Wake D, Vredenburg V. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. PNAS. 2008;105:11466–73.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
International union for the conservation of nature red list. Version 2020–3 [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/statistics.
O’Connor NE, Crowe TP. Biodiversity loss and ecosystem functioning: distinguishing between number and identity of species. Ecology. 2005;86(7):1783–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Heilpern S, Weeks B, Naeem S. Predicting ecosystem vulnerability to biodiversity loss from community composition. Ecology. 2018;99:1099–107.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stuart S, Chanson J, Cox N, Young B, Rodrigues A, Fischman D, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 2004;306:1783–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn: IPBES secretariat; 2019.
Google Scholar
Wake D. Declining amphibian populations. Science. 1991;253:5022.
Article
Google Scholar
Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature. 2000;404(6779):752–5.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bishop PJ, Mainguy G, Angulo A, Lewis JP, Moore RD, Rabb GB, et al. The amphibian extinction crisis—What will it take to put the action into the amphibian conservation action plan? SAPIENS. 2012;5:16.
Google Scholar
Grant E, Miller D, Schmidt B, Adams M, Amburgey S, Chambert T, et al. Quantitative evidence for the effects of multiple drivers on continental-scale amphibian declines. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25625.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Species at risk registry—species search [Internet]. Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: https://species-registry.canada.ca/index-en.html#/species?sortBy=commonNameSort&sortDirection=asc&pageSize=10.
Campbell J. Distribution pattern of amphibians in Middle America. In: Duellman WE, editor. Patterns of distribution of amphibians: a global perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.
Google Scholar
Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Rodríguez P, Mora F, Flores-Villela O, Whittaker RJ. Climate change and amphibian diversity patterns in Mexico. Biol Conserv. 2012;150(1):94–102.
Article
Google Scholar
Pasquali M. Latin America: countries with most threatened amphibian species 2019 [Internet]. Statista. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/977935/countries-highest-number-threatened-amphibian-species-latin-america/.
Whiles M, Lips K, Pringle C, Kilham S, Bixby R, Brenes R, et al. The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of neotropical stream ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ. 2006;4:27–34.
Article
Google Scholar
Hocking D, Babbitt K. Amphibian contributions to ecosystem services. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2014;9:1–17.
Google Scholar
Blaustein AR, Wake DB, Sousa WP. Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conserv Biol. 1994;8(1):60–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Bloxam QMC, Tonge SJ. Amphibians: suitable candidates for breeding-release programmes. Biodivers Conserv. 1995;4(6):636–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Harding G, Griffiths R, Pavajeau L. Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs. Conserv Biol. 2016;30:340–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Griffiths R, Buhlmann K, McKay J, Tuberville T. Reintroduction. In: Gascon C, Collins JP, Moore RD, Church DR, McKay J, Mendelson III, editors. Amphibian conservation action plan IUCN/SSC amphibian conservation summit 2005. Gland: World Conservation Union (IUCN); 2007. p. 40–4.
Google Scholar
Zippel K, Johnson K, Gagliardo R, Gibson R, McFadden M, Browne R, et al. The amphibian ark: a global community for ex situ conservation of amphibians. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2011;6:340–52.
Google Scholar
Amphibian Population Management Guidelines. Amphibian ark amphibian population management workshop. Amphibian ARK: San Diego; 2007. p. 34.
Balmford A, Mace GM, Leader-Williams N. Designing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conserv Biol. 1996;10(3):719–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Trudeau V, Schueler F, Navarro-Martin L, Hamilton C, Bulaeva E, Bennett A, et al. Efficient induction of spawning of Northern leopard frogs (Lithobates pipiens) during and outside the natural breeding season. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:14.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Environment Canada. Recovery strategy for the northern leopard frog (Lithobates pipiens), Rocky Mountain population in Canada. Ottawa: Environment and Climate Change Canada; 2017. p. 71.
Google Scholar
LaClaire L. Dusky gropher frog controlled propagation and reintroduction plan. Jackson: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 2017. p. 20.
Google Scholar
Roznik E, Reichling S. Survival, movements and habitat use of captive-bred and reintroduced dusky gopher frogs. Anim Conserv. 2021;24:51–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Browne RK, Seratt J, Vance C, Kouba A. Hormonal priming, induction of ovulation and in-vitro fertilization of the endangered Wyoming toad (Bufo baxteri). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4(1):34.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Vincent K, Abbott T. Wyoming toad Bufo hemiophrys baxteri now known as Anaxyrus baxteri revised recovery plan 2015. Cheyenne: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; p; 2015. p. 78.
Google Scholar
Voss SR, Woodcock MR, Zambrano L. A tale of two axolotls. Bioscience. 2015;65(12):1134–40.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Browne R, Wang Z, Okada S, McGinnity D, Luo Q, Taguchi Y, et al. The sustainable management of giant salamanders (Cryptobranchoidea). Belize: Sustainability America; 2020. p. 46.
