Within-family plasticity of nervous system architecture in Syllidae (Annelida, Errantia)
Frontiers in Zoology volume 17, Article number: 20 (2020)
The ground pattern underlying the nervous system of the last common ancestor in annelids was long thought to be settled, consisting of a dorsal brain, circumoesophageal connectives and a subepithelial, ladder-like ventral nerve cord with segmental ganglia connected by paired connectives. With the advent of immunocytochemical stainings and confocal laser scanning microscopy, it becomes evident that its architecture is extremely diverse, which makes the reconstruction of a ground pattern in annelida challenging. Whereas the nervous systems of many different families has already been described, only very few studies looked at the diversity of nervous systems within such clades to give a closer estimate on how plastic the annelid nervous system really is. So far, little is known on syllid nervous system architecture, one of the largest and most diverse groups of marine annelids.
The position of the brain, the circumoesophageal connectives, the stomatogastric nervous system, the longitudinal nerves that traverse each segment and the innervation of appendages are relatively uniform within the clade. Both the number of connectives within the ventral nerve cord and the number of segmental nerves, which in earlier studies were used to infer phylogenetic relationships and to reconstruct an annelid ground pattern, are highly diverse and differ between genera or even within a given genus. Differences in the distribution of somata of the brain, the nuchal innervation and its associated cell bodies were found between Syllinae and Exogoninae and may be subfamily-specific.
The nervous system morphology of syllids very likely depends on the taxon-specific ecological requirements. Thus, it is not surprising that in a clade, which occupies such diverse niches as the Annelida, we find similar patterns in phylogenetically widely separated species in similar niches and a high degree of modularity within a family. Only standardized protocols and staining methods can lead to comparable results, but so far different approaches have been taken to describe annelid nervous systems, making homologization of certain structures difficult. This study provides the first thorough description of the nervous system in the family Syllidae, allowing more detailed comparisons between annelid families in the future.
An increasing amount of studies on the nervous system of various invertebrates are being published as methods such as immunocytochemical stainings and confocal laser scanning microscopy advance [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. To date, however, there is very little information on nervous system plasticity and diversity at different taxonomic levels. Often, only one or a few species have been described and are regarded as representatives for the entire family.
The nervous system of annelids was generally described to consist of a rope-ladder like ventral nerve cord with ventral connectives joining segmentally arranged ganglia. The actual situation is more complex [25,26,27] and the underlying ground pattern is being discussed to date , with authors suggesting two [7, 28] or five  connectives present in the ventral nerve cord of the last common ancestor of annelids.
The incorporation of data on the nervous system of 14 annelid families within a phylogenomic framework led to equivocal results regarding the ventral nerve cord and its commissures in the last common ancestor of annelids . The high diversity of nervous system architecures in recent annelid clades, including the likely reduction of features in early branching families such as the Oweniidae  and Sipunculidae , makes it difficult to reconstruct the ground pattern at present.
The ventral nerve cord and the brain are connected by a dorsal and a ventral root of the circumoesophageal connectives, which may fuse to different degrees . These connectives give rise to the nerves innervating the tentacular cirri , if present. Each root of the circumoesophageal connectives forms two commissures within the brain [25, 26, 32]. Roots emanating from the dorsal and ventral commissures of the dorsal and ventral root of the circumoesophageal connectives innervate the anterior appendages called palps . The antennae are innervated from the dorsal commissure alone. Several clusters of somata can be found in the anterior region such as posterior ganglia, palp ganglia and ganglia of the cirumoesophageal connective [25, 32]. In many annelid species structures resembling arthropod mushroom bodies have been described , but these most likely have evolved independently in Annelida [34,35,36].
The pharynx is, especially in annelids with a muscular axial protrusible proboscis, highly complex and little is known on its innervation patterns . It is innervated by the stomatogastric nervous system arising from the brain and the circumoesophageal connectives . The peripheral innervation of body segments was first described in three species of Nereididae . It consists of several segmental nerves which can form dorsal commissures [25, 27]. Usually, the second one is the largest and innervates the parapodium , but the nomenclature can change depending on the number of segmental nerves. It has been reported that the number of segmental nerves can vary among species of the same family [2, 26, 27] and their homologisation is at present difficult [11, 25, 27]. In parapodia-bearing annelids, the parapodial nerve is considered to be homologous . Reaching the parapodial lobe it splits into two roots, one innervating the dorsal and one the ventral cirrus [2, 38]. These cirri are important sensory organs comprising numerous receptor cells which send their processes into the ventral cord.
In addition to the ventral nerve cord, several longitudinal nerves running ventrally, laterally and dorsally have been described for many species . They seem to be part of the ground pattern in annelids, but at present only the unpaired dorsal longitudinal nerve can be homologised across annelids .
Even though the significance of evolutionary changes in central nervous systems is still discussed, it is often regarded as conserved within phyla [38,39,40]. However, it has long been observed that the annelid nervous system varies considerably across the phylum, thus reflecting the broad ecological and morphological diversity of the phylum which relativates the statement above [27, 29]. Detailed morphological analysis can yield valuable information on nervous system evolution and add information on phylogenetic relationships, even if the involved taxa differ in other morphological aspects [41, 42]. While the development of the nervous system in annelids becomes focus of more studies, and comparisons between families help to disentangle the phylogenetic tree , little is known on generic variation. It has been shown in Naididae, the biggest clitellate family with about one thousand species , that much of the variation of neuronal features in the family was overlooked before a detailed study of the clade .
Syllidae inhabit a wide variety of habitats and comprises more than 700 species in 74 genera [44,45,46,47]. Currently five subfamilies are recognized, but phylogenetic analyses have shown that only four are monophyletic and a number of genera are currently not assigned to any subfamily [45, 46] (Fig. 1a). So far little is known on how their morphological and ecological diversity affects internal anatomy, nervous system and sensory organs of different species within this large clade. Here, we present an extensive study of the nervous system of species within the family Syllidae, with an overview on 21 species from 12 genera of all subfamilies of Syllidae (Suppl. Fig. S1, Table 1). Three species of Syllinae (Plakosyllis brevipes, Syllis garciai and Syllis cf. tyrrhena) and two species of Exogoninae (Prosphaerosyllis marmarae and Sphaerosyllis taylori) were investigated in more detail. As staining intensity can differ between specimens, and several scans of different individuals are needed to account for this variation, only these five species, which were readily available and easy to collect, were used to describe differences in the microanatomy of the brain, anterior clusters of somata and segmental innervation.
Overview of the nervous system in Syllidae
According to Fauchald and Rouse and Pleijel [48, 49] the anterior end of syllids comprise a well-developed prostomium, a peristomium reduced to the lips and an achaetigerous first segment followed by the second, chaetigerous segment (Fig. 1b). Their terminology is used in this study. The achaetous segment bears one or two pairs of tentacular cirri.
All species have a dorsally positioned brain, which lies within the prostomium and is surrounded by somata. In some genera of Exogoninae (Prosphaerosyllis, Sphaerosyllis) it extents into the first segments. The brain is connected by the dorsal (drcc) and ventral root (vrcc) of the circumoesophaegeal connectives to the ventral nerve cord. It is is associated with the following sensory organs: a pair of palps (which may be fused to various extends), a pair of lateral antennae and an unpaired median antenna, usually two pairs of cerebral eyes which may be accompanied by a pair of minute anterior eye spots, a pair of laterofrontal sense organs, and the nuchal organs. In certain species part of the antennae and eyes or laterofrontal sense organs may be absent.
In Syllidae the ventral nerve cord always consists of a pair of main ventral nerves and an unpaired median nerve (suppl Fig. S1). The only exception is Plakosyllis brevipes, which has a pair of main ventral nerves, a pair of paramedian ventral nerves and an unpaired median nerve (see section ventral nerve cord). The ventral nerves can fuse to different degrees at the segmental boundaries, but are usually discernible in the region of the ventral ganglia. No clear pattern specific for either one subfamily in its segmental innervation could be discerned. All species have at least three segmental nerves (suppl. Fig. S1). A forth, intersegmental nerve is present in most species, but can be distributed irregularly and was not observed in the Anoplosyllinae, Eusyllis (“Eusyllinae”), Brania pulsilla, Exogone naidina (staining generally very weak), Parapionosyllis labronica, Parapionosyllis minuta (Exongoninae) (suppl. Fig. S1). The parapodial or second segmental nerve is split into at least three neurite bundles.
Microanatomy of the brain and innervation of anterior sensory appendages
The following sections of the manuscript deal only with the five species Plakosyllis brevipes, Syllis garciai and Syllis cf. tyrrhena (Syllinae), and Prosphaerosyllis marmarae and Sphaerosyllis taylori (Exogoninae) unless otherwise mentioned.
The expansion of the somata of the brain differs between Syllinae and Exogoninae. A pair of posterior extensions of the neuropil (here termed posterior nerves) is present in all species (Figs. 2f, 3d, 4d, 5f, 6c, 7a, 8a, 9a, e, 10d, 11a., suppl. Figs. S2a, S3a, b). In Syllinae, Streptosyllis and Autolytinae they connect directly to the neurite bundles of the primary sensory cells of the nuchal organ or the nuchal eupalettes (Figs. 7a, 9a, e, 11e, suppl. Figs. S2a, S3a, b). The somata of the brain are restricted to the prostomium (Figs. 6a-d, 8a, b, d, 10a, b, d). In Exogoninae these posterior nerves are surrounded by a pair of dorsal lobes of brain somata. These lobes extend into the anterior segments to various degrees. In Prosphaerosyllis marmarae the dorsal lobes reach the second chaetiger (Figs. 2a, b, d, f, 3a, d), while in Sphaerosyllis taylori the lobes are shorter and only reach into the first chaetiger (Figs. 4a, b, d, 5a). The posterior nerves themselves are only recognizable to the first chaetigerous segment in both species (Figs. 3a, d, e, g, 5f). The connection of posterior nerves to the nuchal nerves is thought to be located within these dorsal lobes, but could not be observed with certainty.
Serotonin-like immunoreactive (lir) perikarya are found in several clusters among the rind of somata of the brain; some are found posterolaterally of the brain, others lie in a posteromedian position behind the brain (Figs. 5f, 7b, d, 9c, 11f). Due to the dense packing and variable staining of the serotonin-lir perikarya, their number could not be determined accurately for each species. It appears to be higher in the Syllis species than in Plakosyllis and both species of Exogoninae.
The microanatomy of the brain and the origin of longitudinal nerves is basically the same in all species and is summarised in Fig. 12. The brain has a basiepithelial position and an extracellular matrix separating the somata of the brain from the epidermis of the prostomium could not be observed (Figs. 2c, d, f, 4c, d, 6c, d, 8c, d, 10c, d). Only the ventral parts are separated from the underlying mesodermal tissues.
Due to the density of the neuropil it is difficult to distinguish individual commissures within the brain. The dorsal commissure (dcvr, in ) of the vrcc was observed both in Syllinae and Exogoninae (Fig. 12). It is visible in histological sections (Figs. 2c, 4c, 8c, 10c) as well as in serotonin-lir and α-tubulin-lir stainings (Figs. 5c, g, 11a, b). The dcvr extends dorsally comprising the spherical median front of the brain (Figs. 9c, 11c, f), above a muscle bundle penetrating the brain. Sometimes a median and anterior dorsal commissure of the dcvr was observed (Figs 5f, 9f). Other fibres of the vrcc reach to the ventrofrontal part of the brain, sending fibres inside the palps. The drcc also splits. Some fibres join the dcvr, while others form a commissure (dcdr, in ) from which the posterior nerves arise. The origins of the fibres comprising the rest of the neuropil could not be traced. The eyes are directly innervated from lateral regions of the brain, but it could not be detected whether they are connected to one of these roots.
Each lateral antenna is innervated by one neurite bundle that originates from the lateral regions of the brain, slightly dorsoposterior to where the drcc enters the neuropil (Figs. 7a, b, 8c, 9a, 11a, suppl. Figs. S2a, S3a, b), probably corresponding to the dorsal commissure of the drcc. The median antenna is innervated by two neurite bundles coming from the posterior region of the brain (Fig. 3e, also corresponding to the dcdr (data not shown), suppl. Figs. S2a, S3a, b).
The innervation of the tentacular cirri (only one pair in Sphaerosyllis taylori, two pairs in the other species) is also consistent in all Syllidae. A neurite bundle, which emerges from the circumoesophageal connective after the vrcc and drcc have fused, splits and innervates both cirri (Figs. 5e, 7c, d, 9b, g). In Prosphaerosyllis marmarae the neurite bundle of the tentacular cirri is accompanied by two clusters of somata (Figs. 2a, b, 3b, c), which are not present in any of the other species.
The palps are innervated by a strong palp neurite bundle (pn1) coming directly from the neuropil of the brain (Figs. 3a, b, e, 5c, d, 7c, d, 9a, b, e, 11a-d, f). Fibres originate mainly from the vrcc. A few fibres originate from the drcc at a point where the drcc has already entered the neuropil of the brain and join the main palp neurite bundle (Fig. 7c). Several neurite bundles branch off pn1 and enter the palps in the Syllis species (3–4 in Syllis garciai and 2 in Syllis tyrrhena) (Figs. 9a, b, 11a). These are visible in both, serial semi-thin sections, and serotonin-lir and α-tubulin-lir stainings. Inside the palps the neurite bundles ramify further, forming an elaborate plexus.
