Table 2 Pearson correlation coefficient test results for the relationship between DXA calculated body fat percentage (using the N = 29, R²_adj. = 0.862 model) and body condition indices for male and female Israeli fan-toed geckos Ptyodactylus guttatus

Calculated Fat Percentage

Pearson Correlation

1

.398*

.346

.592**

.499**

.290

Sig. (2-tailed)

.044

.066

.001

.006

.128

N

29

26

29

29

29

29

Width of Tail Base

Pearson Correlation

.398*

1

.047

.531**

.249

−.105

Sig. (2-tailed)

.044

.819

.005

.220

.609

N

26

26

26

26

26

26

OLS

Pearson Correlation

.346

.047

1

.744**

.942**

.959**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.066

.819

.000

.000

.000

N

29

26

29

29

29

29

Mass/SVL

Pearson Correlation

.592**

.531**

.744**

1

.904**

.624**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.001

.005

.000

.000

.000

N

29

26

29

29

29

29

Mass/SVL²

Pearson Correlation

.499**

.249

.942**

.904**

1

.897**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.006

.220

.000

.000

.000

N

29

26

29

29

29

29

Mass/SVL³

Pearson Correlation

.290

−.105

.959**

.624**

.897**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.128

.609

.000

.000

.000

N

29

26

29

29

29

29