Of tests, trochs, shells, and spicules: Development of the basal mollusk Wirenia argentea (Solenogastres) and its bearing on the evolution of trochozoan larval key features
© Todt and Wanninger; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 16 October 2009
Accepted: 26 January 2010
Published: 26 January 2010
The phylogenetic status of the aplacophoran mollusk taxon Solenogastres (Neomeniomorpha) is controversially discussed. Some authors propose the clade to represent the most basal branch within Mollusca, while others claim aplacophoran mollusks (Solenogastres and Caudofoveata) to be derived. Larval characters are central in these discussions, specifically the larval test (calymma, apical cap), the ontogeny of the epidermal scleritome, and the proposed absence of larval protonephridia. To date, developmental data are available for five solenogaster species, but most reports are incomplete and need confirmation.
Wirenia argentea deposit small batches of uncleaved embryos that are tightly enclosed by a smooth and transparent egg hull. Cleavage is spiral and unequal. The ciliated larvae hatch about 45 hours after deposition and swim actively in the water column. Within 48-60 hours after hatching they become mushroom-shaped with a pronounced apical cap partly enclosing a posterior trunk. The cells covering the apical cap are large and cleavage arrested. On the apical cap there is a prominent prototrochal band of compound cilia and an apical ciliary tuft and the trunk bears a terminal ciliary band (telotroch). Obscured by the apical cap, a ciliary band originates in the stomodaeal pore and surrounds the trunk. As development is proceeding, the trunk elongates and becomes covered by cuticle with the exception of a ventral ciliary band, the future foot. The larvae have a pair of protonephridia. At 5 days after hatching they begin to settle and within the following 7-9 days the apical cap is gradually reduced. Scattered epidermal sclerites form under the cuticle. Wirenia argentea lack iterated groups of sclerites at any developmental stage. At 40 days after hatching, the postlarvae have a fully developed foregut, but the midgut and hindgut are not yet interconnected.
Solenogastres develop via a trochophore-like lecitotrophic larva with a preoral apical cap that at least partly represents an enlarged prototrochal area. Homology of this larval type (pericalymma larva) to test cell larvae of other spiralian clades is doubtful. The ontogeny of W. argentea does not provide any evidence for a derived status of Solenogastres within Mollusca.
The ancestral status of Solenogastres within Mollusca is not undisputed [13–15], with some authors proposing that the body organization of aplacophoran mollusks, i.e. Solenogastres and their putative sister group, Caudofoveata (Chaetodermomorpha), is the result of simplification and character loss. Based on molecular data, this notion has recently been brought up again . Some authors propose a shell-bearing chiton- (i.e., polyplacophoran)-like ancestor as basal for Mollusca, a hypothesis claimed to be supported by ontogenetic data showing a serial arrangement of dorsal epidermal sclerites in species of Solenogastres [17, 18] and Caudofoveata . The larval/postlarval sclerite rows have been suggested to represent rudiments of spicule rows separating reduced serial dorsal shell fields . Others [20, 21] interpreted the serially arranged sclerites as possible precursors of the seven shell plates found in recent postmetamorphic polyplacophorans. Seven dorsal rows of sclerites seem in fact to occur in larvae of the caudofoveate Chaetoderma sp. , but the observation of seven rows of large imbricating scales covering the dorsal surface of a solenogaster larva (Nematomenia banyulensis) was based on a single specimen  and thus requires reinvestigation. Two postmetamorphic specimens of an unidentified solenogaster species have been described, where the younger specimen showed six distinct sclerite-covered dorsal areas . In larvae of Epimenia babai, by contrast, epidermal sclerites emerge scattered over the entire dorsal surface without showing any seriality [22, 23]. To evaluate these contradictory findings, data on additional solenogaster species are crucial.
We studied the ontogeny of Wirenia argentea, a solenogaster species classified within the Gymnomeniidae (Pholidoskepia), a clade supposedly representing an early branch within Solenogastres . These animals are abundant on silt and mud in water depths of about 150-600 m in the northern European Atlantic and for the present study specimens were kept in the laboratory for several months. We describe behavioral aspects of oviposition and larval locomotion and focus on embryonic, larval and postlarval development, taking account of external morphology as well as of selected aspects of organogenesis. Our results shed new light on the ancestral organization of mollusk larvae and allow for a reevaluation of evolutionary relationships among spiralian test-cell larvae.
Oogenesis, fertilization, and egg deposition
In adult living animals with the body wall musculature not overly contracted, the individual oocytes in the gonad are visible through the dorsal body wall as paired, light yellowish globules. The minimum size limit for reproduction is about one third of the maximum body length, but large animals (8-9 mm body length) produce considerably more eggs. Four to six ripe eggs are stored tightly packed in the pericardium for several hours before deposition (Fig. 1A, B). The posteriormost part of the gonad in specimens bearing ripe eggs generally appears as paired whitish (containing sperm?) structure (Fig. 1B). From histological sections of fully mature specimens it becomes obvious that sperm and eggs are produced simultaneously (Fig. 1C).