Two additional neurite bundles, pn2 and pn3, enter the palps. While pn2 branches off the drcc shortly before it enters the brain (Figs. 3b, e, 5d, 7c, 9b, g, 11d), pn3 branches off the vrcc (Figs. 3c, 5e, 9g, 11b, d). Pn2 fuses with pn1 once it enters the palps. Pn3 runs along the ventral part of the palps and reaches to the ciliary patches at the inner margins of the palps in Syllis tyrrhena and Syllis garciai. It is present in Sphaerosyllis taylori as well, which does not possess similar ciliary patches. In Sph. taylori it reaches to a network of small neurite bundles more proximal than the ciliary patches in the Syllis species. It is not clear if pn3 exists in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae. If so, it is very short and connects to pn1 close to its base, which could only be observed in one specimen. In Plakosyllis brevipes pn3 could not be found.
In both Syllis species a conspicuous neurite bundle leaves the neuropil anteriolaterally to the main palp neurite bundles and runs posteriorly along the lateral margins of the prostomium, where it branches several times (Figs. 9a, 11a). The somata in this region are densely packed (Fig. 11a), but do not appear smaller or globuli-like. Neurite bundles from the drcc reach into this region (Fig. 9a). In Plakosyllis brevipes and both Exogoninae, a similar dorsal cluster of somata was not found. No distinct mushroom body-like structures with globuli-like cell clusters were identified in any of the species.
A pair of laterofrontal sense organs was observed in all species except Plakosyllis brevipes. In Sphaerosyllis taylori two pairs of α-tubulin-lir sense organs lie at the laterofrontal border of the prostomium (Fig. 5d). In Prosphaerosyllis marmarae one pair of similar sense organs is present, but their neurite bundles originate directly from the drcc (Figs. 3e, g), while in Sph. taylori they emerge from the brain, close to where the drcc enters the neuropil. The same kind of sense organs were found in Syllis garciai and Syllis tyrrhena where the neurite bundle leaves the neuropil just above the drcc underneath the lateral antenna and reaches the lateral margin of the prostomium just in front of the anterior lense eyes (Figs. 9e, 11a inset). The neurite bundles very likely do not possess cilia penetrating the cuticle since no external cilia are visible in this region (Fig. 11a inset). In P. brevipes, these sense organs could not be identified with certainty. Strongly innervated regions in the prostomium of Myrianida were observed but it is unclear if these structures are the same as in the other syllids (suppl Figs. S3b). Streptosyllis has a ciliary patch innervated by the drcc which could be similar to the laterofrontal sense organ, but its cilia clearly penetrate the cuticle (Suppl. Fig. S2a).
Nuchal organs and posterior inferior clusters of somata
The distribution of dorsal and nuchal lobes and other clusters of somata is summarized in Figs. 13 and 14. In addition to a pair of dorsal lobes in the Exogoninae, a pair of nuchal lobes is present in all of the five more closely investigated species. It can only be clearly observed in histological sections. The nuchal lobes presumably consist of the nuclei of supportive cells from the nuchal organ and are histologically distinct from the dorsal lobes of the Exogoninae and the somata of sensory cells (Figs. 2d-f, 4d, e, 5h, 6d, 8d, e, 10d, e). In stainings with nuclear markers, the nuclei in the nuchal lobes are difficult to observe as they are set further apart than e.g. the nuclei of the dorsal lobes (Figs. 3a, b, 5a-c, 9e, 11e).
In both Syllis species the nuchal organ lies dorsally behind the prostomium in form of a pair of ciliated pits (Figs. 8a, b, d, e, 9a, e, 10a, b, d, e, 11e). Somata of receptor cells and somata of the brain lie between the nuchal organ and the neuropil of the brain. The somata of these cells are not clearly distinguishable from each other in histological semi-thin sections. Several neurite bundles run directly from the nuchal organ to the posterior neurite bundle of the brain (Figs. 9a, e, f, 11e). The nuchal lobes lie behind the nuchal organ in the first achaetous segment (Figs. 8a, b, d, 10a, b, d). Each lobe is constricted by muscle bundles separating it into two to three bulbs. In Myrianida (Autolytinae), which has a pair of nuchal eupalettes, the innervation is similar to the Syllinae; the brain is directly connected to the primary sensory cells of the nuchal eupalettes via its posterior neurite bundles (suppl. Fig. S3a). The innervation of the nuchal organs in Streptosyllis websteri also resembles the situation in the Syllinae (suppl. Fig. S2a).
In Plakosyllis brevipes the nuchal organs lie laterally across the border of the prostomium and first achaetous segment (Figs. 6a, b, d, 7a). The nuchal lobes extend into the first achaetous segment and are separated into two bulbs (Figs. 6a, b, d). Unlike the Syllis species, the somata of the primary sensory cells of the nuchal organ and the somata of the brain are clearly separated and distinct in histological sections (Fig. 6c, d). The somata of the sensory cells form a pair of postero-lateral lobes between nuchal organ and brain (Fig. 6a, b, d), from which several neurite bundles visible in α-tubulin-lir stainings connect the nuchal organ to the posterior neurite bundles of the brain (Fig. 7a).
In the Exogoninae the nuchal organ also lies laterally between prostomium and the first achaetous segment (Figs. 2a, b, e, 3c-g, 4a, b, 5e, g). The nuchal lobes in these species extend far posteriorly and reach into the second chaetigerous segment. A distinct neurite bundle extends posteriorly from the nuchal organ forming the nuchal neurite bundle (Figs. 3c-f, j, 5b, c, d). Several fine α-tubulin-lir fibres separate from the nuchal neurite bundle and extend into the nuchal lobes (Fig. 3d, i). Other neurite bundles reach into a pair of posterior inferior clusters of somata that are only present in both Exogoninae, and which also receive a neurite bundle from the drcc (Fig. 3a, c, i, 5b, c). This posterior inferior cluster of somata possibly consists of the somata of the primary sensory cells of the nuchal organ. Only in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae another small cluster of somata lies ventrally to the posterior inferior cluster, sending neurite bundles to the drcc (Figs. 2a, b, d, f, 3b, c). Thus there are all in all four clusters of somata (two tentacular clusters, one inferior posterior cluster and a fourth small cluster) in addition to the dorsal lobes and nuchal lobes present in this species (Figs. 2d, f, 3a-c). Several branches of the nuchal neurite bundle reach into the dorsal lobe and seem to connect to the posterior neurite bundles of the brain. In contrast to the Syllinae, a direct connection between the nuchal neurite bundle and the posterior neurite bundles of the brain is not clearly visible in α-tubulin- or serotonin- lir staining in the Exogoninae. In semi-thin sections of Prosphaerosyllis marmarae it seems like neurite bundles of both the sensory cells and the posterior neurite bundles of the brain can be observed in the posterior lobes (Fig. 2f). TEM observations would be necessary to confirm this, since the resolution in light microscopy is not high enough to link somata with their neurites in semi-thin sections.
The stomatogastric nervous system
All Syllidae possess a characteristic pharynx or axial proboscis comprising a pharyngeal tube followed by the so called proventricle, a muscular part of the gut considered as apomorphy of the family . The anterior part of the pharynx is cuticularized and can be everted.
The pharyngeal sheath and the pharynx are innervated by several distinct neurite bundles, all of which are located intraepithelially in the epithelium of the foregut (unpubl. TEM observations). Two neurite bundles form distinct ring-like commissures around the pharyngeal tube (observed in Syllis garciai, Syllis tyrrhena, Plakosyllis brevipes, Prosphaerosyllis marmarae, Sphaerosyllis taylori, Streptosyllis websteri (suppl. Fig. S2b), Streptosyllis sp. (Autolytinae), Brania clavata, Brania pulsilla, Exogone naidina, Parapionosyllis labronica and Sphaerosyllis tetralix (Exogoninae) (data not shown). The innervation of the pharyngeal tube and pharyngeal sheath is similar among at least the Anoplosyllinae, Exogoninae and Syllinae and thus does not depend on the presence or absence of a pharyngeal tooth. Unfortunately, due to strong autofluorescence of the cuticle of the pharynx and weak staining of the stomatogastric neurite bundles, the innervation of the pharynx could not be reconstructed for the Autolytinae (suppl. Fig. S3a).
Initially five pairs of stomatogastric neurite bundles (stgn) (Fig. 15) emerge from the brain and run posteriorly following the epithelium of the pharyngeal sheath until they join into the first ring neurite bundle (Fig. 15a). Stgn 1 and 2 originate from the ventral part of the neuropil of the brain, while the other three emerge from the vrcc, the 5th one shortly before vrcc and drcc fuse (Figs. 3j, 5e, 7c, 9f, g, 11g, 12, 15). Stgn 3 and 4 fuse and separate again posteriorly. The first ring neurite bundle lies where the epithelium of the pharyngeal sheath passes into the epithelium surrounding the pharyngeal tube (Fig. 15a, b).
The stomatogastric neurite bundles then project anteriorly in the outer epithelium of the pharyngeal tube and form a hair-pin like loop at the most anterior tip of the pharynx (Figs. 15a, c2, 16a-d, g). Some of the fibers proceed anteriorly into the pharyngeal papillae. These are part of primary receptor cells present in the papillae . Their neurite bundles are connected to the forward projecting neurite bundles between the anteriormost hair-pin like loop and the first ring commissure (Fig. 16d).
From their anteriormost position the stomatogastric neurite bundles again project posteriorly underneath the muscular layer of the pharynx and reach a second pharyngeal ring commissure (Figs. 15a, c2, 16c, e, h). From here only two latero-median neurite bundles continue posteriorly, each of which splits again into two neurite bundles. Thus, two pairs of neurite bundles enter the proventricle and the ventricle (Figs. 15a, c2, c3, 16i). These neurite bundles could be best traced in dissected proventricles of P. brevipes (Fig. 16e) and Syllis tyrrhena. In addition to the five pairs of stomatogastric neurite bundles a diffuse nervous plexus linking the stomatogastric neurite bundles to each other is also present in the inner epithelium of the pahrynx. Prosphaerosyllis marmarae is the only species in which a third ring neurite bundle is visible in serotonin-lir (Fig. 3g, h). It lies underneath the muscular layer of the pharynx at its anterior end.
Eleven sac-like tubes extend posteriorly from the position of the first ring neurite bundle (Figs. 15a, b, 16b, d, f, h, 17e1) which are only missing in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae. The tubes have been described as pharyngeal glands [50,51,52], which open on the pharyngeal papillae at the beginning of the pharyngeal tube . The glands show a diffuse α-tubulin-lir signal (Fig. 16b, c, h). It is unclear whether they are innervated or if the signal belongs to cilia in the gland cells.
Only in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae stgn1 emerges from the front of the brain instead of the ventroposterior part. From its origin in the neuropil it first extends to the anterior edge of the prostomium and then turns posteriorly (Fig. 3j, e). In Pr. marmarae stomatogastric neurite bundle 2,3 and fuse, then separate again into two bundles, with one bundle reaching backward, while the other one reaches forward into the buccal lips (Fig. 3j). It then turns posteriorly towards the pharynx and separates again into two bundles, with five pairs of neurite bundles reaching the first ring neurite bundle. In Syllis garciai stgn 3 and 4 also reach forward into the buccal lips, before turning posteriorly (Fig. 11b, g). The intestine itself shows a diffuse serotonin-lir signal (16 J).
Ventral nerve cord
The ventral nerve cord lies in a basiepithelial position and is encompassed by the extracellular matrix (Fig. 17d1 inset, e2 inset). In both Syllis species the ventral nerve cord is pushed inside the body cavity by the strongly developed ventral longitudinal muscles (Fig. 17d1, d2). The ventral nerve cord remains basiepithelially, surrounded by the extracellular matrix even if it lies dorsally of the ventral longitudinal muscle bundles as in e.g. Syllis tyrrhena. The ventral nerve cord in Plakosyllis brevipes, Prosphaerosyllis marmarae and Sphaerosyllis taylori remains in its ventral position and segmental nerves branch off laterally, while in Syllis species the segmental neurite bundles branch of laterally from the ventral nerve cord, turn immediately ventrally and run through the gap between ventral longitudinal muscle bundles (Figs. 17a1-c2, 18, 19a2-a5, b2, c2, 20d, 21, 22a1, a2, b1, b2). They then turn laterally and proceed into the periphery and parapodia.
Excepting Plakosyllis brevipes, all species have a ventral nerve cord comprised of three ventral nerves, a pair of main nerves and an unpaired median nerve (Figs. 17a1-e2, 18a2-a5, b2-b5, 19a2-a5, b2-b5, c2-c5, suppl. Fig. S2d, S3c, other data not shown). The ventral nerves fuse to certain degrees, but three separate ones are at least observable in some parts of the ventral nerve cord. The median nerve in the Syllis species is often only visible in the ganglion, while it is hardly distinguishable in the connectives (Figs. 17d1-e2, 19b2-b5, c2-c5). In α-tubulin-lir the median nerve can be obscured by the strong signal of the lateral nerves, but in serotonin-lir all three ventral nerves are distinguishable (Fig. 19b4, c4). In Syllis garciai the three connectives appear more or less fused in semi-thin sections of the anterior end (Fig. 17e1, e2).
