Open Access

β carbonic anhydrase is required for female fertility in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Leo Syrjänen1, 2, 3,
  • Susanna Valanne1Email author,
  • Marianne Kuuslahti1, 2,
  • Tea Tuomela1,
  • Ashwin Sriram1, 4,
  • Alberto Sanz1, 4,
  • Howard T. Jacobs1, 5, 6,
  • Mika Rämet1, 7, 8 and
  • Seppo Parkkila1, 2, 9
Contributed equally
Frontiers in Zoology201512:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-015-0111-3

Received: 17 June 2015

Accepted: 12 August 2015

Published: 22 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze the reversible hydration reaction of carbon dioxide. CAs are present as six structurally divergent enzyme families: α, β, γ, δ, ζ and η. β-CAs have a wide distribution across different species including invertebrates. Previously, we showed that Drosophila melanogaster β-CA is a highly active mitochondrial enzyme. In this study, we investigated the function of Drosophila β-CA by silencing the expression of the β-CA gene using UAS/GAL4-based RNA interference (RNAi) in Drosophila in vivo.

Results

Crossing β-CA RNAi lines over ubiquitous Actin driver flies did not produce any viable progeny, indicating that β-CA expression is required for fly development. RNAi silencing of β-CA ubiquitously in adult flies did not affect their survival rate or function of mitochondrial electron transport chain. Importantly, β-CA RNAi led to impaired reproduction. All β-CA knockdown females were sterile, and produced few or no eggs. Whole ovaries of knockdown females looked normal but upon cadherin staining, there was an apparent functional defect in migration of border cells, which are considered essential for normal fertilization.

Conclusions

These results indicate that although Drosophila β-CA is dispensable for survival of adult flies, it is essential for female fertility.

Background

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) are metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible hydration reaction of carbon dioxide according to the following equation: CO2 + H2O ↔HCO3  + H+ [1]. This reaction catalyzed by CAs is fundamental in the regulation of acid–base balance in living organisms. In addition, this reaction is involved in many physiological processes such as gluconeogenesis and ureagenesis, and it also helps to remove carbon dioxide out of tissues [1].

To date, six different classes of CAs have been identified: α, β, γ, δ, ζ and η [2, 3]. The three major classes α, β and γ are widely distributed among living organisms. On the other hand, the ζ-CAs are found only in diatoms, and the δ-CAs in diatoms and other marine phytoplankton. The novel group of CAs, namely η-CAs, was only recently discovered from malaria causing protozoan organisms of the genus Plasmodium. Of different CA-classes, β-CAs seems to be the class with the widest distribution. β-class CAs have been characterized throughout the tree of life. These enzymes are found in most species belonging to the Archaea and Bacteria domains and additionally probably all species of fungi and plants among domain Eukarya [4]. However, β-CAs are not present in in humans or other vertebrates [5].

β-CAs were first characterized in two metazoan organisms, namely the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster [5], which possesses one β-CA, CAHβ (with annotation symbol CG11967, flybase number FBgn0037646, also called DmBCA [5]) and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [6], which possesses two β-CAs, one of which seems to be inactive. There have been no studies focusing on the biological function of β-CA in D. melanogaster. Fasseas and coworkers found no phenotypic changes in C. elegans when they performed RNAi experiments by feeding [6]. Recently, another β-CA was characterized from the protozoan parasite Leishmania and the effects of different CA-inhibitors were tested in vitro and also against living parasites in vivo. One of the studied compounds was a Schiff’s base type bromoderivative, which was a very efficient inhibitor of β-CA both in vitro and in vivo. Addition of this compound into growth medium containing living Leishmania parasites led to intracellular damages and death of the parasites [7]. Hence, it seems that β-CA is an essential enzyme for survival of Leishmania parasites.

The physiological roles of β-CAs are poorly understood, especially in invertebrate animal species having this gene. However, in some organisms β-CA has a support role for enzymes that utilize or dispose of CO2 or HCO3 . One example of such an enzyme is ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) [8]. Even though D. melanogaster β-CA was characterized four years ago, the physiological significance of this enzyme has remained unclear. Here we have investigated the function of Drosophila β-CA utilizing RNA interference (RNAi) -mediated gene silencing in both developing and adult flies. We show that β-CA is needed for proper border cell migration in the developing egg and is therefore essential for egg fertilization.