Nearly all eggs deposited in the laboratory were fertilized and underwent first stages of cleavage, even if some showed irregularities later in development. Copulation was not observed and had probably taken place in the natural habitat prior to sampling. Self-fertilization is also a possibility, especially because the seminal vesicles of several specimens depositing fertilized eggs in the laboratory contained hardly any sperm.
During egg deposition the animals lift the posterior part of the body (ca. 1/3 of total body length) and expand their posteriorly located pallial cavity opening to release two eggs, one after the other; after some minutes the next two eggs are released, then in large specimens two more. Six eggs appear to be the maximum in one session. It takes 24 hours or more for the next batch of eggs to be ready for deposition. Transport of the rather large eggs through the spawning ducts appears to be due to muscular activity, as rhythmic peristaltic waves occur during the process.
The fertilized eggs are globular, measure 100 μm in diameter, and bear a clear, smooth, slightly sticky egg-hull covered by a thin layer of mucus (Fig. 1D-I). The eggs are oval in shape immediately after release, but they become globular within two to three minutes. First they float, but in a dish with stagnant water they sink to the bottom within about fifteen minutes and then stick to the substrate (detritus as well as glass or plastic).
At 7°C, the first cleavage is completed within three hours after deposition of the fertilized eggs (Fig. 1F). Subsequently, the cells divide every two to three hours, until a 32-cell stage is reached (Fig. 1E). The first cleavage is slightly unequal, with the larger CD blastomere bearing a large polar lobe, which appears as a whitish to semitransparent bulge on the surface (Fig. 1F). After the second cleavage, the A, B, and C quadrants are of equal size, while the D quadrant is larger (Fig. 1G). After the second cleavage a second polar lobe, similar in appearance to the first one but smaller, appears on the D quadrant. The 1D cell of the 8-cell stage is conspicuously larger than all other cells (Fig. 1H). Cleavage is spiral and unequal, but in later stages there are no clear size differences between macromeres and micromeres (Fig. 1E). Gastrulation takes place 25-27 hours after egg deposition. About four hours later the embryos start to rotate within the egg-hull, a movement caused by ciliary action, which can be observed through the still entirely transparent egg-hull. At this stage, the embryos are roughly globular but flattened at the posterior pole. Within the next 5-10 hours they become slightly elongated and the pseudo-blastopore - the opening of the developing apical cap - comes to lie in a ventro-posterior position.
Hatching and larval behavior
Day 1-2 after hatching
Apical cap of Wirenia argentea, test cell numbers and characteristics
3 × (15-20)*
6 × (20-25)*
The test cells covering the apical cap are considerably larger than all other larval cells and their nuclei are about four times the size of other cell nuclei (Fig. 3D, E). Test cell numbers remain constant until reduction of the cap after settlement, while other larval tissues show mitosis (Fig. 3E). The density of non-test nuclei is highest in the posteriormost part of the larva, where the trunk is formed, and in an anterior zone that probably is associated with formation of the central nervous system (Fig. 3C, D).
Day 3-7 after hatching
Day 8-9 after hatching
After day seven, the larval test begins to degenerate. The post-trochal test cells lose their regular quadrangular shape and diminish in size and number (Fig. 4C). It appears that they gradually get detached from the apical cap by epidermal trunk tissue that is protruding below them. The posttrochal cell tiers show a ventral cleft (Fig. 4A). At least in some specimens the ventral part of the prototroch appears more strongly developed and may, together with the ventral ciliary band, serve for creeping on the substratum (Fig. 5C, D).
Day 10-16 after hatching
Day 17-42 after hatching
At days 17-19, larval organs (including protonephridia and stomodaeal ciliation) are reduced, but the midgut is not fully developed yet. The cilia surrounding the oral opening are reduced and the ciliated stomodaeum is replaced by a non-ciliated pharynx. Cilia visible more posteriorly in the gut of a juvenile 30 days after hatching probably are part of the ciliary tract of the midgut (Fig. 5F). Anterior to the mouth opening the vestibulum is formed, endowed with bundles of sensory cilia (Fig. 5F). In a specimen sectioned at 42 days after hatching the yolk reserves have almost completely been absorbed. Inner organs, including radula, midgut, and sensory structures such as the pedal commissure sac, are well developed. The gonopericardial system is still entirely lacking and we could not detect a heart, pericardium, or related structures. It appears that hindgut and midgut have not yet fused at this stage of development.
Fertilization in Wirenia argentea
According to the general presence of organs known to be involved in internal fertilization (seminal receptacles, copulatory stylets) and a sperm type characteristic for internal fertilization, most - if not all - Solenogastres species appear to deposit fertilized eggs . Reciprocal copulation is thought to be the general mechanism for sperm transfer [5, 25]. The low numbers of sperm in the seminal receptacles of our investigated adult specimens, however, raise an interesting notion. The gonad of sectioned specimens contained numerous ripening and mature sperm cells, but we did not observe any copulation behavior in the laboratory. Self-fertilization is known from various mollusks, most interestingly from certain hermaphroditic opisthobranch slugs with internal fertilization . Even if at this point there is no proof for self-fertilization in W. argentea, it is possible that the animals can switch from fertilization via copulation (indicated by presence of sperm in the seminal receptacles) to use of own sperm under stressful conditions, such as laboratory culture.