In Prosphaerosyllis marmarae the median nerve is visible both in α-tubulin-lir and serotonin-lir, and also in semi-thin sections (Figs. 17a1, a2). It only fuses with the main nerves in parts of the ganglion. In Sphaerosyllis taylori on the other hand it is only distinguishable in a very small part of the ganglion in α-tubulin-lir and serotonin-lir (Fig. 18b2-b5). However, in this species the three ventral nerves are distinct in semi-thin sections of the ganglion (Fig. 17b1, b2). Posteriorly in the ganglion of the Exogoninae two small neurite bundles form diagonally crossing commissures of both main ventral nerves (Fig. 18a3 inset, b3 inset). These crossing commissures were not observed in the other species, but may be obscured by the strong signal of the ventral nerve cord.
Three connectives are visible in immunocytochemical stainings of Prosphaerosyllis marmarae, but in some regions fine gaps can be observed between them (Fig. 18a2). In anterior segments only three ventral nerves are present. In posterior segments the connectives of the main nerves are separated into various distinct bundles in both Exogoninae, clearly visible in histological semi-thin sections past the ganglion (Fig. 17a2, b2). The bundles lie adjacent to each other. They are only separated for a length of 10-20 μm and it is difficult to clearly distinguish them. The bundles fuse again before entering the next ganglion.
In contrast to the other four species the ventral nerve cord possesses five connectives in Plakosyllis brevipes (Figs. 17c2 inset, 19a2-a5) which partly fuse to three inside the ganglia (Figs. 17c1, 19a2-a5). These five connectives appear from the second chaetigerous segment onward, in the first segment only three connectives are present.
While all species have a high number of serotonin-lir perikarya in the ventral nerve cord (e.g. > 20 in Sphaerosyllis taylori, again an exact number is difficult to establish as some perikarya lie very close together) the serotonin-lir of perikarya is very low in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae. Even in intense stainings, not more than 3–4 serotonin-lir perikarya associated to the ventral nerve cord were found per segment.
In the Syllis species and the Exogoninae no distinct commissures of the ventral nerve cord were observed. Yet, the nerves partly fuse within the ganglia. Commissures within the ganglion were observed in Plakosyllis brevipes, but it is not possible to resolve if there are 3, 4 or 5 commissures (Fig. 19a2).
In all species the segmental ganglia are slightly shifted anteriorly with regard to the centre of the segment (Figs. 18, 19), but never traverse into the previous segment. Only in the first two segments, the tentacular segment and the first chaetiger, the ganglia of both segments are fused and, therefore, extend across the segmental boundary (Figs. 13, 14). In Sphaerosyllis taylori the ganglia are hardly separated from each other. The somata of the ganglia almost touch each other only leaving rather short and indistinct connectives, giving the ventral nerve cord an almost medullary appearance (Fig. 18b3, b5). In the other species there are noticeably fewer or more condensed somata accompanying the connectives.
In Shaerosyllis taylori additional clusters of somata form dorsoposterior extensions of the ganglia (Figs. 4b, e, 13). In the third segment the dorsoposterior ganglions are hardly visibly anymore and in the fourth segment they are absent. These extra anterior ventral ganglia are not found in any of the other species and may be a result of a small body size.
Segmental neurite bundles and ring neurite bundles of the achaetous segment
In the achaetous segment three neurite bundles emerge from the central nervous system. The first is the strongest and enters the tentacular cirri followed by two smaller ones situated at the posterior edge of the achaetous segment (Figs. 3f, 5e, 9b, g). The neurite bundle innervating the tentacular cirri and the following one come off from the circumoesophageal connective, the last one originates from the region where the circumoesophageal connectives fuse to form the ventral nerve cord. It is not clear if the second ring neurite bundle lies within the first chaetigerous segment forming the first segmental neurite bundle of chaetiger 1 or if it lies in front of the segment boundary and thus belongs to the achaetous segment. Dissepiments are very likely reduced in the anterior segments enabling movement of the pharyngeal complex and complicate a clear distinction between segments.
The segmental innervation is highly variable among species. At least three segmental ring neurite bundles are always present. A fourth intersegmental ring neurite bundle can be missing in irregular patterns in anterior segments of Syllis garciai and Syllis tyrrhena and throughout the whole body of Plakosyllis brevipes and Myrianida and was not observed in the Anoplosyllinae (Figs. 18, 19, 23, suppl. Figs. S2d, S3c). It is only visible in α -tubulin-lir stainings. In Plakosyllis brevipes and Prosphaerosyllis marmarae the first segmental (ring) neurite bundle emerges within the ganglion, in the Syllis species it emerges shortly anterior of the ganglion (Figs. 18, 19). The dorsal commissure of the second ring neurite bundle is formed by a dorsal branch of root 2 of the strongest parapodial neurite bundle. It is difficult to distinguish between dorsal plexus and segmental neurite bundles; neurite bundles of the nervous plexus above the parapodium emerging from the parapodial neurite bundle may sometimes form an additional dorsal commissure (Fig. 18a1, b1).
Parapodial innervation and transition from uni- to bilobed parapodia
The parapodial innervation is similar in all five species and Streptosyllis websteri (suppl. Fig. S2e). The only notable difference among species is the number of neurite bundles that comprise the parapodial innervation (Figs. 18a5, b5, 19a5, b5, c5, 20b1, d, 21, 22). The number ranges from five in Syllis garciai, four in Syllis tyrrhena and Sphaerosyllis taylori, three in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae to two in Plakosyllis brevipes (Figs. 21, 22). In some specimens of Streptosyllis websteri it seems that the parapodial neurite bundles consisted of two, while in others it consisted of three bundles, probably depending on the intensity of the staining (suppl. Fig. S2d, e). All of these neurite bundles are connected to each other. The fine bundles reaching from the ventral nerve cord to the base of the parapodium are termed II.I-II.V. The labels are supposed to illustrate the number of neurite bundles comprising the parapodial innervation. It should be noted that these bundles are only clearly distinguishable in α-tubulin-lir stainings. In serotonin-lir stainings the anteriormost bundle is clearly stained, while only a weak signal can be observed from the other bundles, until they reach the parapodial base (Figs. 21, 22). Once the neurite bundles reach the parapodial base two neurite bundles continue, the main parapodial neurite bundle and the anterior neurite bundle (Fig. 20d). The main neurite bundle splits into two roots (Figs 20b1, d, 21a1, b1, 22a1, b1, c1). Root 1 innervates the ventral cirrus and root 2 innervates the dorsal cirrus, which innervates at least a pair of ciliated cells per annulus (Fig. 19 b2, c2, 20d). Both roots also form several distinct bundles innervating the parapodial musculature.
Root 1 forms a dorsal arch and connects to the anterior parapodial neurite bundle forming the distal parapodial connective (Fig. 20d). From this connective a long neurite bundle is sent along the acicula, which bifurcates before innervating the acicular musculature. It sends neurite bundles to the chaetae, forming a loop around them and re-connects to the acicular neurite bundle (Figs. 20b2, c1, c2, d, 22c2). This bundle turns backwards before reaching the base of the chaeta. The innervation of the acicular muscles can be observed in α-tubulin-lir, but is especially strong in serotonin-lir (Fig. 20b1, b2, b1, c2).
Other neurite bundles of root 1 reach the most distal plane of the parapodium on its ventral side. One of them turns back along the dorsal plane of the parapodium (Fig. 20d) (a direct connection could not be observed in all species) and joins the neurite bundle innervating the acicular muscles. Root 2 runs dorsally on the posterior side of the parapodium (Fig. 20d). It divides into three neurite bundles; the first forms the median parapodial connective to the anterior parapodial neurite bundle. The second innervates the dorsal cirrus. The third forms the most proximal dorsal parapodial connective to the anterior parapodial neurite bundle and a dorsal commissure to root 2 of the parapodium on the other side of the segment (segmental ring neurite bundle) (Fig. 20b2, d). Additional fine neurite bundles connect to the nervous plexus of the body wall and may form a second commissure. Slight variations could be found in the parapodial innervation between species. In Pr. marmarae parapodial papillae are innervated by additional neurite bundles, and a cluster of cell nuclei at the beginning of root 2 (Fig. 21a2) may be associated with a parapodial gland in this species (Fig. 17a1). Sphaerosyllis taylori has conspicuous glands filled with fibrous material situated dorsally to the acicle inside the parapodium (enclosed by the acicular muscles, not shown) (Fig. 17b1, 18b3), which are species specific and used as a character for identification and innervated from the proximal parapodial connective.
Stolons of Syllis tyrrhena develop natatory chaetae, which are long, capillary notopodial chaetae (Fig. 24f). A distinct notopodial lobe is not formed. The median dorsal connective of the parapodium splits into two neurite bundles (Fig. 24a3, b3, c). Between these neurite bundles the natatory chaetae extend from the parapodium (Fig. 24c). From the anterior split of the median connective, a diffuse serotonin-lir signal surrounds the chaetae (Fig. 24a3, b1, b3, c). In addition to the diffuse signal, a very fine α-tubulin-lir neurite bundle forms a loop from the anterior region to the posterior region of the median connective (Fig. 24a3, b3, c). It also splits and forms two loops at its end.
A connection is formed between the anterior neurite bundle of the parapodial innervation and segmental neurite bundle I (Fig. 24b1, b2, c). The connection is not present in the stock animals. The only other notable difference in the segmental nervous system of the stolons is that the nephridium is accompanied by a diffuse serotonin-lir signal and serotonin-lir circle surrounds the nephridial porus (Fig. 24b1). The α-tubulin-lir of the nephridium is more diffuse than in the stock animal and neurite bundle II.II is longer than in the stock animals. It fuses with root 1 of the main parapodial neurite bundle and seems to innervate the serotonin-lir circle around the nephridial pore, but only shows α-tubulin-lir signal (Fig. 24b2).
With the exception of Syllis garciai, all of the more closely investigated species show a neurite bundle that connects the parapodial neurite bundle (II) to the following segmental ring neurite bundle (III) (Figs. 18a2, a5, b2, b5, 19a2, a5, b2, b5). Syllis garciai has an elaborate nervous plexus that connects several of the segmental neurite bundles (Fig. 19c2, c4). In addition to the four segmental ring neurite bundles, two additional segmental neurite bundles innervate the nervous plexus of the body wall and ventral ciliary receptors in S. garciai (Figs. 19c2, c5, 22c1). The first one leaves the ventral nerve cord between the parapodial neurite bundle (segmental ring neurite bundle II) and segmental ring neurite bundle III. A similar segmental neurite bundle can be found in Syllis tyrrhena, where it joins the ventral longitudinal neurite bundle (Figs. 19b2, b5, 22b1). The second additional segmental neurite bundle of S. garciai emerges between segmental ring neurite bundle III and IV. No segmental neurite bundle is present in S. tyrrhena in this region.
Plakosyllis brevipes does not possess any additional segmental neurite bundles. From segmental neurite bundle three a small neurite bundle leads to a distinct segmental cluster of somata not present in any of the other species (Figs. 19a3, a5, 22a1, a2).
Additional segmental neurite bundles can also be found in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae, which innervate ventral sensory papillae. In Pr. marmarae, both the first and third segmental ring neurite bundle branch after leaving the ventral nerve cord. One branch forms the dorsal commissure, while the other branch innervates a ventral papilla. Following the first segmental ring neurite bundle a small neurite bundle leaves the ventral nerve cord and innervates another ventral papilla. A little more posteriorly, a second small neurite bundle leaves the ventral nerve cord. It connects to the first segmental ring neurite bundle and also innervates a lateroventral sensory papilla. From the parapodial neurite bundle II.II another small neurite bundle reaches a ventral papilla (Fig. 18a2, a5, 21a1).
In Sphaerosyllis taylori no additional segmental neurite bundles are present (Figs. 18b2, b5, 21b1). The ventral papillae are innervated by the segmental ring neurite bundles; the first segmental ring neurite bundle forms a small branch which innervates the papillae, similar to Prosphaerosyllis marmarae, but much finer. Two pairs of ventral papillae are directly innervated by the parapodial neurite bundles. Two more pairs of papillae lie at the posterior edge of the segment. The median ones lie underneath the ventral nerve cord and are directly innervated by small fibre bundles from the ventral nerve cord. The more lateral ones are innervated by segmental ring nerve II. Between segmental nerve ring III and IV a small neurite bundle runs to the lateral margins of the segment, but it does not seem to arise from the ventral nerve cord.
Longitudinal neurite bundles
All of the five species studied in more detail (also observed in Eurysillis blomstrandi and Streptosyllis websteri) have three pairs of longitudinal neurite bundles in addition to the ventral nerve cord; a pair of dorsal, a pair of lateral and a pair of ventrolateral longitudinal neurite bundles (Fig. 23). In anterior segments these neurite bundles are continuous and distinct (e.g. Fig. 16a). Approximately from the segment of the proventricle they become discontinuous, only connecting the segmental ring neurite bundles of adjacent segments (Figs. 18a1, b1, 19a1, b1, c1, 23). All longitudinal neurite bundles have the same origin; a fine neurite bundle leaves the circumoesophageal connective shortly after dorsal and ventral root fuse and anteriorly to the neurite bundle that innervates the tentacular cirri (Figs. 3f, 5e, 7c, 9b, g, 12).
The neurite bundle that forms the longitudinal neurite bundles reaches towards the dorsal plane of the animal and bifurcates. It sends one neurite bundle to the dorsal side of the animal, which forms the dorsal longitudinal neurite bundle and receives fibres from the nuchal neurite bundle. A second neurite bundle reaches dorsolaterally and forms the lateral longitudinal neurite bundle. It receives fibres from the neurite bundles innervating the tentacular cirri (Fig. 12).
