- Open Access
Development of the excretory system in a polyplacophoran mollusc: stages in metanephridial system development
© Baeumler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 10 May 2012
- Accepted: 3 September 2012
- Published: 14 September 2012
Two types of excretory systems, protonephridia and metanephridial systems are common among bilaterians. The homology of protonephridia of lophotrochozoan taxa has been widely accepted. In contrast, the homology of metanephridial systems – including coelomic cavities as functional units – among taxa as well as the homology between the two excretory systems is a matter of ongoing discussion. This particularly concerns the molluscan kidneys, which are mostly regarded as being derived convergently to the metanephridia of e.g. annelids because of different ontogenetic origin. A reinvestigation of nephrogenesis in polyplacophorans, which carry many primitive traits within molluscs, could shed light on these questions.
The metanephridial system of Lepidochitona corrugata develops rapidly in the early juvenile phase. It is formed from a coelomic anlage that soon achieves endothelial organization. The pericardium and heart are formed from the central portion of the anlage. The nephridial components are formed by outgrowth from lateral differentiations of the anlage. Simultaneously with formation of the heart, podocytes appear in the atrial wall of the pericardium. In addition, renopericardial ducts, kidneys and efferent nephroducts, all showing downstream ciliation towards the internal lumen, become differentiated (specimen length: 0.62 mm). Further development consists of elongation of the kidney and reinforcement of filtration and reabsorptive structures.
During development and in fully formed condition the metanephridial system of Lepidochitona corrugata shares many detailed traits (cellular and overall organization) with the protonephridia of the same species. Accordingly, we suggest a serial homology of various cell types and between the two excretory systems and the organs as a whole. The formation of the metanephridial system varies significantly within Mollusca, thus the mode of formation cannot be used as a homology criterion. Because of similarities in overall organization, we conclude that the molluscan metanephridial system is homologous with that of the annelids not only at the cellular but also at the organ level.
- Metanephridial system
- Coelomic cavities
Body cavities together with the functionally related nephridial systems are among the most discussed character complexes in the organization of molluscs[1, 2]. Within bilaterians (lophotrochozoans in particular) two main types can be recognized: (1) Acoelomate and pseudocoelomate conditions are correlated with protonephridia. Here ciliary activity of the terminal cell (cyrtocyte or solenocyte) causes ultrafiltration from the primary body cavity through a basal membrane and an ultrafiltration weir into the lumen of the protonephridial duct, which releases the primary filtrate (often with modification) to the external environment. (2) In coelomate animals ultrafiltration is mainly mediated by contractions of muscles (located at the walls of the vascular system - even inside of "podocytes") from the remainders of the primary body cavity (often "blood vessels") into the secondary body cavity. The so-called metanephridia are the releasing tubes, which are often provided with a ciliary funnel at the distal end and usually modify the primary urine. Contrary to protonephridia the locations of ultrafiltration site and modification tube are largely separated.
While there is wide agreement on the homology of protonephridia (e.g.), there are opposing concepts on the homology of metanephridia (metanephridial systems). Firstly, there is the question of the homology between protonephridia and metanephridial systems. Based on the functional continuum between the two systems[2, 5], Haszprunar suggested a direct homology of protonephridial and metanephridial ultrafiltration cells, i.e. the terminal cell with the podocyte. The second question concerns the homology between metanephridial systems of different phyla: Here most authors favour homoplasy[4, 7–12]. This particularly applies to the Mollusca, where a homology of their metanephridia with those of other lophotrochozoans, such as annelids, had been rejected mainly because of differences in development[12, 13].
The fully developed metanephridial excretory system of polyplacophorans, such as Lepidochitona corrugata, is situated at the posterior region of the animal (Figure1). It is composed of the heart being surrounded by the pericardium, paired renopericardial ducts, paired kidneys and paired efferent nephroducts. Accordingly, the excretory and the pericard/heart complex are closely intertwined in structure and function. As reviewed by Morse & Reynolds ultrafiltration takes place from the haemocoel of the heart atria into the pericardial lumen by podocytes which are part of the epithelium of the pericardium covering the walls of the atria[19, 20]. The ultrafiltrate (i.e. the primary urine) becomes transported by heart activity or by ciliary beat in the renopericardial ducts from the pericardial lumen towards the kidneys. Here the primary urine becomes modified by reabsorption and drained off by the efferent nephroducts and the kidney opening into the mantle groove.
