Open Access

State-dependent capital and income breeding: a novel approach to evaluating individual strategies with stable isotopes

Frontiers in Zoology201613:24

Received: 26 February 2016

Accepted: 30 May 2016

Published: 9 June 2016



Species-specific strategies for financing the costs of reproduction are well understood, forming a continuum ranging from high to low reliance on stored nutrients. Animals relying mostly on stored reserves are termed ‘capital breeders’, whereas ‘income breeders’ rely mostly on concurrent intake when financing the costs of reproduction. The role and adaptive value of individual variation in these strategies remain elusive. Life-history theory posits that capital breeding should be favoured when offspring reproductive value peaks, typically occurring early in the season, and that current income should increasingly be used with progressing season. Because resource limitation may hamper flexible resource allocation, a corollary prediction is that only good-condition individuals may show the expected seasonal shift in resource use. To test this prediction, we examined stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) in blood and lipid-free egg yolk of breeding eider females (Somateria mollissima) from the Baltic Sea to assess the role of individual variation in the use of proteins from local diet vs. stored reserves.


We show for the first time that individuals from a single population differ in their utilization of stored reserves and concurrent intake to finance the costs of reproduction. Consistent with our prediction, heavy females predominantly used stored reserves for producing egg yolks early in the season, increasingly relying on local feeding with later onset of breeding, whereas light females showed no seasonal change in allocation strategy.


Stable isotope profiling at the individual level is a powerful tool for monitoring relative changes in investment strategies through time, showing promise as an early warning indicator of ecological change in food webs.


Resource allocation Reproductive allocation Stable isotopes Capital vs. income Climate change Somateria mollissima


The varying degree to which animals rely on stored reserves and on concurrent intake when financing the costs of reproduction led Drent and Daan [1] to classify bird species as either capital or income breeders based on the cues that determine egg-laying and clutch-size decisions. Later, this dichotomy was extended to a host of animals and plants; reliance on stored resources characterizes capital breeding whereas utilization of concurrent food intake is termed income breeding [2]. The more recent realization that these strategies only represent endpoints of a continuum [3] spurred interest in examining the degree to which species are capital or income breeders and the adaptive value of these strategies [4]. A major discovery in the wake of this research is that capital breeders, particularly migratory ones, often rely more on concurrent intake than previously assumed, presumably because of the costs of carrying excess stores (e.g. [5, 6]). These improvements have moved us beyond the overly simplistic capital-income typology and have increased our understanding of the drivers of this variation in nutrient sources contributing to reproductive investment at the species level. As a result, our knowledge on the relative importance of intrinsic (e.g. individual state) and extrinsic factors in determining the allocation of resources to reproduction is increasing [7]. These studies have considered interspecific comparisons, but we still do not know whether such a capital-income continuum exists among individuals of the same species, nor do we understand the causes of such potential variation.

The optimal allocation between competing life-history functions should depend upon internal state (e.g., condition) and the external environment [8]. Notwithstanding this general understanding, it is striking that our knowledge regarding the sources of energy allocated to reproduction is still in its infancy, despite the isotopic tools being available for decades [9]. To address this knowledge gap, we examined stable isotope values (δ13C and δ15N) in blood and lipid-free egg yolk of breeding eider females (Somateria mollissima) from the Baltic Sea during three years to assess the role of individual variation in the use of proteins from local diet vs. stored reserves.

The eider is especially well suited for the purpose since it was previously deemed an extreme capital breeder [3] which abstains from feeding throughout incubation (e.g. [10]). In the northern Baltic this species is also a short-distance migrant [11], providing ample opportunity to transport stored reserves for breeding from the wintering grounds.

Hobson et al. [5] showed that Baltic eiders produce the yolks of their eggs by allocating approximately half of the proteins from endogenous, stored reserves, and half from local feeding. On the other hand, albumen is produced almost entirely from local resources and only a negligible fraction (0.4-0.7 %) of the proteins stem from endogenous resources. This striking difference in resource allocation between different tissues within an egg is in itself interesting. However, the small fraction of stored reserves used to form albumen allows for very little inter-individual variation in allocation strategies and, as such, albumen tissue is of lesser interest when studying individual variation. Yolks, on the one hand, exhibit more variation in the source of protein from which they are formed due to their relatively greater mass contribution and due to their longer-term development (rapid follicular growth lasts 6-9 days; [12]). In our study population, eiders winter off the Danish coast and arrive on the breeding grounds in Finland with body protein reserves derived from winter diets of Danish mussels. Egg yolks formed from endogenous reserves are isotopically distinct from those that are formed from local diets [5]. However, the degree to which the isotopic signature of the endogenous reserves reflects the diet of the wintering grounds will depend on the time since arrival at the breeding grounds due to natural turnover of body proteins. Elemental turnover rates for carbon in blood are not available for our female eiders (mean mass 2050 g) but a half life of 23 days was estimated for Canvasback (Aythya valisineria), another large bodied (~1250 g) diving duck [13]. Applying an allometric correction to the canvasback data derived by Carleton and Martinez del Rio [14] results in a carbon half-life estimate of 27.4 days for eider blood. Thus, the endogenous reserve estimate provided by our model based on eider blood and yolk isotope values will primarily reflect reserves collected on the Danish wintering grounds during the first month following departure from Danish waters. After that the endogenous reserve estimate will progressively represent endogenous reserves formed on the breeding grounds. On the other hand, the contribution of local (exogenous) dietary proteins to egg yolk estimated by our model will not be influenced by time since departure from the wintering grounds. Late breeding females may spend a longer time at the breeding sites, thus filling their reserves with protein from local mussels prior to breeding. Our approach allowed us to disentangle allocation patterns from any potential changes in isotope signature of stored proteins by considering both the timing of breeding and the spatial and isotopic segregation of proteins [15].

In light of the novel evidence suggesting that eiders also utilize local food resources for yolk formation [5], we hypothesized that individuals differ in the degree to which they utilize stored and/or local resources for egg production and energetic needs. We derived specific predictions building upon life-history theory, which holds that the optimal strategy is to first reproduce from both capital and income, and then to rely on current income after storage is used [4]. This is because producing offspring from capital should yield the highest fitness when the reproductive value of offspring peaks, which occurs in the early breeding season in species experiencing a typical seasonal decline in offspring’s reproductive value. The reproductive value of progeny, from the perspective of a parent, can be defined as the likelihood of them surviving to reproductive age and spreading the genes of the parent(s). This value tends to decrease with a progressing season due to increased predation pressure and due to the lesser time available for maturation prior to winter (e.g. [16, 17]). However, we predicted that only females with adequate stored reserves, and hence in good body condition, may be able to flexibly adjust their seasonal resource allocation according to the pattern predicted by theory. In contrast, individuals in poor body condition may depend to a larger extent on locally derived resources (income breeding) throughout the breeding season. To control for variables potentially affecting the energetic demands of breeding, we also related female body size, nest-site cover [18], clutch size and year to the isotopic values of the various tissues examined.


The final model explaining lipid-free yolk δ13C values was significant and explained 54 % of the variance (F 6 63  = 12.57, p < 0.0001, R 2  = 0.54). This model showed that lipid-free yolk δ13C values were explained by an interaction between lay date and size-corrected mass (b = 0.029, F 1, 63 = 11.64, p = 0.001; Fig. 1) and differed among years (F 2, 63  = 20.57, p < 0.0001). The interaction showed that light females relied to a large extent on local protein resources (i.e. they had higher lipid-free yolk δ13C), and did not change their allocation patterns as the season progressed. In contrast, heavy females showed a transition from utilizing mostly stored reserves when breeding early toward an increased use of local feeding when breeding later in the season (Fig. 1). Both years 2010 (z = -6.25, p < 0.0001) and 2012 (z = 4.1.9, p < 0.0001) differed significantly from 2011, but they differed only marginally significantly from one another (z = -2.26, p = 0.07) with respect to lipid-free yolk δ13C (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Eider female lipid-free yolk δ13C values. Eider female lipid-free yolk δ13C values (N = 70) are affected by an interaction between timing of breeding and female size corrected weight. Heavy females (75th percentile, dotted line H, open circles) show a transition from utilizing mostly stored reserves (i.e., lower lipid-free yolk δ13C values) when breeding early toward an increased use of local feeding (i.e., higher lipid-free yolk δ13C values) when breeding later in the season. Light females (25th percentile, solid line L, black dots) do not exhibit an association between timing of breeding and lipid-free yolk δ13C values, but mostly utilize proteins gained from local feeding when producing the yolks for their eggs. Females of median weight (dashed line M, grey dots) exhibit an intermediate association between timing of breeding and lipid-free yolk δ13C values