Google Scholar
Ewen JG, Soorae PS, Canessa S. Reintroduction objectives, decisions and outcomes: global perspectives from the herpetofauna. Anim Conserv. 2014;17(S1):74–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Illinois Department of Natural Resources IDNR. Illinois comprehensive wildlife conservation plan-strategy. Springfield: State of Illinois; 2005. p. 380.
Google Scholar
Seburn DC, Seburn CNL, Weller WF. A localized decline in the western chorus frog, Pseudacris triseriata, in Eastern Ontario. Can Field Nat. 2008;122(2):158–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Seburn D, Gunson K, Schueler F. Apparent widespread decline of the boreal chorus frog (Pseudacris maculata) in Eastern Ottawa. Can Field Nat. 2014;128:151–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Hebenstreit L. Conservation status of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris illinoensis) in Madison County, Illinois [MSc]. [Edwardsville]: Southern Illinois University Edwardsville; 2018.
Pallua J. What can the mythical frog tell us? The symbolism and role of the frog in history and modernity. Folklore. 2019;77:63–91.
Google Scholar
Kuhnlein H, Humphries M. Traditional animal foods of indigenous peoples of northern North America. The contributions of wildlife diversity to the subsistence and nutrition of indigenous cultures. Montreal: Centre for Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment, McGill University; 2017.
Google Scholar
Carson R. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1962.
Google Scholar
Ellis M. Hollywood frogs [Internet]. KQED. 2017 [cited 2021 Feb 8]. Available from: https://www.kqed.org/perspectives/201601135544/hollywood-frogs.
Environment Canada. Recovery strategy of the western chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata), Great Lakes/St. Lawrence—Canadian Shield population, in Canada. Ottawa: Environment Canada; 2015. p. 53.
Google Scholar
Pough F, Andrews R, Candle J, Crump M, Savitzky A, Wells K. Herpetology. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004.
Google Scholar
Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR, Collins JT, Lee-Yaw JA, Cannatella DC. Phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries and contact zones in the trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;44(3):1068–82.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barrow LN, Ralicki HF, Emme SA, Lemmon EM. Species tree estimation of North American chorus frogs (Hylidae: Pseudacris) with parallel tagged amplicon sequencing. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;75:78–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hedges S. An electrophoretic analysis of Holarctic hylid frog evolution. Syst Biol. 1986;35:1–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Cocroft RB. A cladistic analysis of chorus frog phylogeny (Hylidae: Pseudacris). Herpetologica. 1994;50(4):420–37.
Google Scholar
Da Silva HR. Two character states new for hylines and the taxonomy of the genus Pseudacris. J Herpetol. 1997;31(4):609–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Recuero E, Martínez-Solano I, Parra-Olea G, García-París M. Phylogeography of Pseudacris regilla (Anura: Hylidae) in western North America, with a proposal for a new taxonomic rearrangement. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006;39(2):293–304.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Conant R, Collins J. Peterson field guide: reptiles and amphibians, Eastern/Central North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1998.
Google Scholar
Lannoo M, editor. Amphibian declines: the conservation status of united states species. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005.
Google Scholar
Duellman WE, Marion AB, Hedges SB. Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae). Zootaxa. 2016;4104(1):1–109.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moriarty EC, Cannatella DC. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American chorus frogs (Pseudacris: Hylidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004;30(2):409–20.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR, Collins JT, Cannatella DC. A new North American chorus frog species (Amphibia: Hylidae: Pseudacris) from the south-central United States. Zootaxa. 2008;1675(1):1.
Article
Google Scholar
Frost DR, Lemmon EM, McDiarmid RW, Mendelson JRI. Anura—frogs. In: Crother BI, editor. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th ed. SSAR; 2017. p. 6–21.
Faivovich J, Pereyra MO, Luna MC, Hertz A, Blotto BL, Vásquez-Almazán CR, et al. On the monophyly and relationships of several genera of Hylini (Anura: Hylidae: Hylinae), with comments on recent taxonomic changes in hylids. South Am J Herpetol. 2018;13(1):1.
Article
Google Scholar
Ospina OE, Tieu L, Apodaca JJ, Lemmon EM. Hidden diversity in the mountain chorus frog (Pseudacris brachyphona) and the diagnosis of a new species of chorus frog in the Southeastern United States. Copeia. 2020;108(4):778–95.
Article
Google Scholar
Crother BI. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. SSAR Herpetol Circ. 2017;43:1–102.
Google Scholar
GBIF occurrence download [Internet]. Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF.org). Available from: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.w3hp5u.
Wickham H. Easily install and load the “Tidyverse” [R package tidyverse version 1.3.1] [Internet]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN); 2021 [cited 2021 May 28]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse.
Hijmans RJ. Geographic data analysis and modeling [R package raster version 3.4–10] [Internet]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN); 2021 [cited 2021 May 28]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
Chamberlain S, Oldoni D, Barve V, Desmet P, Geffert L, McGlinn D, et al. Interface to the global “Biodiversity” information facility API [R package rgbif version 3.5.2] [Internet]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN); 2021 [cited 2021 May 28]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgbif.
Perrill SA, Daniel RE. Multiple egg clutches in Hyla regilla, H. cinerea and H. gratiosa. Copeia. 1983;2:513–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Mueller CA, Bucsky J, Korito L, Manzanares S. Immediate and persistent effects of temperature on oxygen consumption and thermal tolerance in embryos and larvae of the Baja California chorus frog, Pseudacris hypochondriaca. Front Physiol. 2019;10:754.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dimitrie D. The effects of two insecticides on California anurans (Rana sierrae and Pseudacris sierra) and the implications for declining amphibian populations. [PhD]. [Illinois]: Southern Illinois University Carbondale; 2010.
Wright A, Wright A. Handbook of frogs and toads of the United States and Canada. 3rd ed. Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Company; 1995.
Google Scholar
Weitzel NH, Panik HR. Long-term fluctuations of an isolated population of the Pacific chorus frog (Pseudacris regilla) in northwestern Nevada. Great Basin Nat. 1993;53:379–84.
Article
Google Scholar
Brown H. Embryonic temperature adaptations of the Pacific treefrog, Hyla regilla. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1975;51:863–73.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gardner J. Natural history notes: Pseudacris regilla (Pacific chorus frog) reproduction. Herpetol Rev. 1995;26:32.
Google Scholar
Marnell LF. Herpetofauna of Glacier National Park. Northwest Nat. 1997;78(1):17–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Hollingsworth B, Roberts K. Pseudacris regilla, Pacific treefrog. San Diego natural history museum field guide [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.sdnhm.org/fieldguide/herps/hyla-reg.html.
Romansic JM, Johnson PTJ, Searle CL, Johnson JE, Tunstall TS, Han BA, et al. Individual and combined effects of multiple pathogens on Pacific treefrogs. Oecologia. 2011;166(4):1029–41.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Taubert D, Shetley P, Philipp D, Harrison T. Breeding biology and distribution of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Illinois. Illinois: Illinois: Illinois Dept. of Conservation: Springfield; 1982. p. 163.
Google Scholar
Butterfield BP, Meshaka WE, Trauth SE. Fecundity and egg mass size of the Illinois chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis (Hylidae), from Northeastern Arkansas. Southwest Nat. 1989;34(4):556.
Article
Google Scholar
Butterfield BP. Age structure and reproductive biology of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) from Northeastern Arkansas [MSc]. [Jonesboro]: Arkansas State University; 1988.
Tucker J, Philipp D. Population status of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison County, Illinois: results of 1996 surveys. Springfield: Unpublished report to Illinois Department of Transportation; 1997.
Tucker JK. Fecundity in the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) from Madison County, Illinois. Trans Ill State Acad Sci. 1997;90:167–70.
Google Scholar
Caldwell JP. Demography and life history of two species of chorus frogs (Anura: Hylidae) in South Carolina. Copeia. 1987;1987(1):114.
Article
Google Scholar
Neill WT. Distributional notes on Georgia amphibians, and some corrections. Copeia. 1957;1957(1):43–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Seyle CW, Trauth SE. Life history notes: Pseudacris ornata (ornate chorus frog). Reproduction. Herpetol Rev. 1982;13:45.
Google Scholar
Bragg AN. Observations on the ecology and natural history of Anura. X. The breeding habits of Pseudacris streckeri Wright and Wright in Oklahoma including a description of the eggs and tadpoles. Wasmann Collect. 1942;5:47–62.
Google Scholar
Fouquette MJ, Littlejohn MJ. Patterns of oviposition in two species of hylid frogs. Southwest Nat. 1960;5(2):92.
Article
Google Scholar
Oplinger CS. Sex ratio, reproductive cycles, and time of ovulation in Hyla crucifer crucifer Wied. Herpetologica. 1966;22(4):276–83.
Google Scholar
Welter WA, Carr K. Amphibians and reptiles of Northeastern Kentucky. Copeia. 1939;1939(3):128–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Carr A. Dates of frog choruses in Florida. Copeia. 1940;1940:55.
Article
Google Scholar
Gosner KL, Rossman DA. Eggs and larval development of the treefrogs Hyla crucifer and Hyla ocularis. Herpetologica. 1960;16:225–32.
Google Scholar
Green N, Pauley T. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1987.
Google Scholar
Martof B. Observations on the life history and ecology of the amphibians of the Athens area, Georgia. Copeia. 1955;1955(3):166–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Harper F. Distribution, taxonomy, nomenclature, and habits of the little tree-frog (Hyla ocularis). Am Midl Nat. 1939;22(1):134–49.
Article
Google Scholar
Kehr AI. Stage-frequency and habitat selection of a cohort of Pseudacris ocularis tadpoles (Hylidae: Anura) in a Florida temporary pond. Herpetol J. 1997;7:103–9.
Google Scholar
Green NB. The Breeding habits of Pseudacris brachyphona (Cope) with a description of the eggs and tadpole. Copeia. 1938;1938(2):79.
