Sensory epithelia of the fish inner ear in 3D: studied with high-resolution contrast enhanced microCT
© Schulz-Mirbach et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 May 2013
Accepted: 21 October 2013
Published: 27 October 2013
While a number of studies have illustrated and analyzed 3D models of inner ears in higher vertebrates, inner ears in fishes have rarely been investigated in 3D, especially with regard to the sensory epithelia of the end organs, the maculae. It has been suggested that the 3D curvature of these maculae may also play an important role in hearing abilities in fishes. We therefore set out to develop a fast and reliable approach for detailed 3D visualization of whole inner ears as well as maculae.
High-resolution microCT imaging of black mollies Poecilia sp. (Poeciliidae, Teleostei) and Steatocranus tinanti (Cichlidae, Teleostei) stained with phosphotungstic acid (PTA) resulted in good tissue contrast, enabling us to perform a reliable 3D reconstruction of all three sensory maculae of the inner ears. Comparison with maculae that have been 3D reconstructed based on histological serial sections and phalloidin-stained maculae showed high congruence in overall shape of the maculae studied here.
PTA staining and subsequent high-resolution contrast enhanced microCT imaging is a powerful method to obtain 3D models of fish inner ears and maculae in a fast and more reliable manner. Future studies investigating functional morphology, phylogenetic potential of inner ear features, or evolution of hearing and inner ear specialization in fishes may benefit from the use of 3D models of inner ears and maculae.
KeywordsmicroCT Interactive 3D models Fish inner ear Macula Sensory epithelium
Inner ears in modern bony fishes (Teleostei) are composed of three semicircular canals and three otolithic end organs. Sensory epithelia of the canals, called cristae, are solely overlain by a gelatinous matrix, the cupula. In each of the end organs, the sensory epithelium (macula) is overlain by a massive calcium carbonate biomineralisate, the otolith. Maculae are characterized by orientation patterns of ciliary bundles of the sensory hair cells, i.e. the morphologically and physiologically polarized ciliary bundles form differently oriented groups on the macula. The orientation of a ciliary bundle is determined by the position of its eccentrically placed kinocilium relative to the stereocilia.
Teleosts show several different orientation patterns, and these patterns have been interpreted with regard to or correlated with acoustic abilities (e.g. sound source localization) of fishes (e.g., ). For evaluation of patterns, maculae are flattened during preparation for further analysis using scanning electron or confocal microscopes (e.g., ). This in turn means that orientation patterns are obtained, shown, and compared between species in a purely two dimensionally way irrespective of the natural curvature of the maculae in the ear. As has already been stated by Platt and Popper (1981) , orientation patterns should preferably take into account the three dimensional structure of sensory epithelia. Until now, the reliable reconstruction of maculae in their original 3D curvature was difficult and has to our knowledge only rarely been performed (zebrafish: ; Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana: ). These reconstructions based on histological serial sections were labor-intensive and results were in part uneven as maculae were prone to distortion or artifacts such as disruption during dehydration or embedding procedures.
The non-destructive imaging method of x-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) was used in a recent study on cichlid ears  and in an investigation of 3D utricular and saccular macula in mammals . These studies indicate that a rather fast 3D reconstruction should be possible using microCT. However, iodine stained samples of cichlids  did not provide a sufficient contrast to discriminate otolith, otolithic membrane, maculae, and innervating nerve fibers of the VIIIth cranial nerve. The aim of our study therefore was to establish a fast and more reliable method to three-dimensionally reconstruct whole inner ears of fishes with special focus on the reconstruction of the 3D curvature of maculae.
Our results indicate that reliable 3D reconstructions of inner ears including otoliths and maculae can be obtained by using high-resolution microCT imaging of specimens stained with phosphotungstic acid.
We chose two species from two different orders within the teleosts, the cyprinodontiform black molly Poecilia sp. (Poeciliidae, live-bearers; four specimens) and the perciform slender lion head cichlid Steatocranus tinanti (Cichlidae; two specimens) from local aquarium stores because inner ear morphology including otoliths and/or sensory epithelia of S. tinanti and of the closely related species Poecilia mexicana, respectively, have been investigated in previous studies [2, 5] and could thus be used for comparative purposes.
Specimens were anesthetized and euthanized with an overdose (approx. 0.02%) of MS 222 (ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate; Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequently, scales on the head and in the region of the shoulder girdle were removed and the abdomen was ventrally opened to facilitate penetration of the fixative and the staining solution. Fishes were then fixed in 10% buffered formalin (buffered in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH = 7.2) for up to five days at 4°C. Cacodylate buffer was used instead of phosphate buffer as with the latter phosphate crystals often grow during fixation nearby or on the surface of otoliths (pers. observ. TSM). Based on our previous experience of weak staining of inner ears for microCT with Lugol’s solution (aqueous iodine/iodide staining) and on comparative studies on different staining agents for microCT investigations [7, 8], we chose phosphotungstic acid (PTA; Sigma-Aldrich P4006) because it has been observed to stain other sensory epithelia well such as olfactory epithelia in fishes (; unpublished observations). Prior to staining, a microCT scan was performed using the unstained samples still in aqueous fixative solution.
To check the effects of dehydration and staining, one individual of each species was scanned as (1) non-dehydrated and unstained, (2) dehydrated and unstained, and (3) dehydrated and stained sample to test whether otoliths were partly dissolved or affected (e.g. growth of phosphate crystals) by the staining using PTA in methanol. A first scan was made of each specimen while in the fixative solution. Subsequently, specimens were dehydrated through an ascending methanol series (50%, 75%, 100%; at least one hour per step and overnight in 100%). Prior to staining, a second scan was performed using the unstained and dehydrated sample to check for potential effects of dehydration, i.e. shrinkage and/or distortion. Fishes were then transferred to 1% PTA in 100% methanol for four days. The staining solution was then changed to 100% methanol, in which the sample was scanned.
Testing the dehydration and staining on two spare black molly specimens (33 and 35 mm SL, 5 and 6 mm lateral body thickness) showed that overnight staining (approx. 18 hours) in 1% PTA in methanol was insufficient for full penetration and contrasting of the internal structures, and 48 hours of staining provided some contrast of the peripheral body, but not the central portions (data not shown). Four days of staining proved consistently adequate for fish specimens of this size, and this was adopted a general minimum staining time.
Scans of inner ears with special focus on sensory epithelia were performed with a MicroXCT high-resolution microCT system (Xradia, MicroXCT-200, Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Pleasanton, CA) with a tungsten microfocus X-ray source and variable secondary optical magnification. These scans were made with an anode voltage setting of 40 kV at 4-8 W, with an exposure time of 5–8 seconds and 2x2 pixel binning for projection images every 0.25°. Reconstructed image stacks had isotropic voxel sizes of 9.4 μm (unstained), 5.4 μm (stained), or 2.0 μm (stained, high-resolution scan) for the black molly (Figure 1A-C) and 10 μm (stained) and 4 μm (stained, high-resolution scan) for S. tinanti (Figure 1D-F).
Scans checking potential artifacts of dehydration or staining were always performed using the same isotropic voxel size of 10 μm for both specimens (one specimen per species) and all three conditions (non-dehydrated and unstained; dehydrated and unstained; dehydrated and stained).
3D renderings of inner ears including otoliths, sensory epithelia such as maculae and cristae, and the posterior part of the brain were performed in AMIRA® v. 5.4.1 (Visage Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany).