A small neurite bundle, which originates at the drcc, joins the neurite bundle forming the longitudinal neurite bundles in all species except Prosphaerosyllis marmarae and Syllis tyrrhena. Its fibres form at least part of the ventral longitudinal neurite bundle. It also sends fibres to the posterior inferior cluster of somata in Sphaerosyllis taylori (Fig. 12).
Both Syllis species have a dorsal ciliary band on the first achaetous segment and a discontinuous ciliary band on the first chaetigerous segment, which are both innervated by the dorsal longitudinal neurite bundles (Figs. 9e, 16a). In Syllis tyrrhena ciliary patches lying just above the dorsal cirri in the first three segments and the achaetous segment are innervated by the lateral longitudinal neurite bundles (Figs. 9e, 16a). Plakosyllis brevipes possesses patchy bands of cilia on all segments, but they are innervated by the second ring neurite bundle only. The innervation of dorsal ciliary bands in Myrianida is similar. The Exogoninae do not have any cilia on the segments.
In more posterior segments, the dorsal longitudinal neurite bundle branches off the dorsal commissure of segmental ring neurite bundle 2 close to the neurite bundle innervating the dorsal cirrus. It then connects the dorsal commissures of the following segmental neurite bundles, until it reaches the dorsal commissure of segmental ring neurite bundle 2 of the following segment in a dorsomedian position (Fig. 23). Its course is not strictly longitudinal, but starts from a lateral region of the body and ends in a dorsomedian region.
In anterior segments the lateral longitudinal neurite bundle lies dorsolaterally and forms a continuous lateral neurite bundle that connects all segmental ring neurite bundles within and across segments. In more posterior segments, the lateral longitudinal neurite bundle lies more laterally. It branches off the neurite bundle that also forms the second ring commissure and the innervation of the dorsal cirrus, connecting it to the following segmental ring neurite bundles. It reaches the second segmental ring neurite bundle of the adjoining segment in a slightly more dorsal position (Figs. 20b1, b2, d, 23). In Syllis tyrrhena the neurite bundle splits into very fine neurite bundles, which connects it to the nervous plexus of the body wall, ring neurite bundle 2 and the parapodial neurite bundle of root 1 of the main parapodial neurite bundle forming the median parapodial connective. In the other species only a connection to root 1 of the main parapodial neurite bundle could be observed.
The ventral longitudinal neurite bundle runs ventrolaterally, parallel to the ventral nerve cord. In more posterior segments it branches off root 1 of the main parapodial neurite bundle, shortly after root 1 and 2 separate. It then reaches to the following segmental ring neurite bundles and ends at the anterior neurite bundle of the parapodial innervation of the adjoining segment (Figs. 18a5, b5, 19b5, c5).
In Plakosyllis brevipes the ventral longitudinal neurite bundle connects three adjacent segments. It leaves root 1 of the main parapodial neurite bundle, passes through the next segment crossing the parapodial innervation again and then connects to the ganglion of the third following segment. Thus, two ventral longitudinal neurite bundles that run more or less parallel to each other are present in every segment (Fig. 19a5).
Once the nerves of the ventral nerve cord reach the pygidium they separate and spread out. In Syllis garciai and Sphaerosyllis taylori α-tubulin-lir and serotonin-lir stainings show that the main connectives separate into median and paramedian nerves (Fig. 25a2). At the end of the pygidium just underneath the anus, a commissure connects all nerves of the ventral nerve cord (Fig. 25, suppl. Fig. S2f). The main nerves of the ventral nerve cord reach dorsally and innervate the anal cirri (Fig. 25), which are present in most species. The Syllis species have an additional anal papilla. The source of its innervation was not observed. In Syllis garciai two very fine dorsal commissures, which connect to the neurite bundles coming from the main nerves and to the nervous plexus of the gut, are present (Fig. 25a1). The more posterior one may be the pygidial ring neurite bundle, but could also be part of the nervous plexus of the intestine. The neurites innervating the gut are better differentiated in the posteriormost segments (Fig. 25a1) than in anterior segments.
The general appearance of the brain, its dorsal position and the innervation of anterior appendages is similar in all investigated species of the family Syllidae (suppl. Fig. S1). However, several small differences were found between species and are discussed in more detail. The innervation pattern of the antennae and tentacular cirri observed in this study is consistent with previous descriptions  (suppl. Fig. S4a), which depicted the antennal neurite bundles to be branches of the dcdr. This is very likely part of the ground pattern in all syllids. Clusters of somata (especially present in Prosphaerosyllis marmarae) were not described for Syllidae, but for example in Phyllodocidae, termed tentacular ganglia . These clusters of somata probably consist of the somata of primary sensory cells of the ventral and dorsal tentacular cirri, and are dislocated and arranged in clusters due to limited space, like the dorsal lobes of the brain as discussed below. The resolution of the applied techniques is not high enough to link individual somata to their cell processes in the tentacular or dorsal cirri.
In total up to 12 palp nerve roots have been described across several species of annelids . It is noteworthy to mention that no species exists possessing all of them. However, these palp nerve roots were used as an important character to homologise the anterior appendages across annelids. The number of palp nerves varies between families and sometimes within families, but so far few studies have compared the innervation of the palps within a family. In the sedentary Serpulidae and Sabellidae 8 palp nerve roots were found, in the errant families there are usually fewer . Nerve root 6 and 9 are present in Syllidae, Nereididae (suppl. Fig. S4b), Hesionidae and all studied Aphroditiformia . In other Phyllodocida such as Glyceriformia root 6 can be missing. In Syllidae palp nerve root 6 originates from the ventral commissure of the ventral root of the circumoesophageal connective (vcvr, ) and root 9 from the drcc, shortly before it splits into the dorsal and ventral commissure [25, 32] (suppl. Fig. S4a). The homologisation of these nerves from CLSM images is difficult, as their course is hard to observe if they originate within the neuropil and the brain commissures  are not always found . However other authors were at least able to describe them and additional neurite bundles from reconstructions of serial TEM sections (e.g. ).
From the results of the present study it is clear that Syllidae have more than two nerve roots innervating the palps; a main bundle (pn1), a bundle originating from the drcc (pn2) and at least in some species one originating from the vrcc (pn3) (Fig. 12, suppl. Fig. S1). The neurite bundles forming the main palp neurite bundle (pn1) are likely homologous to nerve root 6. On the other hand, it is unclear which neurite bundles correspond to nerve root 9: Either the neurite bundles branching off the drcc after it has entered the neuropil of the brain, or pn2, which leaves the drcc before it enters the neuropil (see Fig. 12). Additional neurite bundles branching off the drcc that innervate the palps have been described in Nereididae and may be homologous to the fine neurite bundle (pn2) branching of the drcc in Syllidae, if it does not correspond to nerve root 9. Palp nerve root 11 branching off the drcc can be found both in Nereididae (suppl. Fig. S4b) and in Glyceridae within the Phyllodocida , but a homologisation with any nerve root found in the present investigation remains speculative and difficult when comparing data obtained by different methods.
Further neurite bundles branching off the vrcc (or its commissures) were so far only described in some Aphroditiformia within the Phyllodocida . Even though they may be in a similar position, they were not described to innervate ciliary structures , thus a homologisation of pn3 in the Syllidae to any of the nerve roots of the vrcc in Aphroditiformia is impossible at present.
In Autolytus, Syllis and Eurysyllis a dorsal ganglion dorsally of the drcc has been described  (suppl. Fig. S4a). This dorsal cluster of somata [27, 33] is a common feature in several families including Hesionidae, Nereididae and other Phyllodocida such as Sigalionidae, Aphroditidae, Acoetidae, Polynoidae, Eunicidae, Glyceridae and Goniadidae [25, 27]. It is involved in the innervation of the palps in families possessing palp nerve 11 and is usually associated with the drcc . It is assumed that the dorsolateral cluster of somata found in Syllis tyrrhena and Syllis garciai is homologous to the “dorsal ganglion” described in other species. This could also support the homology of pn2 in the Syllidae to palp nerve root 11 described in other families.
While no mushroom bodies were found in this study, an anterior and a lateroposterior mass of globuli cells were described in the syllid Odontosyllis cf. fulgurans (Eusyllinae) with immunocytochemical methods . These clusters were interpreted as an indication for mushroom bodies, but are lacking a distinct neuropil, which should be present in true mushroom bodies . Ganglia consisting of globuli cells were also described in the palps in the general reconstruction of the anterior nervous system of Syllidae from species of the genera Syllis (Syllinae), Autolytus (Autolytinae), Eusyllis (Eusyllinae) from paraffin sections . Intrafamily variation regarding the presence and stage of clusters of globuli-like cells were found in Nephtyidae  and their presence could be similarly variable in Syllidae.
Prostomial sense organs at the laterofrontal margins of the brain are known from α-tubulin-lir stainings of Neanthes arenaceodentata (Nereididae)  (suppl. Fig. S4b). It was interpreted to be the anterior cephalic sense organ described in Alitta (Nereis) virens  and Hediste (Nereis) diversicolor , termed Langdons organ . The Langdons organs have also been described in other annelids , but the species are not mentioned by the author. However, a closer comparison on a cellular level to the Langdons organ in A. virens would be necessary to confirm the homology of these structures in Syllidae and Nereididae.
The arrangement of serotonin-lir somata posterior to the brain was described and used by other authors  to compare different errant and sedentary annelid species and deduct a ground pattern for the Annelida. As shown by our investigations, at least in Syllidae, the number and staining affinities of such somata seems to be relatively variable and are thus not feasible for comparisons between species.
Dorsal and lateral brain lobes and other clusters of somata
A striking difference between the morphology of the anterior nervous system in Exogoninae and other Syllidae is the presence of a pair of conspicuous dorsal lobes in the Exogoninae (see Figs. 13, 14 and suppl. Fig, S1). Posterior lobes of somata have been observed before in other Exogoninae; in Parapionosyllis longicirrata and in 9 species of Sphaerosyllis. They were termed dorsal and lateral lobes of the brain , while in Sphaerosyllis brevifrons highly pigmented lateral nuchal glands (lobes) were described . In a detailed study on Pionosyllis manca  (Eusyllinae) (erroneously named as Parapionosyllis manca (Exogoninae) ), it was concluded that the dorsal and lateral lobes consist of supportive cells of the nuchal organ . Fibres of the nuchal neurite bundle originating from the brain (equivalent to the posterior neurite bundle of the brain in this study) reach into the dorsal and lateral lobes of P. manca.
These lobes were considered to represent possible taxonomic characters of Parapionosyllis and Sphaerosyllis . Since the dorsal lobes in the Exogoninae Prosphaerosyllis marmarae and Sphaerosyllis taylori consist of somata similar to the remaining somata of the brain, the dorsal lobes are real lobes of the brain. Moreover, posterior neurite bundles of the brain reach far into these somata and they are not separated from the remaining somata of the brain. Therefore, they are a possible apomorphy for the Exogoninae . In Exogone no lobes of the brain were described , but histological sections or investigations via immunocytochemistry and CLSM are necessary to confirm this. Unfortunately it was not possible to obtain a proper nuclear staining for Exogone.
Dorsal lobes that consist of support cells of the nuchal organ, as found in Pionosyllis manca, probably correspond to the nuchal lobes present in all five in detail investigated species of Syllidae, and are not homologous to the dorsal lobes of the brain of the Exogoninae. The nuchal lobes also contain nervous fibres (at least α-tubulin-lir fibres) (Fig. 3h) as was observed in the dorsal and lateral lobes in P. manca .
Dorsal lobes of the brain are found in small-sized species of other families. Fauveliopsis adriatica, a sedentary annelid of Cirratuliformia , possesses two pairs of posterior lobes consisting of somata, which were linked to the ability to retract the prostomium in these animals [64, 65]. Sphaerosyllis and Prosphaerosyllis can also retract their prostomium, which may explain similarities in the morphology of the anterior nervous system, even though Syllidae and Fauveliopsidae are not closely related. Similar lobes were observed in other Fauveliopsidae [60, 66, 67]. In F. adriatica the nuchal organ is embedded in the lobes of the brain and somata of dorsal and lateral lobes cannot be distinguished [64, 65]. Four lobes extend posteriorly in the head segment of Astomus taenioides (as Parnterodrilus taeniodes), with the lateral ones fusing with the drcc . Posterior lobes with varying sizes can also be found in several species of Nephtyidae, but these were described as prostomial mucus-glands [56, 69].
Posterior inferior clusters of somata, as present in both Exogoninae, possibly consist of somata from the sensory cells, like the so called nuchal ganglia of other annelid species [64, 70]. Such clusters of cells [27, 33] have been described in many annelids, e.g. in Syllis, Eurysllis and Autolytus (Syllidae) . A connection of the nuchal neurite bundle and the drcc is common in other families , but could only be found in the Exogoninae.
Stomatogastric nervous system
In annelids with a muscular axial protrusible pharynx ring-shaped neurite bundles are common in the pharynx [27, 39] and references therein). Syllid species with an s-shaped pharynx in resting position were described to possess two ring neurite bundles, whereas species with a straight pharynx have only one . However, all observed species have (at least) two stomatogastric ring neurite bundles. Apart from this, the present results are very similar to early descriptions of Autolytus longeferiens (valid as Epigamia alexandri ) , where five pairs of stomatogastric nerves reach the first and second ring nerve, after which two nerves continue, which again split into two. The second pharyngeal ring nerve was described to lie at the position where sheath and pharyngeal tube join . From there nerves reach towards the anterior end of the pharynx to innervate the papillae, while the first pharyngeal ring nerve sits inside the pharyngeal sheath . In contrast, the present study shows that the first pharyngeal ring neurite bundle lies at the junction of sheath and pharyngeal tube and the second one is restricted to the epithelium of the pharyngeal tube.
