor showed, that the two splice variants of the nemertean Lineus longissimus EP activate a single receptor. We investigated the expression of EP in L. longissimus larvae and juveniles with customized antibodies and found that EP positive nerves in larvae project from the apical organ to the ciliary band and that EP is expressed more broadly in juveniles in the neuropil and the prominent longitudinal nerve cords. While exposing juvenile L. longissimus specimens to synthetic excitatory peptides did not show any obvious effect, exposure of larvae to either of the two EPs increased the beat frequency of their locomotory cilia and shifted their vertical swimming distribution in a water column upwards.

Conclusion

Our results show that EP/CCHamide peptides are broadly conserved in protostomes. We show that the EP increases the ciliary beat frequency of L. longissimus larvae, which shifts their vertical distribution in a water column upwards. Endogenous EP may be released at the ciliary band from the projections of apical organ EP positive neurons to regulate ciliary beating. This locomotory function of EP in L. longissimus larvae stands in contrast to the repeated association of EP/CCHamides with its myo-excitatory effect in adult trochozoans and the general association with the digestive system in many protostomes.

Introduction

Neuropeptides are neurotransmitters that are involved in the regulation of most behavioral and physiological processes in animals. Many neuropeptide systems are ancestral to bilaterians and orthologous neuropeptides are deployed in the different bilaterian lineages independent of their nervous system organization [1,2,3]. Only few of the orthologous neuropeptides are well conserved in their amino acid sequences between the different bilaterian lineages and it is often the orthology of their receptors, that reveals their homology [1,2,3,4]. For example, the protostome orthologs of vertebrate neuromedin -B/bombesin- and endothelin-related neuropeptides, the CCHamide and excitatory peptide (EP), are neuropeptides where the orthology of the deuterostome and protostome peptidergic systems could only be detected because of their receptor similarity [2, 3, 5].

The EP was initially discovered in the earthworms Eisenia foetida and Pheretima vittata [6] and has since been identified in many annelid and mollusk species. It has been described under various names depending on the taxon and due to either its myo-excitatory effect or its C-terminal structure (see Table 1 for species, peptide names and references). The arthropod ortholog CCHamide was first discovered in the silk worm Bombyx mori [23] and is known from various arthropods, including insects [3, 23, 24], crustaceans [3, 24,25,26], myriapods [27] and chelicerates [24, 28, 29], with its nomenclature based on the presence of two conserved cysteine residues and an amidated C-terminal histidine residue. Because of the presence of the two cysteine residues, the usually amidated C-terminus and a similar precursor structure in CCHamides and EPs (Fig. 1a), the two peptides were already recognized as possible orthologs [2, 3, 17] before the corresponding receptors were known. This orthology hypothesis was then confirmed with the deorphanization of their orthologous receptors [12, 24]. Notably, the CCHamide system duplicated within the insect lineage into two distinctive CCHamides with two distinctive CCHamide receptors, where each of the two peptides seems to specifically activate its own, corresponding receptor paralog [5, 24]. Experiments showed that CCHamide is involved in the regulation of feeding, sensory perception and the control of insulin like peptides in Drosophila melanogaster [36,37,38] and connected to feeding in other insects [5, 39]. Its expression in different larval or adult insects is connected to the digestive system [23, 38,39,40,41,42]. Experiments with EP showed a myo-excitatory effect that included digestive tissues of oligochaetes [6], leeches [7, 8], and a gastropod species [15], and association with digestive tissues was also shown by immunohistochemistry on a polychaete [10]. (See also Table 2 for functional and anatomical association of EP/CCHamides). The myo-excitatory effect and the expression of EP was observed on tissues of adult animals.

Table 1 Discovery and nomenclature of trochozoan EPs
Fig. 1
figure1

Protostome EP/CCHamide sequences. a Schematic structure of the 116 amino acid long L. longissimus EP2 precursor. Scale bar on the upper right indicates the length of 10 amino acids. b Alignment of the predicted EP/CCHamide peptides of different protostomes with the phylogenetic relationship of the different taxa. C-terminal GKR, GKK or GRK residues indicate the precursor cleavage site and a C-terminal amidation of the residue N-terminal to the glycine, a missing glycine residue (e.g. M. tardigradum) indicates only cleavage without amidation. Peptide sequence logo was created from the alignment. Phylogeny is depicted according to Dunn et al. 2014 [30], annelid phylogeny according to Struck et al. 2015 [31] with Orthonectida as an annelid taxon [32], arthropod phylogeny according to Yeates et al. 2016 [33] and nemertean phylogeny according to Andrade et al. 2014 [34] and Kvist et al. 2015 [35]. Dashed line indicates unclear relationship, asterisks indicate the heteronemertean branch. Full precursor sequences are available in Additional file 1

Table 2 Association of EP/CCHamide peptidergic signaling based on expression, peptide detection and functional analysis of previous studies

Annelids and molluscs, as well as other closely related taxa such as brachiopods and nemerteans, also possess planktonic larvae that usually metamorphose into morphologically different, benthic adults. This ciliated larva is the name giving characteristic of the spiralian taxon Trochozoa [30, 44,45,46,47]. While antibodies against neuropeptides (usually FMRFamide) have been used widely to describe the nervous system of trochozoan larvae [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56], there are comparably few studies that investigated the behavioral effect of neuropeptides in such larvae [57,58,59,60,61] and neither behavioral nor immunohistochemical studies investigated the EP/CCHamide in trochozoan larvae. In nemerteans no functional studies with neuropeptides have been reported so far. One group of nemerteans, the pilidiophorans [34, 35, 62], have a planktotrophic and long living pilidium larva (with a few exceptions [63, 64]). Within such a pilidium larva, the juvenile worm develops from initially isolated imaginal discs that eventually fuse and overgrow the larval gut until it hatches after several weeks and often devours its own larval tissue [64, 65]. The larval nervous system lacks a typical neuropil and comprises an apical organ that consists of an apical plate with densely arranged secretory cells at the base of a prominent apical tuft, and neurons that are associated with the digestive system and a nerve net that loosely covers the body and eventually innervate a prominent nerve underneath the ciliary band [51, 65, 66].

Here we report on the evolution of EP/CCHamide orthologs in ecdysozoans and spiralians with a focus on nemerteans. We test the activation of a single EP receptor by two EP splice variants in the nemertean Lineus longissimus, the EP expression in the pilidium larvae and juveniles of L. longissimus, and the influence of the EP on the behavior of L. longissimus larvae.