Fig. 2

Yearly differences in lipid-free yolk δ13C values. Years 2010 (N = 21) and 2012 (N = 23) differed significantly from 2011 (N = 26), but only marginally significantly from one another (whiskers exhibit the range of the data)

Yolk δ15N values were significantly explained only by year, which accounted for 47 % of the variance (F 3, 66  = 19.87, p < 0.0001, R 2  = 0.47). There was, however, a trend-indicating a negative effect of lay date on yolk δ15N values (b = -0.019, F 1, 66  = 3.46, p = 0.07). This effect could indicate that late-nesting females utilized more local resources than early nesters (i.e., they had lower yolk δ15N values), which is consistent with the positive association between timing of breeding and time spent at the breeding grounds (see below). Years 2010 (z = -6.84, p < 0.0001) and 2012 (z = 5.55, p < 0.0001) differed significantly from 2011, but they did not differ from one another (z = -1.38, p = 0.35) with respect to yolk δ15N.

The model explaining blood δ13C values was significant and explained 24 % of the variance (F 6, 62  = 5.77, p = 0.007, R 2  = 0.24). This model showed that blood δ13C values were explained by an interaction between lay date and size-corrected mass (b = 0.017, F 1, 62  = 4.39, p = 0.04; Fig. 3) and differed among years (F 2, 62  = 3.58, p = 0.03). The interaction is similar to the one observed for lipid-free yolk δ13C and showed that the allocation patterns of light females are negligibly affected by the timing of breeding. In contrast, heavy females showed a clear transition from utilizing more stored reserves when breeding early toward an increased use of local feeding when breeding later in the season (Fig. 3). The year 2010 differed from 2011 (z = -2.60, p = 0.03), but 2012 did not differ from either 2010 (z = -0.90, p = 0.64) or 2011 (z = 1.79, p = 0.17).
Fig. 3

Eider female blood δ13C values. Eider female blood δ13C values (N = 69) are, very similarly to lipid free yolk δ13C values, affected by an interaction between timing of breeding and female size corrected weight. Heavy females (75th percentile, dotted line H, open circles) show a clear transition from utilizing more stored reserves (i.e., lower blood δ13C values) when breeding early toward an increased use of local feeding (i.e., higher blood δ13C values) when breeding later in the season. In contrast, the blood δ13C values of light females (25th percentile, solid line L, black dots) are only negligibly affected by the timing of breeding. Females of median weight (dashed line M, grey dots) exhibit an intermediate association between timing of breeding and blood δ13C values

The final model explaining blood δ15N values was significant and explained 28 % of the variance in blood δ15N (F 4, 64  = 6.29, p = 0.0002, R 2  = 0.28). This model showed that blood δ15N values were significantly explained by year (F 2, 66  = 7.78, p = 0.0009) and by nest cover (F 2, 64  = 3.15, p < 0.05). Both years 2010 (z = -2.50, p = 0.03) and 2012 (z = 3.87, p = 0.0003) differed significantly from 2011, but 2010 and 2012 did not significantly differ from one another (z = 1.28, p = 0.41) with respect to blood δ15N. The significant effect of nest cover detected by the linear model could not be detected by the post-hoc test, however. This test only detected a trend indicating that females nesting in covered nests utilized more stored protein reserves (i.e., had higher δ15N values) than females nesting in open nests (z = 2.06, p = 0.09). We found no differences between open and semi-covered (z = 1.08, P = 0.52) or covered and semi-covered nests (z = 1.93, p = 0.12).