Overview of development
In Lepidochitona corrugata the development of the metanephridial system is a rapid process. It starts soon after settlement, when the animals have reached a length of about 0.4 mm, and is largely completed at a length of about 0.62 mm with achievement of full functionality. Thereafter, mainly increase in size takes place by allometric growth. The development of the metanephridia and the central pericard/heart complex occurs almost simultaneously, thus the processes leading to the formation of individual components are interlocked. Individual processes proceed continuously until finished, for better understanding alone we categorize four successive stages: (1) Appearance of an initial coelomic anlage that gives rise to all major components of the metanephridial system; (2) differentiation of this common anlage to the unpaired anlage of pericardium plus heart and to the paired anlagen of renopericardial ducts, kidneys and efferent nephroducts; (3) achievement of functional nephridial organization; (4) final differentiation towards adult organization.
Stage 1 - initial anlage (spms 3, 3a, 4)
Stage 2 – differentiation of the nephridial components (spms 5, 6, 7)
The anlagen of the remaining components of the metanephridial system are antero-laterally attached to the anlage of heart and pericardium (Figures4A, B, C,5A,6A). There are three regions distinguishable in each of the paired structures (Figure4C, D): The most conspicuous one is placed adjacent to the pericardial anlage, which is followed by a somewhat smaller middle portion and a thin elongate tube leading laterally above the lateral nerve cord towards the mantle groove. These three parts correspond to the future renopericardial duct, the kidney and the efferent nephroduct. From their origin in the antero-ventro-lateral wall of the pericardium and heart anlage, the anlage of the renopericardial duct extends anteriorly for a short distance and then bends posteriorly again. It merges ventro-posteriorly with the anlage of the kidney; the anlage of the efferent nephroduct emerges from the kidney anlage laterally. The efferent nephroduct runs laterally towards the mantle groove, tightly dorsally surrounding the lateral nerve cord (Figure4C, D) and showing a blind end in a short distance from the body surface. All portions contain an internal narrow lumen (Figures4D,5C–E,6C, D) that is continuous with that of the pericardial and heart anlage (Figure6C). The lumen of the efferent nephroduct is extremely narrow (Figure5E) and shows some cilia (Figures5D, E,6C, D). The ciliary bases are continuously distributed all over the length of the internal surface of the entire nephridial anlage from the opening into the pericardial anlage to the end of the efferent nephroduct. In cross sections the number of cilia ranges between eight (Figure5D) and three (Figure5E) with the number decreasing towards the distal end of the efferent nephroduct. At this stage all cells of the nephridial anlagen are connected by apical adhaerens junctions next to the lumen. All components are distinctly different from the pericardium and heart anlage in histology. The anlagen of the renopericardial duct and kidney are conspicuous, while the one of the efferent nephroduct forms a thin hollow tissue extension. The tissue of the prospective renopericardial duct is very dense with large cuboid cells and little granular cell plasma containing few mitochondria in addition to the densely arranged nuclei (Figures5D,6C). The cells of the kidney primordium are somewhat smaller. At this stage they already exhibit vacuoles (Figures5D,6C), which constitutes a first sign of differentiation towards future kidney histology. Mitotic activity is still evident in the anlagen (Figure6C).
Stage 3 – achievement of nephridial organization (spms 8, 9)
Near the region of the ultrafiltration sites, the renopericardial duct emerges from the pericardium (Figure8B). From this site each duct bends backwards and after a short distance turns for- and outwards. It then turns down- and backwards before it enters the kidney (Figure7E). In this development stage the duct comprises a narrow tube with a narrow lumen. Cilia are originating from the entire inner surface; all these cilia extend towards the kidney. In cross sections of the duct the number of cilia is about 50 and thus highest next to the pericardium and decreases subsequently to four in proximity to the kidney. The diameter also decreases with distance from the pericardium (external diameter near the pericardium: 14 μm, near the kidney: 6 μm; lumen width near the pericardium: 5 μm, near the kidney 2 μm).