Four pairs of stomatogastric nerves were described in Syllidae with a straight pharynx . Thus there are either differences among genera in the pharyngeal innervation, or the exact innervation pattern could not be observed with the available methods . Unfortunately, it was not possible to observe the innervation of the anterior pharynx in Myrianida due to weak staining of the stomatogastric nerves and strong autofluorescence of the cuticularized parts, which might have shed light on these differences. In other studies on Syllidae, only three pairs of stomatogastric nerves were observed .
Few detailed studies are available on the stomatogastric nervous system in annelids. A muscular axial protrusible muscular pharynx is typical for Phyllodocida , but the innervation patterns have not been compared so far. In Nereididae five pairs of stomatogastric nerves were found [11, 73] (suppl. Fig. S4b), similar to the results in Syllidae of the present study. Unfortunately the course of the stomatogastric nerves in Nereididae was not further described, however from CLSM-images of Neanthes arenaeodentata it seems like stomatogastric nerves 2 and 3 fuse , while in Syllidae 3 and 4 fuse, which points to some variation among families even if the number of stomatogastric nerves is the same. Nevertheless there are also several interconnections between 2, 3 and 4 in Syllidae. Further studies on the pharyngeal innervation of Phyllodocida could resolve if initially five stomatogastric neurite bundles are part of the ground pattern in Phyllodocida, and if these neurite bundles continue in a similar manner in all families.
The course of the stomatogastric neurite bundles in Prospharosyllis marmarae, first reaching towards the anterior edge of the prostomium and then turning posteriorly, is similar to descriptions of the hesionid Microphthalmus  where they are additionally connected by a commissure. This may have functional reasons e.g. a specific sensory function of the prostomial edge and is probably an analogy among these species.
Ventral nerve cord
Three connectives are most common in Syllidae and have been observed in several genera [27, 50, 74, 75]. Moreover, a trineuralian ventral nerve cord has been reported for many annelid species across a variety of families [2, 5, 25, 27, 39, 76,77,78]. It is present in Scoloplos armiger (Orbinniidae), the dinophilids Dinophilus gyrociliatus, Dinophilus gardineri, Trilbodrils axi, Trilobodrilus heideri, and Trilobodrilus hermaphroditus, Ctendrilus serratus (Ctenodrilidae), Ophelia rathkei (Opheliidae), Capitella capitata (Capitellidae), Platynereis dumerilii (Nereididae), the dorvilleids Ophryotrocha gracilis, Dorvillea bermudensis and Parapodrilus psammophilus, Histriobedella homari (Histriobdellidae), Trochonerilla mobilis (Nerillidae) (the nerillids Nerilla antennata, Mesonerilla intermedia and Nerillidium mediterraneum have only 1 longitudinal nerve), Potamodrilus fluviatilis (Potamodrilidae), Aeolosoma bengalense (Aeolosomatidae), as well as in Myzostoma cirriferum (Myzostomida) and Lobatocerebrum riegeri (Lobatocerebridae). In addition a median nerve is present in Hesionides arenaria (Purschke et al. unpubl.obs.) whereas such a nerve could not be demonstrated in the closely related species Microphthalmus listensis, M. sczelkowii, M. similis (2, Purschke et al. unpubl. Obs.). However, as mentioned by several authors (e.g. [26, 27]) visibility of the median nerve also depends on the method applied or the developmental stage(s) investigated. For instance, Müller  described a short median nerve present in the anteriormost part of the ventral cord in Magelona sp. whereas this nerve was not mentioned by Beckers et al. . There seems to be no clear phylogenetic distribution of the trineuralian nerve cord as it is found both in different families of Pleistoannelida with variations within families and possibly in the early branching Magelonidae. In Eurysillis tuberculata, a genus very similar in morphology to Plakosyllis except for its dorsal tubercles , five ventral connectives were observed in TEM sections . A recent study analysed the ventral nerve cord of different annelid families and found that a ladder-like construction of the ventral nerve cord is found in a variety of taxa of annelids . The number of connectives may thus be associated with specific morphological and ecological properties of a given species raher than with its phylogenetic position.
Syllidae can have three or four segmental ring nerves and several additional segmental neurite bundles. In a study on the nervous system of Naididae (Clitellata) the number of segmental ring neurite bundles was compared over various families of annelids using ancestral character estimation analysis . It was concluded that four segmental neurite bundles are probably the most ancestral state for annelids, with various events of reduction and newly formed segmental neurite bundles . However the authors did not differentiate between ring neurite bundles and other segmental neurite bundles (e.g. in Nereididae [11, 37]). Syllidae were characterised with three segmental neurite bundles , while it has been shown that they can possess between four and up to seven when all segmental neurite bundles are included . Thus it remains difficult to compare segmental neurite bundles among species, especially when different authors report divergent numbers of segmental neurite bundles. In addition, it seems very likely that the fourth segmental ring neurite bundle in syllids is not present in all species within the family. Thus, interspecific variation makes the reconstruction of a plesiomorphic state of segmental neurite bundles for syllids difficult. This is not exceptional, considering different numbers of segmental nerves have beendescribed within certain species of Nereididae [37, 80] (suppl. Fig. S1). Moreover, different authors may count segmental neurite bundles in a different fashion, e.g. in the present study the neurite bundles innervating the parapodia were not differentiated into separate segmental neurite bundles, while others  counted the anterior and main neurite bundles of Syllidae as separate segmental neurite bundles. Fine segmental neurite bundles not forming ring commissures can arise to innervate various sensory structures, which are species or genus specific (e.g. ventral papillae in the Exogoninae). Comparing results obtained by different methods may likewise cause problems; it has been shown in many other annelids that the FMRF-lir, serotonin-lir and α-tubulin-lir parts of the nervous system, e.g. the segmental neurite bundles, are not totally in accord with each other. Moreover, the existence of fine dorsal commissures may have been overlooked in earlier studies not employing immunocytochemistry, e.g.  could not confirm whether the segmental neurite bundles I, II, IV meet in the dorsal midline of nereidids.
Few descriptions are so far available for the complete innervation of annelid parapodia. The parapodial innervation in Syllidae comprises three to five neurite bundles, while in other annelids e.g. nereidids, the parapodial innervation usually consists of only one neurite bundle leaving the ventral nerve cord [2, 11, 37, 80, 81]. It is possible that immunocytochemical stainings do not reveal all elements of the nervous system, and neurite bundles appear as separate, even though they comprise one single neurite bundle. In semi-thin sections separate parapodial neurite bundles could not be distinguished. Likewise, not all of the remaining segmental neurite bundles could be found either on this level and the lack of resolution prevents the differentiation between small neurite bundles. Another possibility is that some of the neurite bundles represent motorneurons while others are neurites of receptor cells and therefore separated into distinct bundles. But as all parapodial neurite bundles are interconnected, they very likely consist both of efferent and affarant fibres, with the majority being afferent [81,82,83,84]. So far only species with mixed segmental neurite bundles consisting of moto- and sensory neurons were reported . The reason for several distinct neurite bundles to form the parapodial innervation in Syllidae remains speculative. As the pattern differs among species it may be related to different functions and movability of the parapodia.
While the fine neurite bundles of the parapodial innervation are difficult to homologise at present, at least the main neurite bundle, which splits into two roots, can be homologised [2, 25]. An anterior bundle is present in Microphthalmus listensis, Microphthalmus sczelkowii (Hesionidae), Ophelia rathkei (Opheliidae), Ophyrotrocha gracilis (Dorvilleidae) , but its course was not described in detail. Dorsal parapodial connectives are present in Glycera, too . Further studies in more errant families could facilitate the homologisation of the parapodial innervation and, thus, shed light on possible interfamily variation and on the evolution of parapodia in annelids.
Variation of the parapodial innervation has been reported within nereidids: some species have an anterior neurite bundle that branches off from the nerve innervating the ventral cirrus and forms a dorsal arch along the parapod , which is missing in other species [11, 80]. The most posterior neurite bundle innervating the ventral side of the parapodium is also not found in all Nereididae [11, 37, 80]. Such intrafamily variation could not be observed in the five detailed analysed species of Syllidae.
Neurite bundles innervating the chaetal sac were described from serotonin-lir signal in Sabellaria [7, 86] and a neurite bundle associated with the acicular chaetal sac was shown in TEM images of Microphthalmus carolinensis , but it is not mentioned where the neurite bundle ends. Tubulin-lir neurite bundles envelope the chaetae in Syllidae. A serotonin-lir signal reaches close to the chaetal muscle fibres. These signals are likely both bristle receptors (tubulin-lir signal, signal is relatively weak) and motoric fibres (serotonin-lir) as described for Alitta (Nereis/Neanthes) virens, Hediste (Nereis) diversicolor , Harmothoe  and Pisione remota, Glycera alba and Ophryotrocha gracilis , respectively. The acicular neurite bundle terminates at the acicular muscle and very likely is motoric. The bristle innervation is very conspicuous in serotonin-lir, but very faint in α-tubulin-lir which is probably why they were not found in the α-tubulin-lir study of Neanthes arenaceodentata . The parapodial innervation in Syllidae is generally very similar to the situation in Nereididae, both when comparing descriptions of Alitta (Nereis/Neanthes) virens and Neanthes arenaceodentata where the nerves split into four [11, 80] or five  neurite bundles.
Peripheral interconnections of the segmental innervation
The interconnection between the parapodial neurite bundle and segmental ring neurite bundle III in Syllis garciai is similar to the interconnection of segmental neurite bundle II (parapodial neurite bundle) and IV in Nereididae [11, 37], but a homologisation is precarious at present. Segmental neurite bundle IV in Nereididae is similar to segmental ring neurite bundle III in Syllidae, but it is not clear if it forms a dorsal commissure in Nereididae . The segmental neurite bundle between segmental ring neurite bundle II and III is present in both Syllis species. In Syllis tyrrhena it joins the ventral longitudinal neurite bundle and is very similar to segmental neurite bundle III of Hediste (Nereis) diversicolor, Alitta (Nereis/Neanthes) virens, Platynereis dumerilii and Neanthes arenaceodentata [11, 37], but again homologisation is uncertain. It is not present in any other investigated syllid species and, while it may be homologous to neurite bundle III in the Nereididae, it may as well be an analogous structure. The peripheral innervation is highly variable between species and may be species specific.
Longitudinal neurite bundles
Peripheral longitudinal neurite bundles are common in many annelid taxa . At least in the five species of Syllidae studied in detail here and Streptosyllis websteri, the number and origin of longitudinal segmental neurite bundles is consistent across species. However, the longitudinal neurite bundles can easily be overlooked due to their discontinuous course and small size. To evaluate whether these neurite bundles are homologous to longitudinal neurite bundles in other annelid taxa, it would be helpful to compare their origin in the anterior segments.
While dorsal, lateral, ventrolateral and more additional longitudinal neurite bundles were found in many species, their origin could not be traced in most of them . In Polygordius appendiculatus the dorsolateral longitudinal neurite bundles originate in part directly from the brain, from nervous fibres around the nuchal organs, and from fibres deriving from the nuchal neurite bundle. The lateral neurite bundles either originate from the first segmental ring neurite bundle or from the brain . In Scoloplos armiger the situation is similar; a pair of dorsolateral neurite bundles originates directly from the brain together with the innermost nuchal nerve and the paired lateral neurite bundle branches off from the circumoesophageal connective just behind the junction of its dorsal and ventral roots . A pair of small neurite bundles that probably form the dorsolateral longitudinal neurite bundles originates directly from the brain and passes the nuchal neurite bundles in Glycera alba, but a direct connection to the nuchal neurite bundles could not be traced . The lateral longitudinal neurite bundles were described to originate from the brain just lateral to the dorsal root of the circumoesopageal connective in Amphinomidae, Euprosynidae, Nereididae and some other “polychaetes” . The origin of lateral neurite bundles inLumbriculidae (Clitellata) is unclear . In Enchytraeus only its origin from the segmental nerves was described .
In the Syllis species the longitudinal neurite bundles do not originate from the brain but from a neurite bundle branching off the circumoesophageal connective. The dorsal longitudinal neurite bundle also receives fibres from the nuchal organ (efferent fibres of the nuchal organ, see ) and innervates the dorsal ciliary organs, as in Polygordius appendiculatus. In other “polychaetes” it was suggested that the nuchal neurite bundle innervates the so called dorsal ciliary organs [64, 88, 89]. Dorsal ciliary bands or patches of cilia are found in many annelid families . They can be chemosensory and in this case are serially repeated nuchal organs [88, 89], create water currents  or are involved in reproduction . The function of these ciliary organs in Syllidae is at present unknown, but they are common in many species and are a character of taxonomic value . Fibres originating from the nuchal commissure form the nuchal neurite bundle, and the neurite bundle innervates the dorsal organs in many annelids . Such a commissure could not be found in Syllidae, but may be difficult to locate in immunocytochemical stainings .
As the origin of the dorsal and lateral longitudinal neurite bundles in Syllidae differ from descriptions in other species, a homology is uncertain. However, at least in some cases, the dorsal longitudinal neurite bundles are clearly associated with the nuchal organ , so either the dorsal longitudinal neurite bundles are convergent structures, or their origin from the circumoesophageal connectives has been overlooked in many species. There is little information available on other Phyllodocida except Nereis [37, 81] and Neanthes arenaceodentata . The description of the three-chaetigerous stages of N. arenaceodentata  resembles the situation in the Syllidae: the dorsolateral longitudinal neurite bundle joins the dorsal root of the circumoesophageal connective and connects it to the peripheral segmental neurite bundles.