Oviposition in Solenogastres
In Wirenia argentea, eggs are deposited shortly after fertilization and prior to the first cleavage. Brood protection has been described for other species, such as Halomenia gravida, observed to carry larvae in the mantle cavity , and Epimenia babai, having at least the capacity of retaining eggs and larvae for several days in the mantle cavity . Wirenia argentea (present data), Nematomenia banyulensis , Neomenia carinata , and Rhopalomenia aglaophaeniae  deposit uncleaved embryos. Solenogasters lay their eggs in paired batches - correlating to the paired arrangement of spawning ducts - with several days to weeks between deposition events. Only in E. babai the eggs of each batch are enclosed in a thick mucus sheath , while generally there is only a thin mucus coating surrounding the egg hulls. The number of eggs deposited per batch varies largely between species and appears to be dependent on body size of the parent. In addition, more eggs are produced early in the breeding period [; personal observation]. Large E. babai specimens of 20 cm body length deposit up to 100 fertilized eggs at once and up to four such batches within one night . Thompson's single N. carinata specimen was 2 cm long and also produced up to 100 eggs per batch , while small species such as W. argentea deposit only 4-6 eggs per batch. Egg size, however, is not correlated in a linear way to average species size. The largest eggs with a diameter of 700 μm (including egg hull) have been found in N. carinata , a species with a maximum body size of 3 cm, while the eggs of the up to 20 cm long E. babai measure 350 μm , and the eggs of both N. banyulensis with a maximum body length of 3 cm  and W. argentea with a body length of about 0.5 cm are 200 μm in diameter. It has to be noted that in some cases (E. babai, probably also N. carinata) the space between embryo and egg hull is considerably larger than for example in W. argentea.
Hatching and larval behavior in Solenogastres
As described here for Wirenia argentea, solenogaster larvae usually hatch at a swimming stage when the prototroch ciliation is well developed [23, 28, 29]. In Epimenia australis, by contrast, the larvae leave the "fertilization membrane" (egg hull) much later, namely at the postlarval crawling stage . Since these observations are based on fixed material only, they require corroboration by in vivo studies. In contrast to the negative geotaxis observed in newly hatched larvae of Wirenia argentea, Neomenia carinata larvae seem to stay within a 2 cm range from the bottom . The basic information available for Epimenia babai [23, 28] shows similarities to our findings on W. argentea. In the former species, the younger larvae exhibit vivid spiral swimming, typical for spiralian trochophore-like larvae, and do not show any phototactic behavior. In E. babai, metamorphosis starts at days seven to eight after hatching at 16°C . Beating of the prototroch cilia can still be observed at this point, but the larvae lose their ability to swim before the trunk is covered by sclerites. This is different to our observation on W. argentea. Probably the relatively short prototroch cilia of the metamorphosing E. babai larvae render swimming more difficult. Epimenia babai juveniles lived up to one month after metamorphosis without food uptake , which despite of the difference in culturing temperature is similar to W. argentea.
The pericalymma larva of Solenogastres
The larva of Wirenia argentea is a pericalymma larva sensu Salvini-Plawen  or test cell larva sensu Heath  and Thompson , with a pronounced apical cap (preoral test). Okusu proposed homology of the somewhat reduced apical cap of Epimenia babai with the larger cap of other species  and we agree with this conclusion. In general, the posterior rim of the apical cap of solenogasters forms a ring-shaped fold (see Fig. 1J) and the relatively large cells lining the outer surface are commonly referred to as test cells. The general arrangement of the partly ciliated test cells stays the same until degeneration of the cap sets in. In W. argentea, the inner surface of the posterior rim of the apical cap - facing the trunk - is formed by smaller cells similar to epidermal cells of the trunk (Fig. 8A-F). No such information is available for any other solenogaster species. In some, such as Epimenia babai, the free part of the posterior apical cap rim is short and is reduced (stretched) at an early larval stage, thus exposing the blastopore [22, 23, 28]. In others, such as Wirenia argentea (described herein), Nematomenia banyulensis , and Neomenia carinata , the apical cap is more pronounced and the rim persists until the larva settles. Rhopalomenia aglaophaeniae  and Halomenia gravida  appear to present an intermediate stage, even if the status of the latter species is somewhat unsure because the brooded larvae detected in the mantle cavity of a sectioned adult do not represent the entire developmental sequence until metamorphic competence . The fact that H. gravida and R. aglaophaeniae, that have larvae bearing a well-developed apical cap, and E. babai with a reduced cap have been assigned to the supposedly derived order Cavibelonia [1, 31] points towards a tendency to cap size reduction within the clade.
