Skip to main content

Table 4 Terrestrial haematophagous leeches versus other sources of iDNA [13, 15, 16, 8189]

From: iDNA from terrestrial haematophagous leeches as a wildlife surveying and monitoring tool – prospects, pitfalls and avenues to be developed

 

Terrestrial leeches

Blow/Flesh flies

Mosquitos

Ticks

Geographical distribution

The Indo-Pacific, incl. Madagascar, Australia and Tasmania

Worldwide

Worldwide

Worldwide

Invertebrate activity

Seasonal variation (moisture dependent)

Seasonal variation

Seasonal variation

Seasonal variation

Collection efficiency

High

High

Medium

Low

Collection method

By hand/trap

Traps

Traps

By hand/nets

Diet

Haematophagous

Saprophagous Coprophagous Flesh-eating

Haematophagous

Haematophagous

Potential feeding bias

Between classes of vertebrates, species dependent

Between classes of vertebrates, primarily mammals

Between and within classes of vertebrates, single host specificity documented, species dependent

Between and within classes of vertebrates, single host specificity documented, species dependent

Size of “host”-meal

<15 mL

<60 μL

2-10 μL

<1 mL

Multiple detectable meals

Possibly

Yes

Yes

Yes

Percentage of samples containing amplifiable host DNA

20–85 %

20–50 %

40–80 %

40–50 %

Host individual ID

Yes

Yes (1 %)

Yes (30 %)

N/A

Temporal scale (Time last meal remains detectable)

Months–1 year

Days

<1 week

Weeks - 10 months (depending on life cycle stage)

Spatial scale (Distance from last “meal” to collection site)

< 1 km

< few kilometres

Few meters

Few meters