Mainly a threshold-based segmentation was applied and, if necessary this labeling was refined or corrected using the brush tool. This means that after setting a threshold which corresponds a certain grey value, only voxels with values greater than or equal this threshold were assigned to the respective LabelField of the structure of interest (otolith, brain, etc.). For the reconstruction of otoliths and organs, initially every 5th to 10th image was labeled, with subsequent interpolation of structures on intervening images. Using the interpolate function may save time and is important to obtain rather smooth surfaces right away . Ruthensteiner (2008)  recommended initial labeling of every third image; as otoliths and most of the organs labeled in our samples changed gradually across slices, we found labeling of every 5th (otoliths, labyrinth, sensory epithelia) to 10th (brain) image sufficient to yield a first good approximation of the respective structure. Subsequently, we checked every image for potential interpolation errors such as still unlabeled portions of the respective structure or labeled regions belonging to another organ. These errors were corrected using the brush tool by labeling or removing erroneously labeled parts where necessary.
Subsequently, every otolith and organ was separated from the 'master’ LabelField file into single LabelFields and saved as separate files. In the case of checking potential artifacts of dehydration or staining, the 'master’ LabelField was directly used for surface rendering without prior separation of single LabelFields. Surface rendering was performed with the SurfaceGen module. If necessary surfaces of each labeled object were reduced to 100,000 surfaces. This was followed by the smoothing of surfaces using the SmoothSurface module (20 iterations; unconstrained smoothing).
Interactive 3D models
In order to give a full 3D impression of reconstructed structures, we created interactive figures in which all organs can be interactively accessed (free choice of perspective and organ composition) and thus provide a better understanding of the spatial relationship of maculae to each other as well as the amount of their curvature. Interactive 3D pdf models were created using Adobe Acrobat 9 pro extended (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) and Deep Exploration 5.5 (right hemisphere) modifying the procedure described by Ruthensteiner and Heß (2008) .
Validation of 3D reconstructions
The right inner ear of one black molly and the left inner ear of one S. tinanti were dissected out, semicircular canals were removed, and end organs were captured in (antero-)medial or ventral (utricle of the S. tinanti specimen) views while taking a stack of 8–13 images at different focal planes for each view using a Leica MZ 16 F stereomicroscope equipped with a ProgRes® C5 camera, applying the ProgRes® MAC CapturePro 2.7.6 image capture software (Jenoptik AG, Germany). To combine the in-focus areas of the source images to an extended-focus 2D-image, we created a montage image using the “Do stack” tool in CombineZM (Image Stacking Software by Alan Hadley, UK).
Moreover, we compared the 3D reconstructed macula sacculi and macula lagenae of the specimen studied here with the respective maculae of Poecilia mexicana described in detail in a previous study by TSM and MH [2, 5].
Evaluation of ciliary bundle orientation in 2D
To validate 3D reconstructed maculae of S. tinanti and to illustrate one possible application of 3D models of sensory epithelia, we first determined orientation patterns of ciliary bundles of the maculae of S. tinanti in 2D. In the case of the black molly, orientation patterns of ciliary bundles of the closely related P. mexicana were available from a previous study . In both species, the macula utriculi showed the strongest three-dimensional curvature. We therefore chose this macula type to project the 2D orientation patterns of ciliary bundles onto the respective 3D models.
Immunohistochemistry: To identify orientation patterns, ciliary bundles of the maculae in eight specimens of S. tinanti (SL: 43–83 mm) were stained according to the method introduced by Lu and Popper (1998)  with TRITC-labeled phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) for stereocilia and anti-bovine α-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibodies (Molecular Probes®, Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) and Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes®, Eugene, OR, U.S.A.) for kinocilia. Prior to staining, the fresh heads were fixed for 1–2 hours in 10% buffered (0.1 M phosphate buffer) formalin solution at room temperature. Inner ears were dissected out in fixative, otoliths removed, and then sensory epithelia were washed four times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer with 0.01% sodium azide at 20 minute intervals at room temperature on a slowly moving shaker. All further steps (unless specified otherwise) were performed at room temperature on a shaker, and after every staining/antibody step tissue samples were washed four times with phosphate buffer with sodium azide at 20 minute intervals. Inner ears were incubated in blocking solution for 1 h and then incubated overnight in anti-bovine α-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibodies (1:200 dilution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer with sodium azide). Sensory epithelia were incubated in Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse antibodies (1:200 dilution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) for 1.5 h at 37°C and in TRITC-labeled phalloidin (1:100 dilution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) for 4 to 5 h. After the staining procedure, samples were stored at 4°C for one day, after which the sensory epithelia were mounted on a slide with an anti-fading medium, VectaShield® (Vector Laboratories). In this medium, the sensory epithelia were carefully flattened and then covered with a cover slip, sealed with nail polish, and stored at 4°C.
