Opposing effects of Notch-signaling in maintaining the proliferative state of follicle cells in the telotrophic ovary of the beetle Tribolium
© Bäumer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 May 2012
Accepted: 29 July 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Establishment of distinct follicle cell fates at the early stages of Drosophila oogenesis is crucial for achieving proper morphology of individual egg chambers. In Drosophila oogenesis, Notch-signaling controls proliferation and differentiation of follicular cells, which eventually results in the polarization of the anterior-posterior axis of the oocyte. Here we analyzed the functions of Tribolium Notch-signaling factors during telotrophic oogenesis, which differs fundamentally from the polytrophic ovary of Drosophila.
We found Notch-signaling to be required for maintaining the mitotic cycle of somatic follicle cells. Upon Delta RNAi, follicle cells enter endocycle prematurely, which affects egg-chamber formation and patterning. Interestingly, our results indicate that Delta RNAi phenotypes are not solely due to the premature termination of cell proliferation. Therefore, we monitored the terminal/stalk cell precursor lineage by molecular markers. We observed that upon Delta RNAi terminal and stalk cell populations were absent, suggesting that Notch-signaling is also required for the specification of follicle cell populations, including terminal and stalk precursor cells.
We demonstrate that with respect to mitotic cycle/endocycle switch Notch-signaling in Tribolium and Drosophila has opposing effects. While in Drosophila a Delta-signal brings about the follicle cells to leave mitosis, Notch-signaling in Tribolium is necessary to retain telotrophic egg-chambers in an “immature” state. In most instances, Notch-signaling is involved in maintaining undifferentiated (or preventing specialized) cell fates. Hence, the role of Notch in Tribolium may reflectthe ancestral function of Notch-signaling in insect oogenesis.
The functions of Notch-signaling in patterning the follicle cell epithelium suggest that Tribolium oogenesis may - analogous to Drosophila - involve the stepwise determination of different follicle cell populations. Moreover, our results imply that Notch-signaling may contribute at least to some aspects of oocyte polarization and AP axis also in telotrophic oogenesis.
KeywordsTribolium Telotrophic oogenesis Follicle cells Axis formation Notch-signaling
The Notch family of receptors plays a central role in an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway that regulates several cell fate decisions in many organisms . Notch encodes a large transmembrane receptor for the ligands Delta (Dl), Serrate (Ser), which are also transmembrane proteins with large extracellular domains, and signaling therefore requires direct cell-cell contact. Insect oogenesis is one such example, where Notch-signaling regulates cell fate decisions of various cell types .
Establishment of distinct follicle cell fates at the early stages of Drosophila oogenesis is crucial for achieving the proper morphology of individual egg chambers [2, 3]. Three distinct follicle cell populations are eventually defined: polar cells, which serve as key signaling centers, stalk cells, which will form the short bridge that connects neighboring egg chambers, and main-body follicle cells, which form an epithelium overlying the germline cyst. Polar and stalk cells are thought to arise from a common precursor population lineage [4–7]. Polar cell fate is induced in a restricted subset of this population by the Notch ligand Delta (Dl), which is produced in germline cells. Subsequently, Notch is required throughout the follicle cell epithelium to switch the main body cells from mitotic cell divisions to endoreplication [5, 6].
Main-body follicle cells undergo three different modes of cell cycle . From the germarium to stage 6, these cells undergo normal mitotic cycles. Beginning at around stage 7, main-body follicle cells undergo three rounds of endocycle (also called endoreplication), resulting in 16 copies of genomic DNA present in each nucleus. At stage 10B, genomic DNA replication stops, and the main body follicle cells switch from endoreplication to synchronized amplification of some genomic loci . The amplified genomic regions encode eggshell proteins, which are required during late oogenesis. The transition from proliferation to endoreplication occurs when a Delta signal from the germline activates Notch in follicle cells. In egg chambers that contain either Delta germline clones or Notch follicle cell clones, follicle cells continue to proliferate beyond stage 6 [5, 6].
Oogenesis in Drosophila and in the beetle Tribolium follows two different modes of oogenesis (out of three to be found among insects), the polytrophic-meroistic (Drosophila) and telotrophic-meroistic (Tribolium) oogenesis [9, 10]. In polytrophic-meroistic ovaries each germ cell cluster matures as one unit encased by somatic follicle cells. While one cell of each cluster develops into an oocyte, the remaining 15 cells adopt nurse-cell fate. In telotrophic-meroistic ovaries as represented by the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, oocytes and nurse cells of a germ cell cluster separate such that each follicle contains only one growing germ cell, the oocyte. This oocyte remains connected to the tropharium – a syncytium of nurse cells – by a nutritive cord . Arrested pro-oocytes are arranged around the somatic plug, a group of small somatic cells located at the posterior end of the tropharium. Pro-oocytes that lose contact to somatic plug cells enter the vitellarium and eventually become encapsulated by somatic follicle cells. During or shortly after encapsulation of the arrested pro-oocytes with somatic follicle cells, these so-called pre-vitellogenic egg chambers become arranged in a single row, depending on the activity of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway . At that stage of Tribolium oogenesis an initial distinction of terminal/stalk precursor cells versus epithelial follicle takes place, as the linear arrangement of follicles probably requires differential adhesion characteristics for those follicle cells contacting two oocytes and those contacting only one. A subsequent step in Tribolium oogenesis then again involves JAK-STAT signaling and seems to result in the determination of stalk precursor cells out of a common terminal/stalk precursor population.
During vitellogenic growth of oocytes, interfollicular stalk cells become morphologically distinguishable. Oocytes considerably increase in size, while follicle cells divide until an average number of 1050 cells per follicle to form a uniform epithelial sheath surrounding the oocyte. Subsequently, follicle cell nuclei become polyploid and -after completion of vitellogenesis- secrete the eggshell, i.e. the vitelline membrane and the outer chorion [9, 10].
To gain additional insides into the molecular mechanisms underlying telotrophic oogenesis, we have elucidated the functions of the Notch-signaling cascade in Tribolium oogenesis.
Results and Discussion
Expression of tribolium notch and delta in oogenesis
To monitor mRNA expression of Tribolium Notch and Delta during telotrophic oogenesis, we used the previously published clones . Tribolium Notch is expressed ubiquitously in both germ line derived cells and somatic follicle cells (not shown). While Serrate is not expressed during Tribolium oogenesis, we found Delta expression to be restricted to the germ line (Additional file 1: Figure S1). In nurse cells and arrested pro-oocytes, Delta is expressed at low levels. At the time egg-chambers enter the vitellarium and during early pre-vitellogenic stages,Delta becomes strongly expressed in the oocytes. Subsequently, Delta levels decrease again. Expression of Tribolium Delta resembles the situation in Drosophila, where Delta signals from the germ line to induce distinct follicle cell fates, and later controls the transition from proliferation to endoreplication.
Depletion of notch and delta affects egg-chamber formation and patterning
Notch-signaling is required to maintain the mitotic cycle
Number of mitotic cell
In Delta RNAi ovarioles, Eya expression in follicle cells is severely reduced (Figure 4B). Only a few follicle cells in the transition zone between tropharium and vitellarium still express Eya at high levels. The far majority of follicle cells, however, only display low level of Eya, supporting our assumption that in absence of Notch-signaling follicle cells enter endocycles prematurely, which obviously prevents additional cell divisions. In contrast to Drosophila, were a Notch-signal brings about the follicle cells to leave mitosis [5, 6], in Tribolium egg-chambers, Notch-signaling apparently prevents follicle cell from entering endocycle. Thus with respect to the cycle/endocycle switch, Notch-signaling in Tribolium and Drosophila has opposing effects.
Delta RNAi prevents proper oocyte encapsulation
The first important function of Notch-signaling in Drosophila oogenesis is encapsulation of the cyst by follicle cells, which is required to establish distinct follicle cell fates at the early stages of oogenesis. In Notch mutant flies, adjacent egg chambers are often fused giving rise to compound egg chambers that contain multiple germ line cysts in a single follicular epithelium [14, 15]. Also in Tribolium, the depletion of Notch and Delta results in the formation of compound follicles and affects shape and size of egg-chambers (Figure 1). Therefore we elucidated, whether the impact of Delta RNAi on oocyte encapsulation and follicle architecture is due to the premature termination of proliferation in Delta RNAi, or if Notch-signaling is indeed involved in the specification of different follicle cell populations.