Material and methods

Bioinformatics

Publicly available transcriptomic or genomic sequencing data were scanned for EP precursors or EP receptors. Adineta vaga (Ensembl: AMS_PRJEB1171), Armorloricus elegans (NCBI: SRR2131253), Baseodiscus unicolor (NCBI: SRR1505175), Cerebratulus spec. (NCBI: SRR1797867), Dinophilus gyrocilatus (NCBI: SRR4039542), Halicryptus spinulosus (NCBI: SRR2682062), Intoshia linei (NCBI: PRJNA316116), Lineus lacteus ([67] dryad data package), Lineus longissimus (NCBI: SRS1118155), Lineus ruber ([67] dryad data package), Loxosoma pectinaricola ([67] dryad data package), Malacobdella grossa ([67] dryad data package), Milnesium tardigradum (NCBI: SRR1598869), Nipponemertes spec. (NCBI: SRR1508368), Novocrania anomala (NCBI: SRS1118148), Owenia fusiformis (NCBI: SRS590031), Paragordius varius (NCBI: PRJEB19315), Paranemertes peregrine ([67] dryad data package), Peripatopsis capensis (NCBI: SRR1145776), Priapulus caudatus (NCBI: SRR1212719), Rotaria tardigrade (NCBI: SRR2430032), Tubulanus polymorphus ([67] dryad data package). Raw reads from NCBI were assembled with a pipeline that used Trimmomatic for read preprosessing [68], SPAdes for error correction [69] and Trinity for the assembly [70]. Assembled transcriptomes and those from the [67] dryad data package were translated into protein sequences with TransDecoder (https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder) (Additional file 9, Additional file 10, Additional file 11).

Publicly available sequences from NCBI and from publications that are listed in Table 1 and Table 2 were used as BLAST reference sequences. Neuropeptide precursor sequences were tested for the presence of a signal peptide using SignalP 4.1 [71]) and Signal-3 L 2.0 [72] and cleavage sites were predicted with the NeuroPred online application (http://stagbeetle.animal.uiuc.edu). Receptor sequences were aligned with ClustalX v2.1 [73], non-conserved regions where removed with TrimAl (using the gappyout option) [74], the phylogenetic tree was calculated with FastTree v2.1 [75] (using the LG amino acid substitution model) and visualized with FigTree v1.4.3 (https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases).

Receptor activation assay

For the receptor activation assay the protocol of [12] was followed. The full ORF of the L. longissimus EP-receptor sequence was amplified by PCR from larval cDNA and was cloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1(+). The vector was transfected into CHO-K1 cells together with a promiscuous Gα-16 protein encoding plasmid and a calcium sensitive luminescent apoaequorin-GFP fusion protein encoding plasmid (G5A). Synthetic peptides of the predicted, mature L. longissimus EP1 and EP2 (customized from GenScript; sequences as described below) were diluted to different concentrations, the dose-dependent luminescence response was measured in a plate reader (BioTek Synergy Mx and Synergy H4, BioTek, Winooski, USA) and analyzed with Prism 6 (GraphPad, La Jolla, USA).

Animal rearing

Adult Lineus longissimus (Gunnerus, 1770) were collected at different collection sites close to the Marine Biological Station Espegrend (University of Bergen) in Norway. L. longissimus were kept together at 12 °C in natural seawater with an approximate salinity of 33–35 ppt, until spawning occurred naturally during Spring. Larvae were kept in 5-l beakers with slow rotators and were fed Rhinomonas sp. algae. Juveniles were retrieved by naturally occurring metamorphosis after about 4–6 weeks of continues rearing.

Immunohistochemistry

Antibodies against the C-terminal CAAGNGamide sequence of the Lineus excitatory peptide were raised in rabbits (genscript) and the antibodies were purified from the blood serum with a Sulfolink™ Immobilization Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to [48]. L. longissimus larvae and juveniles were relaxed in an 8% MgCl2 x 6H2O solution in distilled water for 10 min, fixed in a 4% Formaldehyde solution in seawater for 1 h, washed 5 × 5 min in PBS + 0.1% Tween (PTw), transferred into methanol and stored at − 20 °C. After rehydration in PTw, specimens were incubated in PBS + 0.5% Triton X for 4 h at room temperature, transferred into a 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5 + 0.1% Tween solution (THT), blocked for 1 h in a 5% normal goat serum (NGS) solution in THT and incubated with the primary antibody in THT + 5% NGS for 3 days (approximately 1 ng/μl anti-EP antibody from rabbit and 0.5 ng/μl anti-tyrosinated tubulin antibody from mouse). The primary antibodies were washed 2 × 5 min in THT containing 0.9 M NaCl, washed 5 × 15 min in PBS + 0.2% Triton X + 0.1% BSA (PBT), then washed 5 × 30 min in PTw, transferred into THT, blocked for 1 h in THT + 5% NGS and incubated with the secondary antibodies in THT + 5% NGS overnight (Alexa 488 anti-rabbit and Alexa 647 anti-mouse). Specimens were then washed 5 × 15 min in PBT, 2 × 30 min in PTw, incubated 1 h in PTw containing 1 μg/ml DAPI, washed 2 × 30 min in PTw and transferred into 70% glycerol before mounting in 70% glycerol. As a control to test the antibody specificity, antibodies were preabsorbed in a 2 mM solution of synthetic full-length EP in THT + 5% NGS during the blocking step of the primary antibody.

Vertical swimming assay

Two to three week old larvae of L. longissimus were recorded in transparent columns (6.5 cm height / 3.7 cm length / 2.2 cm width) to compare the vertical distribution of EP-exposed and untreated larvae. For each treatment and replicate more than 200 larvae per column were recorded with a “DMK31AU03” camera (The Imaging Source®) with LED illumination in a darkened box to avoid uncontrolled effects due to the possibility of photo-behavior of the larvae. All treatments and recordings were repeated twice, each time with treatment and control being recorded next to each other. The videos were processed and analyzed with “Fiji” [76] and the repeats were averaged afterwards. (Fiji measurements: 1. Background elimination using Z-project (Average Intensity of all frames) and Image calculator (substract Z-projection from all frames of the video), 2. Conversion of moving larvae to black dots using individual threshold parameter, 3. Combining distribution of larvae over time intervals of 5–10 s using Z-project (Standard Deviation of the corresponding frame sequences), 4. Measurement of larval distribution by dividing the height of the column into 50 squares and using the ‘Measure’ function on each height division, 5. Comparing the measurements in an table to get a horizontal profile of distribution of larvae.) The distributions were compared and tested with a two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (ks.test in “R”).

Measurement of the ciliary beat frequency of L. longissimus larvae

First attempts to immobilize L. longissimus larvae between a microscopic glass slide and cover slip failed, as the larvae were either slowly moving away or they got stuck and the cilia that touched the glass stopped beating rhythmically. Therefore, pulled glass holding-capillaries with an opening of about 50–70 μm were used to immobilize the pilidium larvae, similar to [77]. Larvae were caught with the capillaries at their apical tip between a glass slide and a cover slip that was completely filled with seawater. Reagents were added on one side of the cover slip with a pipette and simultaneously soaked off from the other side with a tissue paper, enabling paired measurements of the ciliary beating from individual larvae, under control conditions, after soaking in peptides and after peptide washout in. The ciliary beating was recorded with a DMK23UV024 camera (The Imaging Source) with 50 frames per second. We used 2–3 week old larvae as this size enabled us to use a holding pipette that has a strong enough suction to keep the larvae from getting washed away when we changed the solution.