Results

Ubiquitous silencing of β-CA causes lethality in Drosophila during development

Crossing two independent β-CA RNAi lines (#100233 and #38612, referred to as β-CA RNAi1 and β-CA RNAi2, respectively) over ubiquitous ActGAL4/CyOy + flies did not produce viable progeny of the phenotype indicative of β-CA dsRNA expression, implying that silencing of β-CA is lethal during fly development. In order to bypass developmental defects and to analyze the significance of β-CA expression for adult Drosophila, we used the inducible GeneSwitch-tubulin-GAL4 (GS-tub-GAL4) driver line for β-CA silencing. The Gene Switch system allows selective expression of the hairpin construct in a chosen time of development, via addition of the inducing agent, Mifepristone (RU-486, hereafter Mif), in the fly food. Therefore, genetically identical siblings from a cross can be used as experimental flies (induction with Mif) and controls (no induction), which eliminates potential concerns regarding genetic background effects. Therefore, after eclosion, F1 progeny (β-CA RNAi/GS-tub-GAL4) flies were placed in Mif-containing food for β-CA silencing in the adults, and control siblings were placed in food without Mif. Firstly, the efficacy of gene silencing in β-CA RNAi flies crossed over GS-tub-GAL4 and treated with Mif was analyzed using qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 1, both RNAi lines showed effective silencing when crossed over GS-tub-GAL4 and induced with Mif. In β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 males the level of gene expression was 35 ± 6 % from that of control males without Mif induction, and in females 69 ± 16 % when compared to control females without induction. With β-CA RNAi2/GS-tub-GAL4 flies the values were 39 ± 8 % and 65 ± 4 %. These data indicate that Mif induced RNAi can be used to analyze the importance of β-CA expression in adult flies.
Fig. 1

β-CA gene expression level is reduced in RNAi knockdown flies (+Mif) compared to control flies (−Mif). β-CA RNAi lines were crossed over the GS-tub-GAL4 line and the eclosed F1 generation progeny was grown for 6 days at +29 °C in food with Mif (knockdown flies, +Mif) or without Mif (control flies, −Mif). Total RNA was extracted from 3 x 3–5 females and males of the lines indicated. Results are shown as % of expression of the control lines, which were normalized to 100 % each. ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001. β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 females ctrl vs. RNA-induced: t stat = 3.63, df = 9; β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 males ctrl vs. RNA-induced: t stat = 12.15, df = 9; β-CA RNAi2/GS-tub-GAL4 females ctrl vs. RNA-induced: t stat = 6.13, df = 10; β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 males ctrl vs. RNA-induced: t stat = 7.48, ds = 10.

β-CA expression is required for female fertility in Drosophila

To evaluate whether β-CA expression is required for survival of adult flies, β-CA RNAi flies were crossed to GS-tub-GAL4 and monitored for survival after introduction to a Mif-containing diet. During 15 days follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in survival between β-CA knockdown flies and controls: 90 % of β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 F1 progeny flies were alive, while the percentage of live flies was 96 % in the control group. In the β-CA RNAi2/GS-tub-GAL4 group the values were 92 % and 93 %, respectively (Fig. 2). This indicates that β-CA knockdown has no effect on the fly survival during the 15 day follow-up time, but does not exclude lifespan differences that may appear during later life. However, the analysis of fertility indicated that the egg laying capacity of Mif-induced β-CA RNAi/GS-tub-GAL4 females was severely reduced. In one representative experiment performed, 50 female knockdown flies were kept together with 30 control w 1118 males, and the flies did not lay a single egg within four days. Occasionally, a very low number of eggs were seen (Additional file 1: Table S1; 0–5 daily), but the eggs did not hatch. On the contrary, eggs, larvae and adult flies were found in all other cross combinations (Additional file 1: Table S1). In vials containing control w 1118 females and β-CA RNAi/GS-tub-GAL4 males, adult flies eclosed. This result implicated that β-CA has an essential function for the female fertility in Drosophila. Of note, fertility of female flies was restored by the second day after transferring the flies onto normal food. Thus, the effect on fertility was reversible.
Fig. 2

