Skip to main content

Table 2 Significance of individual contrasts comparing different treatment combinations on morphometric characters

From: The impact of elevated temperature and CO2 on growth, physiological and immune responses of Polypedates cruciger (common hourglass tree frog)

Contrast

Total body length

Snout-vent length

Tail length

Body width

Control vs ECO2

ns

ns

ns

ns

Control vs ETem32

0.0075

0.0488

0.0275

ns

Control vs ETem34

0.0022

< 0.0001

0.0089

0.0033

Control vs (ETem32, ETem34)

0.0022

0.0011

0.0087

0.0344

ETem32 vs ETem34

ns

0.0101

ns

0.0220

ECO2 vs ETem32

0.0436

Ns

ns

ns

ECO2 vs ETem34

0.0500

0.0016

ns

0.0321

ECO2 vs (ETem32, ETem34)

0.0227

0.0040

ns

0.0477

  1. Significance of these contrasts was tested in repeated measures analyses of variance carried out using PROC MIXED in SAS for the whole experimental period. Contrasts involving ECO2 involved data during the initial 5 weeks after hatching. Contrasts involving the control and ETem34 involved data during the initial 11 weeks after hatching