Preliminary measurements were taken to determine the larval excitation that was triggered by being immobilized and sucked to a holding capillary or by the water flow from changing the solutions. The tests showed that the ciliary beating slowly decreased after larvae were caught with the holding capillary, reaching after about 10 mins a point where the beat frequency did not further decrease. The next test showed that an initial increase in the ciliary beat frequency caused by an exchange of the solution decreased back to the normal frequency in less than 2 min. Test with several exchanges in frequent intervals showed that the ciliary beating was always back to the initial frequency after less than 2 min. Based on these preliminary tests, measurements were taken as follow: Larvae were caught with a glass capillary, the slide got transferred to the microscope and after about 10 min the seawater was exchanged with fresh seawater twice in a row with a waiting time of 2 min after each exchange, before the control condition was recorded. The seawater solution was then exchanged a third time with seawater containing one of the peptides, and after 2 min the ciliary beating under the influence of EP was recorded. Afterwards the larvae were washed for 15 min with several exchanges of fresh seawater before the ciliary beating for the washout was recorded.

Generally, the beating of apical and lateral ciliary bands was tested for 12 larvae under the influence of EP1 and 12 larvae under the influence of EP2, measuring control, peptide exposed and washout conditions for every larva. The videos were processed with Fiji (“plot Z-axis Profile” function to measure the frequency), and differences in the ciliary beat frequency were tested for significance with a paired t-test.

Results

Transcriptome analyses show a wide distribution of EP/CCHamide orthologs in protostomes and an extended C-terminal region in several heteronemerteans

We identified spiralian orthologs of EP/CCHamide in transcriptomes of nemertean, brachiopod, entoproct and rotifer species, and ecdysozoan orthologs in tardigrade, onychophoran, priapulid, loriciferan and nematomorph species, showing the wide distribution of EP/CCHamide within protostomes (Fig. 1b, Additional file 1). Nearly all peptides possess two conserved cysteine residues, a proven or predicted amidated C-terminus (Fig. 1b) and a propeptide structure with a single copy of the bioactive peptide directly located after the signal peptide (Fig. 1a, Additional file 1). The main exception seems to be the EP ortholog in the tardigrade Milnesium tardigradum, which lacks a C-terminal glycine as a substrate for amidation (Fig. 1b) and also has a precursor where the signal peptide and the EP/CCHamide peptide are separated by several amino acids (Additional file 1) – although a similar precursor structure has also been described for the leech Hirudo nipponia [78]. The NeuroPred cleavage prediction of the nemertean M. grossa EP precursors also predicted an additional peptide between the signal peptide and the mature EP, which would lead to a cleavage at the lysine residue N-terminal of the first cysteine (Fig. 1b, Additional file 1), however, mass spectrometric evidence from other spiralians did not show any cleavage at this position [6, 7, 10, 15]. The name-giving C-terminal histidine residue of the arthropod CCHamide is only present in Arthropoda and Onychophora. This residue seems more variable within ecdysozoans, with methionine, phenylalanine or leucine residues in priapulid, nematomorph and loriciferan species. All investigated spiralians share an asparagine residue in this position, although while in most taxa this seems to be the most C-terminal residue, both investigated rotifer species and several nemerteans possess an extended C-terminal region with an additional amino acid. The closely related heteronemertean Cerebratulus and Lineus species all possess an additional glycine residue. This glycine residue seems to have evolved within the heteronemertean lineage, as neither the more distantly related heteronemertean Baseodiscus unicolor, nor the non-heteronemerteans showed this additional residue.

Two L. longissimus excitatory peptide isoforms activate a single L. longissimus EP receptor

In the nemertean L. longissimus we identified two excitatory peptide transcripts that seem to be the result of alternative splicing. The peptides differ only in a few amino acids at the N-terminus of the predicted EP/CCHamide peptide, whereas the rest of the two sequences are identical in their amino acid and nucleotide sequence. PCRs using larval cDNA and two specific primer pairs that were designed in the region where the two transcripts vary confirmed the presence of two separate transcripts (Additional file 2). We only identified a single ortholog of EP/CCHamide receptors in the transcriptome of L. longissimus. A phylogenetic analysis shows the orthologous relationship of protostome EP and CCHamide receptors and the chordate neuromedin B/bombesin and endothelin related receptors (Fig. 2a). The analysis also shows the duplication of the CCHamide receptors in the early insect lineage, which is not present in Collembola, but in as distantly related pterygote insects as dipterans and termites. This receptor duplication within pterygote insects and its absence in Collembola is in accordance with the presence of two CCHamide paralogs in pterygote insects (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 2
figure2

Analysis of EP/CCHamide receptors. a Phylogenetic analysis of protostome EP/CCHamide receptors and related deuterostome receptors. Color coding according to the phylogenetic group as depicted in the simplified tree on the upper right corner. SH-like support values are shown for the indicated nodes. Scale bar on the lower right corner shows amino acid substitution rate per site. The endothelin 1 receptor branch was shortened to half its size (indicated by the two crossing lines). Asterisk highlights the L. longissimus receptor that was biochemically characterized. b Activation of the L. longissimus EP receptor by the two L. longissimus excitatory peptides EP1 (EC50 = 78 nmol/l) and EP2 (EC50 = 59 nmol/l)

We cloned the L. longissimus EP receptor into an expression vector, expressed it in mammalian cells and tested its activation by the L. longissimus EP1 and EP2 peptides. Both peptides activated the receptor at similar, nano-molar concentrations with EC50 values (half maximal effective concentration) of 78 nmol/l for EP1 and 59 nmol/l for EP2 (Fig. 2b).