Fly survival is not impaired upon knockdown of β-CA expression. β-CA RNAi 1 and β-CA RNAi 2 lines were crossed over GS-tub-GAL4. β-CA RNAi 1 /GS-tub-GAL4 flies (n = 385) and β-CA RNAi 2 /GS-tub-GAL4 flies (n = 504) were collected and grown in food vials containing 400 μM Mif for 15 days. Flies from the same crosses were collected and used as controls by growing them in food vials without Mif (n = 81 and n = 80, respectively). The number of dead flies was recorded daily

Mitochondrial oxygen consumption

Since we have shown earlier that β-CA is a mitochondrial protein [5], we decided to assess whether silencing of β-CA gene expression affects mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Upon knockdown of β-CA we observed a female sterile phenotype (Additional file 1: Table S1); it has been recently shown that mutations in mitochondrial proteins cause general sterility in flies by dysfunction of the electron transport chain (ETC.) [9]. Moreover, complementation of the respiratory phenotype can rescue this and other associated phenotypes [9]. Using high resolution respirometry [10] we measured if mitochondrial respiration in whole fly preparations was affected upon knockdown of the β-CA gene. We did not observe any significant differences using complex I- (pyruvate + proline), complex III- (sn-glycerol-3-phosphate) or complex IV-linked (ascorbate + TMPD) substrates in the presence of ADP (Fig. 3a). Additionally, mitochondrial density, measured by the citrate synthase assay, was not altered by β-CA RNAi (Fig. 3b). In conclusion, ubiquitous silencing of the β-CA gene in adult flies did not affect the mitochondrial oxygen consumption in whole flies.
Fig. 3

β-CA RNAi does not alter mitochondrial function in fruit flies. a Mitochondrial oxygen consumption (nmol O2/s mg protein) from female and male Drosophila flies using P + Pr + ADP (CI + III + IV), G3P (CIII + IV) and Ascorbate + TMPD (CIV) as substrates. Number of experiments (n) per group is indicated, data are shown as the mean ± SEM. b) Mitochondrial density measured as citrate synthase activity (UNITS mg/ml of mitochondrial protein) shown as the mean ± SEM from 8 replicate experiments. ADP - Adenosine diphosphate; G3P - Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; P – pyruvate; Pr – proline; TMPD - N,N,N',N'-Tetramethyl-p-Phenylenediamine dichloride

β-CA RNAi causes delayed migration of border cells in Drosophila oogenesis

Because we discovered that silencing of β-CA causes female sterility by almost completely abolishing the egg laying capacity, we hypothesized that β-CA knockdown might cause a functional defect in the ovaries. To test this hypothesis, we exposed one to two-day old β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 and β-CA RNAi2/GS-tub-GAL4 female flies to Mif-containing diet to silence β-CA expression. Flies from the same crosses without Mif were used as controls. At day four, flies were exposed to males to facilitate egg production and after 6 days, ovaries from β-CA RNAi/GS-tub-GAL4 knockdown and control flies were dissected. Ovaries were immunostained with DCAD2 antibody and observed under Carl Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. DCAD2 antibody stains DE-cadherin in border cells, which are a group of somatic cells that migrate at stage 9 during Drosophila oogenesis. Border cells arise and detach from the monolayer follicular epithelium, and they invade and migrate between the nurse cells towards the oocyte. Border cells were so named because they end up on the border between nurse cells and oocyte at early stage 10 [11]. A cartoon of a normal, early stage 10 developing egg is shown in Fig. 4a. Representative images of early stage 10 developing oocytes in β-CA knockdown (+Mif) and control (−Mif) ovaries are shown in Fig. 4b (β-CA RNAi1 line) and 4c (β-CA RNAi2 line). The results clearly indicate that border cell migration was delayed in β-CA knockdown cells compared to controls. At early stage 10, border cells reached the border of the developing oocyte in controls, but in many of the knockdown ovaries the border cells were still under migration and located between the nurse cells. 14/36 β-CA RNAi1/GS-tub-GAL4 early stage 10 knockdown oocytes showed delayed border cell migration, whereas in all 18 control oocytes analyzed, the border cells had already reached the border of the developing oocyte. The phenotype was weaker but visible also with the β-CA RNAi2/GS-tub-GAL4 flies, where 7/27 knockdown oocytes showed delayed border cell migration compared to 26 controls, in all of which the movement of border cells was normal.
Fig. 4

RNAi-mediated silencing of β-CA expression causes delayed border cell migration in Drosophila oogenesis. a A cartoon naming the cells involved in the development of an early stage 10 egg. b & c) Migration of DCAD2-labeled border cells towards the developing oocyte is delayed in β-CA knockdown early stage 10 eggs (white arrows) compared to controls (dashed white arrows). b) Developing eggs from β-CA RNAi 1 /GS-tub-GAL4 control and knockdown flies, c) Developing eggs from β-CA RNAi 2 /GS-tub-GAL4 control and knockdown flies

We conclude that silencing β-CA expression in Drosophila females causes delayed border cell migration during oogenesis, which contributes to the sterility of the female β-CA knockdown flies.

Discussion

Our results show that β-CA is essential for D. melanogaster reproduction. RNAi-mediated silencing of the β-CA gene caused sterility of females. When Drosophila ovaries were examined from both control and RNAi flies, it was found that RNAi flies had disturbances in border cell migration during oogenesis. Previously it has been shown that defective border cell migration leads to sterility of female flies due to impaired formation of the micropyle which is needed in fertilization [12, 13]. Additionally, even mature virgin Drosophila females should spontaneously ovulate at low rate (~1 egg/day) [14], but the knockdown flies typically did not lay any eggs in our study (Additional file 1: Table S1). The mechanism by which oocytes are released from the Drosophila ovary is unknown. The absence of β-CA possibly affects the physiological conditions of the ovulatory tract so that ovulation does not occur. Expression of β-CA has been studied in a publicly available DNA microarray dataset: in FlyAtlas (http://flyatlas.org/atlas.cgi?name=CG11967-RA website, [15]) β-CA expression levels are provided for 17 adult and 8 larval D. melanogaster tissues. The highest upregulated β-CA expression levels in adult flies are found in spermatheca (female), fat body, and heart. The spermatheca is a sperm storage organ, and it is possible that, in addition to disturbances in border cell migration and to the possible effect on ovulation, female sterility upon β-CA knockdown is related to the function of spermatheca. Also, it is interesting that the reduced fertility of β-CA knockdown flies is reversible once β-CA gene expression is no longer silenced. This may be related to the fact that RNAi does not fully remove gene function but drastically lowers the β-CA expression dose, which is sufficient to cause the phenotype, but is reversible once normal gene expression is restored.

Although phenotypes caused by β-CA silencing (lethality during development and sterility in adult flies) are reminiscent of the ones caused by mitochondrial dysfunction [9], we did not detect alterations in electron transport chain (ETC.) functions. In the past, we have found that reduction in mitochondria respiration causes sterility, whereas complementation of the respiratory defect rescues it [9, 10, 16]. Here, the sterile phenotype was not associated with a reduction in respiration indicating a more subtle alteration in mitochondrial function.

Human isozymes CA IX and XII have been linked to tumor invasiveness and migration [17, 18]. It has been suggested that CAs facilitate cell migration by low pH-induced activation of matrix metalloproteinases [19]. Notably, these CA enzymes are membrane-bound, whereas β-CA is mitochondrial. Because HCO3 does not readily diffuse across the mitochondrial membrane, the impaired movement of border cells probably results from disturbances in biosynthetic pathways. Interestingly, a mitochondrial β-CA has been shown to be important in the sexual reproduction of filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospore [20]. In the presence of β-CA gene mutation cas2, vegetative growth, fruiting-body development and ascospore germination were affected, and the double mutant strain cas1/2 was completely sterile. In S. macrospore, cas2 was shown to be mitochondrial while other two β-CAs cas1 and cas3 were cytoplasmic. Defects caused by the lack of cas2 could be partially compensated by elevated carbon dioxide levels in addition to overexpression of cas1, cas3, or a non-mitochondrial cas2 variant. It was depicted that there may be a functional connection between β-CAs and adenylyl cyclase. In this way, the cAMP signaling may be affected. However, this is related to carbon dioxide and bicarbonate sensing in fungi and therefore cannot be directly related to signaling pathways in animals.