Spiralian test cell larvae
The term "test cell larva" stems from early work on protobranch bivalve development and refers to the cover composed of large cells that entirely enclose the developing larval body [9, 10]. Test cells in general are cleavage arrested and deciduous, i.e., they are shed or absorbed during metamorphosis. Salvini-Plawen used the term pericalymma larva to describe a larval type characterized by a test-like cover (calymma) surrounding at least parts of the posterior larval body . He proposed homology of the larval tests between protobranch bivalve and solenogaster larvae, the so-called endolarva of polygordiid and oweniid polychaetes, and the sipunculan "serosa" larva. He furthermore suggested this lecitotrophic larval type to represent a more ancestral condition than the planktotrophic trochophore or veliger larvae [see also ]. There are, however, some conspicuous morphological differences between the diverse pericalymma larvae. The protobranch test is a preoral layer of large ectodermal cells enveloping the entire larval body. In older larvae it is separated from underlying tissues by a non-cellular space and thus only loosely connected to the remaining body [10, 32, 33]. Upon metamorphosis, this entire layer of test-cells is shed. Similar to the situation in Solenogastres, the apical-most cells are absorbed and in Nuculoida there is a ciliated postanal organ somewhat comparable to the posteriormost trunk area in Solenogastres . As an important difference to Solenogastres, the ecdodermal cell layer developing under the protobranch test forms the adult mantle epithelium and shell without any evertion process during metamorphosis. The protobranch test is entirely ciliated or bears three ciliary bands, but never has a single distinct locomotory band ("prototroch").
The overall morphology of larval test and ciliation is astonishingly similar in polychaete endolarvae and in solenogaster pericalymma larvae. In the first, however, the test cells are located preorally and postorally and also anterior and posterior to the prototrochal ciliary band, while in the latter all test cells are preoral and the distance between prototrochal cilia and oral opening is large. In general a metatroch appears to be lacking in mollusks (see below). The serosa or cellular embryonic envelope of the Sipunculus nudus (Sipuncula) larva appears to be a peculiarity of this single species [34, 35], and already Gerould proposed it to be secondarily derived from prototrochal cells . Based on morphological differences and considering the fact that according to recent phylogenies the serosa- and endolarvae do not occur in supposedly "basal" branches of Sipuncula and Polychaeta, it appears more probable that "test cell larvae" have evolved multiple times within Spiralia [see also [12, 23]]. Further knowledge about cell progeny is crucial to assess this hypothesis.
The finding of protonephridia in larval W. argentea is a novelty for solenogasters. These excretory organs are an important trait because their absence in marine mollusks has been used as one of the main arguments against the homology of annelid and mollusk trochophore larvae . Since then, larval protonephridia have been found in several mollusk taxa including caudofoveates  and chitons , and the evidence for larval protonephridia in W. argentea presented here confirms that these organs are ancestral for Mollusca and Trochozoa/Spiralia in general.
Trochs and other ciliation in Solenogastres
The apical cap of all hitherto described solenogaster larvae has a well-developed equatorial band of compound cilia, the prototroch sensu stricto [17, 22, 23, 28, 29]. Heath did not observe any ciliary bands in the brooded larvae of Halomenia gravida , but this might be due to the state of preservation of his material. In free-swimming solenogaster larvae, compound prototrochal cilia are generally restricted to a single row of cells. The cells of the remaining apical cap bear single cilia, which may be grouped into more or less diffuse bands, as for example in the post-trochal cell tiers of W. argentea.
Solenogaster larvae have a densely ciliated ring-shaped zone at the posterior end of their trunk, a telotroch, which is already present in very early larval stages and that prevails until metamorphosis [[23, 29], and herein]. It is not known if the compound cilia of the telotroch take part in locomotion. Interesting is the ciliation of the oral area and stomodaeum in W. argentea larvae, and the distinct troch surrounding the trunk apically (oral troch). Such ciliation has not been described before. Adult solenogasters have a preoral ciliary band surrounding the sensory vestibulum but in general lack locomotory cilia at the mouth opening and in the pharynx [38, 39]. The dense oral and stomodaeal ciliation in W. argentea larvae (especially in the earlier stages) could thus tentatively be interpreted as rudiments of a former planktotrophic feeding apparatus. The oral troch of W. argentea is located in a position comparable to the adoral ciliary zone or even to a metatroch in planktotrophic trochophore larvae (see below). In the recent, definitely non-feeding W. argentea larvae, the oral troch might serve to ventilate the ring-shaped cavity between the apical cap and the anterior trunk. The pericalymma larvae of Solenogastres in general are thought to be non-feeding, i.e. lecitotrophic , but in N. carinata Thompson shows the gut to be complete already at a very early stage [see figure 22 in reference ]. If these observations are correct, swimming stages or at least very young postlarvae of N. carinata may be capable of feeding. His text, however, diverges from the figures, because he describes the fusion between midgut and hindgut to take place during metamorphosis . This is at an early stage, compared to e.g., W. argentea or Epimenia babai [22, 28], but fits the general developmental patterns in lecitotrophic mollusk larvae .
The foot of W. argentea, similar to Nematomenia banyulensis  and E. babai , arises as a simple ciliary band ventrally on the trunk of the swimming larva and only later develops into a longitudinal ciliated fold that may be protruded or retracted by means of dorsoventral body muscles. Generally, the solenogaster foot - in contrast to the muscular foot of chitons and conchiferan mollusks - lacks intrinsic musculature and locomotion is largely due to ciliary action [ and own observations]. As stated for E. babai , there is no indication in development that the solenogaster foot represents a reduced muscular foot.