The available data are not detailed enough to compare the origins of longitudinal neurite bundles in Phyllodocida and Aphroditiformia, but with additional information on more taxa, a homology assessment at the suborder level seems feasible.
A true pygidial ring neurite bundle, as described in Platynereis dumerilii  was not observed. A pygidial ring neurite bundle was also described in Typosyllis antoni , but a recent comparison of a large number of Phyllodocida found such a closed ring neurite bundle only in Nereididae . In previous descriptions of Syllidae, neurite bundles reach dorsally but do not connect, similar to the observations made in this study. The anal papilla of Typosyllis antoni and Syllis fasciata receive their innervation from the pygidial commissure , which is probably also the case for other Syllidae, but was not observed in this study.
The results of this study show a high variability in nervous system architecture among species of different subfamilies of the Syllidae. In the anterior nervous system, the occurrence of clusters of somata in the brain, the presence, morphology and number of laterofrontal sense organs, the numer of palp nerves (possibly not always possible to observe), the presence of dorsal lobes, the morphology of the nuchal lobes and the position of the somata of primary sensory cells of the nuchal organ (only Plakosyllis) is variable between species (suppl. Fig. S1). In the segmental innervation, differences in the numbers of connectives in the ventral nerve cord and the number of segmental neurite bundles were found.
The general structure of the brain with its posterior neurite bundles, the trineuralian ventral nerve cord, the stomatogastric nervous system consisting of initially five neurite bundles and two stomatogastric ring neurite bundles, a pair of ventral, lateral and dorsal longitudinal neurite bundles in anterior segments, at least three segmental ring neurite bundles and the innervation of the parapodia are possible conserved structures present in all Syllidae.
The presence of dorsal-posterior lobes in both Exogoninae very likely correlates with miniaturization and morphological adaptations to interstitial habitats, such as a reduced body size and a retractable prostomium in combination with retainment of a a well-developed sensory system. Unfortunately, the histological structure of these lobes could only be observed in the five more thoroughly investigated species (Exogoninae and Syllinae) (see suppl. Fig. S1).
The application of immunocytochemistry and CLSM imaging allows visualising even very fine neurite bundles, which are impossible to observe in histological sections . Thus, previously undescribed neurite bundles innervating the palps were found in Syllidae. The same is true for the innervation of the stomatogastric nervous system, which is a first step to homologising the innervation of the anterior digestive system of Phyllodocida and Aphroditiformia.
The significance of five connectives in the ventral nerve cord of Plakosyllis brevipes remains unresolved, but the nervous system architecture correlates with the dorsoventrally flattened appearance of the species.
The presence of three segmental ring neurite bundles is constant in all syllid subfamilies, but a fourth segmental ring neurite bundle was found in several species and the number of additional fine segmental neurite bundles differs among species. As noted previously, segmental neurite bundles may be highly variable among species of a given family , and usually correlate with sensory structures such as papillae or epidermal ciliary receptors, which are often species-specific. Nervous system architecture within a genus is fairly similar, as shown for the genus Syllis, while there may be great differences among genera.
Another step is taken to permit the homologisation of other nervous structures such as the parapodial innervation, the poorly known innervation of the digestive tract and the segmental ring neurite bundles. The in-depth descriptions of the parapodial innervation extends our knowledge beyond the Nereididae [11, 37, 80, 81] and brings us closer to homologising the fine innervation of parapodia in errant annelids. At least a comparison of the parapodial innervation between Nereididae and Syllidae is feasible and further work on more species will complement the results. The present work further adds to the work on Nereididae by detailed descriptions of the chaetal innervation. The comparison of the innervation of the parapodium in stolon and stock gives insight into the modifications the uniramous parapodium of syllids has undergone compared to a biramous parapodium.
Currently, too little data is available to make assumptions on the implications of nervous system architecture for phylogenetic analysis in Phyllodocida and Aphroditiformia. However, together with the available work on Nereididae, this study gives a first insight into variations and similarities in nervous system architecture of some phyllodocid taxa, such as similarities in parapodial innervation and number of stomatogastric neurite bundles. The nervous system within families seems to mirror the high variability observed between nervous system morphologies between families reported by . This study provides the first detailed describtion of nervous system variation within one family of errant annelids and future studies on more families will allow reconstructing a ground pattern for higher taxa within Annelida or rather the correlation of nervous system architecture with different ecological lifestyles.
Aims and design
Specimens of different species from four subfamilies of Syllidae were collected to reconstruct the nervous system using immunocytochemistry, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and histological semi-thin sections. Additionally, maximum intensity z-projections of CLSM scans of the species Syllides longicirra, (Anoplosyllinae), Myrianida prolifera (Autolytinae), Eusyllis blomstrandi, Nudisyllis c.f. pulligera (“Eusyllinae”), Brania clavata, Brania pulsilla, Parapionosyllis labronica, Parapionosyllis minuta, Sphaerosyllis hystrix, Sphaerosyllis tetralix (Exogoninae). Syllis krohnii and Syllis sp. (Syllinae) were provided from unpublished data of former studies (Kuper, Wieland, Köhler, Purschke, Osnabrück, Germany) (see Table 1), sighted and included in the results where applicable. Staining protocols applied for these species were similar to the ones described below.
Species collection, fixation and species identification
Specimens of the species Syllis garciai, Syllis tyrrhena, Plakosyllis brevipes, Prosphaerosyllis marmarae and Streptosyllis sp. (juvenile) were collected from the Adriatic Sea in Croatia near Rovinj. Specimens were collected from two locations: Veštar at 2-3 m depth and Punta Croce at 6-8 m depth. Specimens of Sphaerosyllis taylori are from the Levantine Sea and were collected in Lebanon at a public beach in Byblos at 2-3 m depth. Streptosyllis websteri and Exogone naidina were collected in List, Sylt, Germany. Myrianida sp. was collected at the marine biological station Espegrend of the Department of Biology at the University of Bergen from hydrozoan colonies. Other species collected for earlier studies were sampled from sediments, but several are known to be found in other habitats too and not all of them belong to the interstitial meiofauna. Sampling location and species used in the study are summarized in Table 1.
Sand was collected in buckets from the sea bottom by snorkelling. After resting over night or longer a few spoons of sand were immersed in seawater isotonic MgCl2 in a flask, stirred and left to rest for about 10 min. Subsequently the flask was shaken to detach animals from sand grains, and MgCl2 solution was sieved through nets with a mesh size of 250 μm or 125 μm. The sieves were washed out with seawater to collect the animals. Animals were identified to family level under a stereomicroscope, again anesthetised in MgCl2 solution and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (PB) for 1–2 h at room temperature or overnight in the fridge. Best results were obtained with specimens fixed for no more than 1.5 h. Afterwards specimens were washed 3–4 times in phosphate buffer and stored in PB with 0.1% NaN3. Animals were identified to species level with a light-microscope before staining. Selected specimens were photographed with a Nikon Eclipse E800 light-microscope (Nikon, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Kapan) and a Nikon DsFi2-U3 microscope camera. Several books and papers were used for species identification [44, 59, 93,94,95,96].
Immunocytochemistry and confocal laser scanning microscopy
Specimens of the species Syllis garciai and some specimens of the other species were treated for 30–60 s in an ultrasonic bath to permeabilise the tissue prior to staining. Very good staining results could be obtained for S. garciai after freezing some of the specimens in PB with 0.1% NaN3. Unspecific binding sites were then blocked by incubation of specimens overnight in 6% normal goat serum (NGS) (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA) in PBS with 2–10% Triton X-100 (PBT). Specimens were then incubated at room temperature or at 35° in primary antibodies directed against serotonin (5-HT, raised in rabbit) (Immunostar, Hudson, WI, USA and Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria) and acetylated α-tubulin (raised in mouse) (Sigma-Aldrich) in a concentration of 1:100–1:2000 in PBT overnight. Specimens were washed 5–6 times in phosphate buffer for 30–60 min and incubated over night or for up to two nights with secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 568 (goat anti rabbit) (Invitrogen and Dianova Gmbh, Hamburg, Germany) and Alex Fluor 633 (goat anti mouse) (Invitrogen and Jackson Immuno-Research, Soham, UK) at a concentration of 1:200–1:400 in PBT. Additionally, DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) with a dilution of about 1:120 were added. Best results were obtained with a dilution of 1:800 or 1:1000 for primary antibodies against α-tubulin. Antibodies against serotonin were used in dilutions of 1:400, 1:800 or 1:1000 without major differences in the results, but less background staining with higher dilutions. Secondary antibodies were diluted 1:300.
Concentrations of 4% or 10% Triton-X in PBS both lead to good staining results. An increased incubation temperature (35 °C) of primary and secondary antibodies significantly improved serotonin labelling. Generally, results differed among specimens and species even when using the same methods. Some specimens were incubated with one of the antibodies directed against serotonin or α-tubulin and DAPI only, with and without phalloidin. Generally, no improvement in results could be observed when omitting one of the antibodies or phalloidin labelling. A couple of specimens were incubated with primary antibodies directed against serotonin of a different company (Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria) and results were similar. A few specimens were stained with FMRF antibodies (Immunostar), but the antibodies did not penetrate the tissue well. Again results could be improved when using elevated incubation temperatures, but were still not ideal and are therefore not included in the results.
Samples were scanned using a Leica TCS SP5 II confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Specimens were either fixed in 4% PFA for 2 h or in 2% glutaraldehyde for several days. Most specimens were postfixed in osmium tetroxide (OsO4). Fixed specimens were washed three times in PBS and dehydrated in acidic 2, 2-dimethoxypropane (DMP). Before infiltration in agar low-viscosity resin (LVR, Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), specimens were washed 3x in 100% acetone. Resin blocks were polymerised at 60°. Ribbons of 0.5-1 μm serial semi-thin-sections were cut with a Histo Jumbo diamond-knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland) on a UC6 Ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) following the protocol of . Serial sections were dyed in toluidine blue and embedded in LVR. Serial sections were photographed using a Nikon Eclipse E800 light-microscope and a Nikon DsFi2-U3 microscope camera.
Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, USA) was used to stitch several images of the same specimen together e.g. of longitudinal semi-thin-sections using the photomerge function. Z-projections of confocal scans were obtained in Fiji . Further image processing and annotations were done in GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program, Version 2.8.14, GNU general public licence), Scribus (Version 1.4.6, GNU general public licence, using Ghostscript version 9.19) and Inkscape (Version 0.91, GNU general public licence). Illustrations were created in Inkscape. Photos of serial semi-thin sections were converted to 8bit greyscale and reduced in size in Adobe Photoshop CS6 or Fiji and subsequently loaded into Amira (Version 5.4 and 5.5, FEI Visualization Sciences Group, Mérignac, France) and aligned using the alignment editor. Results of the automatic alignment were adjusted by hand. Afterwards regions of interest were segmented to produce selected volume renderings or 3D surface models, which were used as reference for the included illustrations.
Availability of data and materials
The original datasets and analysed data are available upon request from the corresponding author.
First fine segmental neurite bundle
Second fine segmental neurite bundle
Fibres possibly homologous to palp neurite bundle root 6
Fibres possibly homologous to palp neurite bundle root 9
anterior commissure of dorsal root
neurite bundle accompanying acicle
anterior dorsal commissure of vrcc
- aen :
neurite bundle innervating anterior eye
a-tubulin-lir anterior commissure within the anterior ganglion of the stolon
neurite bundle innervating antenna
anterior parapodial neurite bundle
muscle penetrating the brain
cells of crescent shaped ciliary patch on prostomium of Syllis species
cilia of the intestine
- cn :
neurite bundle accompanying chaetae
cilia of support cells of nuchal organ
cuticularised layer of the pharynx
cuticularised plates inside proventricle of P. brevipes
clusters of somata
modified cuticle of nuchal organ
commissure of vrcc
- dc :
dorsal ciliary band
- dcdr :
dorsal commissure of the drcc
inclusions of dorsal cirri in S. garciai
- dcn :
neurite bundle innervating dorsal cirrus
dorsal cluster of somata
dorsal anterior commissure of tentacular segment
dorsal commissure of vrcc
dorsal epidermal plexus
dorsal longitudinal muscle
dorsal longitudinal neurite bundle
distal innervation of parapodial lobe
dorsal median a-tubulin-lir commissure in brain of stolon of S. tyrrhena
neurite bundles forming distal parapodial connecitve
dorsoposterior clusters of somata of the vnc
dorsal root of circumoesophageal connective
epidermal layer of pharynx
segmental neurite bundles forming ring commissures
dorsal commissure of root 2 of II
muscle fibers of the intestine
small root of segmental neurite bundle I
neurite bundle innervating lateral antenna
laterofrontal sense organ
lateral longitudinal muscle
lateral longitudinal neurite bundle
neurite bundles of median antenna
- me :
median dorsal commissure of vrcc
muscular layer of the pharynx
median ventral nerve
main parapodial neurite bundle
muscle of pharyngeal papilla
median dorsal parapodial commissure
main ventral nerve
a-tubulin-lir neurite bundle innervating notochaetae
fibers from nuchal organ joining dorsal longitudinal neurite bundle
nuchal neurite bundle
- no :
serotonin-lir signal accompanying capillary notochaetae
neurite bundle innervating sensory papilla
parapodial cluster of somata
posterior commissure of the brain
neurite bundle innervating pygidial cirrus
ciliary sense organs on palps
neurite bundle innervating posterior eye
pigment granules of the eye
nervous plexus innervating intestine
parapodial ganglion/cluster of somata
- pln :
neurite bundles innervating parapodial lobe
palp neurite bundle
main palp neurite bundle
palp neurite bundle from drcc
palp neurite bundle from vrcc
posterior neurite bundle of the brain
parapodial lobe of first chaetiger
proximal dorsal parapodial commissure
neurite bundles innervating prostomium
- pvn :
paramedian ventral nerve
stomatogastric ring neurite bundle 1–2
first root of main parapodial neurite bundle
second root of main parapodial neurite bundle
segmental cluster of somata
spherical median front of brain
striated muscles of the proventricle
segmental neurite bundles
segmental neurite bundles of tentacular segment
serotonin-lir nervous plexus of body wall
serotonin-lir stomatogastric ring neurite bundle
small root of segmental neurite bundle I in Pr. marmarae
segmental ring neurite bundle
- stgn 1–5:
stomatogastric neurite bundles 1–5
neurite bundle innervating tentacular cirri
neurite bundle innervating dorsal tentacular cirrus
neurite bundle innervating ventral tentacular cirrus
a-tubulin-lir fibers entering nuchal lobe
neurite bundle innervating ventral cirrus
neurite bundles innervating ventricle
ventral ganglion (of ventral nerve cord)
ventral longitudinal muscle
ventral longitudinal neurite bundle
ventral median longitudinal muscle above vnc
ventral nerve cord
ventral root of circumoesophageal connective
Hessling R, Westheide W. CLSM analysis of development and structure of the central nervous system of Enchytraeus crypticus (“Oligochaeta”, Enchytraeidae). Zoomorphology. 1999;119(1):37–47.
MCM M. Das Nervensystem der Polychaeten: immunhistochemische Untersuchungen an ausgewählten Taxa. [PhD thesis]. Germany: University Osnabrück; 1999.
Purschke G. Sense Organs and Central Nervous System in an Enigmatic Terrestrial Polychaete, Hrabeiella periglandulata (Annelida): Implications for Annelid Evolution. Invertebr Biol. 2000;119(3):329–41.
Müller MCM, Westheide W. Comparative analysis of the nervous systems in presumptive progenetic dinophilid and dorvilleid polychaetes (Annelida) by immunohistochemistry and cLSM. Acta Zool. 2002;83(1):33–48.
Purschke G, Hessling R. Analysis of the Central Nervous System and Sense Organs in Potamodrilus fluviatilis (Annelida: Potamodrilidae). Zool Anz - J Comp Zool. 2002;241(1):19–35.
McDougall C, Chen W-C, Shimeld SM, Ferrier DE. The development of the larval nervous system, musculature and ciliary bands of Pomatoceros lamarckii (Annelida): heterochrony in polychaetes. Front Zool. 2006;3:16.
Brinkmann N, Wanninger A. Larval neurogenesis in Sabellaria alveolata reveals plasticity in polychaete neural patterning. Evol Dev. 2008;10(5):606–18.
Santagata S. Evolutionary and Structural Diversification of the Larval Nervous System Among Marine Bryozoans. Biol Bull. 2008;215(1):3–23.
Vortsepneva E, Tzetlin A, Tsitrin E. Nervous system of the dwarf ectoparasitic male of Scolelepis laonicola (Polychaeta, Spionidae). Zoosymposia. 2009;2(1):437–45.
Heuer CM, Müller CH, Todt C, Loesel R. Comparative neuroanatomy suggests repeated reduction of neuroarchitectural complexity in Annelida. Front Zool. 2010;7:13.
Winchell CJ, Valencia JE, Jacobs DK. Confocal analysis of nervous system architecture in direct-developing juveniles of Neanthes arenaceodentata (Annelida, Nereididae). Front Zool. 2010;7:17.
Whitington PM, Mayer G. The origins of the arthropod nervous system: Insights from the Onychophora. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2011;40(3):193–209.
Schwaha T, Wanninger A. Myoanatomy and serotonergic nervous system of plumatellid and fredericellid phylactolaemata (lophotrochozoa, ectoprocta). J Morphol. 2012;273(1):57–67.
Lehmacher C, Fiege D, Purschke G. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis of the muscular and nervous systems in the interstitial polychaete Polygordius appendiculatus (Annelida). Zoomorphology. 2013;133(1):21–41.
Helm C, Adamo H, Hourdez S, Bleidorn C. An immunocytochemical window into the development of Platynereis massiliensis (Annelida, Nereididae). Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(6–8):613–22.
Helm C, Vöcking O, Kourtesis I, Hausen H. Owenia fusiformis – a basally branching annelid suitable for studying ancestral features of annelid neural development. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:129.
Helm C, Capa M. Comparative analyses of morphological characters in Sphaerodoridae and allies (Annelida) revealed by an integrative microscopical approach. Front Mar Sci. 2015;1:82.
Starunov VV, Dray N, Belikova EV, Kerner P, Vervoort M, Balavoine G. A metameric origin for the annelid pygidium? BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15(1):25.
Weidhase M, Helm C, Bleidorn C. Morphological investigations of posttraumatic regeneration in Timarete cf. punctata (Annelida: Cirratulidae). Zool Lett. 2015;1:20.
Zattara EE, Bely AE. Fine taxonomic sampling of nervous systems within Naididae (Annelida: Clitellata) reveals evolutionary lability and revised homologies of annelid neural components. Front Zool. 2015;12(1):1–21.
Bekkouche N, Worsaae K. Nervous system and ciliary structures of Micrognathozoa (Gnathifera): evolutionary insight from an early branch in Spiralia. Open Sci. 2016;3(10):160289.
Rimskaya-Korsakova NN, Kristof A, Malakhov VV, Wanninger A. Neural architecture of Galathowenia oculata Zach, 1923 (Oweniidae, Annelida). Front Zool. 2016;13:5.
Worsaae K, Rimskaya-Korsakova NN, Rouse GW. Neural reconstruction of bone-eating Osedax spp. (Annelida) and evolution of the siboglinid nervous system. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:83.
Gąsiorowski L, Bekkouche N, Worsaae K. Morphology and evolution of the nervous system in Gnathostomulida (Gnathifera, Spiralia). Org Divers Evol. 2017;17(2):447–75.
Orrhage L, Müller MCM. Morphology of the nervous system of Polychaeta (Annelida). Hydrobiologia. 2005;535–536(1):79–111.
Müller MCM. Polychaete nervous systems: Ground pattern and variations—cLS microscopy and the importance of novel characteristics in phylogenetic analysis. Integr Comp Biol. 2006;46(2):125–33.
Annelida PG. Basal Groups and Pleistoannelida. In: Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Hartsch S, Purschke G, editors. Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous Systems: Oxford University Press; 2016. [cited 2016 May 11]. p. 245–312. Available from: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/structure-and-evolution-of-invertebrate-nervous-systems-9780199682201.
Wanninger A. Shaping the things to come: ontogeny of lophotrochozoan neuromuscular systems and the tetraneuralia concept. Biol Bull. 2009;216(3):293–306.
Helm C, Beckers P, Bartolomaeus T, Drukewitz SH, Kourtesis I, Weigert A, et al. Convergent evolution of the ladder-like ventral nerve cord in Annelida. Front Zool. 2018;15(1):36.
Beckers P, Helm C, Purschke G, Worsaae K, Hutchings P, Bartolomaeus T. The central nervous system of Oweniidae (Annelida) and its implications for the structure of the ancestral annelid brain. Front Zool. 2019;16:6.
Carrillo-Baltodano AM, Boyle MJ, Rice ME, Meyer NP. Developmental architecture of the nervous system in Themiste lageniformis (Sipuncula): New evidence from confocal laser scanning microscopy and gene expression. J Morphol. 2019;280(11):1628–50.
Orrhage L. On the Microanatomy of the Brain and the Innervation and Homologues of the Cephalic Appendages of Hesionidae and Syllidae (Polychaeta). Acta Zool. 1996;77(2):137–51.
Richter S, Loesel R, Purschke G, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Scholtz G, Stach T, et al. Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary. Front Zool. 2010;7:29.
Struck T. Phylogeny of Annelida. In: Purschke G, Böggermann M, Westheide W, editors. Handbook of Zoology Annelida. Volume 1: Annelida Basal Groups and Pleistoannelida, Sedentaria I, vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2019. p. 37–68.
Purschke G, Bleidorn C, Struck T. Systematics, evolution and phylogeny of Annelida-a morphological perspective. Mem Mus Vic. 2014;71:247–69.
Struck T, Wey-Fabrizius AR, Golombek A, Hering L, Weigert A, Bleidorn C, et al. Platyzoan paraphyly based on phylogenomic data supports a non-coelomate ancestry of Spiralia. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(7):1833–49.
Smith JE. The Nervous Anatomy of the Body Segments of Nereid Polychaetes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957;240(671):135–96.
Purschke G, Arendt D, Hausen H, Müller MCM. Photoreceptor cells and eyes in Annelida. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2006;35(4):211–30.
THolmes B, Horridge GA. Annelida. In: Structure and function in the nervous systems of invertebrates. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman; 1965. p. 661–789.
Holland LZ, Carvalho JE, Escriva H, Laudet V, Schubert M, Shimeld SM, et al. Evolution of bilaterian central nervous systems: a single origin? EvoDevo. 2013;4:27.
Wanninger A, Koop D, Bromham L, Noonan E, Degnan BM. Nervous and muscle system development in Phascolion strombus (Sipuncula). Dev Genes Evol. 2005;215(10):509–18.
Kristof A, Wollesen T, Wanninger A. Segmental Mode of Neural Patterning in Sipuncula. Curr Biol. 2008;18(15):1129–32.
Erséus C, Envall I, Marchese M, Gustavsson L. The systematic position of Opistocystidae (Annelida, Clitellata) revealed by DNA data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;54(1):309–13.
San Martín GS, Iberica F. 21 : Annelida Polychaeta II : Syllidae. Madrid: CSIC; 2003.
Aguado MT, San MG. Phylogeny of Syllidae (Polychaeta) based on morphological data. Zool Scr. 2009;38(4):379–402.
Aguado MT, San Martín G, Siddall ME. Systematics and evolution of syllids (Annelida, Syllidae). Cladistics. 2012;28(3):234–50.
San Martín G, Worsfold TM. Guide and keys for the identification of Syllidae (Annelida, Phyllodocida) from the British Isles (reported and expected species). ZooKeys. 2015;488:1–29.
Fauchald K, Rouse G. Polychaete systematics: Past and present. Zool Scr. 1997;26(2):71–138.
Syllidae PF. In: Rouse G, Pleijel F, editors. Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 102–6.
Malaquin A. Recherches sur les Syllidiens. Morphologie, anatomie, reproduction, développement. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences, de l'Agriculture et des Arts de Lille, France. 4e Série. 1893;18:1-477.
Haswell WA. The Proboscis of the Syllidae. Part 1. Structure. Q J Microsc Sci. 1921;65:323–37.
Okada YK. Feeding organs and feeding habits of Autolytus edwardsi St. Joseph. Q J Microsc Sci Lond. 1928;72:219–45.
Orrhage L, Eibye-Jacobsen D. On the Anatomy of the Central Nervous System of Phyllodocidae (Polychaeta) and the Phylogeny of Phyllodocid Genera: a New Alternative. Acta Zool. 1998;79(3):215–34.
Purschke G. Structure of the prostomial appendages and the central nervous system in the Protodrilida (Polychaeta). Zoomorphology. 1993;113(1):1–20.
Orrhage L. On the Innervation and Homologues of the Cephalic Appendages of the Aphroditacea (Polychaeta). Acta Zool. 1991;72(4):233–46.
Clark RB. The micromorphology of the supraoesophageal ganglion of Nephtys. Zool Jb Allgem Zool Phys Tiere. 1958;68:261–96.
Langdon FE. The sense-organs of Nereis virens. Sars. J Comp Neurol. 1900;10(1):1–77.
Retzius G. Zur Kenntnis des Gehirnganglions und des sensiblen Nervensystems der Polychaeten. Biol Untersuch. 1895;7:6–11.
Perkins TH. Syllidae (Polychaeta), Principally from Florida, with descriptions of a new genus and twenty-one new species. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1980;93(4):1080–172.
Riser NW. Observations on some poorly known syllid polychaetes from the Gulf of Maine. Can J Zool. 1982;60(2):105–11.
Treadwell AL. Three new species of polychaetous annelids from Chesapeake Bay. Proc U S Natl Mus. 1931;79(2867):1–5.
Lewbart GA, Riser NW. Nuchal Organs of the Polychaete Parapionosyllis manca (Syllidae). Invertebr Biol. 1996;115(4):286–98.
Andrade SCS, Novo M, Kawauchi GY, Worsaae K, Pleijel F, Giribet G, et al. Articulating “Archiannelids”: Phylogenomics and Annelid Relationships, with Emphasis on Meiofaunal Taxa. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(11):2860–75.
Purschke G. Ultrastructure of Nuchal Organs in Polychaetes (Annelida) — New Results and Review. Acta Zool. 1997;78(2):123–43.
Purschke G. Sipunculid-like ocellar tubes in a polychaete, Fauveliopsis Cf. adriatica (Annelida, Fauveliopsidae): implications for eye evolution. Invertebr Biol. 2011;130(2):115–28.
Thiel D, Purschke G, Böggemann M. Abyssal Fauveliopsidae (Annelida) from the South East Atlantic. J Nat Hist. 2011;45(15–16):923–37.
Zhadan A, Atroshchenko M. A new species of Fauveliopsidae (Annelida) from the North Sea. ZooKeys. 2012;181:1–10.
Purschke G, Jouin-Toulmond C. Ultrastructure of sense organs and the central nervous system in Parenterodrilus taenioides and their phylogenetic significance in the taxon Protodrilida (Annelida, Polychaeta). In: Reish J-CDLDJ, editor. Actes 4ème Conférence Int Polychètes Mém Mus Natn Hist Nat Paris, vol. 162; 1994. p. 119–28.
Clark RB. The ‘Posterior Lobes’ of Nephtys: Observations on three New England Species. J Cell Sci. 1958;s3–99(48):505–10.
Purschke G. Sense organs in polychaetes (Annelida). Hydrobiologia. 2005;535–536(1):53–78.
Nygren A. Revision of Autolytinae (Syllidae: Polychaeta). Zootaxa. 2004;680(1):1–314.
Tzetlin A, Purschke G. Pharynx and intestine. Hydrobiologia. 2005;535(1):199–225.
Orrhage L. On the Microanatomy of the Cephalic Nervous System of Nereidae (Polychaeta), with a Preliminary Discussion of Some Earlier Theories on the Segmentation of the Polychaete Brain. Acta Zool. 1993;74(2):145–72.
Kuper M. Ultrastrukturuntersuchungen der Segmentalorgane, der Spermien und der Brutpflegestrukturen der Syllidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). [PhD thesis]. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück; 2002.
Weidhase M, Beckers P, Bleidorn C, Aguado MT. On the role of the proventricle region in reproduction and regeneration in Typosyllis antoni (Annelida: Syllidae). BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16(1):196.
Worsaae K, Müller MCM. Nephridial and gonoduct distribution patterns in Nerillidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) examined by tubulin staining and cLSM. J Morphol. 2004;261(3):259–69.
Hessling R, Purschke G. Immunohistochemical (cLSM) and ultrastructural analysis of the central nervous system and sense organs in Aeolosoma hemprichi (Annelida, Aeolosomatidae). Zoomorphology. 2000;120(2):65–78.
Kerbl A, Bekkouche N, Sterrer W, Worsaae K. Detailed reconstruction of the nervous and muscular system of Lobatocerebridae with an evaluation of its annelid affinity. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15:277.
Beckers P, Helm C, Bartolomaeus T. The anatomy and development of the nervous system in Magelonidae (Annelida) – insights into the evolution of the annelid brain. BMC Evol Biol. 2019;19:173.
Hamaker JI. The nervous system of Nereis virens Sars: a study in comparative neurology. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv. 1898;32(6):89–124.
Dorsett DA. The Sensory and Motor Innervation of Nereis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964;159(977):652–67.
Lawry JV. Structure and function of the parapodial cirri of the polynoid polychaete. Harmothoë. Z Für Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1967;82(3):345–61.
Purschke G, Hugenschütt M, Ohlmeyer L, Meyer H, Weihrauch D. Structural analysis of the branchiae and dorsal cirri in Eurythoe complanata (Annelida, Amphinomida). Zoomorphology. 2017;136(1):1–18.
Horridge GA. Proprioceptors, Bristle Receptors, Efferent Sensory Impulses, Neurofibrils and Number of Axons in the Parapodial Nerve of the Polychaete Harmothoe. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963;157(967):199–222.
Dorsett DA. In: Mill PJ, editor. Organisation of the nerve cord. In: Physiology of Annelids. New York: Academic Press; 1978. p. 115–60.
Chaetae SA, Westheide W, Hermans CO. The Ultrastructure of Polychaeta [Microfauna Marina, Eds Ax P]. New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1988. p. 45–59.
Wilkens V, Purschke G. Pigmented eyes, photoreceptor-like sense organs and central nervous system in the polychaete Scoloplos armiger (Orbiniidae, Annelida) and their phylogenetic importance. J Morphology. 2009;270(11):1296-310.
Jelsing J. Ultrastructural studies of dorsal ciliated organs in Spionidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). In: Sigvaldadóttir E, ASY M, Helgason GV, Reish DJ, Svavarsson J, Steingrímsson SA, editors. Advances in Polychaete Research. Netherlands: Springer; 2002. p. 241–51. (Developments in Hydrobiology).
Jelsing J. Ultrastructural investigations on the cephalic and metameric nuchal organs of Spio cf. filicornis (Polychaeta, Spionidae). Zoomorphology. 2002;121(4):213–20.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Ultrastructural investigation of the nuchal organs of Pygospio elegans (Polychaeta). Zoomorphology. 1987;107(3):169–79.
San Martín G, Aguado MT. Contribution of Scanning Electron Microscope to the Study of Morphology, Biology, Reproduction, and Phylogeny of the Family Syllidae (Polychaeta). In: Kazmiruk V, editor. Scanning Electron Microscopy. InTech. 2012.
Slyusarev GS, Nesterenko MA, Starunov VV. The structure of the muscular and nervous systems of the male Intoshia linei (Orthonectida). Acta Zool. 2019;100(4):451–8.
Licher F, Kuper M. Typosyllis tyrrhena (Polychaeta, Syllidae, Syllinae), a new species from the island Elba. Tyrrhenian Sea. Ital J Zool. 1998;65(2):227–33.
Faulwetter S, Chatzigeorgiou G, Galil BS, Nicolaidou A, Arvanitidis C. Sphaerosyllis levantina sp. n. (Annelida) from the eastern Mediterranean, with notes on character variation in Sphaerosyllis hystrix Claparède, 1863. ZooKeys. 2011;150:327–45.
Faulwetter S, Chatzigeorgiou G, Galil BS, Arvanitidis C. An account of the taxonomy and distribution of Syllidae (Annelida, Polychaetes) in the eastern Mediterranean, with notes on the genus Prosphaerosyllis San Martín, 1984 in the Mediterranean. ZooKeys. 2011;150:281–326.
Çinar ME, Dagli E, Açik S. Annelids (Polychaeta and Oligochaeta) from the Sea of Marmara, with descriptions of five new species. J Nat Hist. 2011;45(33–34):2105–43.
Ruthensteiner B. Soft Part 3D visualization by serial sectioning and computer reconstruction. Zoosymposia. 2008;1(0):63–100.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.
Michel Bariche and Ahmad Jammal from the American University of Beirut (Lebanon) helped with the collection of Sphaerosyllis taylori. Sarah Faulwetter (Patras, Greece) assisted with species identification and literature. Alexandra Kerbl (Kopenhagen, Denmark) provided advice on CLSM scans and literature. Nadya Rimskaya-Korsakova (Moscow, Russia) helped with literature. Nataliya Budaeva (Bergen, Norway) provided the opportunity to collect animals at the marine biological station Espegrend of the Department of Biology at the University of Bergen. Andreas Wanninger (Vienna, Austria) and other members of the department of Integrative Zoology gave feedback and advice on methodological problems. Julian Bibermair (Vienna, Austria) and Lisa-Maria Schmidt (Vienna, Austria) collected one of the sand samples. The original manuscript (master thesis) was honoured by the Rupert-Riedl award for fundamental marine science of the Haus des Meeres (Vienna, Austria) and the NOBIS young researchers award (Austria). Additional thanks go to Harald Krenn, Iljia Bründl-Tschulenk, Kleoniki Keklikoglou and Julia Bauder (Vienna, Austria). Usage of additional unpublished material for a variety of species (Tab. 1) from data obtained by Dr. Michael Kuper, Anne Köhler, Britta Wieland (Osnabrueck, Germany) is kindly acknowledged.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval and consent to participate were not required for this work.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
. Schematic phylogenetic tree of Syllidae, species for which data were obtained, anterior and segmental innervation in each subfamily. Asterisks indicate a character observed in at least one, but not all of the species in a subfamily. Fine innervation patterns only observed in some of the species are omitted. Details on the distribution of somata of the nervous system and of the nuchal organ can only be given for Exogoninae and Syllinae, as histological data is missing in the other subfamilies. Information about Nereididae combined from [10, 11, 25, 37, 72, 79]. Other families of the Phyllodocida were omitted for better readability. Abbreviations: mn – main nerve, mvn – median ventral nerve, pmn – paramedian nerve, I - IV – segmental neurite bundles.
Streptosyllis websteri. Innervation of head, pharynx, segments and pygidium. Maximum intensity z-projections of α-tubulin-lir (grey). A: Detail of the brain showing the nuchal organ. The white arrowhead indicates neurite bundles leading from the nuchal organ towards the posterior neurite bundles of the brain. Orange arrowhead indicates a ciliary patch behind the nuchal organ. B: Innervation of the pharynx. C: Ring neurite bundles forming dorsal commissures and segmental ciliary bands. D: Ventral nerve cord and segmental neurite bundles. S. websteri does not have a forth, intersegmental ring neurite bundle E: Parapodial innervation. Neurites bundles reaching from the ventral nerve cord to the parapodium appear either as two or three separate bundles, depending on the scan. E: Pygidial innervation. Scale bars = 50 μm. Abbreviations: br – brain; cno – cilia of support cells of nuchal organ; cc – circumoesophageal connective; cr – ciliary receptors; in – intestine; lan – neurite bundle innervating lateral antenna; lfs – laterofrongal sense organ (homology unclear); man – neurite bundles innervating median antenna; mn – main ventral nerve; mvn – median ventral nerve; pcm – pygidial commissure; pln – neurite bundles innervating parapodial lobe; pon – posterior neurite bundles of the brain; ppa – pharyngeal papilla; r1 – stomatogastric ring neurite bundle 1; r2 – stomatogastric ring neurite bundle 2; rp1 - first root of main parapodial neurite bundle; rp2 - second root of main parapodial neurite bundle; stgn – stomatogastric neurite bundle; Segmental neurite bundles in yellow: I-III – segmental neurite bundles forming ring commissures. II.I-II.III – neurite bundles innervating parapodium.
. Myrianida sp. Innervation of head, nuchal eupalettes and segments. Maximum intensity z-projections of α-tubulin-lir (grey). A: Prostomium and anterior segments of Myrianida sp. The pharynx shows a strong autofluorescent signal. The nuchal eupalettes are marked in light blue. B: Detail of the brain of Myrianida sp. The posterior neurite bundles of the brain reach directly into the nuchal eupalettes, connecting to the primary sensory cells. C: Segmental innervation of Myrianida prolifera. The fourth segmental neurite bundle is missing in irregular patterns (red arrows). Scale bars = 50 μm (missing for C). Abbreviations: br – brain; cr – ciliary receptors; dc – dorsal cirrus; lan – neurite bundle innervating lateral antenna; lfs – laterofrongal sense organ (homology unclear); man – neurite bundles innervating median antenna; mn – main ventral nerve; mvn – median ventral nerve; ph – pharynx; pon – posterior neurite bundles of the brain. Segmental neurite bundles in yellow: I-IIV– segmental neurite bundles forming ring commissures. Micrograph C Courtesy of Dr. M. Kuper.
. Anterior nervous system of Syllidae and Nereididae as described previously. The neuropil of the brain is connected to the ventral nerve cord via the circumoesophageal connective. Both the dorsal and the ventral root of the circumoesophageal connective form a dorsal and a ventral commissure within the brain. The dorsal commissure of the dorsal root of the circumoesophageal connective (dcdr) forms nerve tracts that reach toward the posterior ganglia, which are involved in the innervation of the nuchal organ. Smaller commissures were omitted. A: Syllidae redrawn after  and . The dcdr sends fibres to the lateral and median antennae. A pair of dorsal ganglia lies above each dorsal root of the circumoesophageal connection. It is innervated by fibres originating from the ventral side of the neuropil of the brain. A cluster of globuli cells lies at the beginning of each palp. The palps are innervated by root 6 coming from the ventral commissure the ventral root of the circumoesophageal connective and root 9 coming from the dorsal root of the circumoesophageal connective. Two pairs of stomatogastric nerves emanate from the ventral commissure of the ventral root of the circumoesophageal connective and one from the circumoesophageal connective where dorsal and ventral root fuse. B: Nereididae redrawn after [10, 11, 25, 72]. The dcdr and the ventral commissure of the dorsal root of the circumoesophageal connective (vcdr) send fibres to the lateral antennae. At least one pair of mushroom bodies (depending on species, rose, dotted line) lies above the neuropil of the brain. Behind them, at the latteral frontal margins of the prostomium lies the Langdons organ (dotted lines). Seven nerves innervate the palps. Five pairs of stomatogastric nerves innervate the pharynx. Abbreviations: cc – circumoesophageal connective; dcdr – dorsal commissure of drcc; dcs – dorsal cluster of somata (dorsal ganglion); dcvr – dorsal commissure of vrcc; drcc – dorsal root of the circumoesophageal connective; gl – ganglion of globuli-like cells; lan – lateral antenna; man – median antenna; nn – nuchal nerve; pgl – posterior ganglion; pn1–12 – palp nerves; stgn 1–3 – stomatogastric nerves 1–3; tcn – neurite bundle innervating tentacular cirri; vcdr – ventral commissure of drcc; vcvr – ventral commissure of vrcc; vrcc – ventral root of the circumoesophageal connective.
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidbaur, H., Schwaha, T., Franzkoch, R. et al. Within-family plasticity of nervous system architecture in Syllidae (Annelida, Errantia). Front Zool 17, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00359-9