Partridge L: Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature. 1980, 283: 290-291.
Article
Google Scholar
Tregenza T, Wedell N: Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol Ecol. 2000, 9: 1013-1027.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mays HL, Hill GE: Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004, 19: 554-559.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wegner KM, Kalbe M, Kurtz J, Reusch TBH, Milinski M: Parasite selection for immunogenetic optimality. Science. 2003, 301: 1343-1343.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ: MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc R Soc London B. 1995, 260: 245-249.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lie HC, Simmons LW, Rhodes G: Genetic dissimilarity, genetic diversity, and mate preferences in humans. Evol Behav. 2010, 31: 48-58.
Article
Google Scholar
Kempenaers B: Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Ad Stud Behav. 2007, 37: 189-278.
Article
Google Scholar
Mays HL, Albrecht T, Liu M, Hill GE: Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review. Genetica. 2008, 134: 147-158.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bos DH, Williams RN, Gopurenko D, Bulut Z, Dewoody JA: Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders. Mol Ecol. 2009, 18: 3307-3315.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Havlicek J, Roberts SC: MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009, 34: 497-512.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hunt J, Bussiere LF, Jennions MD, Brooks R: What is genetic quality?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004, 19: 329-333.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Neff BD, Pitcher TE: Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14: 19-38.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goldberg EE, Kohn JR, Lande R, Robertson KA, Smith SA, Igic B: Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science. 2010, 330: 493-495.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page RE, Omholt SW: The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell. 2003, 114: 419-429.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Heimpel GE, de Boer JG: Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Ann Rev Entomol. 2008, 53: 209-230.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
van Wilgenburg E, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW: Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design?. Front Zool. 2006, 3: 1-10.1186/1742-9994-3-1.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Speicher BR, Speicher KG: The occurence of diploid males in Habrobracon brevicornis. Am Nat. 1940, 74: 379-382.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernatchez L, Landry C: MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years?. J Evol Biol. 2003, 16: 363-377.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hedrick PW, Gadau J, Page RE: Genetic sex determination and extinction. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006, 21: 55-57.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simmons LW: Pheromonal cues for the recognition of kin by female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav. 1990, 40: 192-195.
Article
Google Scholar
Herzner G, Schmitt T, Heckel F, Schreier P, Strohm E: Brothers smell similar: variation in the sex pheromone of male European Beewolves Philanthus triangulum F. (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) and its implications for inbreeding avoidance. Biol J Linn Soc. 2006, 89: 433-442.
Article
Google Scholar
Metzger M, Bernstein C, Hoffmeister TS, Desouhant E: Does kin recognition and sib-mating avoidance limit the risk of genetic incompatibility in a parasitic wasp?. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e13505-10.1371/journal.pone.0013505.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zayed A, Packer L: Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 10742-10746.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hein S, Poethke HJ, Dorn S: What stops the 'diploid male vortex'?-a simulation study for species with single locus complementary sex determination. Ecol Mod. 2009, 220: 1663-1669.
Article
Google Scholar
Kitthawee S: Forced-contact mating: a technique for crossing experiments with the fruit fly parasitoid, Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biol Con. 2008, 44: 73-78.
Article
Google Scholar
Bailey NW, Zuk M: Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information. Biol Let. 2009, 5: 449-451.
Article
Google Scholar
Fowler-Finn KD, Rodriguez RL: Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Evolution. 2012, 66: 459-468.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E: Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science. 1983, 220: 1049-1051.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM: Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc A. 1972, 135: 370-384.
Article
Google Scholar
R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2011, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2140
Google Scholar
Fox J, Weisberg S: An (R) companion to applied regression. 2011, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2
Google Scholar