Skip to main content

Table 2 Locations, sample sizes, microsatellite diversity estimates and Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) equilibrium test for the grayling.

From: Unanticipated population structure of European grayling in its northern distribution: implications for conservation prioritization

Location

 

Microsatellite diversitya

 

Water system

Code

Sample size

Ar

Ho

He

H-Wb

Tenojoki

Tenc

42

2.68 (1–5)

0.27

0.31

0.1941

Näätämöjoki

Naa

35

2.79 (1–7)

0.33

0.36

0.2232

Kaitamo (Inarijoki)

Kai

34

1.56 (1–3)

0.21

0.20

0.9783

Käsivarsi, Poroeno

KasPor

20

3.10 (1–7)

0.31

0.33

0.0436

Käsivarsi, Lätäseno

KasLatc

29

3.22 (1–6)

0.36

0.35

0.9356

Tornionjoki

Torc

63

3.64 (1–7)

0.36

0.37

0.2143

Juujarvi

Juu

35

2.47 (1–5)

0.29

0.27

0.6661

Kemijoki

Kem

35

3.63 (2–6)

0.47

0.47

0.5617

Kitkajärvi

Kit

67

3.20 (1–6)

0.46

0.49

0.0597

Perämeri

Pera

17

3.44 (1–6)

0.47

0.47

0.9974

Ulkokrunnit

Kruc

40

3.55 (1–6)

0.48

0.48

0.1999

Lieksanjoki

Lie

36

2.44 (1–5)

0.39

0.36

0.7229

Lieksanjoki

LieMRc

48

2.58 (1–4)

0.35

0.33

0.9241

Pielinen

PieKRc

42

3.02 (1–5)

0.47

0.47

0.0615

Rauanjoki

Rau

35

3.43 (1–6)

0.52

0.52

0.0039

Isojoki

Iso

36

2.61 (1–5)

0.41

0.44

0.1002

Puruvesi

Pur

36

3.55 (2–5)

0.52

0.53

0.0056

Etelä-Saimaa

Esac

48

2.98 (1–5)

0.49

0.47

0.1214

Vuoksi river

Vuo

22

2.51 (1–4)

0.36

0.34

0.6244

Juzija river

RusJusc

32

3.12 (1–6)

0.41

0.42

0.8362

Vindelälven

SweVinc

38

3.37 (1–6)

0.46

0.47

0.4106

Holmön

SweHolc

34

4.55 (2–7)

0.60

0.63

0.3041

Vättern

SweVatc

45

3.32 (1–8)

0.43

0.45

0.0170

Lesjaskogsvatn

NorLesc

30

1.81 (1–4)

0.22

0.24

0.4477

Eger river

GerEgec

37

3.23 (1–6)

0.41

0.41

0.0353

  1. a allelic richness (based on 16 individual re-samplings; Ar), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) within a population across the 13 microsatellite loci. Numbers within parentheses indicate range for Ar. b P-value for H-W equilibrium test across 13 loci, no populations remained significant following the sequential Bonferroni correction. c Data taken from Koskinen et al. [13].