Organization and metamorphic remodeling of the nervous system in juveniles of Phoronopsis harmeri(Phoronida): insights into evolution of the bilaterian nervous system
© Temereva and Tsitrin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 February 2014
Accepted: 21 April 2014
Published: 28 April 2014
Metamorphic remodeling of the nervous system and its organization in juvenile may shed light on early steps of evolution and can be used as an important criterion for establishing the relationships among large groups of animals. The protostomian affiliation of phoronids does not still have certain morphological and embryological proofs. In addition, the relationship of phoronids and other former “lophophorates” is still uncertain. The resolving of these conflicts requires detailed information from poorly investigated members of phoronids, such as Phoronopsis harmeri.
During metamorphosis, the juvenile consumes the nerve elements of the larval hood. Two dorsolateral groups of larval perikarya remain and give rise to the dorsal ganglion, which appears as the “commissural brain”. The juvenile inherits the main and minor tentacular nerve rings from the larva. Although the larval tentacles are directly inherited by the juvenile in P. harmeri, the ultrastructure and location of the definitive tentacular neurite bundles change greatly. Innervation of the juvenile lophophore exhibits a regular alternation of the intertentacular and abfrontal neurite bundles. The giant nerve fiber appears at early stage of metamorphosis and passes from the right group of dorsolateral perikarya to the left side of the body.
The metamorphic remodeling of the phoronid nervous system occurs in two different ways: with complete or incomplete destruction of organ systems. The morphology of the lophophore seems similar to those of the former members of “Lophophorata”, but its innervation differs greatly. These findings support the separation of bryozoans from Lophophorata and establish a need for new data on the organization of the brachiopod nervous system. The nervous system of the phoronid juvenile is organized as an epidermal nerve plexus but exhibits a nerve center in the anterior portion of the body. The simultaneous presence of both the apical organ and anlage of the cerebral ganglion in phoronids at the larval stage, and the reduction of the apical organ during metamorphosis support the Trochea theory and allow to suggest the presence of two nervous centers in the last common ancestor of the Bilateria. Phoronids retained some plesiomorphic traits and can be regarded as one of the most primitive groups of lophotrochozoans.
KeywordsPhylogeny Nervous system Evolution Lophophorata Metamorphosis Deuterostomia Protostomia The last common bilaterian ancestor
Phoronids are marine benthic animals with biphasic life cycles. Most of phoronids have a planktotrophic larva, which lives in plankton for several months [1, 2] and then undergoes catastrophic metamorphosis. Detailed metamorphosis studies can help clarify some stages of early evolution [3, 4]. Because metamorphosis recapitulate a number of phylogenetic events, its study is valuable to define the relationships and phylogenetic positions between taxa that do not currently occupy a clear phylogenetic position among other bilateria.
The phylum Phoronida has been classified into the protostomian clade through molecular phylogenetic analyses [5, 6]. However, phoronid morphology and embryology have more in common with deuterostomes than protostomes [7, 8]. For this reason, the affiliation of phoronids with the protostomian clade cannot be regarded as strictly established.
A lack of data on phoronid development remains a critical barrier to placing these organism in the tree of life. The organization and development of the nervous system are traditionally used for comparative analysis. In phoronids, the development and organization of the larval nervous system exhibits deuterostome-like features [8, 9]. At the same time, we do not have sufficient data regarding the metamorphic remodeling and organization of the nervous system in the juvenile. The fate of the larval nervous system during metamorphosis and the organization of the juvenile nervous system are unknown. This knowledge may provide insight into phoronid phylogeny and may help establish relationships between phoronids and other Bilateria.
Phoronid metamorphosis has been studied many times by light microscopy [10–14]. The remodeling of nervous system has never been studied by a combination of immunocytochemistry, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Some metamorphic stages of Phoronis pallida have been described in only one paper . According to that brief description, the juvenile nervous system develops before metamorphosis and is integrated into that of the larva. Unfortunately, the fate of each element of the larval nervous system was not traced, and the origin of the dorsal ganglion, which is the main element of definitive nervous system, is still unclear.
Traditionally, phoronids, brachiopods, and bryozoans were all merged into a superphylum group, Lophophorata. This integration was based on a morphological peculiarity common between all lophophorates: the presence of lophophore – a special outgrowth of mesosome bearing tentacles that surround the mouth. The first molecular analysis data revealed that the phylogenetic group “Lophophorata” does not exist and that the Bryozoa form a separate stem within Lophotrochozoa . These data were confirmed by subsequent results that demonstrated that Bryozoa belonged among Polyzoa . According to recent results [17, 18], phoronids and brachiopods are closely related and together form a united clade called Brachiozoa. However, phylogenetic analyses have suggested a close relationship between Bryozoa and Brachiopoda and have refuted the existence of Brachiozoa . Interestingly, according to early data , phoronids were once combined with bryozoans into the group Podaxonia because they both have common patterns of metamorphosis, including enormous growth of the ventral side. The most recent phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and reveal the presence of an Ectoproct-Phoronid clade . Taken together all these data indicate that the relationships between the former members of “Lophophorata” are still uncertain. A comparative analysis of the innervation of a structure as specific as the lophophore may help to clarify the “Lophophorata” phylogeny.
