Molecular species identification boosts bat diversity
© Mayer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 20 September 2006
Accepted: 12 February 2007
Published: 12 February 2007
The lack of obvious morphological differences between species impedes the identification of species in many groups of organisms. Meanwhile, DNA-based approaches are increasingly used to survey biological diversity. In this study we show that sequencing the mitochondrial protein-coding gene NADH dehydrogenase, subunit 1 (nd1) from 534 bats of the Western Palaearctic region corroborates the promise of DNA barcodes in two major respects. First, species described with classical taxonomic tools can be genetically identified with only a few exceptions. Second, substantial sequence divergence suggests an unexpected high number of undiscovered species.
A total of at least 1.5 million species of organisms are described, but an estimated number of 10 to 100 million species may live on our planet [1, 2]. This huge gap gave rise to search for new technologies to describe the biological diversity. Meanwhile, genetic screening approaches involving a single or a small number of genes – often referred to as DNA barcoding – were started in diverse taxonomic groups for two major aims: (i) to establish a standardized technique to identify species, and (ii) to detect new species in an efficient manner to bring us closer to the true number of species [3–6]. So far, DNA barcodes were primarily used for genetic species identification of taxonomically poorly studied taxa and geographic regions like the tropics [7–11]. Here we tested the applicability of DNA sequencing for species delineation and species identification in one of the best-known taxonomic groups in an intensively sampled geographic region.
Substantial nd1 sequence divergence allowed also the distinction of several morphologically characterized taxa whose species status was questioned until recently [12, 19]. Sequences of Barbastella leucomelas from the type locality on the Sinai Peninsula differed on average by 13.3% from sequences obtained from European B. barbastellus. In addition, morphologically characterized subspecies within four species (Eptesicus bottae, E. serotinus, Plecotus auritus and P. kolombatovici [see Additional file 2]) showed mean genetic distances between 5.8 and 15.2%. These examples illustrate that morphologically similar taxa can be genetically well differentiated and that the combination of morphological and mitochondrial DNA sequence datasets is a powerful approach to resolve taxonomic uncertainties. The congruence between slight morphological differences and substantial sequence divergence of at least 5% indicates distinct species. Nevertheless, only the sympatric occurrence of both taxa can finally proof the existence of true biological species .
Highly divergent mitochondrial lineages were found in four species. Most astounding were two bats in central Europe (southern Austria and northern Italy) that had been identified as Myotis nattereri according to external morphology. They differ in their sequences from other central European M. nattereri by on average 9.7%. Among 108 individuals of Myotis mystacinus from all over Europe we found two individuals in Bulgaria that carried another mtDNA haplotype that differed on average by 10.2% from typical M. mystacinus. Bats originally assigned to Hypsugo savii split even into three highly divergent lineages [see Additional file 2]. Finally, in Pipistrellus kuhlii a western (Europe, Morocco and Libya) and eastern (Israel, Syria and Iran) lineage can be distinguished, which differ on average by 5.2%.
Highly divergent mitochondrial lineages provide strong evidence for cryptic species diversity in western Palaearctic bats. Sequence differences of at least 5% clearly fall into the range of interspecific and even intergeneric differences in bats and other mammals . They are concordant with genetic distances between recently discovered cryptic species pairs in bats [15, 22–25]. A comparison of inter-specific genetic variation in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cob) between sister taxa in four mammalian orders including bats led to the conclusion that sequence divergences of >5% are a powerful first indicator for unrecognized cryptic species . The two mitochondrial protein coding genes nd1 and cob are known to evolve at a similar rate . We thus applied a somehow arbitrary species delineation threshold of 5% nd1 sequence divergence, which suggests nine new bat species in the Western Palaearctic. This value drops to still six yet new species, if a more conservative threshold of 9% is applied. Both thresholds indicate at least three new species for Europe, one of them even occurring in central Europe. The validity of these newly proposed bat species will now be tested by analysing other characters like morphological, behavioural or ecological traits. However, the mitochondrial sequences constitute a reliable sorting criterion to search for species-specific phenotypic traits.