EP is expressed in neurons that project from the apical organ to the ciliary bands of L. longissimus larvae

We visualized EP expressing neurons in L. longissimus pilidium larvae using polyclonal antibodies against the C-terminal residues CAAGNGamide. The larval staining revealed EP positive neurons in the apical part of the larvae as well as in developing juveniles inside the larvae (Fig. 3a). The larvae showed the apical EP positive nerves already in 5-day old young larvae before development of the juveniles. The EP positive nerves of the larvae project from the lateral organ towards the ciliary bands at the anterior end of the future juvenile (Fig. 3b, c). The antibodies stained axons as well as somata of a variable number of cells (Fig. 3c, d), possibly depending on the age of the larva. The projecting EP positive neurons directly innervate the prominent neurons underneath the ciliary band at the point where the ciliary bands of the apical lobes and lateral lappets meet (Fig. 3e). With strong excitation and sensitive detection setting, the nerves of the ciliary bands themselves also showed weak EP immunoreactivity (Fig. 3f, g), however, the intensity of the labelling was weaker than the one of the nerves that project from the apical organ and we could not detect EP positive cell bodies that might belong to the ciliary nerve. The EP positive neurons of the larvae and the developing juveniles are not connected. Hatched juveniles show prominent EP staining in the neuropil and in the two longitudinal ventral nerves along the whole body (Fig. 3h, i). We did not observe any EP positive signal in larvae or juveniles when the antibodies were preabsorbed with synthetic EP prior to incubation.

Fig. 3
figure3

``Immunohistochemical analysis of EP in L. longissimus larvae and juveniles. a Side-view of a larva with advanced developing juvenile, showing nerve underneath the ciliary bands and the EP positive nerves in the apical lobe and in the juvenile. b Top-view of the apical part of a larva, with apical organ and ciliary band of the apical lobe, showing network of EP positive nerves. c Side-view of the apical part of a larva, showing EP positive nerve running from the apical organ towards the ciliary band. Asterisks indicate EP positive cell bodies. d Side-view of the EP positive nerve before the innervation of the ciliary band, including EP positive cell bodies of the nerve cells. Asterisks indicate EP positive cell bodies. e Innervation of the nerve underneath the ciliary band by a more proximal EP positive part. Arrows follow the nerve with strong proximal EP signal in the beginning. f Close-up of EP positive signal in the nerve underneath the ciliary of a lateral lappet after strong signal amplification. Double arrow indicates the same nerve as in (g). g Side-view of a larva with developing juvenile, showing EP positive signal in the nerve underneath the ciliary after strong signal amplification. Double arrow indicates the nerve. h Top-view of a juvenile with broad EP positive signal in the neuropil and the ventral nerve cords. i Side-view of a juvenile with broad EP positive signal in the neuropil and the ventral nerve cord. Orientation: all larval pictures are oriented with the anterior side of the developing juvenile to the left. Abbreviations: al = apical lobe, ao = apical organ, at = apical tuft, cb = ciliary band, dj = developing juvenile, ll = lateral lappet, np = neuropil, vn = ventral nerve cord. Color coding: gray/white = anti-tyrosinated tubulin staining (cilia and nerves), magenta = anti-EP staining (EP positive nerve cells), blue = DAPI staining (nuclei). Scale bars indicate length of 50 μm in A-C and G-I, and 20 μm in D-F

EP influences the swimming behavior of L. longissimus

We tested the influence of the predicted EP1 and EP2 peptides on L. longissimus specimens by soaking them with synthetic peptides. When we exposed 2–3 week old planktonic pilidium larvae to 5 μmol/l EP1 or EP2 and recorded their swimming behavior in a vertical column, their average swimming level was shifted upwards, and larvae concentrated in the upper part of the water column (p = 3.3e-3 for EP1 and 6.6e-4 for EP2) (Fig. 4a, b, Additional file 6: Video S1). The vertical distribution of larvae exposed to EP1 and EP2 seemed similar (p = 0.94) (Fig. 4c) and after washout of the peptides, the formerly treated larvae returned to a similar distribution as washed out control larvae (p = 0.95 for EP1-washout/Ctrl-washout and 0.82 for EP2-washout/Ctrl-washout) (Fig. 4d, e) (see also Additional file 3, Additional file 4). Juveniles did not show any obvious reaction at any tested concentration between 50 nmol/l and 50 μmol/l.

Fig. 4
figure4

Effect of EP on the vertical distribution of L. longissimus larvae in a water column. Comparisons of a control and EP1 exposed specimens, b control and EP2 exposed specimens, c EP1 and EP2 exposed specimens, d control and EP1 exposed specimens after several water changes, e control and EP2 exposed specimens after several water changes. Y-axis shows water depth of column, X-axis shows the percentage of larvae. Red and black lines show distribution of larvae under the condition stated above the columns. Horizontal lines indicate average swimming height. P values compare the distribution of the two samples (two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). EP1 and EP2 concentration = 5 μml/l. Ctrl = control, wash = washout

EP causes an increase in the beat frequency of apical and lateral ciliary bands of L. longissimus larvae

To test whether the upwards shift of the swimming distribution of L. longissimus larvae after exposure to EP may be due to a change in the beat frequency of their locomotory cilia (Fig. 5a), we recorded and quantified the beat frequency of locomotor cilia before, during and after exposure to excitatory peptide (Fig. 5b,c, Additional file 5, Additional file 7 Video S2). When larvae were exposed to concentrations of 25 μmol/l or higher of EP1 or EP2, the cilia stopped beating rhythmically and started standing up straight instead, while vibrating with a high frequency (Fig. 5d, e, Additional file 8: Video S3). At lower concentrations, we detected a significant increase of the ciliary beat frequency (cbf) of the outer ciliary bands of the lateral lappets and apical lobes (Fig. 5f). EP1 seemed to be less efficient than EP2, as 10 μmol/l EP1 were necessary to observe significant changes in the cbf, compared to only 5 μmol/l EP2. When the peptides were washed out, the cbf decreased again. We were not able to determine a possible effect of EP on ciliary arrests which occur in combination with muscular contractions of the lobes. Such contractions seemed to be inconsistent between individual larvae (possibly based on the experimental setup) and increased with the time the larvae were stuck to the holding pipette. However, it has to be mentioned that such contractions can be a mechano-sensory response in pilidium larvae that is related to feeding [77]. The ciliary bands of the lateral lappets showed under control conditions a significantly higher cbf than the ciliary bands of the apical lobes with an average of 10.34 beats per second (bps) and 9.66 bps, respectively (p = 1.17e-7, n = 24). Exposure to EP1 or EP2 cancelled this difference, so the cbf of the lateral and apical ciliary bands became more similar with 10.98 bps and 10.79 bps, respectively (p = 0.083, n = 24; see Fig. 5f for differences between EP1 and EP2 treated animals).