The primary aim of this study is to comprehensively describe the fate of the nervous system during metamorphosis and its organization in juveniles of Phoronopsis harmeri.
Description of the competent larva
The nerve elements of phoronid larvae and their fate during metamorphosis
Name of nerve element (labelled in Figure1C)
Expression of 5HT
Expression of FMRFamide
Expression of alfa-tubulin
Fate during metamorphosis and (immunoreactivity in juveniles)
apical organ (ao)
median neurite bundle of the preoral lobe (mn)
anterior marginal neurite bundle of the preoral lobe (am)
ventrolateral branches (vlb)
posterior marginal neurite bundle of the preoral lobe (pm)
sensory field (sf)
neurites and perikarya innervating the oral field (ofn) Can be observed by TEM only
tentacular nerve ring (=main nerve ring) (tn)
completely maintained (5HT, FMRFamide, alfa-tubulin)
minor nerve ring (mn)
completely maintained (alfa-tubulin)
mediofrontal tentacular neurite bundle (mf)
undergoes changes: can not be detected via LSCM and changes in number of neurites (from 100 to 10) (alfa-tubulin)
laterofrontal tentacular neurite bundles (lf)
completely lost; definitive neurite bundles form de novo (alfa-tubulin)
medioabfrontal tentacular neurite bundle
appears in juveniles (alfa-tubulin)
lateroabfrontal neurite bundles (la)
completely maintained (5HT, alfa-tubulin)
two dorsolateral groups of perikarya (gp)
completely maintained and give rise to the definitive dorsal ganglion (5HT)
telotroch nerve ring (ttn)
neurites and nerve cells innervating the epidermis of the larval trunk (sg(=mdn?)) (neurite bundles of the second group )
probably maintained and give rise to the most dorsal neurites (5HT)
neurites of the esophagus (es)
completely maintained (5HT, FMRFamide, alfa-tubulin)
neurites and perikarya innervating the midgut (pmg)
completely maintained (FMRFamide, alfa-tubulin)
anal nerve ring (ar)
probably undergoes changes, because in juveniles exhibits 5HT-like immunoreactivity
neurites and perikarya innervating the metasomal sac (nms)
completely maintained (5HT, FMRFamide, alfa-tubulin)
Additional file 1: Movie 1: The start of metamorphosis in Phoronopsis harmeri. This time-lapse movie shows the typical first steps of the metamorphosis: eversion of the metasomal sac, strong contractions of the ampulla and anterior portion of the body, and maceration of the hood. The active movement of coelomic fluid induces the break of larval blood masses and flow of erythrocytes into the blood vessels. (AVI 19 MB)
Serotonin-like immunoreactivity in the metamorphic nervous system
Neurites of the second group (=neurites and nerve cells innervating the epidermis of the larval trunk), which are prominent in competent larva and spread along the lateral sides of the trunk (see ), are retained and pass from the tentacular nerve ring to the proximal end of the everted metasomal sac (Figure 2B). Larval trunk neurites and perikarya form a net around the remnant of larval posterior body part and the telotroch.
The hood is engulfed gradually, and the apical organ is consumed by the juvenile (Figure 2C). The major tentacular nerve ring maintains its continuity and consists of numerous neurites, which are parallel to each other and associated with perikarya that are scattered among them (Figure 2E, G). The thin serotonin-like immunoreactive intertentacular branches are inherited from larva and still visible (Figure 2E, G). In each tentacle, two lateral serotonin-like immunoreactive neurites remain (Figure 2E, G). The innervations of the larval body remnant remains and is provided with numerous neurites and perikarya (Figure 2D, G). The telotroch is surrounded by numerous thin neurites, which also form the ring around the anus (Figure 2D, G). In median optical sections, serotonin-like immunoreactive cells are evident in the esophageal epithelium (Figure 2D). The body of juvenile is covered by net of neurites and perikarya, which mostly do not contact the epidermis surface and are apparently nonsensory (Figure 2F).
At later stages, the hood is completely engulfed except for two dorsolateral parts (Figure 2H). These hood remnants are located near the youngest tentacles, on both sides of the epistome anlage, which arises from the dorsal portion of the esophagus (Figure 2H). At stage when the postoral ciliated band is ingested, the main tentacular nerve ring is prominent and begins with two dorsolateral aggregations of perikarya, which are located in the hood remnants (Figure 2I). The innervation of tentacles can be observed with higher magnification (Figure 2J). Serotonin-like immunoreactive intertentacular branches are still evident. Two lateroabfrontal serotonin-like immunoreactive neurites remain in each tentacle (Figure 2J).