Homology of trochs in spiralian larvae
Cell lineage studies could confirm the homology of the prototroch across diverse spiralians, including chitons, polychaetes, and nemerteans [41–43]. Typically, prototrochal cells become cleavage arrested early in development, are thus larger than regularly dividing cells, and differentiate as ciliated cells . The definitions of prototroch cells and larval test cells thus are quite similar (see above). There is little doubt that the main locomotory troch in solenogaster larvae represents a prototrochal ciliary band comparable to that, for example, of gastropod veliger larvae or polychaete trochophores, but this prototroch s. str. of mollusks is merely locomotory in function . Information about cell progeny is necessary to infer if and to which degree the larval test of solenogasters and protobranch bivalves represents an enlarged prototrochal area. Cell lineage studies could also shed light on the potential homology of the oral troch of W. argentea to the adoral ciliary zone of other lophotrochozoan larvae or to a metatroch. It shall be noted here that the so-called "metatroch" of the gastropod Crepidula fornicata is probably not homologous to the metatroch of annelid trochophores [44, 45]. The ventral ciliation of the W. argentea larva - the future foot - resembles the early foot ciliation in gastropod and bivalve larvae, but also the locomotory neurotroch (gastrotroch) of certain polychaete trochophores [12, 45]. It is tempting to propose an evolutionary pathway leading from such larval ventral ciliation via a pedal fold, such as present in recent solenogasters, to the more complex muscular foot of "higher" mollusks.
Development of epidermal hard parts in mollusks
Our results on epidermal sclerite development demonstrate that in W. argentea dorsal sclerites do not show a serial arrangement in any ontogenetic stage. Pruvot's description of seven dorsal rows of imbricating scales in N. banyulensis  thus remains an isolated observation based on a single specimen. The situation described for an unidentified solenogaster postlarva  is different in that no single rows of sclerites were present, but an arrangement the authors termed "iterated dorsal groups of spicules". These six groups of sclerites appeared separated by bare areas that were proposed to be homologous to polyplacophoran shell fields. The entire sclerite arrangement of the postlarva was compared to the scleritome of Cambrian fossils, such as Wiwaxia corrugata and Halkieria evangelista. Together with this remarkable specimen, a second and slightly larger representative, supposedly of the same species, lacking the bare areas was found. The presence of very characteristic solid hook-shaped sclerites [see figure 1 in reference , photograph of the small postlarva] suggests an affinity to the probably derived solenogaster clade Phyllomeniidae . This phylogenetic status of the postlarvae somewhat weakens the evolutionary arguments presented , but the findings are of interest when considering the ontogeny of the scleritome (sclerite armour) in solenogasters. The merely 0.4 mm long postlarva had a stunning diversity of sclerite types and the sclerites were quite large in size compared to the total body length, as common in juvenile solenogasters .
It has been known for a long time [23, 30] that in representatives of the supposedly derived clade Cavibelonia the hollow acicular adult sclerites are preceeded by scale-like larval sclerites. The presence of scale-like sclerites has been interpreted as the ancestral status, thus rendering the order Pholidoskepia, characterized by a merely scaly scleritome, the most "basal" clade [5, 31]. Here, we show that also in Pholidoskepia species, such as W. argentea, the adult scales have larval precursors that are different in shape. This is an interesting analogous (?) case to shell development in gastropods with embryonic versus adult shells. In chiton larvae no such ontogenetic change in sclerite types is known and the mantle sclerites arise slightly earlier than the first seven shell plates, even though the shell plate anlagen are obvious as dorsal grooves already earlier than the sclerites [24, 47–50]. The sclerite and shell plate producing cells are of a more diverse and partly different cell progeny as compared to the shell gland cells of conchiferan mollusks: Conchiferan shells stem predominantly from the 2d and to a lesser extent from the 2a, 2b, 2c and 3c micromeres, while the spicule-producing cells of the chiton Mopalia mucosa stem from the 1a, 1d, 2a, 2d, and 3a micromeres and shell plates from the 2d, 3c, and 3d micromeres . In chiton larvae the most anterior part of the sclerite-bearing girdle appears anterior to the prototroch [41, 49] while in solenogaster larvae the cuticle- and sclerite-bearing epidermis is restricted to the area posterior to the main locomotory cilary band. Data on the progeny of solenogaster sclerite producing cells are necessary for further interpretation of this difference.