Fig. 5
figure5

L. longissimus pilidium larvae and the influence of excitatory peptide on their ciliary beating. a SEM picture of a L. longissimus larva. b Experimental setup to record the ciliary beating and the influence of excitatory peptide on a microscope slide. c Light microscopic picture of L. longissimus larvae with a developing juvenile on a holding pipette. d Beating ciliary band of the apical lobe. e The same ciliary band as in D, after overexposure to 25 μmol/l EP2. f Boxplot of the ciliary beat frequency of the apical lobes and lateral lappets under normal conditions, after exposure to either 10 μmol/l EP1 or 5 μmol/l EP2, and after peptide washout. Bold horizontal line indicates median, box indicates upper and lower quartile, whiskers indicate variability outside the upper and lower quartile, circles indicate outliers. Lines within the graph indicate measurement points of individual larvae. P values were calculated with a paired t-test. Asterisks indicate significance with p < 0.02. al = apical lobe, at = apical tuft, bps beats per second, cb = ciliary bands, cs = cover slip, Ctrl = control, EP = excitatory peptide, gs = microscopic glas slide, hp. = holding pipette, dj = developing juvenile, l = larva, ll = lateral lappet, st = stomach

Discussion

In our study we found a wider distribution of EP/CCHamide-type peptides in protostome clades, in addition to those described from arthropod, molluscs and annelid species: we found EP/CCHamide-type peptides in ecdysozoan clades like tardigrades, onychophorans, nematomorphs, loriciferans and priapulids, and in spiralians like rotifers, entoprocts, brachiopods and nemerteans. We show that a group of heteronemerteans possess an additional glycine residue at the C-terminus of the peptide, which is absent in other spiralian. Our peptide-receptor binding assay shows that this modification did not change the peptide-receptor pairing. Our immunohistochemical results show that the planktonic pilidium larvae of L. longissimus possess EP positive nerves that project from the apical organ to the ciliary bands. The exposure of the L. longissimus larvae to synthetic peptides of their endogenous EPs led to an upwards shift in their vertical distribution and closer observation revealed that it increases the beat frequency of the locomotory cilia of their ciliary bands, representing the first experimental observation of a behavioral effect of a neuropeptide in a nemertean.

Evolution of EP/CCHamide-type neuropeptide signaling

In our sequence analysis of EP/CCHamide-type neuropeptides, we found several characteristics that are shared between spiralian and ecdysozoan EP/CCHamide-type neuropeptides. EP/CCHamide-type neuropeptides usually possess two cysteine residues, an amidated C-terminus and a propeptide structure where the signal peptide is directly followed by a single copy of the predicted ligand. A similar propeptide structure with a single N-terminal peptide as well as an amidated C-terminus of the mature peptide is also characteristic for the related deuterostome neuromedin B and gastrin-releasing peptides [3, 79]. Cysteine residues, however, are only present in endothelins, but those peptides possess four cysteines instead of two [80, 81]. The only true indication for an orthology of these deuterostome peptides with the protostome EP/CCHamides are therefore - as previously shown - their receptors [1,2,3]. Other common features of protostome EP/CCHamide-type peptides are the presence of either two consecutive glycine residues or a glycine and an alanine residue between the second cysteine and the amidated C-terminus, as well as the presence of an aromatic amino acid and often a histidine residue between the two conserved cysteine residues. The region between the two cysteine residues shows strong similarities between annelids, molluscs, and the nemertean sequences and to a certain extend also in brachiopods. The corresponding region of the entoproct and rotifer EPs, however, seems more similar to the arthropod EP/CCHamide-type neuropeptides. This could indicate that the trochozoan (Annelida, Mollusca, Nemertea, Brachiopoda) EPs might have diverged more from the ancestral protostome EP/CCHamide peptide. The additional C-terminal glycine residue that is present in certain heteronemerteans is an evolutionary novelty of this group. This heteronemertean modification, however, did not change the peptide-receptor specificity, as it still activates the L. longissimus EP/CCHamide-type receptor.

Physiological role of the EP/CCHamide-type peptides in L. longissimus larvae

There are only few studies that test the behavioral effect of neuropeptides on trochozoan larvae [57,58,59,60,61] and those focus on peptides other than the EP/CCHamide and none of them includes nemerteans. We observed an increase in the ciliary beat frequency of the locomotory cilia when we exposed L. longissimus larvae to synthetic L. longissimus EPs and an upwards shift of the vertical distribution of these larvae in a water column. An influence of neuropeptides on the ciliary based swimming of trochozoan larvae has also been reported for other neuropeptides [57,58,59,60]. The EP positive nerves in L. longissimus larvae project from the apical organ to the ciliary band and seems to directly connect sensory input and locomotory output organ. The apical organ of pilidium larvae is presumed to have a mechano-sensory function, based on the presence of collar cells and the long, bundled apical tuft [82], but an additional function like chemosensation cannot be excluded. The influence of EP on ciliary locomotion of L. longissimus larvae and the broad expression in the prominent ventral nerve cords of the juveniles stands in contrast to the myo-excitatory effect of EPs in different adult/juvenile annelid [6,7,8, 10] and mollusc [15] species and the repeated association of EPs and CCHamides with feeding or the digestive system in annelids [6,7,8,9,10], molluscs [15, 16] and insects [5, 23, 36,37,38,39,40,41,42] (see also Table 2). A direct association of the EP positive cells with feeding behavior can likely be excluded, as at least the feeding reflex of the larvae is triggered by sensory cells that are situated directly along the ciliary band [77] and are therefore independent of the apical organ. However, we cannot exclude an indirect association with feeding, by for example influencing the foraging behavior based on other stimuli such as for example chemosensation. In the larvae of the annelid Platynereis dumerilii, it has been shown that the ciliary beating of larvae and their vertical distribution in a water column can be influenced by a variety of different neuropeptides [57] and their endogenous release is likely depending on different specific inputs. The same observed reaction – namely an increase in ciliary beat frequency – can therefore be the result of different underlying behaviors like for example phototaxis or chemosensation. Based on our experiments, it is therefore difficult to speculate about the underlying trigger that naturally causes a release of EP and a resulting change in locomotion in L. longissimus larvae. Also, an additional secondary effect that is unrelated to locomotion, but might for example modify the feeding reflex, cannot be excluded. However, it has been shown that a single type of neuropeptide can be involved in different behavioral aspects during the life history [58, 83] and ancient peptides can trigger larval specific behaviors [60]. It has also been demonstrated that the same peptide can have opposite effects on the same organ of closely related species [84]. Therefore, only a larger comparison of the effect of EPs on larvae from other trochozoans, including species with feeding as well as species with non-feeding larvae, could give more insight into the conservation of the here described effect of EP/CCHamide-type peptides in trochozoan larvae.

Conclusions

Our results show that EP/CCHamide peptides are broadly conserved in protostomes. We show that the EP increases the ciliary beat frequency of L. longissimus larvae, which shifts their vertical distribution in a water column upwards. Endogenous EP may be released at the ciliary band from the projections of apical organ EP positive neurons to regulate ciliary beating. A locomotory function of EP in L. longissimus larvae, compared to the association of EP/CCHamides with the digestive system in other animals, suggests either an integration of EP into an indirect aspect of feeding like for example the regulation of foraging behavior, or an integration of orthologous neuropeptides into different functions.