FMRFamide-like immunoreactive nervous system
FMRFamide-like immunoreactive neurites and perikarya of inner organs remain and can be traced at all stages during metamorphosis (Figure 5B-D, G, I). Numerous perikarya are located in the epithelium of the midgut (Figure 5D, G). These perikarya have a narrow apical part and a wide basal part with several basal processes, which form a net around the midgut. FMRFamide-like immunoreactive neurites are found along the esophagus. They are mostly orientated longitudinally and form a thick net around the esophagus (Figure 5I). A few FMRFamide-like immunoreactive perikarya are scattered along the juvenile body. They are multipolar, and their projections form a net around the body (Figure 5E, F).
alpha-tubulin-like immunoreactive elements
At later stages of metamorphosis, the pattern of tentacles innervations differs from that of the larva because the prominent medioabfrontal neurite bundle appears in each tentacle (Figure 6C). The intertentacular neurite bundles remain and form two branches, which penetrate into the adjacent tentacle (Figure 6C). At this stage, the prominent trunk neurite is located under the channel of the left nephridium and probably corresponds to the giant nerve fiber (Figure 6D).
In the 3-day-old juvenile, the staining against alpha-tubulin reveals a complex scheme of tentacle innervations. The frontal median neurite bundle passes along the frontal side of each tentacle (Figure 6E). It begins with a large aggregation of many thin neurites, which originate from the thin minor nerve ring. The laterofrontal neurites are retained, but in some cases their connections between the tentacles are not evident (Figure 6E). Regular groups of neurite bundles occur on the abfrontal side of the lophophore (Figure 6F). The neurite of one group passes from the main nerve ring to the base between tentacles: this is the intertentacular branch. Along each intertentacular branch, several left and right neurites originate (Figures 1B, 6F). The terminal part of each intertentacular branch bifurcates and forms two neurites, which penetrate into adjacent tentacles. Thus, each tentacle contains two lateral neurites, which originate from two intertentacular branches. The abfrontal neurite bundle originates from two main neurites, which intertwine with neurites that originate from the intertentacular branch (Figure 6F). As a result, intertentacular and abfrontal branches alternate along the main nerve ring.
The thick net of neurites around the esophagus can be observed by staining of alpha-tubulin. This net is mostly formed by longitudinal neurites (Figure 6G). The net of neurites and some perikarya along the trunk of the juvenile is revealed by alpha-tubulin staining (Figure 6H).
Changes in the Phoronid nervous system at the ultrastructural level
We traced the ultrastructural changes of phoronid nerve elements at several crucial stages of metamorphosis. In this study, we described the organization of the main nerve elements at these stages.
A 3-day-old juvenile looks very similar to an adult animal, but it still has a large posterior pouch, which contains the larval telotroch. In the 3-day-old juvenile, the reorganization of the tentacular apparatus finishes, the epistome is formed, and the remnants of the hood containing aggregations of perikarya are integrated into the juvenile epidermis (Figure 9B). Each tentacle has a definitive organization. The postoral ciliated band develops de novo, and new laterofrontal cells appear (Figure 9B, C). These cells are associated with a small laterofrontal neurite bundle that consists of 5 neurites (Figure 9D). The mediofrontal neurite bundle consists of 10–15 neurites and includes most basal neurites with dense core synaptic vesicles (Figure 9E). Several neurite bundles appear along the abfrontal side of each tentacle. The largest bundle consists of 20 neurites of different diameters (Figure 9F). The lateroabfrontal neurite bundle remains in the 3-day-old juvenile and is still associated with gland cells (Figure 9G). The tentacular neurite bundle consists of a huge aggregation of transversal neurites and perikarya of different types (Figure 9H). The aggregation of neurites forms the most basal layer, which contacts the basal lamina. Most of the neurites have a small diameter and an electron-dense cytoplasm filled with clear (electron-lucent) synaptic vesicles. Some neurites are large in diameter and have an electron-lucent cytoplasm and dense core synaptic vesicles (Figure 9H). The next layer is formed by nonsensory perikarya. The cytoplasm of these perikarya is filled with numerous rough endoplasmic reticula, mitochondria, and synaptic vesicles of different types. Some cells that contact the epidermal surface are most likely sensory because their basal portions are transformed into nerve projections. These cells bear microvilli, which surround a single cilium. An elongated nucleus bears the nucleolus and occupies the middle portion of the cell. The basal portion of the cell forms several projections, some of which contain microtubules and synaptic vesicles and pass through the epidermis to contact the basal lamina (Figure 9H).
Nerve elements are found in different parts of the digestive tract, and these nerve elements are completely inherited from the larval stage. Perikarya and numerous neurites of different types are located in the epithelium of the esophagus (Figure 11F). Small neurite bundles, which consist of a few neurites, pass along the prestomach epithelium (Figure 11C). Here, the large projections of nerve cells, which is filled with synaptic vesicles, are located (Figure 11D). Sporadic neurites with dense core synaptic vesicles were found in the epithelium of the proctodaeum (the ascending branch of the digestive tract) (Figure 11E).
Metamorphosis in phoronids
According to recent data , phoronid metamorphosis occurs in two different ways: with complete or incomplete reduction of organ systems. In P. harmeri, the metamorphic remodeling of the digestive tract, including the formation of the definitive proctodaeum and the fate of the larval telotroch, differs from that of P. muelleri and looks very similar to that of P. psammophila. Certain differences exist in the metamorphic remodeling of the muscles in P. harmeri and P. pallida. In P. pallida, all larval muscles undergo cell death, and definitive muscles form de novo. However, in P. harmeri, the tentacle elevators, esophageal musculature, and trunk body musculature, including muscles of the blood vessels, are inherited by the juvenile from the larva and incorporated into a definitive muscular system .