The effect of mitochondrial CA function has been tested in mammals. In a recent study, the roles of CA VA and VB were examined in mice with targeted mutagenesis [21]. During the study it was found CA VA null mice were smaller than wild-type mice and bred poorly. However, when sodium-potassium citrate-supplemented water was given, the production of offspring was normal. Blood ammonia concentrations of CA VA null mice were elevated, but fasting blood sugar levels were normal. On the other hand, CA VB null mice showed normal growth, normal blood ammonia levels as well as normal fasting blood sugar levels. CA VA/B double-knockout (DKO) mice showed additional abnormalities. Impairment of growth and hyperammonemia were more severe than for CA VA null mice. DKO animals reproduced less than predicted despite of supplemented sodium-potassium citrate in their drinking water. Additionally, survival after weaning was reduced, especially for males. Moreover, fasting blood glucose levels for DKO mice were significantly lower compared to controls. Clearly, these enzyme deficiencies in mice (and probably other vertebrates) are not lethal but cause significant metabolic problems and also have effects on breeding.

Fasseas and coworkers performed CA RNAi studies with C. elegans [6]. Two β-CA genes were found: bca-1 and y116a8c.28. Of these, the latter was shown to encode for an active enzyme. In normal conditions, the authors found some phenotypes, like slow growth rates, but they were unable to consistently reproduce the effects, and the conclusion was that visible phenotype was not found. The level of gene silencing was not reported; it is possible that the level of silencing was not sufficient. On the other hand, it is possible that some other CA might compensate the loss of β-CA function. In addition to the results of this study, our recent findings on Leishmania parasites indicate that the enzyme is essential for invertebrates and protozoans [7].

D. melanogaster β-CA is a mitochondrial enzyme as are most of the other Dipteran β-CAs [22]. It is plausible that findings in D. melanogaster can be generalized also to the other Dipteran species which act commonly as disease vectors. These species include the malaria mosquito Anopheles and the yellow fever mosquito Aedes. In light of this, inhibitors against these enzymes could also be used to restrict the spread of various diseases.

Conclusions

Thus far the physiological role of invertebrate β-CAs has been unclear. Our study indicates that the β-CA function is not vitally important for adult D. melanogaster since β-CA RNAi had no effect on survival, although the enzyme was required during development. However, β-CA is essential for reproduction. Our study suggests that disturbance of β-CA function leads to abnormal border cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis. Previously it has been shown that defective border cell migration leads to sterility of female flies due to impaired formation of micropyle which is needed in fertilization. Vertebrates do not possess β-class CAs, but these enzymes are widespread throughout the phylogeny of life on Earth. This makes them exciting new targets for parasitic drug development. Indeed, β-CAs are found in many pathogenic organisms and pathogen vectors of the animal kingdom and protozoans, including the Leishmania parasites, the malaria mosquito Anopheles, and the yellow fever mosquito Aedes. Our study shows that invertebrate β-CAs are indeed important enzymes, which encourages further studies on anti-parasitic drug development. Since interference of β-CA function seems to cause sterility of female flies, this feature could be used in controlling the amount of insects that cause or distribute harmful diseases.

Methods

Generation of β-CA knockdown flies

Two different β-CA RNAi lines were obtained from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC) from KK and GD collections with the following IDs: #100233 (hereafter referred to as β-CA RNAi 1 ) and #38612 (hereafter referred to as β-CA RNAi 2 ) [23]. These stocks have been generated to overexpress a dsRNA hairpin construct, specific to the β-CA gene under upstream activation sequence (UAS) control. When these flies are crossed over a GAL4 activator protein expressing line, β-CA gene is silenced in the tissue where GAL4 protein is expressed [24]. For ubiquitous RNAi-mediated silencing, β-CA RNAi lines were crossed over the Actin-GAL4 line or a Mifepristone-inducible Geneswitch-tub5-GAL4 line [25].