The kidney itself is an elongate organ. It extends from the junction with the renopericardial duct, underneath and adjacent to the latter posteriorly towards the heart, where it bends laterally until it merges into the efferent nephroduct. It is relatively voluminous and slightly laterally compressed (height x width maximum: 50 x 20 μm). The epithelium of the kidney is composed of large cells with capacious vacuoles with a diameter up to 10 μm (Figure8C). The remaining cytoplasm is very dense and contains numerous often elongate mitochondria. In addition, there is an abundance of dark, roundish vesicles of varying size and unknown nature (Figure8C, D). Internally the kidney contains a narrow indented lumen (Figure8C, D). Numerous microvilli protrude from the inner cell surfaces into this lumen. In addition few cilia can be found. Most of the cilia originate from the renopericardial duct cells, but some also from the kidney cells. The entire basal (external) portion of the kidney cells bears a dense basal infolding system (thickness up to 1 μm); the basement membrane of the kidney cells forms numerous infoldings (Figure8C, E) resembling a microvillous border.
The efferent nephroduct extends laterally from the kidney towards the mantle groove (Figure7A, E). It is a simple tube with thin walls. In cross sections it is composed of three to four cells. The most proximal part was mostly found widened (lumen diameter up to 10 μm) and may function for temporary urine storage. The lumen in the remaining portion is very narrow to as low as 2 μm near the nephropore. The cells of the efferent nephroduct are ciliated on the inside. The number of cilia in cross sections increases towards the nephropore (from four to ten). All cilia extend towards the nephropore; some ciliary tips protrude into the mantle groove. The cells, which form the nephropore, differ from the surrounding epidermal cells by their cell plasma, which is distinctly less electron dense.
Except for the heart, which has mesenchymate organization, the entire tissue of the metanephridial system has endothelial character. All cells are apically interconnected by adhaerens junctions.
Stage 4 – final differentiation towards adult organization (spms 10–16)
After a length of 620 μm had been reached development of the metanephridial system primarily consists of reinforcement of filtration and reabsorptive structures. Most obvious is the size increase of nephridial structures relative to the remaining body of the animal by allometric growth (Figure7B–D, F, G).
In a 753 μm long specimen (spm 10) the ciliation of the renopericardial duct has distinctly been enforced. There are nearly 250 cilia in the renopericardial duct next to the opening in the pericardium visible (Figure9C). The ultrafiltration sites at the base of the atria (Figure9G–I) are much more conspicuous.
Particularly evident during further development is the growth of the kidneys. This can take place asymmetrically (Figure7C). In specimen with 1.159 mm (spm 14) body length both kidneys already extend further anteriorly than to the middle of the animal (Figure7D). The kidneys also start forming out-pouchings. In addition, the transition of the renopericardial ducts towards the kidneys becomes strongly shifted during development (Figure7A–D). At a length of 621 μm the renopericardial ducts run forwards and turn backwards before entering the kidney. By elongation of the kidney the site of transition becomes shifted to the dorsal side. During further development the relative length of the renopericardial ducts is decreasing, since growth of the kidneys continues while the renopericardial ducts hardly grow anymore.
Comparison with previous data on molluscan nephrogenesis
Previous reports on nephrogenesis are restricted to only four of eight molluscan classes: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda and Polyplacophora.
Data on Gastropoda are scarce and differ considerably: The anlagen of kidneys and pericardia are reported to be paired (e.g.: Patella) or unpaired (: Marisa), to be separate (e.g.: Viviparus) or common (e.g.[22, 24]: Marisa). The descriptions agree on the fact, that initially solid anlagen next to the hindgut give rise to kidney and pericardium. In gastropods the renopericardial complex is differentiated prior to metamorphosis[21, 25, 26].
Renopericardial development of Bivalvia has been investigated by a number of studies, but they date back between 80 and 130 years (e.g.[27–32]). These studies can be summarized as follows: Paired, solid anlagen give rise to kidneys, pericardium and (later) gonads. Kidney differentiation with formation of a lumen precedes that of the heart; the kidney becomes tube-like and gets in contact with the epidermis and, thereby, forms a porus to the outside; most of the remaining initial anlage gives rise to the prospective pericardium; the two sides subsequently fuse in the sagittal plane to form the unpaired pericardium and heart.
Cephalopoda show a highly derived mode of development. Data on renopericardial ontogeny are limited to Sepia, Loligo and Octopus[33–37], where kidney development with formation of a lumen distinctly precedes that of the pericardium. From the onset of pericardium differentiation, there is a detectable connection to the kidney, which becomes the future renopericardial duct.