Although sequencing of the mitochondrial nd1 gene revealed evidence for substantial cryptic bat diversity in Europe, it is likely that further species exist that are morphologically and genetically difficult to recognize. First, mitochondrial lineages with less than 5% DNA sequence divergence as found within the species Plecotus macrobullaris, Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Otonycteris hemprichii might also represent distinct species [see Additional file 2]. Second, it is well known that DNA barcodes fail to distinguish recently diverged species . A possible example are specimens of Myotis mystacinus bulgaricus from southeastern Europe (Myotis aurascens sensu Benda and Tsytsulina ) that differ from the nominate central European M. mystacinus in the chromosomal locations of nucleolus organizer regions  and in some morphological characters . However, they show similar nd1 sequences that do not split into two separate lineages. Therefore, sequencing parts of the mitochondrial genome will always provide only the lower limit of true species diversity.
The raise in species number from 37 to 54 corresponds to an increase by almost 50%. New species were discovered in all major genera. Since Western Palaearctic bat species are among the best-studied taxonomic groups in terms of number of studied individuals, geographic coverage and applied techniques, we anticipate an enormous rise in bat species diversity in less studied areas like for example the tropics.
Morphological measurements and a wing tissue sample with a diameter of 5 mm were taken from each individual before it was released. Tissue samples were immediately stored in 80% ethanol and kept at room temperature. The number of specimens and geographic coverage varied among taxa and ranged from one to 112 individuals [see Additional file 1]. To avoid a bias due to unequal sampling intensity, we kept only five sequences per major mitochondrial lineage. Sequences from different localities were given priority and sequences from one locality were chosen at random. This resulted in a total of 217 sequences that were included in genetic distance calculations.
We sequenced 900 bp of the mitochondrial gene nd1 (NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1) because a large data set was already available and the nd1 gene in vespertilionid bats evolves at a similar evolutionary rate as the mitochondrial protein coding gene cytb . Unfortunately, no data from bats were available for the mitochondrial gene for cytochrome oxidase, subunit 1 (cox1), which is commonly used in DNA barcoding. The protocols of DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing were previously published . Sequence alignments were unequivocal. We found neither insertions, deletions nor stop codons that would have been expected for nuclear pseudogenes. Sequence differences of all divergent lineages were confirmed by sequencing 550 base pairs of a second mitochondrial gene, the gene for 16S rRNA, which was proposed as a standard DNA barcoding marker for vertebrates  [see Additional file 3]. Genetic distances (uncorrected p and Kimura 2-parameter with a gamma distribution shape parameter of 0.5) were calculated and illustrated in a neighbor-joining tree by using the computer program PAUP* 4.0b10 . In the text we always refer to uncorrected p distances. All DNA sequences are available from GenBank: Accession numbers of previous studies [GenBank:AF065106, GenBank:AF401362, GenBank:AF401363–AF401366, GenBank:AF401369, GenBank:AF401372, GenBank:AF401373, GenBank:AF401375, GenBank:AF401376, GenBank:AF401378, GenBank:AF401382, GenBank:AF401390, GenBank:AF401393, GenBank:AF401395–AF401398, GenBank:AF401400, GenBank:AF401407, GenBank:AF401409–AF401411, GenBank:AF401414–AF401419, GenBank:AF401421, GenBank:AF401427, GenBank:AF401431–AF401436, GenBank:AF401439–AF401442, GenBank:AF401444, GenBank:AF401446, GenBank:AF401448, GenBank:AF401449, GenBank:AF401451, GenBank:AF401453–AF401457, GenBank:AF401461–AF401466, GenBank:AF401468–AF401477, GenBank:AF516269, GenBank:AF516270, GenBank:AF516272–AF516275, GenBank:AF516277, GenBank:AY027834–AY027837, GenBank:AY027840, GenBank:AY027846, GenBank:AY027848, GenBank:AY027851, GenBank:AY027853, GenBank:AY027856, GenBank:AY027858, GenBank:AY027859, GenBank:AY033950, GenBank:AY033955, GenBank:AY033984–AY033987, GenBank:AY699856, GenBank:AY699858, GenBank:AY699860] and of this study [GenBank:DQ914967–DQ915087].
We are especially grateful to the numerous people who provided tissue samples. Andrea Ross assisted in DNA sequencing. Otto von Helversen, Martina Nagy, Stefan Schuster, Björn Siemers, Michael Veith and two anonymous referees participated in early discussions or made important comments on the manuscript.