The metamorphic remodeling of the larval nervous system is dissimilar in different phoronid species. This difference concerns the remodeling of tentacular neurite bundles. In P. pallida, all radial neurite bundles in the tentacles form de novo, whereas in P. harmeri, the lateroabfrontal neurite bundles, which contact the main nerve ring, are inherited from the larva. At the same time, in P. harmeri, the laterofrontal neurite bundles, which innervate the postoral ciliated band, form de novo, and their ultrastructure differs from that of the larval laterofrontal bundles (see ). The medioabfrontal neurite bundle is not present in larvae  but appears in juveniles. Thus, the juvenile has six radial neurite bundles in each tentacle: one mediofrontal, two laterofrontal, one medioabfrontal, and two lateroabfrontal (Figure 1A, B).
During metamorphosis in both P. pallida and P. harmeri, the apical organ undergoes complete destruction, and the main nerve ring is maintained , herein. A two-day-old juvenile of P. pallida lacks an anlage of the dorsal ganglion, and its final state is developed further post-metamorphosis . In contrast, the juvenile of P. harmeri inherits two dorsolateral groups of perikarya, which give rise to the dorsal ganglion (Table 1). The presence of these groups of perikarya at the larval stage (Figure 1C) might be considered to be an embryonization of development and most likely correlates with the long life of P. harmeri larvae in plankton. Interestingly, the blood system, which is anatomically and histologically complex in adult phoronids [24, 25], also forms in the larval stage .
The innervation of the inner organs is mostly inherited from the larva. Neurites and perikarya were found in all parts of the digestive tract in the larva, the metamorphic animal, and the juvenile.
In summary, the metamorphic remodeling of the phoronid nervous system occurs in two different ways. This difference concerns the fate of the larval tentacular neurite bundles and the formation of the definitive dorsal ganglion. The presence of different pathways of phoronid metamorphosis might correlate with a difference in phoronid biology  and the organization of the larval nervous system .
Metamorphosis in phoronids and other Bilateria
During P. harmeri metamorphosis, some elements of the nervous system are lost, but others are integrated into the juvenile nervous system. The apical and frontal organs of the larva are completely consumed by the juvenile. This fate most likely reflects the provisional state of the apical and frontal organs as sensory structures, which is important for larval life in plankton and settlement .
A reduction of the apical organ is described in the larvae of both protostomes, including the nemerteans , caenogastropods , nudibranchs , and others , and deuterostomes [32, 33]. The reduction occurs before or after metamorphosis and can exhibit cell death of the apical organ without catastrophic changes or with great remodeling of the body plan, when apical organ together with other body parts is completely consumed by the juvenile , herein.
Schmidt-Rhaesa  has expressed the view that, during metamorphosis, the apical organ has different fates in protostomes and deuterostomes. According to Schmidt-Rhaesa , in protostomes, the larval apical organ and adjacent nerve elements are usually integrated into the adult system completely or at least partially; whereas in deuterostomes, apical organ is completely destroyed during metamorphosis and does not incorporated into the definitive nervous system. For this reason, phoronids, whose apical organs do not integrate into the definitive nervous system, exhibit a “deuterostomian-like” type of metamorphosis. However, several elements of the larval nervous system are integrated into phoronid definitive nervous system, which eventually exists as combination of larval and definitive structures. The fusion of larval and definitive nerve elements has been established for deuterostomes and seems to have been inherited from the last common bilaterian ancestor .
Innervation of the lophophore in “Lophophorata”
Among the three “Lophophorata” groups (Brachiopoda, Bryozoa, and Phoronida), the organization of the nervous system has been studied in greatest depth in adult phoronids [34–38]. All authors have described two main elements of the nervous system in adult phoronids: the nerve ring along the external row of tentacles (the main nerve ring), and the concentration of nerve cells and processes at the anal side, which is referred to as the ganglion [35–37, 39, 40].
According to previous studies, in phoronids, each adult tentacle contains either two groups of neurite bundles, frontal and abfrontal [38, 41, 42], or two laterofrontal neurite bundles, which connect the sensory cells of the tentacles and the nerve ring . However, the efficient location of the neurite bundles in one tentacle has not been mentioned previously . According to our results, the structure of the lophophore nervous system exhibits a regular alternation of intertentacular and abfrontal neurite bundles, which originate from the main nerve ring (Figure 1B, D). The prominent feature is the presence of intertentacular branches that give rise to the two neurite bundles that penetrate into adjacent tentacles.
The same intertentacular branches are known in adult bryozoans [43, 44]. They originate from the circum-oral nerve ring that arises from the cerebral ganglion. The circum-oral nerve ring passes along the inner side of the lophophore base. Its position correlates with the location of the minor nerve ring in phoronids. In bryozoans, the intertentacular nerves branch into two pairs of neurites that penetrate into the adjacent tentacles. On the abfrontal side of the tentacle, one pair of neurites fuse and form the abfrontal nerve; the other pair forms the laterofrontal nerves. The frontal nerve independently originates from the main nerve ring of bryozoans . In some bryozoans, the intertentacular nerves give rise to the thin lateral nerves, which contribute to the mediofrontal nerve . The number and location of the radial tentacular neurite bundles in bryozoans is still uncertain .
Thus, the presence of intertentacular neurite bundles makes the innervation of the lophophore of phoronids appears similar to that of bryozoans. Moreover, according to some TEM data, both phoronids  and bryozoans  have not only subepidermal but also subperitoneal nerves. They pass along the lateral sides of each tentacle in bryozoans  and are irregularly scattered in phoronids . On the other hand, innervation of the phoronid lophophore differs from that of bryozoans in the location of the main nerve ring and the origin and location of the radial tentacular neurite bundles. In bryozoans, the intertentacular branches give rise to the laterofrontal and abfrontal neurites bundles, whereas in phoronids, the intertentacular bundle gives rise to the lateroabfrontal tentacular neurite bundles. In contrast to phoronids, which have lateroabfrontal neurite bundles at both the larval  and adult (herein) stages, some bryozoans lack these bundles in tentacles . The histological organization of the dorsal ganglion differs in phoronids and bryozoans. In bryozoans, the cerebral ganglion is invaginated into the epidermis [43, 46], whereas in phoronids, the dorsal ganglion is located subepidermally. At the same time, the main nerve center is located on the dorsal side between mouth and anus in both phoronids and bryozoans.
Thus, we can conclude that the organization of the nervous system in phoronids and bryozoans differs, whereas many morphological similarities of the lophophore exist between the phoronids and bryozoans, including the locations of muscles and the presence of radial neurite bundles, different zones of the epidermis and specialized laterofrontal cells. The difference of lophophore innervation might reflect independent origins of the lophophore in phoronids and bryozoans that support molecular analysis data that suggests phoronids and bryozoans are not relatives at all.
Innervation of the brachiopod lophophore has not been clearly studied. According to some results [47, 48], each brachium of the lophophore is innervated by lower and main brachial nerves, which arise from subenteric and supraenteric ganglions, respectively. These two ganglia are the main nerve elements of the brachiopod nervous system. Some brachiopods have accessory brachial nerves, which pass near the main brachial nerve. The supraenteric ganglion gives rise to several frontal neurite bundles, which pass along the frontal side of each tentacle. Interestingly, there are only frontal tentacular neurite bundles in brachiopods .
The innervation of the lophophore in brachiopods greatly differs in comparison with phoronids because of the difference in location and origin of the radial tentacular neurite bundles and the absence of intertentacular branches. On one hand, this difference might be due to poor study of the brachiopod nervous system. On the other hand, the difference might reflect a general difference between the body plan organization in phoronids and brachiopods. More detailed observations are needed on the organization of brachiopod nervous system to clarify the source of this difference.
The organization of a definitive nervous system in phoronids and other bilaterians
The organization of the phoronid definitive nervous system is traditionally regarded as one of the most primitive types of organization among all bilaterians [32, 38, 49]. This opinion is based on the peculiarities of histological organization of the phoronid definitive nervous system. It is organized as a subepidermal nerve plexus, which is completely located in the epidermis, and can be compared with the nerve plexus of cnidarians . Among all Bilateria, the definitive nervous system, which is completely located in the epidermis, can be found in both protostomes and deuterostomes, including vestimentiferans , hemichordates , and echinoderms . However, the definitive nervous system of phoronids is unique compared with these animals because it lacks longitudinal nerves.
Although the nervous system of phoronids is organized as a nerve plexus, it exhibits centralization at an early stage of formation of the definitive nervous system. This fact supports the hypothesis that a nerve center was present in the last common bilaterian ancestor [53, 54].
The dorsal ganglion of juvenile phoronids consists of two dorsolateral groups of perikarya, which connect through a thick commissure. The serotonin-like immunoreactive dorsal commissure between two branches of the main nerve ring was found in early larvae of P. harmeri. In competent larvae, this dorsal commissure does not exhibit immunoreactivity against serotonin . This type of organization of the nerve center, which consists of two groups of perikarya connected through a commissure, is regarded as a “commissural brain” . Other bilaterians, including the lower bilaterian Acoelomorpha, have been reported to have a similar commissural brain [31, 55]. Because Acoelomorpha has been recently established as a deuterostome bilaterian , the “commissural brain” is now present in all three large stems of Bilateria: Deuterostomia (Acoelomorpha), Ecdysozoa (Arthropoda), and Lophotrochozoa (Gastrotricha, Phoronida). This dispersion might reflect the presence of the “commissural brain” in the last common bilaterian ancestor.
A scenario of phoronid evolution
The metamorphic remodeling of the phoronid nervous system occurs in different ways. The definitive nervous system combines larval and adult nerve elements. The same combination is known in deuterostomes and was inherent in the last common bilaterian ancestor. The nervous system of the juvenile (and the adult) is organized as an epidermal plexus but demonstrates a concentration in the anterior portion of the body. The presence of the concentration of perikarya and neurites in the anterior portion of the body – a nerve center that forms a “commissural brain” – is characteristic of the last common bilaterian ancestor. The dorsal ganglion of phoronids also forms a “commissural brain”. Thus, phoronids demonstrate some plesiomorphic features that were inherited from the last common bilaterian ancestor and maintained through time. Because phoronids exhibit certain plesiomorphic features, they can be regarded as one of the most primitive groups of lophotrochozoans.