Confocal imaging: Samples were investigated with a Leica TCS SP2 inverse confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) using a Leica HCX PL APO UV 40x oil dipping objective (NA = 1.25) and with the 488 nm argon-gas-laser line and the 543 nm He-Ne laser. Overlapping image stacks of each macula were photographed at a z-step size of 1 μm and a pixel size of 183 nm x 183 nm. The image stacks were reduced to one image by applying the brightest point projection tool in Image J v. 1.46r. Brightest point projected images were used for creating one map of the stained stereocilia of each macula in Adobe Photoshop CS4®. Orientations of ciliary bundles were determined as described by Lu and Popper (1998) .
Projection of 2D orientation patterns on the 3D models of the maculae
In AMIRA® v. 5.4.1 created and rendered surfaces were opened in Adobe Photoshop CS4® Extended as wavefront (obj) files. Then arrows indicating the orientation of groups of ciliary bundles were drawn on the dorsal face of the 3D models of the macula utriculi of S. tinanti and Poecilia sp., respectively.
Results and discussion
Effects of dehydration and staining
Reliability of 3D reconstructed maculae
Projection of 2D ciliary bundle orientation patterns on the 3D models of the maculae
3D models of maculae as obtained by our approach and subsequent projection of 2D evaluated orientation patterns of ciliary bundles of sensory hair cells onto the 3D reconstructed maculae (see Figure 9), may be especially important in comparative studies investigating several species of the same group with regard to their inner ear morphology and hearing abilities. Buran et al. (2005)  found distinctly out-of-plane curved maculae lagenae in one out of four studied elopomorph species. Ramcharitar et al. (2004)  reported strongly curved maculae sacculi in a sciaenid species (Bairdiella chrysoura); the authors  assumed that this may have an impact on the hearing abilities. Future application of microCT imaging on stained specimens in such studies will therefore have an impact in two ways: (i) peculiarities such as strongly curved maculae can be illustrated and compared qualitatively in 3D by the authors and the readers using interactive 3D models, and (ii) 3D datasets offer the possibility for a quantification of the amount of curvature of maculae, evaluation of the angle between the macula or otoliths to the sagittal plane, or to perform other 3D morphometrics (e.g., [14, 15]), or even functional modeling of the sensory organs.
Further future applications
So far, PTA contrasting for microCT has less frequently been used compared to iodine-based stainings for example. PTA staining provided good results for studying vertebrate embryos and thus is of great value for developmental studies [16, 17].
Once the specimen is stained, microCT scans can be performed using different resolutions. Scans at “lower” resolutions (ca. 5-10 μm voxel sizes) may help to gain additional insights for example on the position and distance of inner ears to the swim bladder which is an important aspect in fish hearing; a small distance or even a connection between swim bladder and inner ears is likely to enhance auditory abilities (for an overview see ). High-resolution scans on the same specimen then allow for deciphering details of inner ear anatomy that yield not only information on the 3D curvature of maculae, but also on the in situ position and orientation of the maculae relative to each other and on the amount of overlap between macula and the corresponding otolith (see also Additional file 1, Additional file 2). The latter information may be of particular interest because parts of the macula not overlain by the otolith are hypothesized to be stimulated in a different way than the overlain regions, which is suggested to have physiological implications for hearing in fishes such as sound source localization .