Information about nephrogenesis of the Polyplacophora is scarce. In a study on general development of Acanthochiton discrepans Hammarsten and Runnström report the kidneys to be formed as outgrowth of the preformed pericardium; they subsequently get in contact with the epidermis and form a nephroporus. The more recent studies by Bartolomaeus and Salvini-Plawen & Bartolomaeus on Lepidochitona cinerea added ultrastructural details on pericardium and heart development. In this study observations are restricted to three stages (250, 550 and 1000 μm length). Whereas we can confirm the principle mode of development in Lepidochitona (i.e. outgrowth of the releasing duct from the pericardium with minimal support from the ectoderm), we note a number of differences in the details of nephrogenesis: Concerning the first anlage at about 550 μm body length, Bartolomaeus and Salvini-Plawen & Bartolomaeus described a paired anlage of the pericardium epithelial tubes left and right from the rectum with already differentiated podocytes and cilia. In contrast our study shows an unpaired mass of cells which differentiate towards an epithelial cavity lacking ultrafiltration cells (podocytes). In a specimen with about 1 mm body length Bartolomaeus described a large pericardium with heart and caudally emerging pericardioducts with blind endings in the body wall. In our specimens of this size the whole metanephridial system is fully developed and shows nephropores, and the pericardioducts emerge relatively far anterior on the sides of the pericardium.
Both species, Lepidochitona cinereus and L. corrugata, are closely related, nevertheless heterochronic effects, i.e. shifts in the timing of nephrogenesis, cannot be fully excluded. On the other hand we based our study on 16 specimens of varying stages of nephrogenesis, whereas the former study investigated specimens of different stages only. Accordingly, studies on the nephrogenesis of further species, in particular of representatives of the Lepidopleurida, appear necessary to proceed towards inference of a ground pattern of nephrogenesis in the Polyplacophora.
Inference of homology always is a matter of probabilities and even identical genetic background of a phenotypic subject does not solve the matter i.e. "homocracy" structures;. All homologization is comparison, and various hierarchical levels need to be clearly distinguished[40, 41]. Concerning the excretory systems the levels to be considered are; (1) Iterative homology of ultrafiltration cells, i.e. the protonephridial cyrtocyte with the metanephridial podocyte; (2) Serial homology of larval protonephridia with adult metanephridial system; (3) Supraspecific homology of both systems among the Mollusca and beyond. Current understanding of the modular organization of the genome makes it possible to consider homologies (similarities based on shared gene expression) independently from synapomorphies (appearance of characters at the phylogenetic tree).
Proto- and metanephridial system in Lepidochitona corrugata:
The (developing) metanephridial system resembles the protonephridia of Lepidochitona corrugata in several aspects: (1) Both organ systems start most internally with ultrafiltration sites. These are followed by a transportation duct, then a modification portion, and finally an efferent duct, which opens via a pore to the outside. Nematodes or arthropods have principally different excretory structures, so this similarity is not trivial. (2) In both cases epithelial ultrafiltration cells filter molecules from the primary (haemocoel) to a secondary (endothelial) body cavity. (3) The fine structure of the ultrafilter itself is identical and complex; it is composed of meandering slits, which form gaps between pedicle elements, and these gaps are interconnected by a thin diaphragm. (4) The transportation duct following the ultrafiltration portion shows dense downstream ciliation. (5) Both organs exhibit an absorptive portion, the kidney, which has identical cellular organization with basal infoldings, apical microvillous border and strongly vacuolized cytoplasm. Again the case of vertebrate kidney shows that this similarity is not trivial.
The two systems also exhibit differences:
(1) Ultrafiltration of protonephridia is done by terminal cells, while it is carried out by podocytes in the case of metanephridia. Essentially, the difference between these two cell types is presence (terminal cells) and absence (podocytes) of ciliation. Nevertheless, a homology between these cell types appears likely , since intermediate forms have been reported, e.g. the "cyrtopodocytes" in the amphioxus Branchiostomma and do occur also in early juvenile bivalves (Ruthensteiner et al. unpubl.). In addition, both types do occur subsequently during ontogeny in certain polychaetes (e.g. ). The finding of a cilium in a podocyte of Lepidochitona corrugata – remarkably the first report of a podocyte bearing a cilium in a mollusc – lends substantial support to this concept.
(2) In the metanephridial system filtration pressure is (partly) generated by heart beat, while it is (partly) generated by the ciliation of terminal cells in protonephridia. However, this difference seems to be of limited significance, since in both systems a major part of negative pressure generation is facilitated by the same structures, the downstream ciliation of the excretory duct (see [43, 44] for review of molluscan metanephridial systems).
