Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
Google Scholar
Rueffler C, Hermisson J, Wagner GP. Evolution of functional specialization and division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E326–35.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Storz JF. Gene duplication and evolutionary innovations in hemoglobin-oxygen transport. Physiology. 2016;31:223–32.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kirk DL. Germ-soma differentiation in Volvox. Dev Biol. 2001;238:213–23.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson EO. The insect societies. Cambridge: Belknap Press; 1971.
Google Scholar
Gadau J, Fewell J. organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2009.
Book
Google Scholar
Beshers SN, Fewell JH. Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:413–40.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Robinson GE. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:637–65.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wakano JY, Nakata K, Yamamura N. Dynamic model of optimal age polyethism in social insects under stable and fluctuating environments. J Theor Biol. 1998;193:153–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Iwasa Y, Yamaguchi S. Task allocation in a cooperative society: specialized castes or age-dependent switching among ant workers. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tripet F, Nonacs P. Foraging for work and age-based polyethism: the roles of age and previous experience on task choice in ants. Ethology. 2004;110:863–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Seid MA, Traniello JFA. Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;60:631–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Giehr J, Heinze J, Schrempf A. Group demography affects ant colony performance and individual speed of queen and worker aging. BMC Evol Biol. 2017;17:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Crall JD, Gravish N, Mountcastle AM, Kocher SD, Oppenheimer RL, Pierce NE, et al. Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–13.
CAS
Google Scholar
Shimoji H, Kasutani N, Ogawa S, Hojo MK. Worker propensity affects flexible task reversion in an ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2020;74:92.
Article
Google Scholar
Enzmann BL, Nonacs P. Age-related division of labor occurs in ants at the earliest stages of colony initiation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75:35.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson EJH, Feinerman O, Franks NR. Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;276:4373–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Kohlmeier P, Feldmeyer B, Foitzik S. Vitellogenin-like A–associated shifts in social cue responsiveness regulate behavioral task specialization in an ant. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2005747.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Miyazaki S, Shimoji H, Suzuki R, Chinushi I, Takayanagi H, Yaguchi H, et al. Expressions of conventional vitellogenin and vitellogenin-like A in worker brains are associated with a nursing task in a ponerine ant. Insect Mol Biol. 2021;30:113–21.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Herb BR, Wolschin F, Hansen KD, Aryee MJ, Langmead B, Irizarry R, et al. Reversible switching between epigenetic states in honeybee behavioral subcastes. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:1371–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dolezal AG, Brent CS, Hölldobler B, Amdam GV. Worker division of labor and endocrine physiology are associated in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. J Exp Biol. 2012;215:454–60.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dolezal AG, Johnson J, Hölldobler B, Amdam GV. Division of labor is associated with age-independent changes in ovarian activity in Pogonomyrmex californicus harvester ants. J Insect Physiol. 2013;59:519–24.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wnuk A, Wiater M, Godzinska EJ. Effect of past and present behavioural specialization on brain levels of biogenic amines in workers of the red wood ant Formica polyctena. Physiol Entomol. 2011;36:54–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Raubenheimer D, Tucker D. Associative learning by locusts: pairing of visual cues with consumption of protein and carbohydrate. Anim Behav. 1997;54:1449–59.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Griffin AS. Social learning about predators: a review and prospectus. Anim Learn Behav. 2004;32:131–40.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Karino K, Someya C. The influence of sex, line, and fight experience on aggressiveness of the Siamese fighting fish in intrasexual competition. Behav Process. 2007;75:283–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Dukas R. Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:145–60.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL, Shine R. Adjusting to a toxic invader: native Australian frogs learn not to prey on cane toads. Behav Ecol. 2010;21:966–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Salena MG, Turko AJ, Singh A, Pathak A, Hughes E, Brown C, et al. Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices. Anim Cognit. 2021;24:395–406.
Article
Google Scholar
Dunlap AS, Stephens DW. Reliability, uncertainty, and costs in the evolution of animal learning. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016;12:73–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Jandt JM, Bengston S, Pinter-Wollman N, Pruitt JN, Raine NE, Dornhaus A, et al. Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels. Biol Rev. 2014;89:48–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Châline N, Jaisson P. Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol. 2007;17:1308–12.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg JL. Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1998;265:327–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson GE. Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labor based on hormonall regulated response thresholds. J Comp Physiol A. 1987;160:613–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL. Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1996;263:1565–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Tofts C. Algorithms for task allocation in ants. (A study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol. 1993;55:891–918.