Finally, as the method produces highly informative datasets in a rather short time, these can be used by scientists interested in the diversity of inner ear morphology in fishes asking taxonomical, phylogenetic, or ecomorphological questions. Evangelista et al. (2010)  have already performed a quantitative comparison of inner ears in sharks and rays, concluding that variation in ears could best be explained by taking into account phylogeny as well as feeding strategy; however, the study was based on 2D measurements. Measurements taken from 3D models of inner ears comparing different taxa may elucidate certain specializations in inner ear morphology and hearing abilities found in some species. In phylogenetic studies on inner ears in primates, such 3D morphometric analyses based on CT imaging have already successfully been applied (e.g., [21, 22]).
Successful 3D reconstruction of fish inner ears has recently been performed using thin-sheet laser imaging microscopy (TSLIM)  (see also [24, 25]). Though TSLIM provides excellent resolution similar to histological sections, a decalcification step during sample preparation is necessary. In the case of fish inner ears this means that otoliths have to be dissolved, i.e. information about otolith morphology and the relationship between otoliths and corresponding maculae is lost. A combination of both non-destructive methods , however, might further improve the success of 3D reconstruction of fish ears and their components.
Our study shows that high-resolution contrast enhanced microCT imaging of PTA stained fish provides a powerful method to obtain reliable 3D images of fish inner ears including the maculae in a less labor-intensive way compared to most previous studies illustrating fish inner ears and/or maculae in 3D based on histological methods [2, 4, 26]. We suggest that future studies will benefit from using such 3D models of fish inner ears and maculae in comparative investigations focusing on functional morphology, hearing specializations and morphometric analyses. As dehydration and staining can differently affect inner ears of different species, any analysis of inner ears in 3D should include an investigation of the effects on the species under study.
We thank Prof. Dr. I. Lichtscheidl (CIUS, Core Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Reesearch, Vienna, Austria) and her working group for their support with confocal microscopy and Prof. Dr. F. Ladich (Department of Behavioural Biology, Vienna, Austria) for providing the specimens of S. tinanti. This study was funded by the German Academic Exchange Service (TSM).
- Popper AN, Schilt CR: Hearing and Acoustic Behavior: Basic and Applied Considerations. Fish Bioacoustics. Volume 32. Edited by: Webb J, Fay R, Popper A. 2008, Springer New York: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 17-48.View Article
- Schulz-Mirbach T, Hess M, Plath M: Inner ear morphology in the Atlantic molly Poecilia mexicana - first detailed microanatomical study of the inner ear of a cyprinodontiform species. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6: e27734-10.1371/journal.pone.0027734.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Platt C, Popper AN: Fine Structure and Function of the ear. Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes. Edited by: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR. 1981, New York: Springer, 3-38.View Article
- Bang PI, Sewell WF, Malicki JJ: Morphology and cell type heterogeneities of the inner ear epithelia in adult and juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Comp Neurol. 2001, 438: 173-190. 10.1002/cne.1308.View ArticlePubMed
- Schulz-Mirbach T, Metscher B, Ladich F: Relationship between swim bladder morphology and hearing abilities - a case study on asian and african cichlids. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7: e42292-10.1371/journal.pone.0042292.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Uzun-Coruhlu H, Curthoys IS, Jones AS: Attachment of the utricular and saccular maculae to the temporal bone. Hear Res. 2007, 233: 77-85. 10.1016/j.heares.2007.07.008.View ArticlePubMed