Availability of data and materials

Sequence files, individual measurements and example videos are provided as Supplement. Raw data videos are available from the authors upon reasonable request. Genbank accession numbers for L. longissimus EP1, EP2 and EP receptor are: MN068403 - MN068405.

Abbreviations

bps:

beats per second

cbf:

ciliary beat frequency

D. melanogaster :

Drosophila melanogaster

EC50 :

Half maximal effective concentration

EP:

Excitatory peptide

L. longissimus :

Lineus longissimus

L11:

Elevenin

References

  1. 1.

    Thiel D, Franz-Wachtel M, Aguilera F, Hejnol A. Xenacoelomorph neuropeptidomes reveal a major expansion of neuropeptide systems during early bilaterian evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(10):2528-43.

  2. 2.

    Jékely G. Global view of the evolution and diversity of metazoan neuropeptide signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(21):8702–7.

  3. 3.

    Mirabeau O, Joly JS. Molecular evolution of peptidergic signaling systems in bilaterians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(22):E2028–E37.

  4. 4.

    Semmens DC, Beets I, Rowe ML, Blowes LM, Oliveri P, Elphick MR. Discovery of sea urchin NGFFFamide receptor unites a bilaterian neuropeptide family. Open Biol. 2015;5(4):150030.

  5. 5.

    Ida T, Takahashi T, Tominaga H, Sato T, Sano H, Kume K, et al. Isolation of the bioactive peptides CCHamide-1 and CCHamide-2 from Drosophila and their putative role in appetite regulation as ligands for G protein-coupled receptors. Front Endocrinol. 2012;3:177.

  6. 6.

    Oumi T, Ukena K, Matsushima O, Ikeda T, Fujita T, Minakata H, et al. The GGNG peptides: novel myoactive peptides isolated from the gut and the whole body of the earthworms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;216(3):1072–8.

  7. 7.

    Minakata H, Fujita T, Kawano T, Nagahama T, Oumi T, Ukena K, et al. The leech excitatory peptide, a member of the GGNG peptide family: isolation and comparison with the earthworm GGNG peptides. FEBS Lett. 1997;410(2–3):437–42.

  8. 8.

    Nagahama T, Ukena K, Oumi T, Morishita F, Furukawa Y, Matsushima O, et al. Localization of leech excitatory peptide, a member of the GGNG peptides, in the central nervous system of a leech (Whitmania pigra) by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Cell Tissue Res. 1999;297(1):155–62.

  9. 9.

    Niida T, Nagahama T, Oumi T, Ukena K, Morishita F, Furukawa Y, et al. Characterization of binding of the annelidan myoactive peptides, GGNG peptides, to tissues of the earthworm, Eisenia foetida. J Exp Biol. 1997;279(6):562–70.

  10. 10.

    Matsushima O, Takahama H, Ono Y, Nagahama T, Morishita F, Furukawa Y, et al. A novel GGNG-related neuropeptide from the polychaete Perinereis vancaurica. Peptides. 2002;23(8):1379–90.

  11. 11.

    Veenstra JA. Neuropeptide evolution: neurohormones and neuropeptides predicted from the genomes of Capitella teleta and Helobdella robusta. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;171(2):160–75.

  12. 12.

    Bauknecht P, Jékely G. Large-scale combinatorial deorphanization of Platynereis neuropeptide GPCRs. Cell Rep. 2015;12(4):684–93.

  13. 13.

    Conzelmann M, Williams EA, Krug K, Franz-Wachtel M, Macek B, Jékely G. The neuropeptide complement of the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:906.

  14. 14.

    Kerbl A, Conzelmann M, Jékely G, Worsaae K. High diversity in neuropeptide immunoreactivity patterns among three closely related species of Dinophilidae (Annelida). J Comp Neurol. 2017;525(17):3596–635.

  15. 15.

    Morishita F, Minakata H, Takeshige K, Furukawa Y, Takata T, Matsushima O, et al. Novel excitatory neuropeptides isolated from a prosobranch gastropod, Thais clavigera: the molluscan counterpart of the annelidan GGNG peptides. Peptides. 2006;27(3):483–92.

  16. 16.

    Morishita F, Furukawa Y, Kodani Y, Minakata H, Horiguchi T, Matsushima O. Molecular cloning of precursors for TEP-1 and TEP-2: the GGNG peptide-related peptides of a prosobranch gastropod, Thais clavigera. Peptides. 2015;68:72–82.

  17. 17.

    Veenstra JA. Neurohormones and neuropeptides encoded by the genome of Lottia gigantea, with reference to other mollusks and insects. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;167(1):86–103.

  18. 18.

    Stewart MJ, Favrel P, Rotgans BA, Wang TF, Zhao M, Sohail M, et al. Neuropeptides encoded by the genomes of the Akoya pearl oyster Pinctata fucata and Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas: a bioinformatic and peptidomic survey. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:840.

  19. 19.

    Adamson KJ, Wang T, Zhao M, Bell F, Kuballa AV, Storey KB, et al. Molecular insights into land snail neuropeptides through transcriptome and comparative gene analysis. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:308.

  20. 20.

    Zatylny-Gaudin C, Cornet V, Leduc A, Zanuttini B, Corre E, Le Corguille G, et al. Neuropeptidome of the cephalopod Sepia officinalis: identification, tissue mapping, and expression pattern of neuropeptides and neurohormones during egg laying. J Proteome Res. 2016;15(1):48–67.

  21. 21.

    Bose U, Suwansa-ard S, Maikaeo L, Motti CA, Hall MR, Cummins SF. Neuropeptides encoded within a neural transcriptome of the giant triton snail Charonia tritonis, a crown-of-thorns starfish predator. Peptides. 2017;98:3–14.

  22. 22.

    Zhang MW, Wang YF, Li YP, Li WR, Li RJ, Xie XR, et al. Identification and characterization of neuropeptides by transcriptome and proteome analyses in a bivalve mollusc Patinopecten yessoensis. Front Genet. 2018;9:197.

  23. 23.

    Roller L, Yamanaka N, Watanabe K, Daubnerová I, Zitnan D, Kataoka H, et al. The unique evolution of neuropeptide genes in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;38(12):1147–57.

  24. 24.

    Hansen KK, Hauser F, Williamson M, Weber SB, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP. The Drosophila genes CG14593 and CG30106 code for G-protein-coupled receptors specifically activated by the neuropeptides CCHamide-1 and CCHamide-2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;404(1):184–9.

  25. 25.

    Toullec JY, Corre E, Mandon P, Gonzalez-Aravena M, Ollivaux C, Lee CY. Characterization of the neuropeptidome of a Southern Ocean decapod, the Antarctic shrimp Chorismus antarcticus: focusing on a new decapod ITP-like peptide belonging to the CHH peptide family. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2017;252:60–78.

  26. 26.