Solenogastres (Neomeniomorpha) develop via a trochophore-like lecitotrophic larva with a pronounced preoral apical cap covered by large, cleavage-arrested deciduous cells. These cells have previously been termed test cells and appear at least partly to represent an enlarged prototrochal area. The morphology of the solenogaster apical cap differs considerably from the morphology of the so-called larval test of other spiralian larvae, namely of protobranch bivalves and selected polychaetes and sipunculans, and thus a homology of test-cell larvae (pericalymma larvae) across spiralian clades appears unlikely. The presence of an oral troch encircling the larval body and covered by the apical cap as well as the dense ciliation of the non-functional stomodaeum in the W. argentea larva may point towards an earlier function in feeding and might indicate secondary lecithotrophy in solenogaster larvae. Characters linking the solenogaster larva to other spiralian trochophores are the presence of paired larval protonephridia and the ventral trunk ciliation that resembles a locomotory neurotroch in certain polychaete trochophores and later develops into the ventral creeping sole (non-muscular foot) typical for solenogasters. Differences to other spiralian trochophores include the long distance between the prototroch and the stomodaeal opening and the very late appearance of the mid- and hindgut in postlarval stages. The dorsal trunk cuticle with calcareous sclerites is an adult character that generally arises early in solenogaster development. In W. argentea, the sclerites are evenly distributed and no serially arranged calcareous structures comparable to those found in polyplacophoran larvae are present. Our results provide no evidence for promoting a chiton-like ancestor for recent mollusks, but rather support an ancestral position of Solenogastres.
Animal collection and cultures
About 300 specimens of adult Wirenia argentea Odhner, 1921, syn. Aestoherpia glandulosa Salvini Plawen, 1985, were collected using an environmental sledge (RP sledge) in Hauglandsosen (Bergen, Norway), at 180-220 m deep. The animals were extracted from the sediment samples immediately after collection and were kept in 50 ml plastic jars with 20-30 specimens per jar at 7°C in constant darkness; light exposure occurred only during handling. During the first week, 2/3 of the seawater was changed and embryos and larvae collected every day, after the first week every second day. Adults did not feed, even though we offered a number of potential prey organisms (diverse cnidarians). The animals started to deposit eggs several hours to days after capture and continued to do so for nearly 2 months. For timing of development, embryos were transferred to similar plastic dishes with filtered seawater directly after deposition. Timing is based on ca. 40 individuals. Additional larvae (ca. 200) were transferred to clean dishes at the earliest swimming stage. Postlarvae were kept to a maximum of 42 days after hatching. Larvae and postlarvae were relaxed by drop-wise addition of cold 7.14% MgCl2 and fixed appropriately (see below).
Scanning electron microscopy
Specimens were fixed 1.5 h on ice in 1% OsO4 in filtered sea water, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, critical point dried, and sputter coated with gold-palladium. Digital images were acquired using a ZEISS Supra 55VP scanning electron microscope. About 40 specimens were studied.
Histology and transmission electron microscopy
Specimens were fixed for 12 hours at 7°C in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M sodium cacodylate buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 0.35 M sucrose at pH 7.3) and postfixed for 1.5 h on ice in 1% OsO4 in filtered sea water. The adult specimens were decalcified for 3 h at room temperature in a 3% solution of ascorbic acid in distilled water. All specimens were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series followed by 100% propylene oxide and embedded in Agar Low Viscosity Resin (Agar Scientific, UK). Semithin serial sections (1 or 2 μm) were produced on a Reichert Ultracut S microtome using a Diatome Histo Jumbo Knife  and stained with toluidine blue. Digital images were produced using a CCD microscope camera (Spot Insight, Diagnostic Instruments Inc., USA) on a Leica DMB-RBE microscope. Serial sections of six adult specimens and four larvae were produced. Ultrathin sections were cut using the same microtome, mounted on copper slot-grids, contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined with a Morgagni 268 electron microscope. Digital images were produced with a Mega View III Soft Imaging System and edited using Adobe Photoshop CS2 9.0.2 and Adobe Illustrator CS11. Our results on internal ultrastructure are based on two larvae and two postlarvae of different stages.
Immunocytochemical labeling, nuclear staining, and confocal microscopy
Larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.3) for 4-12 h on ice. After fixation, the samples were washed twice for 15 min in PBS and stored at 4°C in PBS with 0.1% NaN3 added. Specimens were permeabilized for 1 h in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 (PTA) at room temperature. Blocking of unspecific binding sites was carried out using a solution of 6% normal goat serum (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, Pennsylvania, USA) in PTA (block-PTA) for 3 h at room temperature. Antibodies raised in mouse against acetylated α-tubulin (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) were used in a 1:500 dilution in block-PTA. The specimens were incubated for 20-24 h at room temperature, followed by four washes in block-PTA over 3 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, they were incubated in a 1:200 dilution of a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Sigma) in block-PTA for 20-24 h at room temperature, followed by four washes over 3-4 h in PBS at room temperature. Some specimens were consecutively labeled for 30 min with the Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, USA). Specimens were mounted in Fluoromount G (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, Alabama, USA). Image acquisition was performed on a Leica DM IRBE microscope equipped with a Leica TCS SP 2 confocal laserscanning unit. Z-projections of whole-mount preparations were obtained. The confocal images herein represent projection images produced by merging stacks of optical sections.