RNA extraction

β-CA RNAi lines were crossed over the GS-tub-GAL4 line and the eclosed F1 generation progeny were grown for 6 days at +29 °C in food with 400 μM Mif (knockdown flies) or without Mif (control flies). The flies were transferred into new food vials once during the period. RNA extractions were made as triplicates for both sexes: for each line, 3 x 3–5 females and males were used. RNA extraction was done using TRI Reagent® Solution (Ambion), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR)

qRT-PCR was performed with the above mentioned extracted total RNAs to quantify the level of gene silencing. Also RNA extracted from the GS-tub-GAL4 line was tested by qRT-PCR to identify possible leakiness of the tubulin driver. PCR reactions were performed in MicroAmp optical 96-well reaction plates using a SYBR-Green PCR master mix kit (Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primers for qRT-PCR were designed using Primer Express Software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems). The forward primer used in the reaction for β-CA gene expression was 5’-GACAAGGGAGCAAATGGTCAA-3’ and the reverse primer was 5’-TCTACTGTCCATGCAGGTGAAGAA-3’. The β-CA amplicon size was 88 bp. The reaction was carried out in an ABI PRISM 7000 Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The data were analyzed with ABI PRISM 7000 SDS software and normalized to the RpL32 housekeeping gene. The forward primer used for RpL32 was 5’-GGTTACGGATCGAACAAGCG-3’ and the reverse primer was 5’-TTCTGCATGAGCAGGACCTC-3’. The RpL32 amplicon size was 101 bp. The final results were expressed as % of expression of the control lines, which were normalized to 100 % each, as described in [26].

Survival study

To study the effect of the β-CA gene knockdown on the survival rate of flies, the β-CA RNAi 1 and β-CA RNAi 2 lines were crossed over GS-tub-GAL4. Eclosed, one day old β-CA RNAi 1 /GS-tub-GAL4 flies and β-CA RNAi 2 /GS-tub-GAL4 flies were collected and grown in mixed-sex groups in food vials containing 400 μM Mif for 15 days. Flies from the same crosses were collected and used as controls by growing them in food vials without Mif. The number of dead flies was recorded daily.

Fly fertility

To study the fertility of D. melanogaster β-CA knockdown flies, the β-CA RNAi 1 /GS-tub-GAL4 and β-CA RNAi 2 /GS-tub-GAL4 eclosed flies were collected and placed at +29 °C in normal food (control) or food containing 400 μM Mif (β-CA RNAi induced) for six days. w 1118 control flies were kept in the same conditions. Thereafter the flies were mated with flies from the same cross or with w 1118 control flies, in different combinations (Additional file 1: Table S1). Fertility was followed up to 15 days.

Additionally, the possible reversibility of fly fertility was studied by providing normal food to the previously mentioned flies after 6 days. The flies were put into new vials daily to find out when their fertility was restored.

Measurement of mitochondrial oxygen consumption by high-resolution respirometry

Whole fly homogenates from β-CA RNAi 1 /GS-tub-GAL4 and β-CA RNAi 2 /GS-tub-GAL4, grown with or without Mif for six days, were used for respirometry measurements. Twenty flies were homogenized in MIB (250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4) and filtered before immediately being used in an OROBOROS O2k oxygraph (Oroboros Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria). Homogenates were incubated in assay buffer (120 mM KCl, 5 mM KH2PO4, 3 mM Hepes, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 % BSA, pH 7.2) at 25 °C. Experiments were performed according to the previously described protocol [10]. Values were normalized to protein concentration as calculated by the Bradford method.

Mitochondrial density measurements via the citrate synthase assay

Approximately 40–60 flies were immobilised on ice and then transferred to a chilled mortar. The flies were homogenised in 500 μl of ice-cold mitochondria isolation medium (250 mM sucrose, 5 mM Tris–HCl, 2 mM EGTA), and the homogenate was filtered through cheesecloth. Then, an additional 500 μl of the mitochondria isolation medium containing 1 mM DTT was added, and the samples were frozen at −80 °C overnight. Next, the samples were defrosted, and 50 μl of the sample was diluted 1:5 in mitochondria isolation medium containing 1 mM PMSF. The remainder of the sample was used to isolate mitochondria as described elsewhere [27]. The mitochondria were subsequently diluted 1:4 in mitochondria isolation buffer containing 1 mM PMSF. Measurements were performed in a 96-well plate, in which 182 μl of fresh reaction buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) and 2.5 mM EDTA), 2 μl of 30 mM acetyl-CoA and 2 μl of 10 mM DTNB were added to each well. Finally, the samples (either the whole homogenate or isolated mitochondria) were added. The reaction was initiated by adding 10 μl of 10 mM oxaloacetate (OAA), and the linear increase in absorbance at 412 nm was followed for 3–4 min using a PerkinElmer EnVision 2104 plate reader. Blanks were made from the same samples without the addition of OAA and then measured. Mitochondrial density was calculated by dividing the specific citrate synthase activity measured in the whole-fly homogenates by the specific citrate synthase activity measured in isolated mitochondria.