Article
Google Scholar
Green NB. A Study of the life history of Pseudacris brachyphona (Cope) in West Virginia with special reference to behavior and growth of marked individuals [PhD]. [Columbus]: Ohio State University; 1952.
Green NB. Postmetamorphic growth in the mountain chorus frog, Pseudacris brachyphona Cope. Proc West Virginia Acad Sci. 1964;36:34–8.
Google Scholar
McClure K. Ecology of Pseudacris brachyphona: a second look [MSc]. [Huntington]: Marshall University; 1996.
Gosner KL, Black IH. Notes on the life history of Brimley’s chorus frog. Herpetologica. 1958;13(4):249–54.
Google Scholar
Blair WF. Calling and spawning seasons in a mixed population of anurans. Ecology. 1961;42(1):99–110.
Article
Google Scholar
Bragg AN. Observations on the ecology and natural history of Anura. XVI. Life history of Pseudacris clarkii (Baird) in Oklahoma. Wasmann Collect. 1943;5:129–40.
Google Scholar
Kennedy JP. Notes on a breeding congress of Pseudacris clarki and Pseudacris nigrita in Harris County, Texas. Herpetologica. 1958;14(4):192.
Google Scholar
Sias J. Natural history and distribution of the upland chorus frog, Pseudacris feriarum Baird, in West Virginia [MSc]. [Huntington]: Marshall University; 2006.
Dodd C. Frogs of the United States and Canada. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013.
Google Scholar
Livezey RL. Some observations on Pseudacris nigrita triseriata (Wied) in Texas. Am Midl Nat. 1952;47(2):372–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Dundee H, Rossman D. The amphibians and reptiles of Louisiana. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press; 1989.
Google Scholar
Dorcas M, Gibbons W. Frogs and toad of the southeast. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2008.
Google Scholar
Gosner KL, Rossman DA. Observations of the reproductive cycle of the swamp chorus frog, Pseudacris nigrita. Copeia. 1959;1959(3):263.
Article
Google Scholar
Mitchell JC, Pague CA. Filling gaps in life-history data: clutch sizes for 21 species of North American anurans. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2014;9:409–20.
Google Scholar
Whiting A. Population ecology of the western chorus frog, Pseudacris triseriata [MSc]. [Quebec]: McGill University; 2004.
Smith H. The amphibians of Kansas. Am Midl Nat. 1934;15:377–528.
Article
Google Scholar
Parmelee J, Knutson M, Lyon J. A field guide to amphibian larvae and eggs of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Washington: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division; 2002. p. 48.
Google Scholar
Varoux M. Optimisation des conditions d’élevage de la Rainette faux-grillon de l’Ouest (Pseudacris triseriata) au Biodôme de Montréal. Montréal: Diplôme Universitaire et Technologique, Génie Biologique, Université d’Avignon; 2015. p. 45.
Google Scholar
Duellman WE, Schwartz A. Amphibians and reptiles of Southern Florida. Bull Florida State Mus. 1958;3:181–324.
Google Scholar
Gibbons J, Semlitsch RD. Guide to the reptiles and amphibians of the Savannah River Site. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 1991.
Google Scholar
Martof BS, Thompson EF. Reproductive behavior of the chorus rrog, Pseudacris nigrita. Behaviour. 1958;13(3/4):243–58.
Google Scholar
Brady M, Harper F. A Florida subspecies of Pseudacris nigrita (Hylidae). Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1935;48:107–10.
Google Scholar
Whitaker JO. A study of the western chorus frog, Pseudacris triseriata, in Vigo County, Indiana. J Herpetol. 1971;5(3/4):127–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Pettus D, Angleton GM. Comparative reproductive biology of Montane and Piedmont chorus frogs. Evolution. 1967;21(3):500–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hecnar S, Hecnar D. Pseudacris triseriata (western chorus frog) reproduction. Herpetol Rev. 1999;30:38.
Google Scholar
Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM. A likelihood framework for estimating phylogeographic history on a continuous landscape. Syst Biol. 2008;57(4):544–61.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
NatureServe. NatureServe Explorer [web application] [Internet]. NatureServe. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 25]. Available from: https://explorer.natureserve.org/.
Somma L. Pseudacris hypochondriaca (Hallowell, 1854): U.S. Geological survey, nonindigenous aquatic species database, Gainesville, FL [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 25]. Available from: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=2781.
AmphibiaWeb. AmphibiaWeb [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 25]. Available from: http://amphibiaweb.org.
Wente WH, Phillips JB. Seasonal color change in a population of Pacific tree frogs (Pseudacris regilla). J Herpetol. 2005;39(1):161–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Resnick LE, Jameson DL. Color polymorphism in Pacific tree frogs. Science. 1963;142(3595):1081–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wente W, Phillips J. Fixed green and brown color morphs and a novel color-changing morph of the Pacific tree frog Hyla regilla. Am Nat. 2003;162:461–73.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Corn PS. Genetic and developmental studies of albino chorus frogs. J Hered. 1986;77(3):164–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
McAlpine D, Gilhen J. Erythrism in spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) in Maritime Canada. Can Field-Nat. 2018;132:43–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells K. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 1977;25:666–93.