We thank Christoffer Schander and Egil Severin Erichsen for support with SEM work at University of Bergen and Natalie Bäumler, Bernhard Ruthensteiner, and Gerhard Haszprunar for cooperation on protonephridia ultrastructure at the Bavarian State Collection for Zoology and at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich (Germany). CT's stay in Munich in March/April 2009 was supported by a DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service) stipend (A/08/15187). This study was partly financed by an Open Researcher Initiated Grant, University of Bergen, (226270 Friforsk_09_Todt) to CT. Research in the lab of AW was supported by the EU-funded Marie Curie Network MOLMORPH under the 6th Framework Programme (contract grant number MEST-CT-2005-020542).
- von Salvini-Plawen L: On the phylogenetic significance of the aplacophoran Mollusca. Iberus. 2003, 21: 67-97.Google Scholar
- Haszprunar G, Schander C, Halanych KM: Relationships of higher molluscan taxa. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Mollusca. Edited by: Ponder WF, Lindberg DR. 2008, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 19-32.Google Scholar
- Todt C, Okusu A, Schander C, Schwabe E: Solenogastres, Caudofoveata and Polyplacophora. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Mollusca. Edited by: Ponder WF, Lindberg DR. 2008, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 71-96.Google Scholar
- von Salvini-Plawen L: On the origin and evolution of the Mollusca. Atti Convegni Lincei. 1981, 49: 235-293.Google Scholar
- von Salvini-Plawen L: Early evolution and the primitive groups. The Mollusca. Edited by: Wilbur K. 1985, New York: Academic Press, 10: 59-150.Google Scholar
- Haszprunar G: Is the Aplacophora monophyletic? A cladistic point of view. Am Malacol Bull. 2000, 15: 115-130.Google Scholar
- von Salvini-Plawen L: Was ist eine Trochophora? - Eine Analyse der Larventypen mariner Protostomier. Zool Jb Anat. 1980, 103: 389-423.Google Scholar
- Nielsen C: Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. 2001, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Drew GA: Some observations on the habits, anatomy, and embryology of members of the Protobranchia. Anatom Anz. 1899, 15: 493-519.Google Scholar
- Drew GA: The life-history of Nucula delphinidonta (Mighels). Quart J Mic Sci. 1901, 44: 313-391.Google Scholar
- Haszprunar G, Salvini-Plawen L, Rieger R: Larval planktotrophy - a primitive trait in the Bilateria?. Acta Zool. 1995, 76: 141-154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C: Trochophora larvae: Cell-lineages, ciliary bands, and body regions. 1. Annelida and Mollusca. J Exp Zool. 2004, 302: 35-68. 10.1002/jez.b.20001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheltema AH: Ancestors and descendants: Relationships of the Aplacophora and Polyplacophora. Am Malacol Bull. 1988, 6: 57-68.Google Scholar
- Scheltema AH: Aplacophora as progenetic aculiferans and the coelomate origin of molluscs as the sister taxon of Sipuncula. Biol Bull. 1993, 184: 57-78. 10.2307/1542380.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivanov DL: Origin of Aculifera and problems of monophyly of higher taxa in molluscs. Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca. Edited by: Taylor JD. 1996, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 59-65.Google Scholar
- Wilson NG, Rouse GW, Giribet G: Assessing the molluscan hypothesis Serialia (Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora) using novel molecular data. Mol Phyl Evol. 2010, 54: 187-193. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pruvot G: Sur le developpement d'un solenogastre. Compt Rend Acad Sc Paris. 1890, 114: 1211-1214.Google Scholar
- Scheltema AH, Ivanov DL: An aplacophoran postlarva with iterated dorsal groups of spicules and skeletal similarities to Paleozoic fossils. Invert Biol. 2002, 121: 1-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C, Haszprunar G, Ruthensteiner B, Wanninger A: Early development of the aplacophoran mollusc Chaetoderma. Acta Zool. 2007, 88: 231-247. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2007.00270.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Salvini-Plawen L: Zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Mollusken: Die Beziehungen der Caudofoveata und der Solenogastres als Aculifera, als Mollusca und als Spiralia. Z wiss Zool. 1972, 184: 205-304.Google Scholar
- von Salvini-Plawen L, Steiner G: Synapomorphies and plesiomorphies in higher classification of Mollusca. Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca. Edited by: Taylor JD. 1996, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29-51.Google Scholar
- Baba K: The later development of a solenogastre, Epimenia verrucosa (Nierstrasz). J Dept Agricult Fukuoka Univ. 1938, 6: 21-40.Google Scholar
- Okusu A: Embryogenesis and development of Epimenia babai (Mollusca: Neomeniomorpha). Biol Bull. 2002, 203: 87-103. 10.2307/1543461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buckland-Nicks J, Gibson G, Koss R: Phylum Mollusca: Polyplacophora, Aplacophora, Scaphopoda. Atlas of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. Edited by: Young CM. 2002, San Diego, San Francisco: Academic Press, 245-259.Google Scholar
- Hyman LH: Class Aplacophora. The Invertebrates. Edited by: Hyman LH. 1967, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 6: 13-70.Google Scholar