In conclusion, we assume that there is substantial homology between the protonephridial and metanephridial system in Lepidochitona at least at the cellular level. For Lepidochitona it seems possible that the metanephridial system as a whole is a serial homologue of the protonephridial system. However, the overall data are still fragmentary and do not permit a final clarification of that question. For example, it remains unclear if the absorptive portions (kidneys) of protonephridia are homologous throughout the Mollusca.
Proto- and metanephridial systems in molluscs and related taxa:
The current evolutionary understanding of nephridial systems in the Mollusca is as follows:
(1) Protonephridia: There is wide agreement that a single pair of anteriorly placed, larval protonephridia ("head-kidneys" sensu , "archinephridia" sensu  of polychaetes) is a synapomorphic organ system at least for Trochozoa (i.e. Entoprocta, Mollusca, Sipuncula, and Annelida; doubtfully also Nemertinea) [4, 5, 9, 47] and thus plesiomorphic for the Mollusca (see also ).
(2) Metanephridial system: Salvini-Plawen (e.g. [11–13, 48–50]) considered metanephridial nephroducts ("kidneys") to be evolved within the Mollusca at the evolutionary level of Testaria (Polyplacophora and Conchifera). These "emunctoria" are interpreted as specialized portions of previously undifferentiated "pericardioducts", which originally lack a function in excretion. Salvini-Plawen provides two main reasons for his hypothesis: (a) the absence of an ultrafiltration/reabsorption (metanephridial) system in aplacophoran molluscs; (b) the non-homology with excretory organs of other phyla, such as the metanephridia of annelids. However, both arguments seem doubtful: (ad a) TEM findings suggest regular metanephridial function also among aplacophorans: Podocytes were described from the pericardium of both aplacophoran taxa, Solenogastres  and Caudofoveata , providing evidence for ultrafiltration. Morphological evidence for reabsorption has been reported in the caudofoveate Falcidens crossotus: Cells of the lower pericardial ducts (releasing also the gametes) exhibit all ultrastructural characteristics of absorptive cells including a distinct basal infolding system (Figure 23 G of ). Accordingly, a metanephridial system probably also exists in Solenogastres. (ad b) Salvini-Plawen (e.g. ) and Salvini-Plawen & Bartolomaeus ( , also ) also rejected a homology between molluscan and annelid/sipunculan metanephridia by assumed different germ layer origin and different mode of formation: While the molluscan kidneys are a mesodermal outgrowth of the pericardium, the annelid kidneys are formed as ingrowth of ectodermal epidermis. However, there are molluscs showing metanephridial anlagen without a connection to a pericardium  and there are certain annelids (e.g. [55, 56]) where metanephridia descend from the coelothelium of the previously formed coelomic pouches (see also ). Thus, because of the variability in nephrogenesis of both, Mollusca and Annelida this reasoning cannot be upheld. Also the second argument against homology of molluscan and annelid nephridia is weak at least: Molluscs lack a funnel at the beginning of the nephroduct as found in annelids . However, a funnel is just an outbulging opening of the metanephridial duct into a voluminous coelomic cavity. Again, annelids vary in this respect, and particularly those with a restricted coelomic cavity, such as some leeches, lack a funnel too .
Accordingly, and based on substantial similarities in fine-structure, we think that a metanephridial system consisting of terminal podocytes at the pericardial walls (ultrafiltration site), a renopericardial duct (transport and generation of pressure by cilia), and a nephroduct ("kidneys": reabsorption) belongs to the basic pattern of the Mollusca and is homologous with those of other trochozoan phyla.
Admittedly, the data basis for these assumptions is still poor. Further comprehensive studies with a 4-dimensional approach (3D-analysis of successive development stages) on nephridial organs of more molluscan taxa and other invertebrates are required for a better understanding of the questions on homology and synapomorphy raised above and thus on the framework of evolution of filtration excretory organs among Metazoa.
The metanephridial system of the polyplacophoran Lepidochitona corrugata is formed from a coelomic anlage that gives also rise to the central pericard/heart complex. Lateral outgrowths of this anlage form the kidneys and nephroducts that get in contact with the body surface. Because of similarities in overall organization and because of the variability of nephrogenesis in both Mollusca and Annelida, we conclude that the molluscan metanephridial system is homologous with that of the annelids not only at the cellular but also at the organ level.