    Nguyen TV, Rotllant GE, Cummins SF, Elizur A, Ventura T. Insights into sexual maturation and reproduction in the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) via in silico prediction and characterization of neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:430.

  27. 27.

    Christie AE. Neuropeptide discovery in Symphylella vulgaris (Myriapoda, Symphyla): in silico prediction of the first myriapod peptidome. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015;223:73–86.

  28. 28.

    Christie AE. In silico characterization of the neuropeptidome of the Western black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015;210:63–80.

  29. 29.

    Veenstra JA. Neuropeptide evolution: chelicerate neurohormone and neuropeptide genes may reflect one or more whole genome duplications. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2016;229:41–55.

  30. 30.

    Dunn CW, Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Hejnol A. Animal phylogeny and its evolutionary implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2014;45:371–+.

  31. 31.

    Struck TH, Golombek A, Weigert A, Franke FA, Westheide W, Purschke G, et al. The evolution of annelids reveals two adaptive routes to the interstitial realm. Curr Biol. 2015;25(15):1993–9.

  32. 32.

    Schiffer PH, Robertson HE, Telford MJ. Orthonectids are highly degenerate annelid worms. Curr Biol. 2018;28(12):1970–+.

  33. 33.

    Yeates DK, Meusemann K, Trautwein M, Wiegmann B, Zwick A. Power, resolution and bias: recent advances in insect phylogeny driven by the genomic revolution. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016;13:16–23.

  34. 34.

    Andrade SCS, Montenegro H, Strand M, Schwartz ML, Kajihara H, Norenburg JL, et al. A transcriptomic approach to ribbon worm systematics (Nemertea): resolving the pilidiophora problem. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(12):3206–15.

  35. 35.

    Kvist S, Chernyshev AV, Giribet G. Phylogeny of Nemertea with special interest in the placement of diversity from Far East Russia and Northeast Asia. Hydrobiologia. 2015;760(1):105–19.

  36. 36.

    Farhan A, Gulati J, Grosse-Wilde E, Vogel H, Hansson BS, Knaden M. The CCHamide 1 receptor modulates sensory perception and olfactory behavior in starved Drosophila. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2765.

  37. 37.

    Ren GR, Hauser F, Rewitz KF, Kondo S, Engelbrecht AF, Didriksen AK, et al. CCHamide-2 is an orexigenic brain-gut peptide in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133017.

  38. 38.

    Sano H, Nakamura A, Texada MJ, Truman JW, Ishimoto H, Kamikouchi A, et al. The nutrient-responsive hormone CCHamide-2 controls growth by regulating insulin-like peptides in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(5):e1005209.

  39. 39.

    Llopis-Gimenez A, Han Y, Kim Y, Ros VID, Herrero S. Identification and expression analysis of the Spodoptera exigua neuropeptidome under different physiological conditions. Insect Mol Biol. 2019;28(2):161–75.

  40. 40.

    Li SZ, Torre-Muruzabal T, Sogaard KC, Ren GR, Hauser F, Engelsen SM, et al. Expression patterns of the Drosophila neuropeptide CCHamide-2 and its receptor may suggest hormonal signaling from the gut to the brain. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76131.

  41. 41.

    Zoephel J, Reiher W, Rexer KH, Kahnt J, Wegener C. Peptidomics of the agriculturally damaging larval stage of the cabbage root fly Delia radicum (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41543.

  42. 42.

    Veenstra JA, Ida T. More Drosophila enteroendocrine peptides: Orcokinin B and the CCHamides 1 and 2. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;357(3):607–21.

  43. 43.

    Mekata T, Kono T, Satoh J, Yoshida M, Mori K, Sato T, et al. Purification and characterization of bioactive peptides RYamide and CCHamide in the kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2017;246:321–30.

  44. 44.

    Giribet G, Dunn CW, Edgecombe GD, Hejnol A, Martindale MQ, Rouse GW. Assembling the spiralian tree of life. In: Telford MJ, Littlewood DTJ, editors. Animal evolution: genomes, fossils, and trees. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 52–64.

  45. 45.

    Edgecombe GD, Giribet G, Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Kristensen RM, Neves RC, et al. Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions. Org Divers Evol. 2011;11(2):151–72.

  46. 46.

    Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, et al. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276(1677):4261–70.

  47. 47.

    Laumer CE, Bekkouche N, Kerbl A, Goetz F, Neves RC, Sørensen MV, et al. Spiralian phylogeny informs the evolution of microscopic lineages. Curr Biol. 2015;25(15):2000–6.

  48. 48.

    Conzelmann M, Jékely G. Antibodies against conserved amidated neuropeptide epitopes enrich the comparative neurobiology toolbox. Evodevo. 2012;3(1):23.

  49. 49.

    Hay-Schmidt A. Distribution of catecholamine-containing, serotonin-like and neuropeptide FMRFamide-like immunoreactive neurons and processes in the nervous system of the actinotroch larva of Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida). Cell Tissue Res. 1990;259(1):105–18.

  50. 50.

    Hay-Schmidt A. Ultrastructure and immunocytochemistry of the nervous system of the larvae of Lingula anatina and Glottidia sp. (Brachiopoda). Zoomorphology. 1992;112(4):189–205.

  51. 51.

    Hindinger S, Schwaha T, Wanninger A. Immunocytochemical studies reveal novel neural structures in nemertean pilidium larvae and provide evidence for incorporation of larval components into the juvenile nervous system. Front Zool. 2013;10(1):31.

  52. 52.

    Gruhl A. Serotonergic and FMRFamidergic nervous systems in gymnolaemate bryozoan larvae. Zoomorphology. 2009;128(2):135–56.

  53. 53.

    Shun'kina KV, Starunov VV, Zaitseva OV, Ostrovskii AN. Serotonin and FMRFamide immunoreactive elements in the nervous system of freshwater bryozoans (Bryozoa: Phylactolaemata). Dokl Biol Sci. 2013;451:244–7.

  54. 54.

    Battonyai I, Voronezhskaya EE, Obukhova A, Horváth R, Nezlin LP, Elekes K. Neuronal development in the larvae of the invasive biofouler Dreissena polymorpha (Mollusca: Bivalvia), with special attention to sensory elements and swimming behavior. Biol Bull. 2018;234(3):192–206.

  55. 55.

    Kristof A, de Oliveira AL, Kolbin KG, Wanninger A. Neuromuscular development in Patellogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda) and its importance for reconstructing ancestral gastropod bodyplan features. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2016;54(1):22–39.

  56. 56.

    Helm C, Vöcking O, Kourtesis I, Hausen H. Owenia fusiformis - a basally branching annelid suitable for studying ancestral features of annelid neural development. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16(1):129.

  57. 57.

    Conzelmann M, Offenburger SL, Asadulina A, Keller T, Münch TA, Jékely G. Neuropeptides regulate swimming depth of Platynereis larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(46):E1174–83.