The annual median timing of breeding was significantly positively correlated with the annual median number of days spent at the breeding grounds prior to egg laying (r p  = 0.65, df = 14, p = 0.006; Fig. 4). Interestingly, there was no association between the annual median timing of migration and that of breeding (r p  = 0.06, df = 14, p = 0.83).
Fig. 4

The annual timing of breeding. The annual timing of breeding (median lay date, N = 16) of eider females is significantly positively associated with the annual median number of days spent at the breeding grounds prior to egg laying (line represents linear regression: b = 0.45, F 1, 14  = 10.24, p = 0.006, R 2  = 0.42)


We show for the first time using stable isotope analysis how individuals from a single population differ in the degree to which they utilize stored reserves and concurrent feeding to finance the costs of reproduction. This was made possible by pairing individual physiological and behavioural parameters as well as year effects with individual isotopic measurements of female eiders and their eggs. Our study not only fills in a crucial knowledge gap regarding nutrient allocation strategies, but also shows that unambiguous assignment of species onto the capital-income axis may be difficult. Thus, we were able to show, based primarily on lipid-free yolk and female blood δ13C data, that breeding eider females allocate a mixture of local and stored reserves to yolk production. There was also substantial state-dependent individual heterogeneity with respect to the source of nutrients allocated to reproduction (Figs. 1 and 3).

Assuming a seasonal decrease in offspring reproductive value, an assumption that is likely to be met in eiders [1923], life-history theory posits that capital breeding should boost early reproduction whereas current income should increasingly be used for egg production as the season progresses [4]. We found a weak negative association between lay date and yolk δ15N values. The weakness of this association may reflect the context-dependent nature of allocation strategies; consistent with our a priori prediction, we found that early breeding heavy females relied almost solely on stored reserves when producing the yolks for their eggs, and to an increasing degree on local feeding as the season progressed (dotted lines in Figs. 1 and 3). Light females, however, relied largely on local feeding when producing yolk and exhibited no change in allocation strategy over the course of the breeding season (solid black line in Figs. 1 and 3), and may actually even slightly increase their reliance on stored reserves over the season (Figs. 1 and 3). This suggests that only females with sufficient reserves at their disposal may be able to pursue a mixed allocation strategy predicted by theory and that females with limited reserves are reliant on a fixed allocation strategy more at the income-breeding end of the capital-income continuum. Furthermore, this finding implies that light and heavy females differ more in their allocation strategies early in the season, but tend to converge in their allocation strategies toward the end of the season (distance between dotted and solid line decreases in Figs. 1 and 3).

The blue mussel is the main prey of eiders across the Baltic Sea (e.g., [24]), but its quality as food, in terms of soft body content, varies considerably over time and space [25, 26], mainly due to climatic fluctuations. During warm winters when seawater temperatures are higher, blue mussels lose mass because of increased metabolism and maintenance costs during times of minimal food intake [26]. Consequently, these mussels are of poor nutritional value for eiders, while cold winters allow mussels to maintain high shell to muscle tissue ratios and so be of high value for feeding eiders [26]. In light of our results, females able to gather large fat stores on the wintering grounds may depend less on the local food source for their own energy budget, whereas females with lesser stores will be more exposed to potential fluctuations in blue mussel stocks at the breeding localities (Figs. 1 and 3). In this respect, it is interesting to note that female body condition is repeatable between years [27] and that females in poor body condition have lower survival prospects [28], for reasons that are unclear but perhaps related to the less flexible breeding resource allocation strategies shown here. The source and amount of proteins and lipids available to eiders and how these macronutrients are allocated between female maintenance through incubation and direct allocations to eggs will reflect, then, the interplay between nutritional conditions and opportunities on both breeding and wintering grounds.

Here, we have considered only protein pathways linking endogenous and exogenous sources to eggs, but δ13C analyses are also suited for tracing lipid sources [5]. It is noteworthy that the timing of breeding seems to be more tightly connected to the duration females spend at the breeding grounds prior to initiating breeding (Fig. 4) than to the timing of migration per se. This suggests that our finding regarding the seasonal trend in local vs. stored reserves may also have population-level consequences: local food availability and quality may be more important in years when females spend a longer time at the breeding grounds prior to initiating egg laying, whereas in late years that of the wintering grounds may be of more central importance for successful clutch formation and breeding. In this respect, and due to the fact that allocation strategies may differ between different macronutrients [29] future isotopic studies should also investigate the sources of lipids to female energy budgets as well as to eggs.

Climate change is likely to increase the frequency of warm winters that hamper mussel growth and decrease their quality as food for Baltic eiders wintering in the Danish straits [26]. Thereby climate change may lead to greater reliance of eiders on local food resources gathered at the breeding grounds [5], which may in turn result in eiders being forced to breed later (this study; Fig. 4). Delayed breeding may subsequently result in reduced fecundity [19, 22] and fledgling success [21] and thereby reduce the viability of this already endangered population [30]. Thus, stable isotope profiling of breeding animals in general, and eiders in particular, may prove a useful tool for monitoring the impacts of complex, large-scale processes such as climate change on feeding opportunities and breeding propensity, as well as function as an early warning system should long-term changes in resource allocation be detected.