During development and in adult organization the metanephridial system of the polyplacophoran Lepidochitona corrugata shares many detailed traits with the protonephridia of the same species. In both cases, there are most distal ultrafiltration sites; downstream they are followed by a duct supplied with reabsorptive portions (kidneys) and an efferent duct leading towards the body surface. The histology of individual portions is identical. This suggests there is a serial homology of various cell types and between the two excretory systems. It might even be argued that there is the same kind of homology between the two organ systems as a whole.
Juvenile specimens of the chiton Lepidochitona corrugata (Reeve, 1848) were collected near the Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-sur-Mer (France). Details for specimen acquisition and the subsequent fixation, embedding and light microscopical (LM) procedures were provided previously[14, 59].
Specimens investigated with methods applied in addition to LM serial section examination
Specimen number (spm)
Number of LM sections used for subsequent TEM sectioning
Computerized 3D analysis (Amira software)
SR, total specimen
SR, metanephridial region
SR, metanephridial region
aligned 3D stack
SR, total specimen
SR, metanephridial region
SR, total specimen
aligned 3D stack
SR, total specimen
aligned 3D stack
SR, total specimen
1.5 μm / 1.0 μm
SR, total specimen
SR, metanephridial region
SR, total specimen
Protocols for TEM analysis as well as 3D-analysis and -visualization were also provided previously[14, 59]. Preparation of the interactive 3D-model (Additional file1) essentially followed the procedures outlined in Ruthensteiner & Heß.
We thank E. Lodde (Zoologische Staatssammlung München) and H. Gensler (LMU Munich) for invaluable support at various laboratory procedures, Dr. Beckmann and his working group (LMU Munich) for permission to use the TEM and the GeoBioCenter of the LMU Munich for providing a license of the Software AMIRA. This work was supported by a grant from the German Science Foundation (DFG, grant number: RU-895/4-1).
- Bartolomaeus T, Quast B: Structure and development of nephridia in Annelida and related taxa. Hydrobiologia. 2005, 535: 139-165. 10.1007/s10750-004-1840-z.Google Scholar
- Ruppert EE, Smith PR: The functional organization of filtration nephridia. Biol Rev. 1988, 63: 231-258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Storch V, Hermann K: Podocytes in the blood vessel linings of Phoronis muelleri (Phoronoida, Tentaculata). Cell Tissue Res. 1978, 190: 553-556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt-Rhaesa A: The Evolution of Organ Systems. 2007, Oxford: Oxford Univ PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith PR, Ruppert EE: Nephridia. Microfauna Marina. 1988, 4: 231-262.Google Scholar
- Haszprunar G: The molluscan rhogozyte (pore-cell, Blasenzelle, cellule nucale), and its significance for ideas on nephridial evolution. J Moll Stud. 1996, 62: 185-211. 10.1093/mollus/62.2.185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T: Ultrastructure and development of the nephridia in Anaitides mucosa (Annelida, Polychaeta). Zoomorphology. 1989, 109: 15-32. 10.1007/BF00312180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T: Ultrastructure and relationship between protonephridia and metanephridia in Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida). Zoomorphology. 1989, 109: 113-122. 10.1007/BF00312317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T, Ax P: Protonephridia and metanephridia - their relation within the Bilateria. Z zool Syst Evolut-forsch. 1992, 30: 21-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C: Animal Evolution. Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. 1995, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Salvini-Plawen L: Zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Mollusken: Die Beziehung der Caudofoveata und der Solenogastres als Aculifera, als Mollusca und als Spiralia. Z wiss Zool. 1972, 184: 205-394.Google Scholar
- Salvini-Plawen L: Annelida and Mollusca - a prospectus. Microfauna Marina. 1988, 4: 383-396.Google Scholar
- Salvini-Plawen L, Bartolomaeus T: Mollusca: Mesenchymata with a "coelom". Body cavities: function and phylogeny. Edited by: Lancaveggia G, Valvassori R, Candia MD. 1995, Modena: Selected Symposia and Monographs U.Z.I, 75-92.Google Scholar