  58. 58.

    Conzelmann M, Williams EA, Tunaru S, Randel N, Shahidi R, Asadulina A, et al. Conserved MIP receptor-ligand pair regulates Platynereis larval settlement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(20):8224–9.

  59. 59.

    Penniman JR, Doll MK, Pires A. Neural correlates of settlement in veliger larvae of the gastropod, Crepidula fornicata. Invertebr Biol. 2013;132(1):14–26.

  60. 60.

    Thiel D, Bauknecht P, Jékely G, Hejnol A. An ancient FMRFamide-related peptide-receptor pair induces defence behaviour in a brachiopod larva. Open Biol. 2017;7(8):170136.

  61. 61.

    Braubach OR, Dickinson AJG, Evans CCE, Croll RP. Neural control of the velum in larvae of the gastropod, Ilyanassa obsoleta. J Exp Biol. 2006;209(Pt 23:4676–89.

  62. 62.

    Kvist S, Laumer CE, Junoy J, Giribet G. New insights into the phylogeny, systematics and DNA barcoding of Nemertea. Invertebr Syst. 2014;28(3):287–308.

  63. 63.

    Martín-Durán JM, Vellutini BC, Hejnol A. Evolution and development of the adelphophagic, intracapsular Schmidt's larva of the nemertean Lineus ruber. Evodevo. 2015;6:28.

  64. 64.

    Maslakova SA. The invention of the pilidium larva in an otherwise perfectly good spiralian phylum Nemertea. Integr Comp Biol. 2010;50(5):734–43.

  65. 65.

    Maslakova SA. Development to metamorphosis of the nemertean pilidium larva. Front Zool. 2010;7(1):30.

  66. 66.

    Hay-Schmidt A. Catecholamine-containing, serotonin-like and neuropeptide FMRFamide-like immunoreactive cells and processes in the nervous-system of the Pilidium Larva (Nemertini). Zoomorphology. 1990;109(5):231–44.

  67. 67.

    Kocot KM, Struck TH, Merkel J, Waits DS, Todt C, Brannock PM, et al. Phylogenomics of Lophotrochozoa with consideration of systematic error. Syst Biol. 2017;66(2):256–82.

  68. 68.

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

  69. 69.

    Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, et al., editors. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013.

  70. 70.

    Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–U130.

  71. 71.

    Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8(10):785–6.

  72. 72.

    Zhang YZ, Shen HB. Signal-3L 2.0: a hierarchical mixture model for enhancing protein signal peptide prediction by incorporating residue-domain cross-level features. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57(4):988–99.

  73. 73.

    Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8.

  74. 74.

    Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–3.

  75. 75.

    Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9490.

  76. 76.

    Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.

  77. 77.

    von Dassow G, Emlet RB, Maslakova SA. How the pilidium larva feeds. Front Zool. 2013;10:47.

  78. 78.

    Minakata H, Ikeda T, Nagahama T, Oumi T, Ukena K, Matsushima O, et al. Comparison of precursor structures of the GGNG peptides derived from the earthworm Eisenia foetida and the leech Hirudo nipponia. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999;63(2):443–5.

  79. 79.

    Ohki-Hamazaki H, Neuromedin B. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;62(3):297–312.

  80. 80.

    Yanagisawa M, Masaki T. Molecular biology and biochemistry of the endothelins. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1989;10(9):374–8.

  81. 81.

    Kochva E, Bdolah A, Wollberg Z. Sarafotoxins and endothelins: evolution, structure and function. Toxicon. 1993;31(5):541–68.

  82. 82.

    Chernyshev AV, Astakhova AA, Dautov SS, Yushin VV. The morphology of the apical organ and adjacent epithelium of pilidium prorecurvatum, a pelagic larva of an unknown heteronemertean (Nemertea). Russ J Mar Biol. 2013;39(2):116–24.

  83. 83.

    Williams EA, Conzelmann M, Jékely G. Myoinhibitory peptide regulates feeding in the marine annelid Platynereis. Front Zool. 2015;12(1):1.

  84. 84.

    Painter SD, Greenberg MJ. A survey of the responses of bivalve hearts to the molluscan neuropeptide FMRFamide and to 5-Hydroxytryptamine. Biol Bull. 1982;162(3):311–32.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Carmen Andrikou and Anlaug Furu Boddington for helping with animal collection and rearing. We further thank Jürgen Berger from the Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology (Tübingen, Germany) for taking the SEM picture of the larva.

Funding

This research was supported by the FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN grant no. 317172 “NEPTUNE” to AH and GJ and received further support by the DFG - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to GJ (Reference no. JE 777/3–1).

Author information

DT designed and conducted the research, analyzed the data, prepared figures, and wrote the first version of the manuscript. AH designed the study and contributed in writing of the manuscript. PB and GJ provided help and hosted the deorphanization experiments. GJ contributed to the writing of the manuscript and to the interpretation and discussion of the data. All authors conceived the study and read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Andreas Hejnol.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of nemerteans, their embryos and larva in the laboratory does not raise any ethical issues, and therefore does not need approval from regional and local research ethics committees. Lineus longissimus is not an endangered or protected species. In accordance with local guidelines, permission for collection of material was not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

EP and CCHamide precursors sequences used for Fig. 1. (DOCX 21 kb)

Additional file 2:

Primer and sequences of L. longissimus EP1, EP2 and EP-receptor. (DOCX 36 kb)

Additional file 3:

Individual measurements for the vertical distribution shown in Fig. 4. (XLSX 112 kb)

Additional file 4:

KS test results of the vertical distributions shown in Fig. 4. (TXT 10 kb)

Additional file 5:

Table with ciliary beat frequency measurements of individual larvae used for Fig. 5. (XLSX 11 kb)

Additional file 6:

Video S1. Time laps (4x) of the swimming behavior of EP exposed larvae and untreated larvae. (AVI 11407 kb)

Additional file 7:

Video S2. Ciliary beating of apical and lateral ciliary bands of a single larva under control conditions, after exposure to 5 μM EP2 and after EP washout. (AVI 3056 kb)

Additional file 8:

Video S3. Larva on a holding pipette under control conditions and after exposure to high concentrations of EP (50 μM). (AVI 12376 kb)

Additional file 9:

Sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis of the EP receptors in Fig. 2. (FASTA 41 kb)

Additional file 10:

Alignment used for the phylogenetic analysis of the EP receptors in Fig. 2. (FASTA 31 kb)

Additional file 11:

Fasttree output file of the phylogenetic analysis of the EP receptors (Fig. 2). (TXT 7 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Neuropeptide
  • GPCR
  • CCHamide
  • Excitatory peptide
  • Nemertea
  • GGNG
  • Locomotion
  • Ciliary beating

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.