- Metscher BD: MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 2009, 9: 11-10.1186/1472-6793-9-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Pauwels E, Van Loo D, Cornillie P, Brabant L, Van Hoorebeke L: An exploratory study of contrast agents for soft tissue visualization by means of high resolution X-ray computed tomography imaging. J Microsc. 2013, 250: 21-31. 10.1111/jmi.12013.View ArticlePubMed
- Ruthensteiner B: Soft Part 3D Visualization by Serial Sectioning and Computer Reconstruction.Micromolluscs: Methodological Challenges - Exciting Results: Proceedings from the Micromollusc Symposium of the 16th Unitas Malacologica World Congress of Malacology. Volume 1. Edited by: Geiger DL, Ruthensteiner B. 2008, Auckland: Magnolia Press, 63-100. Zoosymposia,
- Ruthensteiner B, Heß M: Embedding 3D models of biological specimens in PDF publications. Microsc Res Tech. 2008, 71: 778-786. 10.1002/jemt.20618.View ArticlePubMed
- Lu ZM, Popper AN: Morphological polarizations of sensory hair cells in the three otolithic organs of a teleost fish: fluorescent imaging of ciliary bundles. Hear Res. 1998, 126: 47-57. 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00149-X.View ArticlePubMed
- Buran BN, Deng X, Popper AN: Structural variation in the inner ears of four deep-aea elopomorph fishes. J Morphol. 2005, 265: 215-225. 10.1002/jmor.10355.View ArticlePubMed
- Ramcharitar JU, Deng XH, Ketten D, Popper AN: Form and function in the unique inner ear of a teleost: the silver perch (Bairdiella chrysoura). J Comp Neurol. 2004, 475: 531-539. 10.1002/cne.20192.View ArticlePubMed
- Godefroy JE, Bornert F, Gros CI, Constantinesco A: Elliptical fourier descriptors for contours in three dimensions: a new tool for morphometrical analysis in biology. C R Biol. 2012, 335: 205-213. 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.12.004.View ArticlePubMed
- Mitteroecker P, Gunz P: Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol. 2009, 36: 235-247. 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x.View Article
- Metscher BD: MicroCT for developmental biology: a versatile tool for high-contrast 3D imaging at histological resolutions. Dev Dyn. 2009, 238: 632-640. 10.1002/dvdy.21857.View ArticlePubMed
- Metscher BD: X-ray microtomographic imaging of intact vertebrate embryos. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011, 12: 1462-1471.
- Braun CB, Grande T: Evolution of peripheral mechanisms for the enhancement of sound reception. Fish Bioacoustics. Edited by: Webb JF, Fay RR, Popper AN. 2008, New York: Springer: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 99-144.View Article
- Rogers PH, Zeddies DG: Multipole Mechanisms for Directional Hearing in Fish. Fish Bioacoustics. Volume 32. Edited by: Webb JF, Fay RR, Popper AN. 2008, New York: Springer, 233-252.View Article
- Evangelista C, Mills M, Siebeck UE, Collin SP: A comparison of the external morphology of the membranous inner ear in elasmobranchs. J Morphol. 2010, 271: 483-495.PubMed
- Lebrun R, de Leon MP, Tafforeau P, Zollikofer C: Deep evolutionary roots of strepsirrhine primate labyrinthine morphology. J Anat. 2010, 216: 368-380. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01177.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Coleman MN, Boyer DM: Inner ear evolution in primates through the Cenozoic: Implications for the evolution of hearing. Anat Rec Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol. 2012, 295: 615-631. 10.1002/ar.22422.View Article
- Santi PA, Johnson SB, Hillenbrand M, GrandPre PZ, Glass TJ, Leger JR: Thin-sheet laser imaging microscopy for optical sectioning of thick tissues. Biotechniques. 2009, 46: 287-294.PubMed CentralPubMed
- Buytaert JAN, Johnson SB, Dierick M, Salih WHM, Santi PA: MicroCT versus sTSLIM 3D imaging of the mouse cochlea. J Histochem Cytochem. 2013, 61 (5): 382-395. 10.1369/0022155413478613.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Santi PA: Light sheet fluorescence microscopy: a review. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011, 59: 129-138. 10.1369/0022155410394857.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Ghanem TA, Rabbitt RD, Tresco PA: Three-dimensional reconstruction of the membranous vestibular labyrinth in the toadfish, Opsanus tau. Hear Res. 1998, 124: 27-43. 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00108-7.View ArticlePubMed
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.