Skip to main content

Table 2 The top matrix shows the pairwise relatedness values between females according to Queller and Goodnight[59, 60]

From: Modeling the origins of mammalian sociality: moderate evidence for matrilineal signatures in mouse lemur vocalizations

  06-09 10-10 11-11 101-10 112-10 113-10 17-10 19-10 28-09 36-11 41-11 45-10 46-11 51-10 52-11 58-10
06-09   0.11 0.25 -0.18 0.03 -0.15 -0.17 0.61 a -0.22 -0.20 0.29 b 0.12 0.05 0.12 -0.14 0.09
10-10 0.38   0.04 -0.08 0.41 a -0.02 -0.15 0.10 -0.03 -0.09 0.00 -0.02 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 0.01
11-11 1.27 1.65   0.06 0.28 0.05 -0.17 0.24 -0.22 -0.03 -0.03 0.14 0.16 0.34 c -0.04 0.62 a
101-10 0.14 0.24 1.41   0.08 0.01 -0.10 -0.20 0.00 -0.05 0.03 0.51 a -0.22 0.01 0.16 -0.12
112-10 1.00 0.62 2.27 0.85   -0.01 -0.12 -0.06 0.06 -0.07 -0.14 0.08 0.09 -0.09 0.07 0.09
113-10 0.15 0.23 1.42 0.01 0.85   -0.05 -0.08 -0.02 0.01 0.19 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.36 a 0.02
17-10 1.96 2.34 0.69 2.10 2.95 2.11   -0.28 0.52 a 0.49 a -0.02 -0.14 0.44 a -0.05 -0.04 -0.19
19-10 0.08 0.46 1.19 0.22 1.08 0.23 1.88   -0.31 -0.05 0.44 a 0.10 -0.06 0.20 -0.24 0.16
28-09 1.02 1.40 0.25 1.16 2.01 1.17 0.94 0.94   0.23 b -0.08 -0.19 0.17 b -0.02 0.06 -0.15
36-11 2.82 3.20 1.55 2.96 3.82 2.97 0.87 2.74 1.81   -0.06 -0.08 0.38 a 0.10 0.01 -0.05
41-11 0.50 0.89 0.77 0.65 1.50 0.65 1.45 0.42 0.51 2.32   0.28c 0.03 0.10 -0.08 -0.01
45-10 0.17 0.55 1.10 0.31 1.17 0.32 1.79 0.09 0.85 2.65 0.33   0.01 0.09 -0.10 -0.03
46-11 0.07 0.45 1.20 0.21 1.07 0.22 1.89 0.01 0.95 2.75 0.43 0.10   -0.09 0.01 0.08
51-10 0.95 1.33 0.32 1.09 1.94 1.10 1.01 0.87 0.07 1.88 0.44 0.78 0.88   -0.19 0.29 b
52-11 0.38 0.77 0.88 0.53 1.38 0.53 1.57 0.31 0.63 2.44 0.12 0.22 0.32 0.56   -0.07
58-10 0.42 0.81 0.85 0.57 1.42 0.57 1.53 0.34 0.59 2.40 0.08 0.25 0.35 0.52 0.04  
  1. The bottom matrix shows the acoustic distances for the female dyads. In both matrices, bold values show dyads from the six kin groups (compare Table 3).
  2. aP < 0.001, Likelihood ratio > 37.02, Type II error <0.77.
  3. bP < 0.01, Likelihood ratio > 11.95, Type II error <0.59.
  4. cP < 0.05, Likelihood ratio > 3.31, Type II error <0.36.