Article
Google Scholar
Ulrich Y, Kawakatsu M, Tokita CK, Saragosti J, Chandra V, Tarnita CE, et al. Response thresholds alone cannot explain empirical patterns of division of labor in social insects. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001269.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Peeters C, Crewe R. Insemination controls the reproductive division of labour in a ponerine ant. Naturwissenschaften. 1984;71:50–1.
Article
Google Scholar
Fukumoto Y, Abe T, Taki A. A novel form of colony organization in the ‘queenless’ ant Diacamma rugosum. Physiol Ecol Jpn. 1989;26:55–61.
Google Scholar
Kikuchi T, Nakagawa T, Tsuji K. Changes in relative importance of multiple social regulatory forces with colony size in the ant Diacamma sp. from Japan. Anim Behav. 2008;76:2069–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Nakata K. Age polyethism, idiosyncrasy and behavioural flexibility in the queenless ponerine ant, Diacamma sp. J Ethol. 1995;13:113–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Nakata K. Does behavioral flexibility compensate or constrain colony productivity? Relationship among age structure, labor allocation, and production of workers in ant colonies. J Insect Behav. 1996;9:557–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Traniello JFA. Foraging strategies of ants. Annu Rev Entomol. 1989;34:191–210.
Article
Google Scholar
Sahu PK, Kolay S, Annagiri S. To reunite or not: a study of artificially fragmented Diacamma indicum ant colonies. Behav Process. 2019;158:4–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Endler A, Liebig J, Schmitt T, Parker JE, Jones GR, Schreier P, et al. Surface hydrocarbons of queen eggs regulate worker reproduction in a social insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:2945–50.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Shimoji H, Dobata S. The build-up of dominance hierarchies in eusocial insects. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2022;377:20200437.
Article
Google Scholar
Ito F, Higashi S. A linear dominance hierarchy regulating reproduction and polyethism of the queenless ant Pachycondyla sublaevis. Naturwissenschaften. 1991;78:80–2.
Article
Google Scholar
Monnin T, Peeters C. Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol. 1999;10:323–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Peeters C, Tsuji K. Reproductive conflict among ant workers in Diacamma sp. from Japan: dominance and oviposition in the absence of the gamergate. Insectes Soc. 1993;40:119–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson GE, Page RE, Strambi C, Strambi A. Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies. Science. 1989;246:109–12.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Huang ZY, Robinson GE. Honeybee colony integration: worker–worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:11726–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Robinson GE, Strambi C, Strambi A, Huang Z-Y. Reproduction in worker honey bees is associated with low juvenile hormone titers and rates of biosynthesis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1992;87:471–80.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marco Antonio DS, Guidugli-Lazzarini KR, do Nascimento AM, Simões ZLP, Hartfelder K. RNAi-mediated silencing of vitellogenin gene function turns honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers into extremely precocious foragers. Naturwissenschaften. 2008;95:953–61.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Morandin C, Hietala A, Helanterä H. Vitellogenin and vitellogenin-like gene expression patterns in relation to caste and task in the ant Formica fusca. Insectes Soc. 2019;66:519–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson GE, Huang Z-Y. Colony integration in honey bees: genetic, endocrine and social control of division of labor. Apidologie. 1998;29:159–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Kohlmeier P, Alleman AR, Libbrecht R, Foitzik S, Feldmeyer B. Gene expression is more strongly associated with behavioural specialization than with age or fertility in ant workers. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:658–70.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Corona M, Libbrecht R, Wurm Y, Riba-Grognuz O, Studer RA, Keller L. Vitellogenin underwent subfunctionalization to acquire caste and behavioral specific expression in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003730.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Okada Y, Sasaki K, Miyazaki S, Shimoji H, Tsuji K, Miura T. Social dominance and reproductive differentiation mediated by dopaminergic signaling in a queenless ant. J Exp Biol. 2015;218:1091–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shimoji H, Kikuchi T, Ohnishi H, Kikuta N, Tsuji K. Social enforcement depending on the stage of colony growth in an ant. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2018;285:4–9.
Google Scholar
Duarte A, Weissing FJ, Pen I, Keller L. An evolutionary perspective on self-organized division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2011;42:91–110.
Article
Google Scholar
Duarte A, Pen I, Keller L, Weissing FJ. Evolution of self-organized division of labor in a response threshold model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012;66:947–57.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Duarte A, Scholtens E, Weissing FJ. Implications of behavioral architecture for the evolution of self-organized division of labor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002430.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dussutour A, Simpson SJ. Description of a simple synthetic diet for studying nutritional responses in ants. Insectes Soc. 2008;55:329–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9:378–400.
Article
Google Scholar
Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J R Soc Interface. 2017;14:20170213.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bartoń K. MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.43.17. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
Hartig F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.3. 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. URL https://www.R-project.org/.