Article
Google Scholar
Vitt L, Caldwell JP. Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles. 4th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2014.
Google Scholar
Smith D. Adult recruitment in chorus frogs: effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology. 1987;68:344–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Muths E, Scherer RD, Amburgey SM, Corn PS. Twenty-nine years of population dynamics in a small-bodied montane amphibian. Ecosphere. 2018;9(12):e02522.
Article
Google Scholar
Kissel AM, Tenan S, Muths E. Density dependence and adult survival drive dynamics in two high elevation amphibian populations. Diversity. 2020;12(12):478.
Article
Google Scholar
Oseen KL, Wassersug RJ. Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans. Oecologia. 2002;133(4):616–25.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gray P, Stegall E. Distribution and status of Strecker’s chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri streckeri) in Kansas. Trans Kans Acad Sci. 1986;89(3/4):81.
Article
Google Scholar
Goldberg SR. Notes on reproduction of Strecker’s chorus frog, Pseudscris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae), from Oklahoma. Bull Chic Herpetol Soc. 2020;3:61–3.
Google Scholar
Storer T. A synopsis of the amphibia of California, vol. 27. Berkeley: University of California Publications in Zoology; 1925.
Book
Google Scholar
Stebbins RC. Amphibians of Western North America. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1951.
Book
Google Scholar
Waters D. Geographic distribution: Pseudacris regilla (Pacific treefrog). Herpetol Rev. 1992;23:24–5.
Google Scholar
Blair WF, Littlejohn MJ. Stage of speciation of two allopatric populations of chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Evolution. 1960;14(1):82–7.
Google Scholar
Brown LE. Subterranean feeding by the chorus frog Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica. 1978;34(2):212–6.
Google Scholar
Wells K, Schwartz JJ. The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2007.
Book
Google Scholar
Matthews TC. Genetic changes in a population of boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris triseriata) polymorphic for color. Am Midl Nat. 1971;85(1):208–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Tordoff W, Pettus D. Temporal stability of phenotypic frequencies in Pseudacris triseriata (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). J Herpetol. 1977;11(2):161–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Platz JE, Forester DC. Geographic variation in mating call among the four subspecies of the chorus frog: Pseudacris triseriata (Wied). Copeia. 1988;1988(4):1062–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Duellman WE, Trueb L. Biology of amphibians. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1994.
Google Scholar
Ouellet M, Fortin C, Grimard M-J. Distribution and habitat use of the boreal chorus frog (Pseudacris maculata) at its extreme northeastern range limit. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2009;4:277–84.
Google Scholar
Shulse C, Semlitsch R, Trauth K, Williams A. Influences of design and landscape placement parameters on amphibian abundance in constructed wetlands. Wetlands. 2010;30:915–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Burt CE. Contributions to the herpetology of Texas I. Frogs of the genus Pseudacris. Am Midl Nat. 1936;17(4):770–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Moriarty E, Lannoo M. Pseudacris triseriata complex (including feriarum, kalmi, triseriata, and maculata) striped chorus frog. In: Lannoo MJ, editor. Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005. p. 485–8.
Google Scholar
Wilczynski W, Lynch K. Female sexual arousal in amphibians. Horm Behav. 2011;59:630–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Conant R, Cagle FR, Goin CJ, Lowe CH, Neill WT, Netting MG, et al. Common names for North American amphibians and reptiles. Copeia. 1956;1956(3):172–85.
Google Scholar
Brooke PN, Alford RA, Schwarzkopf L. Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000;49(1):79–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells K. The effects of social interaction on anuran vocal behavior. In: Fritszch B, Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ, Hetherington T, Walkowiak W, editors. The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. New York: Wiley; 1988.
Google Scholar
Bee MA, Cook JM, Love EK, O’Bryan LR, Pettitt BA, Schrode K, et al. Assessing acoustic signal variability and the potential for sexual selection and social recognition in boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata). Ethology. 2010;116(6):564–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Cocroft RB, Ryan MJ. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim Behav. 1995;49(2):283–303.
Article
Google Scholar
Crenshaw JW, Blair WF. Relationships in the Pseudacris nigrita complex in Southwestern Georgia. Copeia. 1959;1959(3):215.
Article
Google Scholar
Vélez A, Guajardo A. Individual variation in two types of advertisement calls of Pacific tree frogs, Hyliola (=Pseudacris) regilla, and the implications for sexual selection and species recognition. Bioacoustics. 2020;2020:1–21.
Google Scholar
Lemmon EM. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution. 2009;63(5):1155–70.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zimmitti SJ. Individual variation in morphological, physiological, and biochemical features associated with calling in spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer). Physiol Biochem Zool. 1999;72(6):666–76.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rosen M, Lemon RE. The vocal behavior of spring peepers, Hyla crucifer. Copeia. 1974;1974(4):940–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Schwartz JJ. Graded aggressive calls of the spring peeper, Pseudacris crucifer. Herpetologica. 1989;45(2):172–81.
Google Scholar
Owen P. The structure, function, and evolution aggressive signals in anuran amphibians [PhD]. [Mansfield]: University of Connecticut; 2003.
Owen PC, Tucker JK. Courtship calls and behavior in two species of chorus frogs, genus Pseudacris (Anura: Hylidae). Copeia. 2006;2006(1):137–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Gerhardt HC, Huber F. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002. p. 552.
Google Scholar
Perrill SA. Male mating behavior in Hyla regilla. Copeia. 1984;1994(3):727–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Roble SM. Observations on satellite males in Hyla chrysoscelis, Hyla picta, and Pseudacris triseriata. J Herpetol. 1985;19(3):432–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Lance S, Wells K. Are spring peeper satellite males physiologically inferior to calling males? Copeia. 1993;1993:1162–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Forester DC. Vocal behavior and mating tactics of the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer): a field exercise in animal behavior. In: Ploger BJ, Yasukawa K, editors. Exploring animal behavior in laboratory and field: an hypothesis-testing approach to the development, causation, function, and evolution of animal behavior. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2003. p. 327–40.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Halliday T, Adler K. Firefly encyclopedia of reptiles and amphibians. Toronto: Firefly Books; 2002.
Book
Google Scholar
Smith R. Mating and oviposition in the Pacific Coast tree toad. Science. 1940;92:379–80.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Trauth SE, Cox RL Jr, Butterfield BP, Saugey DA, Meshaka WE Jr. Reproductive phenophases and clutch characteristics of selected Arkansas amphibians. JAAS. 1990;44:107–13.
Google Scholar
Skelly D. Pond drying, predators, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles. Copeia. 1996;1996:599–605.
Article
Google Scholar
Blaustein L. Oviposition site selection in response to risk of predation: evidence from aquatic habitats and consequences for population and community structure. In: Wasser SP, editor. Evolutionary theory and processes: modern perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1999.
Google Scholar
Buxton VL, Sperry JH. Reproductive decisions in anurans: a review of how predation and competition affects the deposition of eggs and tadpoles. Bioscience. 2017;67(1):26–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Buxton VL, Ward MP, Sperry JH. Frog breeding pond selection in response to predators and conspecific cues. Ethology. 2017;123(5):397–404.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuramoto M. Correlations of quantitative parameters of fecundity in amphibians. Evolution. 1978;32(2):287–96.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lang C. Size-fecundity relationships among stream-breeding hylid frogs. Herpetol Nat Hist. 1995;3:193–7.
Google Scholar
Prado C, Haddad C. Size-fecundity relationships and reproductive investment in female frogs in the Pantanal, south-western Brazil. Herpetol J. 2005;15:181–9.
Google Scholar
Nali RC, Zamudio KR, Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs. Am Nat. 2014;184(6):727–40.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Duffitt AD, Finkler MS. Sex-related differences in somatic stored energy reserves of Pseudacris crucifer and Pseudacris triseriata during the early breeding season. J Herpetol. 2011;45(2):224–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Harding J, Holman J. Michigan frogs, toads, and salamanders: a field guide and pocket reference. East Lansing: Michigan State University Museum; 1992.
Google Scholar
Harkey GA, Semlitsch RD. Effects of temperature on growth, development, and color polymorphism in the ornate chorus frog Pseudacris ornata. Copeia. 1988;1988(4):1001.
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson MT, Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP, Blaustein AR. The direct and indirect effects of temperature on a predator–prey relationship. Can J Zool. 2001;79(10):1834–41.
Google Scholar
Amburgey S, Funk WC, Murphy M, Muths E. Effects of hydroperiod duration on survival, developmental rate, and size at metamorphosis in boreal chorus frog tadpoles (Pseudacris maculata). Herpetologica. 2012;68(4):456–67.
Article
Google Scholar
Wagner W. Tadpoles and Pollen: Observations on the feeding behavior of Hyla regilla larvae. Copeia. 1986;1986:802–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Britson CA, Kissell RE. Effects of food type on developmental characteristics of an ephemeral pond-breeding anuran, Pseudacris triseriata feriarum. Herpetologica. 1996;52(3):374–82.
Google Scholar
Whiles M, Gladyshev M, Sushchik N, Makhutova O, Kalachova G, Peterson S, et al. Fatty acid analyses reveal high degrees of omnivory and dietary plasticity in pond-dwelling tadpoles. Freshw Biol. 2010;55:1533–47.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rittenhouse T, Semlitsch R. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands. 2007;27:153–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Semlitsch R. Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manag. 2008;72:260–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Pechmann J, Estes R, Scott D, Gibbons J. Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands. 2001;21:93–111.
Article
Google Scholar
Brandt BB. The frogs and toads of Eastern North Carolina. Copeia. 1936;1936(4):215–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Kramer DC. Movements of western chorus frogs Pseudacris triseriata triseriata tagged with Co60. J Herpetol. 1973;7(3):231–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Froom B. Amphibians of Canada. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Limited; 1982.