Notch-signaling in follicle cell patterning
While the remaining differentiated stalk cells lost tsl expression (Figure 7 B, red arrow), some of the adjacent cells (i.e. non-stalk cells) were still tsl positive (Figure 7B, arrowheads). Strikingly, we found tsl expression also to be lost from putative stalk precursor cells (Figure 7B, white arrow), indicating a function for Notch-signaling in specifying the stalk cell lineage.
In Drosophila, follicle cell lineages are established in stepwise manner. Polar cell fate is induced in a restricted subset of this population by Delta, which is produced in germline cells [5, 6]. Polar cells, in turn, express the ligand Unpaired (Upd; Outstretched), which activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in neighboring polar/stalk precursors, thereby inducing the stalk cell fate [4, 16–18]. Also in telotrophic Tribolium oogenesis, stalk formation involves the determination of stalk precursor cells out of a common terminal/stalk cell population in a JAK-STAT dependent manner. In dome or STAT RNAi, stalks cells are lost and individual egg-chambers maximize the area of contact . In Delta RNAi, however, not only stalk and stalk precursor cells, but the entire terminal follicle population is lost, indicating that - analogous to Drosophila-Notch-signaling in telotrophic oogenesis is required for early steps in follicle cell patterning, i.e. the determination of terminal follicle cells. Subsequently, graded levels of JAK-STAT signaling may specify additional follicle cell populations, including stalk precursor cells. Therefore we posit that early steps in follicle cell patterning are conserved between polytrophic and telotrophic oogenesis, as both involved the specification of follicle cell populations in stepwise and JAK-STAT and Notch dependent manner.
Axis formation in telotrophic oogenesis
Interestingly, also in Delta depleted ovarioles we still observed the localization of eg mRNA. However, while in older egg-chambers transcripts become localized to the anterior pole of the oocyte, in young follicles mRNA localization frequently occurs premature and perpendicular to the apparent anterior-posterior axis of the egg-chamber (Figure 8B).
In Drosophila ,axes formation depends on a series of cell-cell-signaling events between the germline and the soma and between different populations of somatic cells (for review see [19, 20]). The first symmetry-breaking step in Drosophila oogenesis is a Delta signal given out by the germline cyst as it buds from the germarium [4, 6]. This induces the adjacent anterior follicle cells to differentiate into polar cells, which express the JAK/STAT ligand Upd and eventually induces terminal follicle cell fates, including stalk cell [18, 21]. Stalk formation induces the follicle cells anterior to it, which contact the neighboring younger germline cyst, to upregulate E-cadherin. This allows them to adhere preferentially to the posterior pole of the oocyte in the younger cyst, thereby positioning it posterior to the nurse cells [22, 23].
In response to a second Delta signal from the germline, cells become competent to respond to subsequent inductive signals. The anterior and posterior polar follicle cells continue to secrete Unpaired and this gradient distinguishes terminal follicle cells from main-body follicle cells and establishes a symmetrical pre-pattern of the follicular epithelium [18, 21]. This (AP) symmetry is broken when the oocyte nucleus lies close to the posterior pole of the oocyte, where EGF signaling to the overlying posterior follicle cells, and subsequent back signaling, lead to the repolarisation of the oocyte cytoskeleton and to the localization of maternal bicoid and oskar mRNAs at the poles .
The premature polarization of the oocyte in absence of Delta indicates that also in Tribolium interactions of the germline and the soma contribute at least to the timing of oocyte polarization. Since Delta depleted follicle cells enter endocycles prematurely, it is imaginable that the switch from mitosis to endoreplication triggers oocyte polarization and eventually, mRNA localization. However, in wildtype ovarioles there is no correlation of the onset of eg mRNA localization and the switch to endocycle (mRNA localization precedes endoreplication; not shown). Still, our results suggest that in contrast to Drosophila oogenesis, Notch-signaling is required to keep telotrophic egg-chambers in an “immature” or “unpolarized” state.
In addition to the premature polarization of the oocyte we also observed the miss-localization of eg mRNA with respect to the anterior-posterior axis of the egg-chamber, suggesting that Notch-signaling may indeed influence the determination of the anterior posterior axis. In Drosophila, the positioning of the oocyte at the posterior of the germline cyst ultimately leads to the formation of the A-P axis of the embryo . The oocyte is positioned by a Notch-dependent relay mechanism that includes a series of posterior to anterior inductions. The older cyst induces the anterior polar cells, the anterior polar cells induce the stalk, and the stalk induces the positioning of the oocyte of the younger anterior cyst . Given that terminal follicle cell populations (including stalk cells) are lost in Tribolium in Delta RNAi, interaction of posterior and anterior follicle might be interrupted, and as a consequence, oocytes are not polarized correctly. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that also telotrophic oogenesis involves a Notch-based relay mechanism signaling from older to younger follicles, similar to the way follicle polarity is transmitted in Drosophila from one cyst to the next younger one .
Still, we cannot exclude that the miss-localization of eg transcripts rather is due to the displacement or rotation of egg-chambers. Previously, we have shown that the depletion of JAK-STAT also affects the alignment of pre-vitellogenic egg chambers. In wildtype ovarioles, early follicles become arranged in a single row as they are engulfed by somatic cells. Upon JAK-STAT RNAi, young oocytes still are encapsulated by follicle cells, but are not aligned in a linear row, which eventually results in the displacement of entire-egg chambers. Even though in Delta RNAi egg-chambers still become aligned linearly, encapsulation is incomplete, which may also result in the rotation of follicles. Thus, miss-localization of eg transcript could be due to effects of Delta RNAi in follicle alignment and orientation within the ovariole.
The polarization of the oocyte in telotrophic Tribolium oogenesis is - in contrast Drosophila - apparently independent of JAK-STAT signaling and also the Tribolium Gurken (grk) orthologue seems not to play a major role in AP axis formation, but rather acts in dorso-ventral patterning . Even though our results suggest that Notch-signaling might contribute at least to some aspects of oocyte polarization also in Tribolium, the mechanisms of AP axis formation in telotrophic oogenesis remain to be elucidated.
Notch-signaling is used widely to restrict particular fate choices and to regulate pattern formation throughout the animal kingdom. In this study we show that Notch-signaling has at least two distinct functions during telotrophic Tribolium oogenesis, Notch-signaling is required to keep follicle cells in the mitotic cell cycle. Consequently, the loss of Delta or Notch triggers premature endoreplication of follicle cells. While with respect to mitotic cycle/endocycle switch Notch-signaling in Tribolium and Drosophila has opposing effects, the function of Notch-signaling in Tribolium may reflect the ancestral role of Notch-signaling in restricting cell fates.
In addition, we provide evidence that Notch-signaling is involved in the determination of distinct follicle cell fates also in the Tribolium ovary. As judged by morphology and tsl expression, in mildly affected Delta RNAi ovarioles terminal but not lateral follicle cell populations are severely affected, indicating that those phenotypes are not solely due to the premature termination of cell proliferation. We posit that function of Notch-signaling in follicle cell patterning during telotrophic oogenesis resembles the situation in Drosophila, and thus, may represent an ancestral feature of epithelial pattern formation in insect oogenesis.
We found conserved and divergent aspects of follicle cell patterning in telotrophic Tribolium oogenesis. Given that in most instances, Notch-signaling is involved in maintaining undifferentiated (or preventing specialized)cell fates, the role of Notch in Tribolium may reflect the ancestral function of Notch-signaling in insect oogenesis.
To visualize the morphology, Hoechst 33258 and TRITC labelled Phalloidin, which labels the f-actin cytoskeleton were used. Whole mount in situ hybridization, were essentially performed as described before .
To visualize the morphology after in situ hybridization, ovaries were counterstained by Hoechst 33258 (5 μg/ml) and an anti-α-Tubulin antibody (mouse monoclonal, 1:1000; Sigma). Mitotically active cells were labelled by an anti-phospho-Histone H3 antibody (rabbit polyclonal, 1:200; Upstate). The mouse monoclonal anti-Eyes-absent antibody (DSHB,) was used in dilution of 1:100. The following secondary antibodies were used: Cy2 or Cy3 conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immuno-Research, 1:50); Cy2 or Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-mouse (1:200, Sigma). All incubations were done at 4°C over night. Ovary images were captured on a Zeiss ApoTome fluorescence microscope.
We are grateful to Martin Klingler and Jürgen Büning for continuous support. We thank Ralph Rübsam for critical reading of the manuscript. The work of MS was funded through grants by the German Research Foundation (DFG SCHO1058/4-1).
- Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ: Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 1999, 284: 770-776. 10.1126/science.284.5415.770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bastock R, St Johnston D: Drosophila oogenesis. Curr Biol. 2008, 18: R1082-R1087. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horne-Badovinac S, Bilder D: Mass transit: epithelial morphogenesis in the Drosophila egg chamber. Dev Dyn. 2005, 232: 559-574. 10.1002/dvdy.20286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Assa-Kunik E, Torres IL, Schejter ED, Johnston DS, Shilo BZ: Drosophila follicle cells are patterned by multiple levels of Notch signaling and antagonism between the Notch and JAK/STAT pathways. Development. 2007, 134: 1161-1169. 10.1242/dev.02800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grammont M, Irvine KD: fringe and Notch specify polar cell fate during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 2001, 128: 2243-2253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopez-Schier H, St Johnston D: Delta signaling from the germ line controls the proliferation and differentiation of the somatic follicle cells during Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 1393-1405. 10.1101/gad.200901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Torres IL, Lopez-Schier H, St Johnston D: A Notch/Delta-dependent relay mechanism establishes anterior-posterior polarity in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2003, 5: 547-558. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00272-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calvi BR, Lilly MA, Spradling AC: Cell cycle control of chorion gene amplification. Genes Dev. 1998, 12: 734-744. 10.1101/gad.12.5.734.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baumer D, Trauner J, Hollfelder D, Cerny A, Schoppmeier M: JAK-STAT signalling is required throughout telotrophic oogenesis and short-germ embryogenesis of the beetle Tribolium. Dev Biol. 2011, 350: 169-182. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.10.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trauner J, Buning J: Germ-cell cluster formation in the telotrophic meroistic ovary of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Polyphaga, Tenebrionidae) and its implication on insect phylogeny. Dev Genes Evol. 2007, 217: 13-27. 10.1007/s00427-006-0114-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aranda M, Marques-Souza H, Bayer T, Tautz D: The role of the segmentation gene hairy in Tribolium. Dev Genes Evol. 2008, 218: 465-477. 10.1007/s00427-008-0240-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vachias C, Couderc JL, Grammont M: A two-step Notch-dependant mechanism controls the selection of the polar cell pair in Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 2010, 137: 2703-2711. 10.1242/dev.052183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bai J, Montell D: Eyes absent, a key repressor of polar cell fate during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 2002, 129: 5377-5388. 10.1242/dev.00115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu T, Caron LA, Fehon RG, Artavanis-Tsakonas S: The involvement of the Notch locus in Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 1992, 115: 913-922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruohola H, Bremer KA, Baker D, Swedlow JR, Jan LY, Jan YN: Role of neurogenic genes in establishment of follicle cell fate and oocyte polarity during oogenesis in Drosophila. Cell. 1991, 66: 433-449. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90008-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baksa K, Parke T, Dobens LL, Dearolf CR: The Drosophila STAT protein, stat92E, regulates follicle cell differentiation during oogenesis. Dev Biol. 2002, 243: 166-175. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghiglione C, Devergne O, Georgenthum E, Carballes F, Medioni C, Cerezo D, Noselli S: The Drosophila cytokine receptor Domeless controls border cell migration and epithelial polarization during oogenesis. Development. 2002, 129: 5437-5447. 10.1242/dev.00116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGregor JR, Xi R, Harrison DA: JAK signaling is somatically required for follicle cell differentiation in Drosophila. Development. 2002, 129: 705-717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roth S: Drosophila oogenesis: coordinating germ line and soma. Curr Biol. 2001, 11: R779-R781. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00469-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roth S, Lynch JA: Symmetry breaking during Drosophila oogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009, 1: a001891-10.1101/cshperspect.a001891.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xi R, McGregor JR, Harrison DA: A gradient of JAK pathway activity patterns the anterior-posterior axis of the follicular epithelium. Dev Cell. 2003, 4: 167-177. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00412-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Godt D, Tepass U: Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion. Nature. 1998, 395: 387-391. 10.1038/26493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnston D: The Drosophila AP axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte. Development. 1998, 125: 3635-3644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez-Reyes A, Elliott H, St Johnston D: Polarization of both major body axes in Drosophila by gurken-torpedo signalling. Nature. 1995, 375: 654-658. 10.1038/375654a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch JA, Peel AD, Drechsler A, Averof M, Roth S: EGF signaling and the origin of axial polarity among the insects. Curr Biol. 2010, 20: 1042-1047. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.