Dissection, staining and examination of ovaries

One to two-day old female β-CA RNAi 1 /GS-tub-GAL4 and β-CA RNAi 2 /GS-tub-GAL4 flies were placed at +29 °C in normal food (control) or food containing 400 μM Mif (β-CA RNAi induced) for six days. Flies were moved to fresh food with or without Mif every two days. On day four, male Oregon R flies were added to induce egg production of the females. On the 6th day, the knockdown and control females were anesthetized on a CO2 pad and the ovaries were dissected.

The dissected ovaries were transferred in 0.5 ml tubes containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed using 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min at +4 °C and rinsed 2x with PBS 0.3 % Triton (PBT). Ovaries were washed 2x 15 min in PBT containing 0.5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA), incubated overnight with the DCAD2 primary antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa, USA, 1:20) in PBT-BSA, rinsed 2x with PBT and washed again 2 x 15 min in PBT-BSA. Incubation with the secondary Goat anti-rat antibody (AlexaFluor 488 conjugate, Life Technologies, 1:1000) in PBT-BSA was carried out for 2 h at RT. Ovaries were rinsed again 2x in PBT and washed 3x 15 min in PBT. DAPI (final conc. 1 μg/ml, Sigma) was added to the second last wash. After the final wash, ovaries were placed in 70 % glycerol for at least 30 min at +4 °C, and then transferred in Vectashield Mounting medium (Vector Laboratories).

Prior to microscopy, the ovaries were put on microscope slides, the egg chambers separated using a sharpened wire and the samples mounted and sealed using cover slips and nail varnish. Ovaries were examined and imaged using the Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope with 20x objective. Early stage 10 developing eggs were distinguished from earlier developmental stages based on the shape of the follicle cells surrounding the developing oocyte (see Fig. 4a and [28] Fig. 1b). Images are snap-shots of the focal plane of each developing oocyte where border cells are visible.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis of β-CA gene expression in control and knockdown flies by qRT-PCR was carried out using Student’s t-test for two samples assuming equal variances. Statistical analysis of fly survival experiments was carried out in Prism 6 (GraphPad) using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. High resolution respirometry data were analyzed with Prism 6 (GraphPad) using the unpaired Student’s T-test. The level of statistical significance was established as p < 0.05.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC, http://stockcenter.vdrc.at) for providing the β-CA RNAi lines. Drosophila GS-tub-GAL4 line was a kind gift from Dr Scott Pletcher. The DCAD2 polyclonal antibody developed by Tadashi Uemura was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at the University of Iowa, USA. We thank Professor Sarah Bray in the University of Cambridge, UK, for ovary dissection and staining methods.

Funding

This study has been supported by funds from The Academy of Finland (MR, SP, HTJ and A. Sanz), European Research Council (A. Sanz), Jane & Aatos Erkko Foundation (MR and SP), Sigrid Juselius Foundation (MR and SP) and FinMIT Centre of Exellence and Academy professorship funding (HTJ). This study was also supported by the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital (MR and HTJ), Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Oulu University Hospital (MR) and the Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (MR).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
BioMediTech, University of Tampere
(2)
School of Medicine, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital
(3)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Central Finland Central Hospital
(4)
Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing Health, Newcastle University
(5)
Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki
(6)
Tampere University Hospital
(7)
Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital
(8)
PEDEGO Research Center, Medical Research Center Oulu, and Department of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital
(9)
Fimlab Laboratories Ltd