Google Scholar
Storey K, Storey J. Freeze tolerance and intolerance as strategies of winter survival in terrestrially-hibernating amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1986;83A:613–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Storey KB, Storey JM. Persistence of freeze tolerance in terrestrially hibernating frogs after spring emergence. Copeia. 1987;1987(3):720–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Storey K, Storey JM. Freeze tolerance and freeze avoidance in ectotherms. In: Wang LCH, editor. animal adaptation to cold advances in comparative and environmental physiology, vol. 4. Berlin: Springer; 1989.
Google Scholar
Churchill T, Storey K. Organ metabolism and cryoprotectant synthesis during freezing in spring peepers Pseudacris crucifer. Copeia. 1996;1996:517–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Layne JR, Kefauver J. Freeze tolerance and postfreeze recovery in the frog Pseudacris crucifer. Copeia. 1997;1997(2):260–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Croes S, Thomas R. Tolerance and cryoprotectant synthesis of the Pacific tree frog Hyla regilla. Copeia. 2000;2000:863–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Higgins SA, Swanson DL. Urea is not a universal cryoprotectant among hibernating anurans: evidence from the freeze-tolerant boreal chorus frog (Pseudacris maculata). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2013;164(2):344–50.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harper F. A season with Holbrook’s chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata). Am Midl Nat. 1937;18(2):260–72.
Article
Google Scholar
Ashston RE, Ashton PS. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida: part three: the amphibians. Miami: Windward Publishing; 1988.
Google Scholar
Govindarajulu PP, Anholt BR. Interaction between biotic and abiotic factors determines tadpole survival rate under natural conditions. Écoscience. 2006;13(3):413–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Melvin SD, Houlahan JE. Tadpole mortality varies across experimental venues: Do laboratory populations predict responses in nature? Oecologia. 2012;169(4):861–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stanback M. Gambusia holbrooki predation on Pseudacris feriarum tadpoles. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2010;5:486–9.
Google Scholar
Earl JE, Cohagen KE, Semlitsch RD. Effects of leachate from tree leaves and grass litter on tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012;31(7):1511–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kissner J. Amphibians of the Southern Great Plains: habitat and the impacts of temperature and pH on survival [MSc]. Texas Tech University; 2013.
Kramer DC. Viability of the eggs of Pseudacris triseriata (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). J Herpetol. 1978;12(1):119–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith D. Factors controlling tadpole populations of the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) on Isle Royale, Michigan. Ecology. 1983;64:501–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Luja VH, Rodriguez-Estrella R, Schaub M, Schmidt BR. Among-population variation in monthly and annual survival of the Baja California tree frog, Pseudacris hypochondriaca curta, in desert oases of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2015;10:112–22.
Google Scholar
Jameson DL. Growth, dispersal and survival of the Pacific tree frog. Copeia. 1956;1956(1):25–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Jones DK, Dang TD, Urbina J, Bendis RJ, Buck JC, Cothran RD, et al. Effect of simultaneous amphibian exposure to pesticides and an emerging fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(1):671–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tucker JK. Growth and survivorship in the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis). Trans Ill State Acad Sci. 2000;93:63–8.
Google Scholar
Tucker J, Chick J, Szafoni R. The Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris illinoensis) and wetland mitigation: What has worked? Champaign: Division of Ecology and Conservation Science section for Field Stations and Ecosystem Science; 2008. p. 45.
Google Scholar
Tucker J. Early post-transformational growth in the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis). J Herpetol. 1995;29:314–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Blouin MS. Life history correlates of a color polymorphism in the ornate chorus frog, Pseudacris ornata. Copeia. 1989;1989(2):319.
Article
Google Scholar
Jameson DL. Survival of some Central Texas frogs under natural conditions. Copeia. 1956;1956(1):55–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Lykens DV, Forester DC. Age structure in the spring peeper: Do males advertise longevity? Herpetologica. 1987;43:216–23.
Google Scholar
Morin PJ. Functional redundancy, non-additive interactions, and supply-side dynamics in experimental pond communities. Ecology. 1995;76(1):133–49.
Article
Google Scholar
Skelly D. A behavioral trade-off and its consequences for the distribution of Pseudacris treefrog larvae. Ecology. 1995;76:150–64.
Article
Google Scholar
Storrs SI, Kiesecker JM. Survivorship patterns of larval amphibians exposed to low concentrations of atrazine. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(10):1054–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Van Allen BG, Briggs VS, McCoy MW, Vonesh JR. Carry-over effects of the larval environment on post-metamorphic performance in two hylid frogs. Oecologia. 2010;164(4):891–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stewart K, Lougheed S. Testing for intraspecific postzygotic isolation between cryptic lineages of Pseudacris crucifer. Ecol Evol. 2013;3:4621–30.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lawrence S. Feasibility of reintroducing spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer) to their historic range [MSc]. Northern Illinois University; 2018.