Metamorphic animals and newly formed juvenile of P. harmeri were collected with a planktonic net during November of 2011 in Vostok Bay, Sea of Japan. Larvae were reared at 1 to 3C in an incubator with a 12-h light–dark cycle until metamorphosis and then until 3- and 10-day-old juveniles. At 2–3 min intervals (up to the newly formed juvenile), specimens were prepared for future investigations (see below).
Metamorphic stages, newly formed juveniles, and 3- and 10-day-old juveniles were photographed using a Panasonic DMC-TZ10 digital camera mounted on a binocular light microscope. All these stages were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cytochemistry, and confocal laserscanning microscopy (CLSM).
For SEM, fixed metamorphic stages of P. harmeri that had been dehydrated in ethanol followed by an acetone series were critical point dried and then sputter coated with platinum-palladium alloy. Specimens were examined with a Jeol JSM scanning electron microscope.
For TEM, metamorphic stages and 3-day-old juveniles of P. harmeri were fixed at 4˚C in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer containing 21 mg/ml NaCl and then postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer containing 23 mg/ml NaCl. Postfixation was followed by en bloc staining for 2 h in a 1% solution of uranyl acetate in distilled water. Specimens were then dehydrated in ethanol followed by an acetone series and embedded in Spurr resin (Sigma Aldrich). Semithin and thin sections were cut with a Reichert Ultracut E ultratome. Semithin sections were stained with methylene blue, observed with Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope and photographed with an AxioCam HRm camera. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate and then examined with a JEOL JEM 100B electron microscope.
For cytochemistry, metamorphic stages of P. harmeri, newly formed juveniles, 3-, and 10-day-old juveniles were narcotised in MgCl2, then fixed overnight in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution on a filtrate of sea water and washed (two times) in phosphatic buffer (pH 7.4) (Fisher Scientific) with Triton X-100 (0.3%) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) for a total of 2 h. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% normal donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK) in PBT overnight at +4°C. Subsequently, the larvae were transferred into primary antibody: the mixture of a-Acetylated Tubulin (1:1000) and either anti-FMRFamide (1:3000) or anti-serotonin (1:1000) (ImmunoStar, Hudson, WI, USA) in PBT and incubated for 24 h at +4°C with gentle rotation. Specimens were washed for 8 h at +4°C (at least three times) in PBT and then exposed to the secondary antibody: donkey anti-rabbit- Atto 647 N and donkey anti-mouse-Atto 565 (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) both 2–3 mkg/ml in PBT for 24 h at +4°C with gentle rotation. Then, the specimens were washed in PBT/BSA and incubated in a mixture of rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (1:50) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). In the following, they were washed in PBS (three times × 40 min), mounted on a cover glass covered with poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and embedded in Murray Clear. Specimens were viewed with Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope (IDB, Moscow, Russia). Z-projections were generated using the programme Image J version 1.43.
The use of phoronids in the laboratory does not raise any ethical issues and therefore approval from regional or local research ethics committees is not required.
This research was supported in part by grants to ET from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (#14-04-00238), Russian Scientific Found (# 14-14-00262), and Grant of the President of Russia (# MD-1979.2013.4; # NSH-1801.2014.4). The work was performed at User Facilities Center of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University under financial support of Ministry of Education and Science of Russian federation. ET is very grateful to her friend Svetlana Maslakova for hosting her at the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology in 2010 and for providing resources and training, especially in immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. We thank B. Jaffee and Leo Rusin for help with the English language.
