From: Small-scale phenotypic differentiation along complex stream gradients in a non-native amphipod
Category | Phenotypic trait | Affected by components of the river gradient | Rationale |
---|---|---|---|
Body size and condition-related adult traits | Body length | Increased body size may translate into an enhanced tolerance to low temperatures. | |
Increased resource availability may result in larger adult body size, which is often correlated with increased investment into reproduction [53]. | |||
â–¼Oxygen [48] | Oxygen availability is coupled with temperature regimes and probably a major mechanistic determinant of growth and general development. | ||
â–²Competition [54]* | Large specimens are more competitive at high conspecific densities. | ||
â–¼ (Micro)pollution [55]* | Reduced size below sewage treatment works can be a result of the water containing endocrine-disrupting chemicals. | ||
Relatively larger individuals experience higher predation risk than smaller ones. | |||
Male pairing success is positively related to body size. | |||
Body weight (size-corrected) | â–² Resources [61]* | Higher resource availability (usually after leaf fall in autumn and winter) results in increased body condition. | |
â–¼Competition [53] | Intraspecific competition results in fewer resources being available per individual to invest into somatic maintenance and reproduction. | ||
Predator cues can induce behavioural alterations (e.g., reduced foraging), resulting in lower body condition. | |||
Offspring-related phenotypic traits | Fecundity (number of offspring per brood) | â–² Resources [58] | Higher resource availability allows for more investment into egg production. |
â–² Predation [57]* | Predators increase extrinsic mortality, favouring r-selected phenotypes with more, but smaller embryos (see also Embryo size). | ||
â–¼ Pollution [64] | Pollution (sewage and heavy metals) derived from industrial and domestic sources reduce fecundity. | ||
â–¼ (Micro)pollution [65]* | Endocrine-disrupting chemicals cause intersexuality in amphipods, leading to a reduced fecundity. | ||
Embryo size | Larger embryo size during winter may be driven by a higher tolerance to low water temperatures. Absence of cold temperatures in thermally-polluted streams reduces selection for large embryo size. | ||
â–¼ Resources [68]* | Under high resource availability embryo size can be reduced, while embryo size should be increased under resource shortage. | ||
â–¼ Predation [57]* | The optimal egg size depends on the relationship between juvenile survival and egg size [57]*. The trade-off between offspring size and fecundity [69]* allows females to increase fecundity by producing a few smaller embryos. Smaller size (allowing higher fecundity) is only beneficial if enough offspring survive. | ||
Physiological traits | Gill surface area | â–¼ Pollution [70]* | Toxic metals are taken up by aquatic crustaceans via the gills. Hence, increased gill area might be disadvantageous under elevated heavy metal concentrations. |
â–¼ Oxygen [46] | High oxygen supply allows species to have smaller gill areas. | ||
Traits used for intrasexual communication and mate defense | Antennae length | Male antennae are important for locating and evaluating potential mates. | |
â–² Male biased sex-ratio/intraspecific density | Sex ratios affect male mating behaviour [72] and, therefore, the strength of sexually selected male traits. Male-male competition should increase at high population densities and /or male biased sex-ratios because of the high encounter rate between competitors. | ||
Longer antennae were induced by exposure to non-ionic surfactant 4-nonylphenol [73]; no effect of estrogen 17 α-ethinylestradiol was observed [74]. | |||
Gnathopod size | â–² Sexual selection [71]* | Male gnathopods play a central role in holding/securing the female before and during copulation (amplexus). | |
â–² Male biased sex-ratio [72]* | Under male biased sex-ratios, male-male competition increases and males guard females longer. |