Whitehurst PH, Pierce BA. The relationship between allozyme variation and life-history traits of the spotted chorus frog, Pseudacris clarkii. Copeia. 1991;1991(4):1032.
Article
Google Scholar
Rosenberg EA, Pierce BA. Effect of initial mass on growth and mortality at low pH in tadpoles of Pseudacris clarkii and Bufo valliceps. J Herpetol. 1995;29(2):181–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Sours G, Petranka J. Intraguild predation and competition mediate stage-structured interactions between wood frog (Rana sylvatica) and upland chorus frog (Pseudacris feriarum) larvae. Copeia. 2007;2007:131–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Swanson J, Bailey L, Muths E, Funk WC. Factors influencing survival and mark retention in postmetamorphic boreal chorus frogs. Copeia. 2013;2013:670–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Muths EL, Scherer RD, Amburgey SM, Matthews T, Spencer AW, Corn PS. First estimates of the probability of survival in a small-bodied, high-elevation frog (boreal chorus frog, Pseudacris maculata), or how historical data can be useful. Can J Zool. 2016;94:599–606.
Article
Google Scholar
Whiting A. Factors affecting larval growth and development of the boreal chorus frog Pseudacris maculata [PhD]. [Alberta]: University of Alberta; 2010.
Hossack B, Puglis H, Battaglin W, Anderson C, Honeycutt R, Smalling K. Widespread legacy brine contamination from oil production reduces survival of chorus frog larvae. Environ Pollut. 2017;231:742–51.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Davis RA, Lohr CA, Roberts JD. Frog survival and population viability in an agricultural landscape with a drying climate. Popul Ecol. 2019;61(1):102–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Messerman A, Semlitsch R, Leal M. Estimating survival for elusive juvenile pond-breeding salamanders. J Wildl Manag. 2020;84:562–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt B. Monitoring the distribution of pond-breeding amphibians when species are detected imperfectly. Aquat Conserv. 2005;15:681–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Mazerolle MJ, Bailey LL, Kendall WL, Royle JA, Converse SJ, Nichols JD. Making great leaps forward: accounting for detectability in herpetological field studies. J Herpetol. 2007;41(4):672–89.
Article
Google Scholar
Bainbridge L, Stockwell M, Valdez J, Klop-Toker K, Clulow S, Clulow J, et al. Tagging tadpoles: retention rates and impacts of visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags from the larval to adult amphibian stages. Herpetol J. 2015;25:133–1408.
Google Scholar
Fouilloux C, Garcia-Costoya G, Rojas B. Visible implant elastomer (VIE) success in early larval stages of a tropical amphibian species. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9630.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Courtois EA, Lelong C, Calves O, Loyau A, Schmeller DS. The use of visible implant alpha tags for anuran tadpoles. Herpetol Rev. 2013;44:230–3.
Google Scholar
Trauth JB, Trauth SE, Johnson RL. Best management practices and drought combine to silence the Illinois chorus frog in Arkansas. Wildl Soc Bull. 2006;34(2):514–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Frías-Alvarez P, Zúñiga-Vega JJ, Flores-Villela O. A general assessment of the conservation status and decline trends of Mexican amphibians. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19(13):3699–742.
Article
Google Scholar
SARA. Species at Risk Act. 2002.
Bonin J, Galois P. Report on the situation of the western chorus frog (Pseudacris maculata) in Quebec. Wildlife and Habitats Directorate: Quebec; 1996. p. 39.
Google Scholar
Tardif B, Lavoie G, Lachance Y. Québec biodiversity atlas. Threatened or vulnerable species. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, Direction du développement durable, du patrimoine écologique et des parcs; 2005. p. 60.
Google Scholar
Bogart J, Taylor E, Boles R. Western chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) and boreal chorus frog (P. maculata): clarification concerning the wildlife species listed under SARA in light of recent taxonomic interpretations. Canada: Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting (November 22–26, 2015) of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada; 2015 p. 5.
Rogic A, Tessier N, Noël S, Gendron A, Branchaud A, Lapointe F-J. A “trilling” case of mistaken identity: call playbacks and mitochondrial DNA identify chorus frogs in Southern Quebec (Canada) as Pseudacris maculata and not P. triseriata. Herpetol Rev. 2015;46:1–7.
Google Scholar
US ESA. Endangered Species Act. 1983.
Henning B, Hinz L. Conservation guidance for species in greatest need of conservation (SGNC)—INHS technical report 2016 (09). Champaign: Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Heritage; 2016. p. 54.
Google Scholar
Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Endangered and threatened amphibians [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www2.illinois.gov/dnr/conservation/NaturalHeritage/Pages/Amphibians.aspx.
Wingert HE. Amphibian declines during a 50-year period in south central Pennsylvania. J Pa Acad Sci. 2018;92(2):136–52.
Google Scholar
Mitchell J, Breisch A, Buhlmann K. Habitat management guidelines for amphibians and reptiles of the Northeastern United States. Montgomery: Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation; 2006.
Google Scholar