- Temereva EN: New data on distribution, morphology and taxonomy of phoronid larvae (Phoronida, Lophophorata). Invert Zool. 2009, 6 (1): 47-64.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Neretina TV: A distinct phoronid larva: morphological and molecular evidence. Invert Syst. 2013, 27 (6): 622-633.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: The evidence of metamery in adult brachiopods and phoronids. Invert Zool. 2011, 8: 87-101.Google Scholar
- Altenburger A, Wanninger A, Holmer LE: Metamorphosis in Craniiformea revisited: Novocrania anomala shows delayed development of the ventral valve. Zoomorphology. 2013, 132 (4): 379-387. 10.1007/s00435-013-0194-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halanych KM, Bacheller JD, Aguinaldo AMA, Liva SM, Hillis DM, Lake JA: Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that lophophorates are protostome animals. Science. 1995, 267: 1641-1643. 10.1126/science.7886451.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, Sorensen MV, Haddock SH, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen RM, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G: Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 2008, 452: 745-749. 10.1038/nature06614. doi:10.1038/nature06614PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Embryogenesis in phoronids. Invert Zool. 2012, 8 (1): 1-39.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Tsitrin EB: Development and organization of the larval nervous system in Phoronopsis harmeri: new insights into phoronid phylogeny. Front Zool. 2014, 11: 3-10.1186/1742-9994-11-3. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-11-3PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva E, Wanninger A: Development of the nervous system in Phoronopsis harmeri (Lophotrochozoa, Phoronida) reveals both deuterostome- and trochozoan-like features. BMC Evol Biol. 2012, 12: 121-10.1186/1471-2148-12-121. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-121PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zimmer RL: Reproductive biology and development of Phoronida. PhD Thesis. 1964, Ann Arbor: University Microfilm, 1-416.Google Scholar
- Siewing R: Morphologische Untersuchungen zum Archicoelomatenproblem. The body segmentation in Phoronis muelleri de Selys-Longchamps (Phoronidea) Ontogenese – Larve – Metamorphose – Adultus. Zool Jahrb Anat. 1974, 92 (2): 275-318.Google Scholar
- Herrmann K: Untersuchungen über Morphologie, Physiologie, und Ökologie der Metamorphose von Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida). Zool Jahrb Anat. 1976, 95: 354-426.Google Scholar
- Herrmann K: Larvalentwicklung und Metamorphose von Phoronis psammophila (phoronida, Tentaculata). Helgoländer Meeresun. 1979, 32: 550-581. 10.1007/BF02277994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN: The digestive tract of actinotroch larvae (Lophotrochozoa, Phoronida): anatomy, ultrastructure, innervations, and some observations of metamorphosis. Can J Zool. 2010, 88 (12): 1149-1168. 10.1139/Z10-075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santagata S: Structure and metamorphic remodeling of the larval nervous system and musculature of Phoronis pallida (Phoronida). Evol Dev. 2002, 4: 28-42. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.01055.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paps J, Baguñà J, Riutort M: Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insights from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes. Proc R Soc. 2009, 276: 1245-1254. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1574. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1574View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santagata S, Cohen B: Phoronid phylogenetics (Brachiopoda; Phoronata): evidence from morphological cladistics, small and large subunit rDNA sequences, and mitochondrial cox1. Zool J Linn Soc. 2009, 157: 34-50. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00531.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cohen BL: Rerooting the rDNA gene tree reveals phoronidsto be ‘brachiopods without shells’; dangers ofwide taxon samples in metazoan phylogenetics (Phoronida; Brachiopoda). Zool J Linn Soc. 2013, 167: 82-92. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00869.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jang K: Hwang Ui: Complete mitochondrial genome of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Cheilostomata): phylogenetic position of Bryozoa and phylogeny of lophophorates within the Lophotrochozoa. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 167-10.1186/1471-2164-10-167.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beklemishev VN: Principles of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates. 1944, Moscow: Sovetskaya NaukaGoogle Scholar
- Nesnidal MP, Helmkampf M, Meyer A, Witek A, Bruchhaus I, Ebersberger I, Hankeln T, Lieb B, Struck TH, Hausdorf B: New phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and an Ectoproct-Phoronid clade and indicate that Polyzoa and Kryptrochozoa are caused by systematic bias. BMC Evol Biol. 2013, 13: 253-10.1186/1471-2148-13-253.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Embryogenesis and larval development of phoronid Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912: dual origin of the coelomic mesoderm. Invert Reprod Dev. 2007, 50 (2): 57-66. 10.1080/07924259.2007.9652228.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Tsitrin EB: Development, organization, and remodeling of phoronid muscles from embryo to metamorphosis (Lophotrochozoa: Phoronida). BMC Dev Biol. 2013, 13: 14-10.1186/1471-213X-13-14. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-13-14PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Ultrastructure of the blood system in phoronid Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912: 1. Capillaries Rus J Mar Biol. 2004, 30 (1): 28-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Ultrastructure of the blood system in Phoronid Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912: 2. Main vessels. Rus J Mar Biol. 2004, 30 (2): 101-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: The circulatory system of phoronid larvae. Dokl Biol Sci. 2000, 375 (5): 712-714.Google Scholar