- Baeumler N, Haszprunar G, Ruthensteiner B: Development of the excretory system in the polyplacophoran mollusc, Lepidochitona corrugata: The protonephridium. J Morph. 2011, 272: 972-986. 10.1002/jmor.10964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haszprunar G: Is the Aplacophora monophyletic? A cladistic point of view. Am Malacol Bull. 2000, 15: 115-130.Google Scholar
- Vinther J, Sperling EA, Briggs DEG, Peterson KJ: A molecular palaeobiological hypothesis for the origin of aplacophoran molluscs and their derivation from chiton-like ancestors. Proc R Soc. 2012, B279 (1732): 1259-1268.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hammarsten OD, Runnström J: Zur Embryologie von Acanthochiton discrepans (Brown). Zool Jb Anat. 1926, 47: 261-318.Google Scholar
- Morse MP, Reynolds PD: Ultrastructure of the heart-kidney complex in smaller classes supports symplesiomorphy of molluscan coelomic characters. Origin and Evolutionary Radiation of the Mollusca. Edited by: Taylor JD. 1996, Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, 89-97.Google Scholar
- Okland S: The heart ultrastructure of Lepidopleurus asellus (Spengler) and Tonicella marmorea (Fabricius) (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Zoomorphology. 1980, 96: 1-19. 10.1007/BF00310073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okland S: Ultrastructure of the pericardium in chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora), in relation to filtration and contraction mechanisms. Zoomorphology. 1981, 97: 193-203. 10.1007/BF00310276.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith FGW: The development of Patella vulgata. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond. 1935, B225: 95-125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Demian ES, Yousif F: Embryonic development and organogenesis in the snail Marisa cornuarietis (Mesogastropoda, Ampullariidae). III. Development of the circulatory system. Malacologia. 1973, 12: 175-194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Otto H, Tönniges C: Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung von Paludina vivipara. Z wiss Zool. 1906, 80: 411-514. pls 22–27Google Scholar
- Fernando W: The development of the kidney in Ampullaria (Pila) gigas. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 1931, 101: 745-750. pls 1–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bickell LR, Chia FS: Organogenesis and histogenesis in the planktotrophic veliger of Doridella steinbergae (Opisthobranchia: Nudibranchia). Mar Biol. 1979, 52: 291-313. 10.1007/BF00389071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bickell LR, Kempf SC: Larval and metamorphic morphogenesis in the nudibranch Melibe leonina (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia). Biol Bull. 1983, 165: 119-138. 10.2307/1541359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fernando W: The origin and development of the pericardium and kidneys in Ostrea. Proc Roy Soc Lond. 1931, B107: 391-397. pls 29–32View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harms W: Postembryonle Entwicklungsgeschichte der Unioniden. Zool Jb Anat. 1909, 28: 325-368. pls 13–16Google Scholar
- Herbers K: Entwicklungsgeschichte von Anodonta cellensis Schröt. Z wiss Zool. 1914, 108: 1-174.Google Scholar
- Meisenheimer J: Die Entwicklung von Herz, Pericard, Niere und Genitalzelle bei Cyclas im Verhältnis zu den übrigen Mollusken. Z wiss Zool. 1901, 69: 415-428. pl 29Google Scholar
- Meisenheimer J: Entwicklungsgeschichte von Dreissensia polymorpha. Z wiss Zool. 1901, 69: 1-137. pls 1–13Google Scholar
- Ziegler HE: Die Entwicklung von Cyclas cornea Lam. (Sphaerium corneum L.). Z wiss Zool. 1885, 41: 525-569. pls 27–28Google Scholar
- Boletzky S: Untersuchungen über die Organogenese des Kreislaufsystems von Octopus vulgaris Lam. Rev Suisse Zool. 1968, 75: 765-812.Google Scholar
- Boletzky S: Ontogenetic and phylogenetic aspects of the cephalopod circulatory system. Experientia (Basel). 1987, 43: 478-483. 10.1007/BF02143575.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faussek V: Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der Cephalopoden. Mitth Z Stat Neapel. 1900, 14: 83-236. pls 6–10Google Scholar
