Gray JA. Sex differences in emotional behaviour in mammals including man: endocrine bases. Acta Psychol. 1971;35(1):29–46.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kelley DB. Sexually dimorphic behaviors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11(1):225–51.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tieger T. On the biological basis of sex differences in aggression. Child Dev. 1980;51:943–63.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Darwin C. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. 1st ed. John Murray; 1871.
Book
Google Scholar
McPherson FJ, Chenoweth PJ. Mammalian sexual dimorphism. Anim Rep Sci. 2012;131(3–4):109–22.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Archer J. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Rev Gen Psychol. 2004;8(4):291–322.
Article
Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock T. Sexual selection in females. Anim Behav. 2009;77(1):3–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Arak A. Sexual dimorphism in body size: a model and a test. Evolution. 1988;42(4):820–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fairbairn DJ. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1997;28(1):659–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn WU. Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethology. 2005;111(11):977–1016.
Article
Google Scholar
Parker GA. Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol. 1974;47(1):223–43.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Briffa M, Sneddon LU. Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Funct Ecol. 2007;21(4):627–37.
Article
Google Scholar
Palanza P, Parmigiani S. How does sex matter? Behavior, stress and animal models of neurobehavioral disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;76:134–43.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Elwood RW, Nesbitt AA, Kennedy HF. Maternal aggression in response to the risk of infanticide by male mice, Mus domesticus. Anim Behav. 1990;40(6):1080–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Maynard Smith J, Harper DG. The evolution of aggression: can selection generate variability? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988;319(1196):557–70.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maynard Smith J. Game theory and the evolution of behaviour. Proc R Soc B. 1979;205(1161):475–88.
Google Scholar
King JA. The ecology of aggressive behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1973;4(1):117–38.
Article
Google Scholar
McGlone JJ. Agonistic behavior in food animals: review of research and techniques. J Anim Sci. 1986;62(4):1130–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Price EO. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1999;65(3):245–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Brust V, Guenther A. Domestication effects on behavioural traits and learning performance: comparing wild cavies to guinea pigs. Anim Cogn. 2015;18(1):99–109.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Scandurra A, Alterisio A, Di Cosmo A, D’Aniello B. Behavioral and perceptual differences between sexes in dogs: an overview. Animals. 2018;8(9):151.
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gray S, Hurst JL. The effects of cage cleaning on aggression within groups of male laboratory mice. Anim Behav. 1995;49(3):821–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Zipser B, Schleking A, Kaiser S, Sachser N. Effects of domestication on biobehavioural profiles: a comparison of domestic guinea pigs and wild cavies from early to late adolescence. Front Zool. 2014;11:30.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kappel S, Hawkins P, Mendl MT. To group or not to group? Good practice for housing male laboratory mice. Animals. 2017;7(12):88.
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Van Loo PL, Van Zutphen LF, Baumans V. Male management: coping with aggression problems in male laboratory mice. Lab Anim. 2003;37(4):300–13.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Verdon M, Rault JL. Aggression in group housed sows and fattening pigs. In: Špinka M, editor. Advances in pig welfare. Woodhead Publishing; 2018. p. 235–60.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Weber EM, Dallaire JA, Gaskill BN, Pritchett-Corning KR, Garner JP. Aggression in group-housed laboratory mice: why can’t we solve the problem? Lab Anim. 2017;46(4):157–61.
Article
Google Scholar
D’Eath RB, Turner SP. The natural behaviour of the pig. In: Marchant-Forde JN, editor. The welfare of pigs. Springer; 2009. p. 13–45.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Graves HB. Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus scrofa). J Anim Sci. 1984;58(2):482–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Barrette C. Fighting behavior of wild Sus scrofa. J Mamm. 1986;67(1):177–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Liv Prod Sci. 1998;56(1):15–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Desire S, Turner SP, D’Eath RB, Doeschl-Wilson AB, Lewis CR, Roehe R. Genetic associations of short-and long-term aggressiveness identified by skin lesion with growth, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics in growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(7):3303–12.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Battocchio D, Iacolina L, Canu A, Mori E. How much does it cost to look like a pig in a wild boar group? Behav Proces. 2017;138:123–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Rushen J. A difference in weight reduces fighting when unacquainted newly weaned pigs first meet. Can J Anim Sci. 1987;67(4):951–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Jensen P, Yngvesson J. Aggression between unacquainted pigs—sequential assessment and effects of familiarity and weight. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;58(1–2):49–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Clark CC, D’Eath RB. Age over experience: consistency of aggression and mounting behaviour in male and female pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2013;147(1–2):81–93.
Article
Google Scholar
Camerlink I, Turner SP, Farish M, Arnott G. The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Peden RS, Turner SP, Boyle LA, Camerlink I. The translation of animal welfare research into practice: the case of mixing aggression between pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018;204:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Stolba A, Wood-Gush DGM. The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Anim Sci. 1989;48(2):419–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Andersen IL, Andenæs H, Bøe KE, Jensen P, Bakken M. The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000;68(2):107–20.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Briffa M, Sneddon LU, Wilson AJ. Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour. Biol Lett. 2015;11(3):20141007.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Camerlink I, Turner SP, Farish M, Arnott G. Aggressiveness as a component of fighting ability in pigs using a game-theoretical framework. Anim Behav. 2015;108:183–91.