- Pola M, Duarte MMG: Is self-fertilization possible in nudibranchs?. J Moll Stud. 2008, 74: 305-308. 10.1093/mollus/eyn019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heath H: Solenogastres from the eastern coast of North America. Mem Mus Comp Zool Harvard Coll. 1918, 45: 185-263.Google Scholar
- Baba K: The early development of a solenogastre, Epimenia verrucosa (Nierstrasz). Annot Zool Japon. 1940, 19: 223-256.Google Scholar
- Thompson TE: The development of Neomenia carinata Tullberg (Mollusca Aplacophora). Proc R Soc Lond B. 1960, 153: 263-278. 10.1098/rspb.1960.0101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pruvot G: Sur l'embryogénie d'une Proneomenia. C R Acad Sci Paris. 1892, 114: 1211-1214.Google Scholar
- von Salvini-Plawen L: Antarktische und subantarktische Solenogastres (Eine Monographie 1889-1974). Zoologica. 1978, 44: 1-315.Google Scholar
- Gustafson RG, Reid RGB: Development of the pericalymma larva of Solemya reidi (Bivalvia: Cryptodonta: Solemyidae) as revealed by light and electron microscopy. Mar Biol. 1986, 93: 411-427. 10.1007/BF00401109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zardus JD, Morse P: Embryogenesis, morphology and ultrastructure of the pericalymma larva of Acila castrensis (Bivalvia: Protobranchia: Nuculoida). Invert Biol. 1998, 117: 221-244. 10.2307/3226988.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rice M: Larval development and metamorphosis in Sipuncula. Amer Zool. 1976, 16: 563-571.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rice M: Observations on development and metamorphosis of Siphonosoma cumanense with comparative remarks on Sipunculus nudus (Sipuncula, Sipunculidae). Bull Mar Sci. 1988, 42: 1-15.Google Scholar
- Gerould JH: Studies on the embryology of the Sipunculidae, I. The embryonal envelope and its homologue. Mark Anniversary Volume. 1903, New York: Henry Holt and Co, 439-452.Google Scholar
- Bartholomaeus T: Larvale Nierenorgane bei Lepidochiton cinereus (Polyplacophora) and Aeolidia papillosa (Gastropoda). Zoomorphology. 1989, 108: 297-307. 10.1007/BF00312162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Todt C, von Salvini-Plawen L: Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the foregut in Wirenia argentea and Genitoconia rosea (Mollusca, Solenogastres). Zoomorphology. 2004, 123: 65-80. 10.1007/s00435-003-0089-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Todt C, von Salvini-Plawen L: The digestive tract of Helicoradomenia (Solenogastres), aplacophoran molluscs from the hydrothermal vents of the East Pacific Rise. Invert Biol. 2005, 124: 230-253. 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2005.00023.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raven CP: Morphogenesis: The analysis of molluscan development. 1966, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2Google Scholar
- Henry JQ, Okusu A, Martindale MQ: The cell lineage of the polyplacophoran, Chaetopleura apiculata: variation in the spiralian program and implications for molluscan evolution. Dev Biol. 2004, 272: 145-160. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.04.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henry JQ, Hejnol A, Perry KJ, Martindale MQ: Homology of ciliary bands in spiralian trochophores and other larvae. Integr Comp Biol. 2007, 47: 865-871. 10.1093/icb/icm035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maslakova SA, Martindale MQ, Norenburg JL: Vestigial prototroch in a basal nemertean, Carinoma tremaphoros (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea). Evol Dev. 2004, 6: 219-226. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04027.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hejnol A, Martindale MQ, Henry JQ: High-resolution fate map of the snail Crepidula fornicata: the origins of ciliary bands, nervous system, and muscular elements. Dev Biol. 2007, 305: 63-76. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rouse GW: Trochophore concepts: ciliary bands and the evolution of larvae in spiralian Metazoa. Biol J Linn Soc. 1999, 66: 411-464. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01920.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Todt C, von Salvini-Plawen L: New Simrothiellidae (Solenogastres, Mollusca) from the Mozambique Channel, western Indian Ocean. Veliger. 2003, 46: 252-266.Google Scholar
- Haas W: Evolution of calcareous hardparts in primitive molluscs. Malacologia. 1981, 21: 403-418.Google Scholar
- Haas W, Kriesten K, Watanabe N: Preliminary note on the calcification of shell plates in chiton larvae (Placophora). Proceedings of the 3rd International Biomineralization Symposium: The mechanisms of biomineralization in animals and plants. Edited by: Omori M, Watanabe N Kanagawa. 1980, Tokai University Press, 67-72.Google Scholar
- Jakobs DK, Wray CG, Wedeen CJ, Kostriken R, DeSalle R, Staton RL, Gates R, Lindberg DR: Molluscan engrailed expression, serial organization, and shell evolution. Evol Dev. 2000, 2: 340-347. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00077.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wanninger A, Haszprunar G: Chiton myogenesis: perspectives for the development of larval and adult muscle systems in molluscs. J Morphol. 2002, 252: 103-113. 10.1002/jmor.1077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blumer MJF, Gahleitner P, Narzt T, Handl C, Ruthensteiner B: Ribbons of semithin sections: an advanced method with a new type of diamond knife. J Neurosci Meth. 2002, 120: 11-16. 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00166-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.