- Marthy H-J: Die Organogenese des Cölomsystems von Octopus vulgaris Lam. Rev Suisse Zool. 1968, 75: 723-763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naef A: Die Organogenese des Cölomsystems von Loligo. Jena Z Naturwiss. 1909, 45: 221-266.Google Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T: Die Leibeshöhlenverhältnisse und Nephridialorgane der Bilateria - Ultrastruktur, Entwicklung und Evolution. 1993, Habilitationsschrift: Georg-August-Universität GöttingenGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C, Martinez P: Patterns of gene expression: homology or homocracy?. Dev Genes Evol. 2003, 213: 149-154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ereshefsky M: Homology thinking. Biol Philos. 2012, 27: 381-400. 10.1007/s10539-012-9313-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haszprunar G: The types of homology and their significance for evolutionary biology and phylogenetics. J Evol Biol. 1992, 5: 13-24. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5010013.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hasse C, Rebscher N, Reiher W, Sobjinski K, Moerschel E, Beck L, Tessmar-Raible K, Arendt D, Hassel M: Three consecutive generations of nephridia occur during development of Platynereis dumerilii (Annelida, Polychaeta). Dev Dyn. 2010, 239: 1967-1976. 10.1002/dvdy.22331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrews EB: Excretory system of molluscs. The Mollusca Vol.11: Molluscan Form and Function. Edited by: Trueman ER, Clarke MR. 1988, London: Acad Press, 381-448.Google Scholar
- Potts WTW: Excretion in molluscs. Biol Rev. 1967, 42: 1-41. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1967.tb01337.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T: Ultrastructure of the protonephridia in larval Magelona mirabilis (Spionida) and Pectinaria auricoma (Terebellida): Head kidneys in the ground pattern of the Annelida. Microfauna Marina. 1995, 10: 117-141.Google Scholar
- Woltereck R: Beitrag zur praktischen Analyse der Polygordius-Entwicklung nach dem "Nordsee"- und dem "Mittelmeer-typus". I. Der für beide Typen gleichlaufende Entwicklungsabschnitt: vom Ei bis zum jüngsten Trochophorastadium. Roux’s Arch Entw-Mech Org. 1904, 18: 377-403. pls. 22–23Google Scholar
- Nielsen C: Trochophora larvae: Cell-lineages, ciliary bands, and body regions. 1. Annelida and Mollusca. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol). 2004, 302B: 35-68. 10.1002/jez.b.20001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salvini-Plawen L: Origin, phylogeny and classification of the phylum Mollusca. Iberus (1990). 1991, 9: 1-33.Google Scholar
- Salvini-Plawen L: On the phylogenetic significance of the aplacophoran Mollusca. Iberus. 2003, 21: 67-97.Google Scholar
- Salvini-Plawen L: Significance of the Placophora for molluscan phylogeny. Venus. 2006, 65: 1-17.Google Scholar
- Reynolds PD, Morse MP, Norenburg J: Ultrastructure of the heart and pericardium of an aplacophoran mollusc (Neomeniomorpha): evidence for ultrafiltration of blood. Proc Roy Soc Lond. 1993, B 254 (1340): 147-152.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tscherkassky M: Zur Ultrastruktur der Caudofoveata (Mollusca, Aculifera) unter spezieller Berücksichtigung des Gonopericards und des Pallialraumes. 1993, Wien: Dissertation an der Formal- und Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität WienGoogle Scholar
- Scheltema AH, Tscherkassky M, Kuzirian AM: Chapter 2, Aplacophora. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. Volume 5: Mollusca I. Edited by: Harrison FW, Kohn AJ. 1994, New York: Wiley-Liss, 13-54.Google Scholar
- Altnöder A, Haszprunar G: Larval morphology of the brooding clam Lasaea adansonii (Gmelin, 1791) (Bivalvia, Heterodonta, Galeommatoidea). J Morph. 2008, 269: 762-774. 10.1002/jmor.10623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bunke D: Early development of metanephridia in the caudal budding zone of a clitellate annelid, Dero digitata (Naidida): an electron-microscopical study. Acta Zool. 2003, 84: 87-97. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2003.00128.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyer A: Die Entwicklung der Nephridien und Gonoblasten bei Tubifex rivulorum LAM. nebst Bemerkungen zum natürlichen System der Oligochäten. Z wiss Zool. 1929, 133: 517-562.Google Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T: Structure, function and development of segmental organs in Annelida. Hydrobiologia. 1999, 402: 21-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goodrich ES: The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Quart Journ Micr Sci. 1946, 86 (342): 113-329.Google Scholar
- Ruthensteiner B: Soft Part 3D visualization by serial sectioning and computer reconstruction. Zoosymposia. 2008, 1: 63-100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruthensteiner B, Heß M: Embedding 3D models of biological specimens in pdf publications. Microsc Res Tech. 2008, 71: 778-786. 10.1002/jemt.20618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.