Article
Google Scholar
Bergman M, Olofsson M, Wiklund C. Contest outcome in a territorial butterfly: the role of motivation. Proc R Soc B. 2010;277(1696):3027–33.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
O’Connor CM, Reddon AR, Ligocki IY, Hellmann JK, Garvy KA, Marsh-Rollo SE, Hamilton IM, Balshine S. Motivation but not body size influences territorial contest dynamics in a wild cichlid fish. Anim Behav. 2015;107:19–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Hsu Y, Wolf LL. The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav. 1999;57(4):903–10.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Oldham L, Camerlink I, Arnott G, Doeschl-Wilson A, Farish M, Turner SP. Winner–loser effects overrule aggressiveness during the early stages of contests between pigs. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–3.
Article
Google Scholar
Brown SM, Peters R, Nevison IM, Lawrence AB. Playful pigs: evidence of consistency and change in play depending on litter and developmental stage. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018;198:36–43.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Weller JE, Camerlink I, Turner SP, Farish M, Arnott G. Playful pigs: early life play-fighting experience influences later life contest dynamics. Anim Behav. 2019;158:269–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Cordoni G, Gioia M, Demuru E, Norscia I. The dark side of play: play fighting as a substitute for real fighting in domestic pigs, Sus scrofa. Anim Behav. 2021;175:21–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Vieira MC, Peixoto PE. Winners and losers: a meta-analysis of functional determinants of fighting ability in arthropod contests. Funct Ecol. 2013;27(2):305–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Stuart-Fox DM, Firth D, Moussalli A, Whiting MJ. Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament. Anim Behav. 2006;71(6):1263–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Weller JE, Turner SP, Farish M, Camerlink I, Arnott G. The association between play fighting and information gathering during subsequent contests. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Mauget R. Behavioural and reproductive strategies in wild forms of Sus scrofa (European wild boar and feral pigs). In: Sybesma W, editor. The welfare of pigs. Springer; 1981. p. 3–15.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Gonyou HW. The social behaviour of pigs. In: Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW, editors. Social behaviour in farm animals. Wallingford; 2001. p. 147–76.
Chapter
Google Scholar
D’Eath RB, Pickup HE. Behaviour of young growing pigs in a resident-intruder test designed to measure aggressiveness. Aggress Behav. 2002;28(5):401–15.
Article
Google Scholar
Spake JR, Gray KA, Cassady JP. Relationship between backtest and coping styles in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012;140(3–4):146–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Erhard HW, Mendl M. Measuring aggressiveness in growing pigs in a resident-intruder situation. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1997;54(2–3):123–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Prunier A, Averos X, Dimitrov I, Edwards SA, Hillmann E, Holinger M, Ilieski V, Leming R, Tallet C, Turner SP, Zupan M, Camerlink I. Early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs. Animal. 2020;14(3):570–87.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Seyfang J, Plush KJ, Kirkwood RN, Tilbrook AJ, Ralph CR. The sex ratio of a litter affects the behaviour of its female pigs until at least 16 weeks of age. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018;200:45–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Copeland DL, Levay B, Sivaraman B, Beebe-Fugloni C, Earley RL. Metabolic costs of fighting are driven by contest performance in male convict cichlid fish. Anim Behav. 2011;82(2):271–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Turner SP, Farnworth MJ, White IM, Brotherstone S, Mendl M, Knap P, Penny P, Lawrence AB. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;96(3–4):245–59.
Article
Google Scholar
Li CY, Yang Y, Lee PY, Hsu Y. Opponent familiarity and contest experience jointly influence contest decisions in Kryptolebias marmoratus. Front Zool. 2014;11:92.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ewbank R, Bryant MJ. Aggressive behaviour amongst groups of domesticated pigs kept at various stocking rates. Anim Behav. 1972;20(1):21–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Frädrich H. A comparison of behaviour in the Suidae. In: Geist V, Walther F, editors. The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management. IUCN Publishers; 1974. p. 133–43.
Google Scholar
Calderón Díaz JA, Vallet JL, Lents CA, Nonneman DJ, Miles JR, Wright EC, Rempel LA, Cushman RA, Freking BA, Rohrer GA, Phillips C. Age at puberty, ovulation rate, and uterine length of developing gilts fed two lysine and three metabolizable energy concentrations from 100 to 260 d of age. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(7):3521–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Spitz F. Current state of knowledge of wild boar biology. Pig News Inform. 1986;7(22):171–5.
Google Scholar
Camerlink I, Turner SP, Farish M, Arnott G. Advantages of social skills for contest resolution. R Soc Open Sci. 2019;6(5):181456.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Robert S, Martineau GP. Effects of repeated cross-fosterings on preweaning behavior and growth performance of piglets and on maternal behavior of sows. J Anim Sci. 2001;79(1):88–93.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Baxter EM, Jarvis S, D’Eath RB, Ross DW, Robson SK, Farish M, Nevison IM, Lawrence AB, Edwards SA. Investigating the behavioural and physiological indicators of neonatal survival in pigs. Theriogenology. 2008;69(6):773–83.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar