Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Correction to: Sea urchin growth dynamics at microstructural length scale revealed by Mn-labeling and cathodoluminescence imaging

  • Przemysław Gorzelak1Email author,
  • Aurélie Dery2,
  • Philippe Dubois2 and
  • Jarosław Stolarski1
Frontiers in Zoology201815:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0253-1

Received: 31 January 2018

Accepted: 31 January 2018

Published: 12 April 2018

The original article was published in Frontiers in Zoology 2017 14:42

Correction

Upon publication of this article [1] it was noticed errors were introduced during the production process which resulted in the omission of decimal points from Tables 2 and 3. In addition Table 1 incorrectly used commas to indicate decimal points. These errors do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The publisher apologizes for these errors. The correct versions of Tables 1, 2 and 3 appear below and have been updated in the original article.
Table 1

Conditions (mean values) in beakers during trial and main experiments

Trial experiment

Species

Temperature

SD

Salinity

SD

pHT

SD

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.88

1.07

33.45*

0.13

7.95

0.09

 Controls

Paracentrotus lividus

15.83

1.12

33.51

0.13

7.96

0.09

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.79

1.1

33.53

0.16

7.95

0.11

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.77

1.11

33.52

0.11

7.94

0.9

 Mn 1mg/L

Paracentrotus lividus

15.73

1.12

33.51

0.12

7.95

0.1

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.68

1.13

33.56

0.13

7.95

0.11

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.78

1.12

33.56

0.1

7.96

0.11

 Mn 3 mg/L

Paracentrotus lividus

15.67

1.16

33.59

0.14

7.97

0.12

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.81

1.14

33.56

0.12

7.96

0.12

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.84

1.15

33.58

0.1

7.97

0.11

 Mn 61.6 mg/L

Paracentrotus lividus

15.86

1.15

33.59

0.1

7.95

0.12

 

Paracentrotus lividus

15.84

1.15

33.59

0.1

7.96

0.11

Main experiment

       
 

Paracentrotus lividus

17.75

0.39

33.48

0.21

8.11

0.06

 Controls

Paracentrotus lividus

17.69

0.43

33.53

0.24

8.1

0.06

 

Paracentrotus lividus

17.73

0.35

33.54

0.26

8.11

0.06

 

Paracentrotus lividus

17.58

0.41

33.52

0.2

8.11

0.06

 Mn 1mg/L

Paracentrotus lividus

17.67

0.38

33.51

0.16

8.1

0.07

 

Paracentrotus lividus

17.57

0.42

33.58

0.36

8.11

0.07

 

Paracentrotus lividus

17.56

0.34

33.62

0.28

8.09

0.08

 Mn 3mg/L

Paracentrotus lividus

17.43

0.46

33.63

0.32

8.11

0.06

 

Paracentrotus lividus

17.45

0.42

33.63

0.3

8.11

0.06

 

Echinometra sp.

25.05

0.54

34.46

0.17

8.1

0.06

 Controls

Echinometra sp.

25.04

0.52

34.48

0.2

8.1

0.05

 

Echinometra sp.

25.06

0.51

34.43

0.2

8.11

0.06

 

Echinometra sp.

25.06

0.51

34.43

0.19

8.11

0.06

 Mn 1mg/L

Echinometra sp.

25.07

0.52

34.47

0.24

8.1

0.05

 

Echinometra sp.

25.07

0.52

34.45

0.23

8.09

0.05

 Controls

Prionocidaris baculosa

25.16

0.37

35.29

0.22

7.96

0.05

 

Prionocidaris baculosa

25.1

0.37

35.29

0.22

7.96

0.05

 Mn 1mg/L

Prionocidaris baculosa

25.16

0.36

35.3

0.21

7.95

0.06

 

Prionocidaris baculosa

25.09

0.36

35.3

0.21

7.95

0.06

Table 2

Lengths of spine tips of Paracentrotus lividus regenerated during trial experiments (3 spines per individual/ 3 individuals per treatment) and calculated average longitudinal extension rates (ALER) per treatment

 

Mn=1 mg/L

Mn=3 mg/L

Mn=61.4 mg/L

Mn=0 mg/L

Spine1

2.581 mm

1.819 mm

0 mm

2.491 mm

Spine2

2.435 mm

2.52 mm

0 mm

2.774 mm

Spine3

2.087 mm

2.687 mm

0 mm

2.756 mm

Spine1

1.65 mm

1.45 mm

0 mm

2.457 mm

Spine2

1.69 mm

2.67 mm

0 mm

2.867 mm

Spine3

1.83 mm

1.61 mm

0 mm

2.894 mm

Spine1

1.118 mm

0.922 mm

0 mm

1.911 mm

Spine2

3.414 mm

3.462 mm

0 mm

2.313 mm

Spine3

2.923 mm

1.386 mm

0 mm

2.648 mm

ALER

183 μm/day

172 μm/day

0 μm/day

214 μm/day

Table 3

Lengths of the spine tips of Echinometra sp. regenerated during trial experiments (3 spines per individual/3 individuals per treatment) and calculated average longitudinal extension rates (ALER) per treatment

 

Mn=3mg/L

Mn=0mg/L

Spine1

0.481 mm

4.742 mm

Spine2

0.053 mm

1.806 mm

Spine3

1.929 mm

1.835 mm

Spine1

1.367 mm

0.083 mm

Spine2

1.894 mm

0.12 mm

Spine3

1.948 mm

0.05 mm

Spine1

2.521 mm

2.387 mm

Spine2

4.656 mm

2.305 mm

Spine3

5.32 mm

2.262 mm

ALER

187 μm/day

144 μm/day

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
(2)
Laboratoire de Biologie marine, Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium

Reference

  1. Gorzelak P, Dery A, Dubois P, Stolarski J. Sea urchin growth dynamics at microstructural length scale revealed by Mn-labeling and cathodoluminescence imaging. Front Zool. 2017;14(1):42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement