Skip to main content

Table 4 Significance of contrasts comparing tadpole activity in elevated temperature treatments with those in other treatments

From: The impact of elevated temperature and CO2 on growth, physiological and immune responses of Polypedates cruciger (common hourglass tree frog)

Contrast

Weeks after hatching

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

aControl vs ETem32

0.049

ns

ns

ns

Ns

0.0348

ns

0.0848

aControl vs ETem34

0.070

ns

ns

ns

Ns

ns

–

–

aETem32 vs ETem34

ns

ns

ns

ns

Ns

ns

–

–

aControl vs (ETem32, ETem34)

0.022

ns

ns

ns

ns

0.051

–

–

bControl vs ETem32

ns

ns

ns

0.042

Ns

0.009

ns

0.0021

bControl vs ETem34

ns

ns

ns

ns

Ns

0.043

–

–

bETem32 vs ETem34

ns

ns

ns

ns

Ns

ns

–

–

bControl vs (ETem32, ETem34)

ns

ns

ns

0.099

Ns

0.017

–

–

  1. a Significance of these contrasts was tested in analyses of variance carried out separately for each week using PROC GLM of SAS
  2. b Significance of these contrasts was tested in repeated measures analyses of variance carried out using PROC MIXED in SAS and testing using least squares means for each week separately