- Santagata S, Zimmer RL: Comparison of the neuromuscular system among actinotroch larvae: systematic and evolutionary implication. Evol Dev. 2002, 4: 43-54. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.01056.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maslakova SA: Development to metamorphosis of the nemertean pilidium larva. Front Zool. 2010, 7: 30-10.1186/1742-9994-7-30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gifondorwa DJ, Leise EM: Programmed cell death in the apical ganglion during larval metamorphosis of the marine mollusk Ilyanassa obsolete. Biol Bull. 2006, 210: 109-120. 10.2307/4134600.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz-Jones GJ, Hadfield MG: Loss of sensory elements in the apical sensory organ during metamorphosis in the nudibranch Phestilla sibogae. Biol Bull. 2011, 220: 39-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richter S, Loesel R, Purschke G, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Scholtz G, Stach T, Vogt L, Wanninger A, Brenneis G, Doring C, Faller S, Fritsch M, Grobe P, Heuer CM, Kaul C, Møller OS, Müller C, Rieger V, Rothe BH, Stegner M, Harzsch S: Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary. Front Zool. 2010, 7: 1-10.1186/1742-9994-7-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt-Rhaesa A: The evolution of organ systems. 2007, New-York: Oxford University Press, 1-385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burke RD: Deuterostome neuroanatomy and the body plan paradox. Evol Dev. 2011, 13: 110-115. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00460.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Selys-Longchamps M: Phoronis. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel. Monogr. 1907, 30: 280-Google Scholar
- Silén L: On the Nervous System of Phoronis. Arkiv Zool. 1954, 6 (1): 1-40.Google Scholar
- Fernández I, Pardos F, Benito J, Roldan C: Ultrastructural observation on the phoronid nervous system. J Morph. 1996, 230: 265-281. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199612)230:3<265::AID-JMOR2>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herrmann K: Phoronida. Microscopic Anatomy of Ivertebrates. V. 13: Lophophorates, Entoprocta, and Cycliophora. Edited by: Harrison FW, Woollacott RM. 1997, NY: Willey-Liss, 207-235.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Microscopic Anatomy and ultrastructure of the nervous system of Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912 (Lophophorata: Phoronida). Rus J Mar Biol. 2009, 35 (5): 388-404. 10.1134/S1063074009050046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hyman LH: The lophophorate coelomates – Phylum Phoronida. The Invertebrates. Vol. 5. SmallerCoelomate Groups. Edited by: Boell EJ. 1959, NewYork: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 228-274.Google Scholar
- Bullock TH, Horridge GA: Structure and Function in the Nervous System of Invertebrates. 1965, San Francisco: Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
- Pardos F, Roldan C, Benito J, Emig CC: Fine structure of the tentacles of Phoronis australis. Acta Zool. 1991, 72 (2): 81-90. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1991.tb00320.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pardos F, Roldan C, Benito J, Aguirre A, Fernández I: Ultrastructure of the lophophoral tentacles in the genus Phoronis (Phoronida, Lophophorata). Can J Zool. 1993, 71: 1861-1868. 10.1139/z93-265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwaha T, Wood T: Organogenesis during budding and lophophoral morphology of Hislopia malayensis Annandale, 1916 (Bryozoa, Ctenostomata). BMC Dev Biol. 2011, 11: 23-10.1186/1471-213X-11-23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shunkina KV, Starunov VV, Zaitseva OV, Ostrovsky AN: Comparative neuroanatomy of the lophophore and the body wall in freshwater bryozoans (Bryozoa: Phylactolaemata). Zool Zhurn. 2014, 93 (3): 497-507. In press. [in Russian with English summary]Google Scholar
- Mukai H, Teracado K, Reed CG: Bryozoa. Microscopic Anatomy of Ivertebrates. V. 13: Lophophorates, Entoprocta, and Cycliophora. Edited by: Harrison FW, Woollacott RM. 1997, NY: Willey-Liss, 45-206.Google Scholar
- Gruhl A, Bartolomaeus T: Ganglion ultrastructure in phylactolaemate Bryozoa: evidence for a neuroepithelium. J Morph. 2008, 269: 594-603. 10.1002/jmor.10607.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blochmann F: Untersuchungen über den Bau der Brachiopoiden. I. Die Anatomie von Crania anomala (Müller). 1892, Jena: Gustav Fisher, 1-65.Google Scholar
- James MA: Brachiopoda: Internal Anatomy, Embryology, and Development. Microscopic anatomy of Invertebrates. (Wiley-Liss). V. 13 (Lophophorates, Entoprocta, and Cycliophora). 1997, 297-407.Google Scholar
- Mamkaev YV: About phoronids of far eastern seas. Issledovaniya dal’nevostochnykh morei USSR. 1962, 8: 219-237. [in Russian with English summary]Google Scholar
- Miyamoto N, Shinozaki A, Fujiwara Y: Neuroanatomy of the Vestimentiferan Tubeworm Lamellibrachia satsuma Provides Insights into the Evolution of the Polychaete Nervous System. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8 (1): e55151-10.1371/journal.pone.0055151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055151PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stach T, Gruhl A, Kaul-Strehlow S: The central and peripheral nervous system of Cephalodiscus gracilis (Pterobranchia, Deuterostomia). Zoomorphology. 2012, 131: 11-24. 10.1007/s00435-011-0144-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cobb JLS: Neurobiology of echinodermata. Nervous Systems of Invertebrates. Edited by: Ali MA. 1987, New York: Plenum, 483-525.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arendt D, Denes AS, Jekely G, Tessmar-Raible K: The evolution of nervous system centralization. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2008, 363: 1523-1528. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2242.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nomaksteinsky M, Roettinger E, Dufour HD, Chettouh Z, Lowe CJ, Martindale MQ, Brunet J-F: Centralization of the deuterostome nervous system predates chordates. Curr Biol. 2009, 19: 1264-1269. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.063.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raikova OI, Reuter M, Kotikova EA, Gustafsson MKS: A commissural brain! The pattern of 5-HT immunoreactivity in Acoela (Plathelminthes). Zoomorphology. 1998, 118 (2): 69-77. 10.1007/s004350050058.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, Poustka AJ, Wallberg A, Peterson KJ, Telford MJ: Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature. 2011, 470: 255-258. 10.1038/nature09676.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C: Life cycle evolution: was the eumetazoan ancestor a holopelagic, planktotrophic gastraea?. BMC Evol Biol. 2013, 13: 171-10.1186/1471-2148-13-171.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C: How to make a protostome. Invertebr Syst. 2012, 26 (1): 25-40. 10.1071/IS11041.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.