Our findings show how feeding opportunities on the wintering and breeding grounds are interlinked in female eiders, but also open up the possibility that annual fluctuations in the relative availability of these food sources differentially affect individual fitness depending on state. In light of these novel findings, we urge more research attention to be drawn to individually-based stable isotope studies in order to further our understanding about the causes and consequences of the state-dependent nutrient allocation strategies demonstrated here. Although more research is required to refine our isotopic models, especially those aspects related to isotopic discrimination associated with the mobilization to eggs of endogenous reserves [5], it is clear that we already possess a powerful tool to monitor relative changes in female investment strategies through time. Ultimately, consideration of the hitherto unrecognized inter-individual variation in resource allocation patterns may offer a novel approach for elucidating the ramifications of ecological alterations, such as climate change, on food webs.


The study was conducted at Tvärminne (59°50’N, 23°15’E), western Gulf of Finland, in 2010–2012. Eiders in this population winter in Danish waters, and their northward migration usually occurs without stopping [11]. Females forage outside the breeding colonies before initiating breeding and during the early stages of laying [31]. Timing of breeding was estimated by measuring the incubation stage using an egg floatation test [18]. Egg sampling was timed to the early phases of incubation. Because laying order may be important in stable isotope studies [32], we collected the darkest egg (visual inspection) – which is typically the first laid egg [33] – from each sampled clutch.

Females were captured during early incubation using hand nets, weighed (to the nearest 5 g), measured for structural size (length of the radius-ulna to the nearest 1 mm) and blood samples were obtained by extracting ~1.5 ml of blood from the ulnar vein. The nest sites of all captured females were classified into one of three classes: open, partly covered or covered [19] and clutch size (prior to egg sampling) recorded. The relative mass estimates were obtained by calculating the standardized residuals from a linear model where log-transformed female mass was explained by log-transformed size and by the log-transformed number of days since the start of incubation. A relative mass estimate was used to allow comparison of females of all sizes. One egg was collected for stable isotope analysis from each nest upon capture of the female. Egg sampling and female handling procedures, including ringing, were approved by the Animal Experiment Board/State Provincial Office of Southern Finland, number ESLH-2009-02969/Ym-23, and Tvärminne Zoological Station.

When eiders arrive in spring to their breeding grounds they may need to wait for the remaining snow and ice to melt on and around the breeding islands as well as for the ground to dry sufficiently as not to jeopardize egg viability. Variation in the length of this waiting period at the breeding grounds may affect the amount of stored reserves left for egg formation. To estimate the period spent at the breeding grounds prior to initiating breeding, we utilized daily migration counts of migrating eiders collected in 1997-2012 at the Hanko Bird Observatory (HALIAS) situated 20 km west of Tvärminne. The time spent at the breeding grounds prior to breeding was given by the number of days between the arrival of the 50th percentile of the population at HALIAS [34] and the median annual estimated lay date at Tvärminne from the corresponding time period (1997-2012).

The isotope analysis protocol, mixing model details and the endogenous and exogenous endpoint calculations used have been recently described in detail by Hobson et al. [5]. All stable isotope values are reported in delta (δ) notation as the parts per thousand deviation in ratios of heavy to light isotope abundance in samples vs. those of international standards (Vienna PeeDee Belemnite for δ13C and AIR for δ15N). Briefly, we considered protein source contributions from endogenous (modelled on female blood isotope values) and exogenous (local blue mussel, Mytilus edulis) endpoints and applied isotopic discrimination factors linking lipid-free egg yolk isotope values with these two sources. These discrimination factors were based on a captive eider study [35] for exogenous (i.e. local dietary routing) pathways and the carnivore model of Hobson [36] for the endogenous (i.e. mobilization from stored proteins) pathway [37]. Mixing models to estimate relative contributions from the two sources were run using MixSIR (v. 1.0, [38]) for each individual. Our previous study showed that eggs formed from endogenous protein reserves had higher δ15N and lower δ13C values than those formed from exogenous sources [5]. We could thus interpret individual strategies of female nutrient investment into eggs based on relative egg δ15N and δ13C values and how these changed through time.

Values of δ13C and δ15N for female blood and lipid-free egg yolk were explained by year, clutch size, lay date, female size-corrected mass, female size and nest cover as well as all their two-way interactions (except those with year) in separate generalized linear models (GLMs). Only three of the 76 females sampled over the three-year study period were sampled in two different years, thus precluding the necessity of including female identity as a random effect in the models. Due to the few years of data, year was treated as a categorical variable in the analysis. Because of this, each individual year will require one degree of freedom, which is why interactions between year and other covariates were omitted, to ensure an acceptable ratio of sample size to covariates in model selection. Female mass declines with advancing incubation and this decline may mask any potential effect of size-corrected mass on isotope values in egg components. Incubation stage was hence included in all models in which size-corrected mass was present. The presence of multicollinearity between explanatory variables was assessed by calculating the variance inflation factors (VIFs). No multicollinearity was detected and all VIFs were below 1.80. All non-significant variables were dropped from the models in a step-wise manner based on their F-value calculated from Type II sums of squares, which are unaffected by the order of covariates. The final model only contained significant variables. Significant interactions were graphically illustrated using simple slope analysis [39], by estimating the slope of the independent variable on the dependent variable at high (75th percentile), median, and low (25th percentile) levels of the moderator. If significant year effects were detected, the years were compared with one another using multiple comparisons of means based on Tukey’s contrasts.

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to examine associations between the timing of breeding and both the period spent at the breeding grounds prior to egg laying and the timing of migration.

The residuals of all models adhered to the assumption of independence and normality. All analyses were performed using the R 3.1.2 software [40].


HALIAS, Hanko bird observatory; VIF, variance inflation factor



We thank numerous people participating in field work at Tvärminne over the years, particularly Heikki Eriksson and Petteri Lehikoinen of Avescapes Oy. Tväminne Zoological Station provided excellent facilities. This study was funded by the Academy of Finland (grant number 266208 to KJ and grant 128039 to MÖ) and the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (MÖ).

Authors’ contributions

KJ conceiving the original idea, collecting samples in the field, data analysis, manuscript writing. MÖ developing original idea, manuscript writing. KH conceiving the original idea, stable isotope analysis, manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Novia University of Applied Sciences, Coastal Zone Research Team
Environmental and Marine Biology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University
Environment Canada
Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario


  1. Drent RH, Daan S. The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea. 1980;68:225–52.Google Scholar
  2. Stephens PA, Boyd IL, McNamara JM, Houston AI. Capital breeding and income breeding: their meaning, measurement, and worth. Ecology. 2009;90:2057–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Meijer T, Drent R. Re‐examination of the capital and income dichotomy in breeding birds. Ibis. 1999;141:399–414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ejsmond MJ, Varpe Ø, Czarnoleski M, Kozłowski J. Seasonality in offspring value and trade-offs with growth explain capital breeding. Am Nat. 2015;25:1–58.Google Scholar
  5. Hobson KA, Jaatinen K, Öst M. Differential contributions of endogenous and exogenous nutrients to egg components in wild Baltic Common Eiders (Somateria mollissima): A test of alternative stable isotope approaches. Auk. 2015;132:624–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sharp CM, Abraham KF, Hobson KA, Burness G. Allocation of nutrients to reproduction at high latitudes: insights from two species of sympatrically nesting geese. Auk. 2013;130:171–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd IL. State-dependent fertility in pinnipeds: Contrasting capital and income breeders. Funct Ecol. 2000;14:623–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. McNamara JM, Houston AI. State-dependent life histories. Nature. 1996;380:215–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobson KA, Hughes KD, Ewins PJ. Using stable isotope analysis to identify endogenous and exogenous sources of nutrients in eggs of migratory birds: Applications to Great Lakes contaminants research. Auk. 1997;114:467–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Parker H, Holm H. Patterns of nutrient and energy expenditure in female Common Eiders nesting in the high Arctic. Auk. 1990;107:660–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Alerstam T, Bauer C-A, Roos G. Spring migration of eiders Somateria mollissima in southern Scandinavia. Ibis. 1974;116:194–210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Robertson GJ. Annual variation in common eider egg-size: effects of temperature, clutch size, laying date, and laying sequence. Can J Zool. 1995;73:1579–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Haramis MG, Jorde DF, Macko SA, Walker JL. Stable isotope analysis of Canvasback winter diet in upper Chesapeake Bay. Auk. 2001;118:1008–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Carleton SA, Martinez del Rio C. The effect of cold-induced increased metabolic rate on the rate of 13C and 15N incorporation in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Oecologia. 2005;144:226–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jönsson KI. Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos. 2005;78:57–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Perrins CM. The timing of birds’ breeding seasons. Ibis. 1970;112:242–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Verhulst S, Nilsson JA. The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 2008;363:399–410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilpi M, Lindström K. Habitat-specific clutch size and cost of incubation in Common Eiders, Somateria mollissima. Oecologia. 1997;111:297–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Öst M, Wickman M, Matulionis E, Steele B. Habitat-specific clutch size and cost of incubation in eiders reconsidered. Oecologia. 2008;158:205–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Öst M, Smith BD, Kilpi M. Social and maternal factors affecting duckling survival in eiders Somateria mollissima. J Anim Ecol. 2008;77:315–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Öst M, Steele BB. Age-specific nest-site preference and success in eiders. Oecologia. 2010;162:59–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Descamps S, Bêty J, Love OP, Gilchrist HG. Individual optimization of reproduction in a long-lived migratory bird: a test of the condition-dependent model of laying date and clutch size. Funct Ecol. 2011;25:671–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaatinen K, Seltmann MW, Hollmén T, Atkinson S, Mashburn K, Öst M. Context dependency of baseline glucocorticoids as indicators of individual quality in a capital breeder. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2013;191:231–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bagge P, Lemmetyinen R, Raitis T. Spring food of some diving waterfowl in the southwestern Finnish archipelago. Oikos. 1973;15:146–50.Google Scholar
  25. Westerbom M, Kilpi M, Mustonen O. Blue mussels, Mytilus edulis, at the edge of the range: population structure, growth and biomass along a salinity gradient in the north-eastern Baltic Sea. Mar Biol. 2002;140:991–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Waldeck P, Larsson K. Effects of winter water temperature on mass loss in Baltic blue mussels: implications for foraging sea ducks. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2013;444:24–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaatinen K, Öst M. Experience attracts: the role of age in the formation of cooperative brood-rearing coalitions in eiders. Anim Behav. 2011;81:1289–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ekroos J, Öst M, Karell P, Jaatinen K, Kilpi M. Philopatric predisposition to predation-induced ecological traps: habitat-dependent mortality of breeding eiders. Oecologia. 2012;170:979–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Casas J, Pincebourde S, Mandon N, Vannier F, Poujol R, Giron D. Lifetime nutrient dynamics reveal simultaneous capital and income breeding in a parasitoid. Ecology. 2005;86:545–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Birdlife International. European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2015.Google Scholar
  31. Hario M, Öst M. Does heavy investment in foraging implicate low food acquisition for female Common Eiders Somateria mollissima? Orn Fenn. 2002;79:111–20.Google Scholar
  32. Sénéchal E, Bêty J, Gilchrist HG, Hobson KA, Jamieson SE. Do purely capital layers exist among flying birds? Evidence of exogenous contribution to Arctic nesting Common Eider eggs. Oecologia. 2011;165:593–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Robertson GJ, Cooke F. Intraclutch egg-size variation and hatching success in the Common Eider. Can J Zool. 1993;71:544–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lehikoinen A, Kilpi M, Öst M. Winter climate affects subsequent breeding success of Common Eiders. Glob Chan Biol. 2006;12:1355–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Federer RN, Hollmén TE, Esler D, Wooller MJ. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope discrimination factors for quantifying Spectacled Eider nutrient allocation to egg production. Condor. 2006;114:726–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hobson KA. Reconstructing avian diets using stable-carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of egg components: Patterns of isotopic fractionation and turnover. Condor. 1995;97:752–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gauthier G, Bêty J, Hobson KA. Are greater snow geese capital breeders? Newevidence from a stable isotope model. Ecology. 2003;84:3250–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore JW, Semmens BX. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett. 2008;11:470–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc; 1991.Google Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.Google Scholar


© The Author(s). 2016


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.