- Wilson EO: The encyclopedia of life. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003, 18: 77-80. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00040-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heywood VH, Watson RT: Global Biodiversity Assessment. 1995, Cambridge, U.K. , Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Blaxter ML: The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004, 359: 669-679. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1447.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP: A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003, 18: 70-74. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moritz C, Cicero C: DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (10): e354-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hebert PD, Gregory TR: The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol. 2005, 54 (5): 852-859. 10.1080/10635150500354886.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monaghan MT, Balke M, Gregory TR, Vogler AP: DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005, 360 (1462): 1925-1933. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1724.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W: Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (41): 14812-14817. 10.1073/pnas.0406166101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith MA, Fisher BL, Hebert PD: DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005, 360 (1462): 1825-1834. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1714.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD: DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (10): 3657-3662. 10.1073/pnas.0511318103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blaxter M, Elsworth B, Daub J: DNA taxonomy of a neglected animal phylum: an unexpected diversity of tardigrades. Proc Roy Soc London, Biol Sci. 2004, 271 Suppl 4: S189-92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simmons NB: Order Chiroptera. Mammal species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Edited by: Wilson DE, Reeder DM. 2005, Baltimore, MD , Johns Hopkins University Press, 312-529.Google Scholar
- Benda P, Hulva P, Gaisler J: Systematic status of African populations of Pipistrellus pipistrellus complex (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with a description of a new species from Cyrenaica, Libya. Acta Chiropterologica. 2004, 6 (2): 193-217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benda P, Kiefer A, Hanak V, Veith M: Systematic status of African populations of long-eared bats, genus Plecotus (Mammalia: Chrioptera). Folia Zoologica. 2004, 53: 1-47.Google Scholar
- Mayer F, von Helversen O: Cryptic diversity in European bats. Proc Roy Soc London, Biol Sci. 2001, 268 (1478): 1825-1832. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1744.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruedi M, Mayer F: Molecular systematics of bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) suggests deterministic ecomorphological convergences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001, 21 (3): 436-448. 10.1006/mpev.2001.1017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berthier P, Excoffier L, Ruedi M: Recurrent replacement of mtDNA and cryptic hybridization between two sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Proc Roy Soc London, Biol Sci. 2006, 273 (1605): 3101-3109. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3680.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harrison DL: A new species of pipistrelle bat (Chiroptera Pipistrellus) from South Israel. Durban Mus Novit. 1960, 5 (19): 261-267.Google Scholar
- Horácek I, Hanak V, Gaisler J: Bats of the Palaearctic region: A taxonomic and biogeographic review. Proceedings of the VIIIth European bat research symposium. Edited by: Woloszyn BW. 2000, Krakow, Poland , Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Vol. I Approaches to biogeography and ecology of bats: 11-157.Google Scholar
- Mayr E: Animal species and evolution. 1963, Cambridge, Mass. , Harvard University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baker RJ, Bradley RD: Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy. 2006, 87: 643-662. 10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barratt EM, Deaville R, Burland TM, Bruford MW, Jones G, Racey PA, Wayne RK: DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature. 1997, 387: 138-139. 10.1038/387138b0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castella V, Ruedi M, Excoffier L, Ibanez C, Arlettaz R, Hausser J: Is the Gibraltar strait a barrier to gene flow for the bat Myotis myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)?. Mol Ecol. 2000, 9 (11): 1761-1772. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01069.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Helversen O, Heller KG, Mayer F, Nemeth A, Volleth M, Gombkötö P: Cryptic mammalian species: a new species of whiskered Bat (Myotis alcathoe n. sp.) in Europe. Naturwissenschaften. 2001, 88 (5): 217-223. 10.1007/s001140100225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiefer A, Mayer F, Kosuch J, von Helversen O, Veith M: Conflicting molecular phylogenies of European long-eared bats (Plecotus) can be explained by cryptic diversity. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002, 25 (3): 557-566. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00299-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benda P, Tsytsulina KA: Taxonomic revision of Myotis mystacinus group (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in the western Palearctic. Acta Soc Zool Bohem. 2000, 64: 331-398.Google Scholar
- Volleth M: Differences in the location of nucleolus organizer regions in European vespertilionid bats. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics. 1987, 44: 186-197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD: The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst Biol. 2005, 54 (5): 844-851. 10.1080/10635150500354878.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vences M, Thomas M, van der Meijden A, Chiari Y, Vieites DR: Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool. 2005, 2 (1): 5-10.1186/1742-9994-2-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swofford DL: PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). 2002, Sunderland, MA , Sinauer, 4thGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.