References

  1. Sly WS, Hu PY. Human carbonic anhydrases and carbonic anhydrase deficiencies. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:375–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zimmerman SA, Ferry JG. The beta and gamma classes of carbonic anhydrase. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:716–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Del Prete S, Vullo D, Fisher GM, Andrews KT, Poulsen SA, Capasso C, et al. Discovery of a new family of carbonic anhydrases in the malaria pathogen Plasmodium falciparum--the eta-carbonic anhydrases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:4389–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hewett-Emmett D. Evolution and distribution of the carbonic anhydrase gene families. EXS. 2000;90:29–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Syrjänen L, Tolvanen M, Hilvo M, Olatubosun A, Innocenti A, Scozzafava A, et al. Characterization of the first beta-class carbonic anhydrase from an arthropod (Drosophila melanogaster) and phylogenetic analysis of beta-class carbonic anhydrases in invertebrates. BMC Biochem. 2010;11:28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasseas MK, Tsikou D, Flemetakis E, Katinakis P. Molecular and biochemical analysis of the beta class carbonic anhydrases in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Rep. 2009;38:1777–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Syrjänen L, Vermelho AB, de Almeida RI, Corte-Real S, Salonen T, Pan P, et al. Cloning, characterization and inhibition studies of a beta carbonic anhydrase from Leishmania donovani chagasi, the protozoan parasite responsible of leishmaniasis. J Med Chem. 2013;56:7372–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Majeau N, Coleman JR. Effect of CO2 Concentration on Carbonic Anhydrase and Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Expression in Pea. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:569–74.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vartiainen S, Chen S, George J, Tuomela T, Luoto KR, O'Dell KM, et al. Phenotypic rescue of a Drosophila model of mitochondrial ANT1 disease. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7:635–48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kemppainen KK, Rinne J, Sriram A, Lakanmaa M, Zeb A, Tuomela T, et al. Expression of alternative oxidase in Drosophila ameliorates diverse phenotypes due to cytochrome oxidase deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:2078–93.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rorth P. Initiating and guiding migration: lessons from border cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:325–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Montell DJ. Border-cell migration: the race is on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:13–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Montell DJ, Rorth P, Spradling AC. slow border cells, a locus required for a developmentally regulated cell migration during oogenesis, encodes Drosophila C/EBP. Cell. 1992;71:51–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Heifetz Y, Lung O, Frongillo Jr EA, Wolfner MF. The Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp26Aa stimulates release of oocytes by the ovary. Curr Biol. 2000;10:99–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet. 2007;39:715–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen S, Oliveira MT, Sanz A, Kemppainen E, Fukuoh A, Schlicht B, et al. A cytoplasmic suppressor of a nuclear mutation affecting mitochondrial functions in Drosophila. Genetics. 2012;192:483–93.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Svastova E, Hulikova A, Rafajova M, Zat'ovicova M, Gibadulinova A, Casini A, et al. Hypoxia activates the capacity of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase IX to acidify extracellular pH. FEBS Lett. 2004;577:439–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Parkkila S, Rajaniemi H, Parkkila AK, Kivela J, Waheed A, Pastorekova S, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor suppresses invasion of renal cancer cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:2220–4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinez-Zaguilan R, Seftor EA, Seftor RE, Chu YW, Gillies RJ, Hendrix MJ. Acidic pH enhances the invasive behavior of human melanoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1996;14:176–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Elleuche S, Poggeler S. Beta-carbonic anhydrases play a role in fruiting body development and ascospore germination in the filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora. PLoS One. 2009;4, e5177.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shah GN, Rubbelke TS, Hendin J, Nguyen H, Waheed A, Shoemaker JD, et al. Targeted mutagenesis of mitochondrial carbonic anhydrases VA and VB implicates both enzymes in ammonia detoxification and glucose metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:7423–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zolfaghari Emameh R, Barker H, Tolvanen ME, Ortutay C, Parkkila S. Bioinformatic analysis of beta carbonic anhydrase sequences from protozoans and metazoans. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:38.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature. 2007;448:151–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993;118:401–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernandez-Ayala DJ, Sanz A, Vartiainen S, Kemppainen KK, Babusiak M, Mustalahti E, et al. Expression of the Ciona intestinalis alternative oxidase (AOX) in Drosophila complements defects in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 2009;9:449–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29, e45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanz A, Soikkeli M, Portero-Otin M, Wilson A, Kemppainen E, McIlroy G, et al. Expression of the yeast NADH dehydrogenase Ndi1 in Drosophila confers increased lifespan independently of dietary restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:9105–10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schonbaum CP, Perrino JJ, Mahowald AP. Regulation of the vitellogenin receptor during Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:511–21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Syrjänen et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement